Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Review Articles

The rising prevalence of obesity: part B—public health policy solutions

Agha, Maliha BSc(Hons), MSc, MPHa; Agha, Riaz MBBS, MSc, Oxf, MRCSEng, FRSPHb,

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000019
  • Open

Abstract

Policies to prevent obesity

An effective public health policy to reduce obesity should be based on the following principles1:

  • Reliable predictions of the future.
  • Understanding what policies will be feasible on a long-term basis.
  • Consequences related to the policy (particularly environmental).

Determining the root cause of obesity is central to any effort to prevent it2. Designing effective strategies to prevent and treat obesity is difficult due to the uncertainty around the etiology of obesity3.

Environmental conditions serve as a “default” for affecting the behavior and health of the population. For instance poverty and social inequality can be among the root cause for poor access to health care, inadequate education, poor living conditions, and stress, therefore affecting health. Greater exposure to such “defaults” produces increased health consequences4. Policies to change defaults are, therefore, more effective and cheaper than the traditional means of persuasion and education. For example, banning smoking in public places in 2008 resulted in a significant reduction in smoking5.

Policies to reduce obesity should focus on promoting children’s health, nutritious food, physical activity, supporting health in the workplace, and behavioral modification (self-monitoring of eating habits, stress management, stimulus control, problem solving, contingency management, cognitive restructuring, and social support). Policies to provide effective treatment and support to overweight and obese people must also be implemented to reduce health inequalities too6.

Health targets must be set for each policy between the associated bodies to monitor the effectiveness of the policy and to ensure concentrated efforts and uniformity of policy implementation (but rules must be implemented to achieve the target by fair means and without bias).

Schools as an important starting point

Youth obesity is due to environmental defaults such as lack of activity, poor nutrition, and the ready availability of large portions of calorie-dense food. Schools often contribute to the creation of a negative food and activity environment, thus setting poor defaults for children’s health and nutritional understanding and awareness. In the United Kingdom, 98% of secondary schools sold soda, 78% sold cookies, and 69% sold potato chips, in 20067–11.

Evidence shows that school-based policies can be effective in improving the health of school children. However, policies must be carefully constructed due to the prevalence of weight-bias in schools12. Prohibiting junk food and banning vending machines in schools and soft drink advertisements in the cafeteria and promoting school-based lunch programs (such as those popularized by the Chef Jamie Oliver) has shown to lower students body mass index (BMI)13–15. Actively promoting young children to consume fruits and vegetables during meals (rather than leaving them to help themselves) has been shown to significantly increase their consumption16.

Nutritional environment

The United States has a significantly greater rate of obesity when compared with Japan—what lessons can be learnt from this? The food culture in Japan has sufficiently resisted some of the global trends in obesity17. The cheapness, easy availability, highly palatability, increased fat-consumption, commercial food promotions, reliability on snacks and ready-made meals, and heavy marketing of energy-dense foods results in increased food intake and decreased consumption of healthy foods. However, the food industry has always blamed lack of physical activity among obese individuals as the main contributor to obesity18. In the 1940s each kilojoule of carbohydrate in the diet had 0.6 kJ of fat, increasing to 0.9 kJ in the 1990s which is an increase of 50%.

Increasing the accessibility of a diet rich in fresh vegetables, fruits, and lean meats must be made to replace processed and fast-food rich diets. Buy-one-get-one-free schemes must be used more on nutritious than non-nutritious foods. Food labelling must be improved by providing the correct nutritional properties of the food in an easy to read format. Labels that claim “low in salt” or “light” will have to meet the standardized definitions agreed by the EU. Food high in fat or sugar must be labelled as such. The use of “traffic light labels” (high, medium, or low amounts of fat, saturated fat, sugars and salt per 100 g of the food) must be corrected for those manufacturers using it in the form of a percentage showing an individual’s Guideline Daily Amount of a nutrient which is wrong.

For any broad nutritional advancement, wholesale cultural and societal changes are required. Food industries need to take responsibility for their products to place genuine efforts to reform the nation’s diet19. Policies to target behavior by reducing the sugar in children’s beverages can also show promising results20. Therefore, by changing the supply chain and influencing those who govern and monitor changes in health, the targets can be achieved significantly.

Evidence suggests that a growing number of British people lack the basic skills to prepare a healthy meal. Therefore, by giving people a better understanding of healthy eating through training we can help change the dietary milieu of the population.

Physical activity

According to the Royal College of General Practitioners, on an average food intake has fallen by 750 kcal/d and activity levels decreased by 800 kcal/d, thus contributing to rising obesity. The tackling obesity in England report reveals that, compared with today, the extra physical activity in daily living 50 years ago was equal to running a marathon a week. An average person now walks 189 miles/y compared with 255 miles over 25 years ago. We are walking less than we have ever done in history. This is due to replacement of active modes of transport (walking and cycling) with motorcars, buses, tubes, trams, and trains, etc. Physical activity in adults delays cognitive impairment in the elderly21,22 and also reduces cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes, and some cancers23.

Three reviews have concluded that decrease in total energy expenditure is the main reason behind the current obesity epidemic24–26. Although there has been an increase in self-reported leisure time physical activity, evidence shows a decrease in physical activity in nonleisure time, such as occupation, transportation, and household chores27. Therefore, to promote and encourage an active lifestyle through the provision of safe sidewalks or safe cycle lanes a redesign of urban infrastructure is required.

At work, employers can support their employees by providing healthy meal options in cafeterias, making shower facilities available for those cycling to work and providing gym memberships to employees.

Education

Evidence shows a decrease in professional advice on losing weight among all ages with the most noticeable decline among older adults28. Although healthy eating recommendations have been developed for many years, people are still not making healthy choices on how much and what to eat. According to the Food Standards Agency, there is still a high intake of saturated fat, sugar, and salt and lower than recommended intake of fruits and vegetables. This shows that health promotion messages are not delivered loud or consistently enough to change the behavior of people. Frequent professional advice and counselling to overweight and obese people will play a significant role in increasing awareness of the risks associated with obesity. Drug therapy and surgery in extreme cases can also make a significant contribution in tackling obesity.

Advertisements

Education and lessons work as a catalyst to help change behavior. However, their decision-making is heavily counterbalanced by advertising and promotion campaigns undertaken by the food industry29. In United Kingdom, children aged 15 to 18, watch over 2.5 hours of television per day30. Marketing a brand or a product has a great psychological and emotional power on the population. A Mintel study on advertising costs revealed that only a fraction of money is spent on advertising fruits compared with chocolates, snacks, etc. Also the £5 million annual budget of the Government’s Five-a-day campaign is simply drowned out by the advertising budgets of large food companies with their own agenda (Tables 1, 2)31.

Table 1
Table 1:
Advertising spend across the top 10 advertised food brands in the United Kingdom (2002).
Table 2
Table 2:
Children’s snack products, market size, and advertising (AD) spend (1998–2003).

It was also found that food advertisements were shown more frequently during children’s programs (45%–58%) compared with adult programs in the United Kingdom (21%). Of these advertisements, 95%–99% of food advertisements were high in fat, sugar, or salt and 86% during adult programs. However, no adverts for fresh fruits and vegetables were shown during either of the programs16. This shows that children are targeted more intensively when promoting and advertising ultimately unhealthy foods. One report showed that for soft drinks companies, 8-year-old boys are the ideal target customers16.

Like Sweden, Norway, and Quebec government policy, advertisements aimed at children under 12 or during children programs should not be permitted in other countries. Like in Finland, Denmark, and Netherland, presenters from children’s programs must not appear in advertisements. Fast foods such as McDonald’s should be restricted from promoting toys in its advertisements in the United Kingdom32. The same advertisement strategy can be used to replace attitude by replacing non-nutritious food advertisements with advertisements focusing on promoting and increasing knowledge about fruits and vegetables.

Fruit and vegetable prices

Fruits and vegetables are considerably cheaper in street markets than in supermarkets. Therefore, trimming the profits attached to fresh fruits and vegetables in the supermarkets can also bring some considerable scope33.

BMI monitoring

BMI screening is essential in every age group and can lead to changes in behavior. A screening program in London showed overweight girls restricted their unhealthy diet and around 50% showed a positive change in their behavior. Recent studies indicated that school-based BMI screening is generally accepted by British34 and American35 children and their parents. This may be because parents often underestimate their children’s weight and would like to be informed of their weight status. However, a small percentage of adverse effects such as embarrassment and shame were reported by the children.

Policies for frequent BMI screening (in schools particularly) must be implemented36, along with control over the consequences associated with it such as weight-related teasing, stigmatization, eating disorder risk, parental efficacy and educational quality37.

Government and health sector

Changing the economic, social, and political environment which “fosters” obesity will not be easy. It will require determination and resolve from government leaders to create and maintain change. Government should concentrate its efforts on informing the population and addressing environmental factors to make healthy choices easier38. The associated government departments need to work together to impact obesity (Fig.1)39.

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Government departments.

The older population are usually considered the most reticent to change their long-standing health behaviors. Therefore, health promotion programs for the older population should be implemented and nutritional policies for older adults must focus on providing meals and social educational services to older people40. We have talked about interventions for preconceptual and pregnant women elsewhere41.

Conclusions

Public health policies are significantly required to address the behavioral, environmental, and sociocultural factors creating the “obesogenic” environment by promoting decreased calorie intake and increased physical activity.

However, due to the continuous increase in the prevalence of obesity and lack of evidence for efficacy, it is difficult to measure which policy interventions will be most effective at halting the rise of obesity.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.

References

1. Black WC. Anatomic extent of disease: a critical variable in reports of diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2000;217:319–20.
2. American Heart Association. Obesity: impact on cardiovascular disease. 1998. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1818. Accessed March 17, 2012.
3. Prentice AM, Jebb SA. Education and debate: obesity in Britain: gluttony or sloth? Br Med J 1995;311:437–39.
4. Adler NE, Boyce WT, Chesney MA, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: no easy solution. J Am Med Assoc 2003;269:3140–5.
5. Houston DK, Nicklas BJ, Zizza CA. Weighty concerns: the growing prevalence of obesity among older adults. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109:1886–95.
6. The International Longevity Centre—UK. Obesity in the UK: a review and comparative analysis of policies within the devolved regions. 2008. Available at: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/files/pdf_pdf_45.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2012.
7. Finkelstein DM, Hill EL, Whitaker RC. School food environments and policies in US public schools. Pediatrics 2008;122:e251–9.
8. O’Toole TP, Anderson S, Miller C, et al. Nutrition services and foods and beverages available at school: results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006. J Sch Health 2007;2077:500–21.
9. Nanney MS, Davey C. Evaluating the distribution of school wellness policies and practices: a framework to capture equity among schools serving the most weight-vulnerable children. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108:1436–9.
10. National Institutes of Health and National Heart, Lung, & Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: The evidence report. Obes Res 1998;6(suppl 2):51s–209s.
11. Greves HM, Rivara FP. Report card on school snack food policies among the United States; largest school districts in 2004–2005: room for improvement. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006;3:1–10.
12. Bauer KW, Yang YW, Austin SB. How can we stay healthy when you’re throwing all this in front of us? Findings from focus groups and interviews in middle schools on environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity. Health Educ Behav 2004;31:34–6.
13. Story M, Kaphingst KM, French S. The role of schools in obesity prevention. Future Child 2006;16:109–42.
14. Probart C, McDonnell E, Hartman T, et al. Factors associated with the offering and sale of competitive foods and school lunch participation. J Am Diet Assoc 2006;106:242–7.
15. Kubik MY, Lytle LA, Story M. School wide food practices are associated with body mass index in middle school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:1111–4.
16. Schwartz MB. The influence of a verbal prompt on school lunch fruit consumption: a pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007;4:6.
17. The Daily Green. The ADA and Corporate Sponsors: an unhealthy alliance?. 2008. Available at: http://www.thedailygreen.com/healthy-eating/blogs/healthy-food/marion-nestle-ADA-politics-44031808. Accessed March 17, 2012.
18. Miller DA. The obesity epidemic—who’s fault is it, anyway?. 2008. Available at: http://www.stress-free-weight-loss.com/costs.htm. Accessed March 19, 2012.
19. Social Issue Research Centre (SIRC). The Junk Food Commission. Available at: http://www.sirc.org/news/children_and_snack_food.html. Accessed March 17, 2012.
20. Foster GD, et al. A policy-based school intervention to prevent overweight and obesity. Paediatrics 2008;121:e794–802.
21. Kramer AF, Erickson KI, Colcombe SJ. Exercise, cognition, and the aging brain. J Appl Physiol 2006;101:1237–42.
22. Angevaren M, et al. Physical activity and enhanced fitness to improve cognitive function in older people without known cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD005381.
23. Keysor JJ. Does late-life physical activity or exercise prevent or minimize disablement? A critical review of the scientific evidence. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:129–36.
24. Wilson P, O’Meara S, Summerbell C, et al. The prevention and treatment of childhood obesity. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:65–74.
25. Poston WS, Foreyt JP. Obesity is an environmental issue. Atherosclerosis 2004;146:201–9.
26. Weinsier RL, Hunter GR, Heini AF, et al. The etiology of obesity: relative contribution of metabolic factors, diet, and physical activity. Am J Med 1998;105:145–50.
27. Schmitz MK, Jeffery RW. Public health interventions for the prevention and treatment of obesity. Med Clin North Am 2000;84:491–512.
28. Jackson JE, Doescher MP, Saver BG, et al. Trends in professional advice to lose weight among obese adults, 1994 to 2000. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:814–8.
29. Brownell KD, Schwartz MB, Puhl R, et al. The need for bold action to prevent adolescent obesity. J Adolesc Health 2009;45(suppl):S8–17.
30. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Generation M: media in the lives of 8–18 year-olds. A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. 2005. Available at: http://www.kff.org. Accessed April 6, 2012.
31. Responsible Advertising and Children. Food and beverage advertising andchildren: RAC position. Available at: http://www.fic.wfanet.org/advert/index2.html. Accessed March 19, 2012.
32. Bennett J, Boles O, Crossley R. A recipe for success: how food companies can profit from consumer health. 2007. Available at: http://www.iblf.org/~/media/Files/Resources/Guides/RecipeforSuccess.ashx. Accessed March 19, 2012.
33. Friends of the Earth. Healthy planet eating. 2010. Available at: http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/healthy_planet_eating.pdf. Accessed March 19, 2012.
34. Grimmett C, Croker H, Carnell S, et al. Telling parents their child’s weight status: psychological impact of a weight-screening program. Pediatrics 2008;122:e682–8.
35. Kalich KA, Peterson V, Kalich KE, et al. Comfort and utility of school-based weight screening: the student perspective. BMC Paediatrics 2008;8:9.
36. Wake M. Issues in obesity monitoring, screening and subsequent treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr 2009;21:811–6.
37. Evansa EW, Sonneville KR. BMI report cards: will they pass or fail in the fight against pediatric obesity? Curr Opin Pediatr 2009;21:431–6.
38. Carraro R, Cebrian MG. Role of prevention in the contention of the obesity epidemic. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57(suppl 1):S94–6.
39. O Bar-Or J, Foreyt J, Bouchard C, et al. Physical activity, genetic, and nutritional considerations in childhood weight management. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:2–10.
40. Chernoff R. Nutrition and health promotion in older adults. J Gerontol 2001;56A:47–53.
41. Agha M, Agha RA, Sandall J. Interventions to reduce and prevent obesity in pre-conceptual and pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e95132.
Keywords:

Obesity; Overweight; Public health

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.