Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Observational Study

UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase expression as a predictor of survival in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma

Saha, Shekhar MDa; Yao, Sha MDb; Elakad, Omar MSb; Lois, Anna-Maria MDb; Henric-Petri, Hannah MDb; Buentzel, Judith MDc; Hinterthaner, Marc MDa; Danner, Bernhard C. MDa; Ströbel, Philipp MDb; Emmert, Alexander MDa; Bohnenberger, Hanibal MDb,

Author Information
International Journal of Surgery Oncology: April 2020 - Volume 5 - Issue 2 - p e85
doi: 10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000085

Abstract

Lung cancer results in about 1.6 million deaths worldwide each year1. About 85% of the patients suffer from a histologic sub-type of lung cancer collectively known as non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Among these patients, pulmonary adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell lung cancer (SQCLC) are the most common sub-types. Fifteen percent of all lung cancer patients are diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC)1. Patients with NSCLC in UICC (Union for international cancer control) stages I, II, and IIIA are treated by radical surgery if the tumor is resectable and if the patients are functionally operable2 potentially followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Currently, adjuvant treatment is mainly guided by TNM classification. However, additional prognostic estimation by molecular characterization may support critical treatment decisions to determine the best adjuvant therapeutic procedure.

Approximately 40% of patients are diagnosed with lung cancer in UICC stage IV and are mainly excluded from surgical treatment options2. In addition to the histologic differentiation, molecular studies have discovered numerous genetic subgroups of lung cancer. Adenocarcinomas are characterized by a high number of genomic alterations. With 32% of the cases, mutations in the K-Ras gene represent the largest genetic subgroup, followed by mutations in the EGFR gene (11%)3. Fusion of ALK, Ros, and Ret genes occurs in 1%–3% of cases4. In about 25% of cases, no genetic driver mutation have yet been identified5,6. The discovery of activating genetic mutations in the EGFR and ALK kinases, together accounting for ∼15% of AC cases, has significantly improved the prognosis of these specific subgroups of patients through the use of targeted kinase inhibitors7,8. Unfortunately, similar therapeutic successes from molecular therapies have not yet been achieved in 85% of patients with a K-Ras mutation or without driver mutation, so that the majority of patients continue to receive conventional chemotherapy.

UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH) catalyzes a 2-fold oxidation reaction resulting in the formation of UDP-α-D-glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcA) from UDP-α-D-glucose (UDP-Glc) using NAD+ (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) as the oxidant9,10. UDP-GlcA in turn plays an important role in the formation of hyaluronic acid (HA), which promotes the cellular growth and migration of physiological cells11,12. Elevated levels of matrix glycosaminoglycan HA have been shown to be associated with the progression of epithelial cancers such as those of the breast, colon and prostate9,13–16. Downregulation of UGDH in colorectal carcinoma cell lines delayed cell aggregation and impaired cell motility. This effect was reversed by the addition of exogenous HA which implies that UGDH may be important for the regulation of cancer cell motility and metastasis16. Furthermore, HA interacts with CD44 which leads to the formation of large RTK-containing signaling complexes, which in turn leads to malignant transformation of intestinal epithelial cells17. In addition, UGDH has been identified as a potential diagnostic biomarker for prostate cancer that may complement the use of biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of prostate cancer15. Other studies have also demonstrated that downregulation of UGDH could arrest the proliferation of glioblastoma by preventing the production of components of the extracellular matrix18,19. A recent study by Haguida et al20 has reported UGDH to be an early sero-diagnostic marker in addition to being a poor prognostic indicator in patients suffering from pulmonary AC. UGDH has also been reported to play a role in the development of chemoresistance in patients with NSCLC21.

In this study, we therefore investigated the protein expression levels of UGDH in tissue samples and its influence on clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival in patients suffering from lung cancer.

Material and methods

Tissue samples

Approval for using the samples in this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen (#1-2-08). Informed consent was obtained from all patients. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Version of October 2013) and institutional, state and federal guidelines. Tissue samples were obtained from surgical resections at the Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery of the University Medical Center, Göttingen. Exclusion criteria for patients’ selection were neoadjuvant treatment, unresectable tumor, histology other than AC, SQCLC or SCLC, and age below 18 years.

Immunohistochemical staining

Tissue samples were assembled in tissue microarray. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described previously22. Briefly, tissue sections were incubated in EnVision Flex Target Retrieval Solution, pH low (Dako) followed by incubation of primary antibodies against UGDH (Sigma, 1:500) for 20 minutes at room temperature. HRPO peroxidase coupled to polymeric secondary antibodies (EnVision Flex+, Dako) and DAB (Dako) were applied for visualization. Tissue samples were analyzed by light microscopy considering staining intensity (0=negative; 1=weakly positive; 2=strongly positive).

Statistical analysis

The correlation between the patients’ pathologic features and UGDH protein expression was analyzed by contingency tables and χ2 tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare patients’ survival to UGDH protein expression. P-values were calculated according to Mantel-Cox log-rank test. Statistical significance of P-values was suggested at P<0.05. GraphPad Prism (Version 7.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) was used for statistical analyses and extraction of the graphs.

Results

Patient characteristics

For this study, 213 patients (142 male, 71 female) with lung cancer were included. The median age of this cohort was 67 years (range, 34–85 y) and 144 patients (67.6%) were older than 60 years. A total of 180 patients (84.5%) were diagnosed with NSCLC of whom 96 patients (45.1%) were diagnosed with AC, 84 patients (39.4%) with SQCLC, and 33 patients (15.5%) with SCLC. All patients were treated with surgical tumor resection. According to UICC (seventh edition) stage, 152 patients (74.5%) were classified as stage I or II and 52 patients (25.5%) as stage III or IV. Nodal status was positive in 84 (41.2%) patients and for 187 patients (91.7%) R0 resection of the tumor was achieved. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1 and all patient characteristics can be found in Supplementary Table 1 (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/IJSO/A4).

Table 1
Table 1:
Patient characteristics.

Expression of UGDH in lung cancer patients and correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics

Expression levels of UGDH in lung cancer tissue samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. According to staining intensity, expression of UGDH was described as negative (staining score 0) or positive (staining score 1 or 2) and analyzed for each tumor entity (Figs. 1A–C). UGDH was expressed in 62.5% of AC, 70.2% in SQCLC and 48.5% in SCLC (Fig. 1 D). In cases of adenocarcinoma, expression of UGDH was significantly correlated with the occurrence of lymph node metastasis (P=0.018) meanwhile sex, age, degree of differentiation or UICC stage showed no association with UGDH expression. By contrast, the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with SQCLC and SCLC showed no significant correlation with UGDH (Tables 24).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Representative immunohistochemical stainings with no (score 0) (A), weak (score 1) (B) and strong (score 2) (C) staining of UGDH in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Scale bar: 100 µm. Staining intensity of UGDH sorted by entity (D). SCLC indicates small cell lung cancer; UGDH, UDP-glucose-6-dehydrogenase.
Table 2
Table 2:
UGDH expression in adenocarcinoma samples sorted by clinical features.
Table 3
Table 3:
UGDH expression in squamous cell lung cancer samples sorted by clinical features.
Table 4
Table 4:
UGDH expression in small cell lung cancer samples sorted by clinical features.

Impact of UGDH expression on patient’s prognosis

We next analyzed the influence of UGDH expression on overall survival for each cancer entity separately. The median follow-up time was 23.5 months (range, 1–125). Patients with an adenocarcinoma and expression of UGDH showed a significantly worse overall survival in Kaplan-Meyer-Estimation (Median survival 34 vs. 40 mo, hazard ratio=0.4995, P=0.0454, Fig. 2A). Overall survival of patients with SQCLC and SCLC showed no correlation with UGDH expression (Figs. 2B, C).

Figure 2
Figure 2:
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival in which all patients with adenocarcinoma (A), squamous cell lung carcinoma (B) and small cell lung cancer (C) were grouped according to staining intensity of UGDH. The P-value is from a log-rank test. *Significant. UGDH indicates UDP-glucose-6-dehydrogenase.

Discussion

Treatment decisions for patients suffering from lung cancer are mainly based on UICC cancer stage. In early stage lung cancer, 5-year survival rate ranges approximately from 80% in stage I to 33% in stage IIIA23–25. The main treatment option in early stages is surgical resection of the tumor followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Meta-analysis demonstrated a 4%–5.4% decreased risk of death after 5 years using cisplatin-based adjuvant regimens compared with no chemotherapy26,27. Prognostic biomarkers could support treatment decisions for the selection of those patients who benefit the most from the adjuvant therapy.

In this study we investigated the protein expression levels of UGDH in human lung cancer tissue samples and found that UGDH was expressed in 63.4% of the patients. In patients with pulmonary AC a strong protein expression of UGDH was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and poor overall survival. That supports the theory that UGDH expression plays a role in the migration and metastatic of tumor cells12,16,28. Accordingly, a recent report by Hagiuda et al20 presented UGDH expression as an indicator for poor prognosis in patients suffering from AC.

HA and other components of the extracellular matrix play important roles in tumor growth and metastasis12,17,29. UGDH is the rate limiting step in production of several components of the extracellular matrix such as HA, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, and heparan sulfate proteoglycans19. Downregulation of UGDH reduces tumor cell migration and proliferation in glioblastomas18. UGDH expression promotes androgen independent tumor growth in human prostate cancer28. Therefore, UGDH could be evaluated as a biomarker for progression and metastasis of pulmonary adenocarcinomas. This in turn may play an important role in the decision-making process for the application of adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of those patients. However, repetitive screening of UGDH expression in different and larger patient cohorts with different characteristics will be essential to build a stable tumor biomarker that can be used in routine diagnostic. Especially, precise and accurate validation and standardization will be crucial for the clinical application of UGDH as a biomarker for lung cancer.

Patients diagnosed with late stage lung cancer (UICC IIIB–IV) are mainly treated with systemic therapy regimens. While the prognosis of patients especially with an AC harboring a drugable molecular alteration like an EGFR or ALK mutation has greatly improved in the last years, 85% of patients with adenocarcinoma and, for example, a K-Ras mutation or without an identified driver mutation are still treated with conventional chemotherapy leading to a 5-year survival rate of <20%30.

The blockade of UDP-GlcA in tumor cells by antagonizing UGDH is an upcoming therapeutic option to treat cancer9. Hwang et al31 found that polyphenols such as gallic acid and quercetin were effective inhibitors of UGDH which demonstrated a strong antiproliferative effect on MCF7 human breast cancer cells. There has also been an interest in the development of UGDH inhibitors, these include UDP-α-D-xylose which is a strong feedback inhibitor of UGDH and UDP-chloroacetol which acts against the active-site cysteine residue. However, the production of such novel therapeutic agents is still in its infancy9.

However, further functional and in vivo experiments will be needed to scrutinize the possibilities of UGDH inhibitors in clinical management of lung cancer patients.

In summary, expression of UGDH in patients with AC may be considered as a prognostic biomarker for patient stratification and therapeutic decisions. In addition, UGDH should be further investigated as a novel drug target in AC as it displays inhibitable catalytic activity.

Ethical approval

None.

Sources of funding

The authors are supported by the German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Funds of the Göttingen University. H.B. and O.E. are supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe Foundation (grant: 70112551). H.B. is supported by the University medical center Göttingen and the Else-Kröner-Fresenius-Foundation. J.B. is supported by the “Göttinger Kolleg für Translationale Medizin” (funded by the Ministery for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony). S.Y. is supported by the Chinese Scholarship Counsil.

Author contributions

H.B. conceived and supervised the project. S.S., O.E., and J.B., performed statistical analyses. H.H.-P., S.Y., and A.-M.L. performed experiments. A.E., B.C.D., M.H., and P.S. contributed clinical samples and/or patient characteristics. H.B., J.B., and S.S. wrote the manuscript with final approval of all authors.

Conflict of interest disclosures

The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.

Research registration unique identifying number (UIN)

None.

Guarantor

None.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Jennifer Appelhans for her technical support.

References

1. Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Nature 2018;553:446–54.
2. Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer : current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2016;5:288–300.
3. D’Arcangelo M, Cappuzzo F. K-Ras mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: prognostic and predictive value. ISRN Mol Biol Vol 2012;837306:8.
4. Kohno T, Nakaoku T, Tsuta K, et al. Beyond ALK-RET, ROS1 and other oncogene fusions in lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2015;4:156–64.
5. Bass A, Thorsson V, Shmulevich I, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 2014;513:202–9.
6. Tomasetti C, Marchionni L, Nowak MA, et al. Only three driver gene mutations are required for the development of lung and colorectal cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:118–23.
7. Lynch TJJ, Blumenschein GRJ, Engelman JA, et al. Summary statement novel agents in the treatment of lung cancer: Fifth Cambridge Conference assessing opportunities for combination therapy. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3(suppl 2):S107–S112.
8. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4—ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature 2007;448:561–6.
9. Egger S, Chaikuad A, Kavanagh KL, et al. UDP-glucose dehydrogenase : structure and function of a potential drug target. Biochem Soc Trans 2010;38:1378–85.
10. Eixelsberger T, Brecker L, Nidetzky B. Catalytic mechanism of human UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase: in situ proton NMR studies reveal that the C-5 hydrogen of UDP-glucose is not exchanged with bulk water during the enzymatic reaction. Carbohydr Res 2012;356:209–14.
11. Price ZK, Lokman NA, Ricciardelli C. Differing roles of hyaluronan molecular weight on cancer cell behavior and chemotherapy resistance. Cancers 2018;10:482–503.
12. Dicker KT, Gurski LA, Pradhan-Bhatt S, et al. Hyaluronan: a simple polysaccharide with diverse biological functions. Acta Biomater 2014;10:1558–70.
13. Huh J, Choi M, Yang S, et al. Inhibition of human UDP-glucose dehydrogenase expression using siRNA expression vector in breast cancer cells. Biotechnol Lett 2005;27:1229–32.
14. Auvinen P, Tammi R, Parkkinen J, et al. Hyaluronan in peritumoral stroma and malignant cells associates with breast cancer spreading and predicts survival. Am J Pathol 2000;156:529–36.
15. Huang D, Casale GP, Tian J, et al. UDP-glucose dehydrogenase as a novel field-specific candidate biomarker of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2010;126:315–27.
16. Wang T, Pan Y, Fu C, et al. Down-regulation of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase affects glycosaminoglycans synthesis and motility in HCT-8 colorectal carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res 2010;316:2893–902.
17. Misra S, Obeid LM, Hannun YA, et al. Hyaluronan constitutively regulates activation of COX-2-mediated cell survival activity in intestinal epithelial and colon carcinoma cells*. J Biol Chem 2008;283:14335–44.
18. Oyinlade O, Wei S, Lal B, et al. Targeting UDP-α α-D-glucose 6-dehydrogenase inhibits glioblastoma growth and migration. Oncogene 2018;37:2615–29.
19. Goodwin CR, Ahmed AK, Xia S. UDP-α-D-glucose 6-dehydrogenase: a promising target for glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2019;10:1542–3.
20. Hagiuda D, Nagashio R, Ichinoe M, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of nuclear UGDH localization in lung adenocarcinoma. Biomed Res 2019;40:17–27.
21. Paul D, Chanukuppa V, Jaipal P, et al. Global proteomic profiling identifies etoposide chemoresistance markers in non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Prot 2016;138:95–105.
22. Bohnenberger H, Kaderali L, Ströbel P, et al. Comparative proteomics reveals a diagnostic signature for pulmonary head-and-neck cancer metastasis. EMBO Mol Med 2018;2018:1–15.
23. Lin JJ, Cardarella S, Lydon CA, et al. Five-year survival in EGFR-mutant metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with EGFR-TKIs. J Thorac Oncol 2015;11:556–565.
24. Okada M, Nishio W, Sakamoto T. Evolution of surgical outcomes for nonsmall cell lung cancer: time trends in 1,465 consecutive patients undergoing complete resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1926–31.
25. Mountain CF. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest 1997;111:1710–7.
26. Burdett S, Jp P, Tierney J, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3:CD011430. Available at: http://www.cochranelibrary.com.
27. Pignon J, Scagliotti GV, Douillard J, et al. Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE collaborative group. J Clin Oncol 2019;26:3552–59.
28. Wei Q, Galbenus R, Raza A, et al. Androgen-stimulated UDP-glucose dehydrogenase expression limits prostate androgen availability without impacting hyaluronan levels. Cancer Res 2009;69:2332–9.
29. Toole BP. Hyaluronan in morphogenesis. Cell Dev Biol 2001;12:79–87.
30. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:39–51.
31. Hwang EY, Huh J-W, Choi M-M, et al. Inhibitory effects of gallic acid and quercetin on UDP-glucose dehydrogenase activity. FEBS Lett 2008;582:3793–7.
Keywords:

UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase; Adenocarcinoma; Lung cancer; Prognostic marker

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.