Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Comparison of Linezolid and Daptomycin in the Treatment of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bacteremia

Bio, Laura L. PharmD, BCPS*; Perez, Mirza E. PharmD, BCPS; MacDougall, Conan PharmD, MAS, BCPS; Gallagher, Jason C. PharmD, BCPS


In the article by Bio et al., appearing in Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 343–347 entitled “Comparison of Linezolid and Daptomycin in the Treatment of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bacteremia” there was an error in Table 1. In the table, the numbers listed for the infecting organisms were reversed. The correct data appears in the table below:

Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. 20(2):168-169, March 2012.

Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice: September 2011 - Volume 19 - Issue 5 - p 343-347
doi: 10.1097/IPC.0b013e31822b7f6e
Original Articles

Objective: To describe the microbiological cure rate and clinical outcomes of linezolid and daptomycin pharmacotherapy in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) bacteremia.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who received either linezolid or daptomycin for the treatment of VRE bacteremia from January 2004 to March 2008. The patients were included if they received linezolid or daptomycin and had a positive blood culture for VRE. The primary end point was microbiological cure, defined as negative blood cultures for VRE at the end of therapy. Clinical outcomes at the end of treatment and adverse events were also evaluated.

Results: Eighty-four patients were included: 47 received linezolid (600 mg every 12 hours) and 37 received daptomycin (median dose, 6.0 mg/kg; range, 3.7-8.8 mg/kg). Baseline thrombocytopenia was more common in the daptomycin group (56.8% vs. 19.1%; P < 0.001). Linezolid and daptomycin demonstrated similar rates of microbiological cure (89.4% vs. 86.5%; P = 0.67) and clinical success (50.0% vs. 64.7%; P = 0.19). Results were similar after adjustment for age, severity of illness, intensive care unit admission, and removal of indwelling cathethers. No patients relapsed in either arm. All-cause mortality was 38.3% (18 patients) and 32.4% (12 patients) in the linezolid and daptomycin group, respectively (P = 0.65).

Conclusion: Linezolid and daptomycin therapy both seemed to be efficacious in the treatment of VRE bacteremia.

From the *Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, PA; †Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA; and ‡University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Correspondence to: Jason C. Gallagher, PharmD, BCPS, Temple University School of Pharmacy, 3307 North Broad St, Philadelphia, PA. E-mail:

The authors have no funding to disclose.

Laura L. Bio, Conan MacDougall, and Mirza E. Perez have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Jason C. Gallagher has received research support from Cubist Pharmaceuticals, has served on the speakers' bureau of Cubist, and has served on an advisory board for Pfizer.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.