Relevance of manual small-incision surgery in today’s private practice setting : Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Guest Editorial

Relevance of manual small-incision surgery in today’s private practice setting

Gogate, Parikshit1,2,3

Author Information
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 70(11):p 3757-3758, November 2022. | DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2170_22
  • Open

Manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) has been around for more than two decades and forms the bulwark of cataract surgery training in Indian ophthalmology residency programs at present.[1] Its equivalence with phacoemulsification has been proven by numerous randomized control trials and meta-analyses.[23] It is the most common type of cataract surgery performed under the National Programme for the Control of Blindness and Visual Impairment and by community eye centers, charitable hospitals, and non-governmental organizations where high-volume and high-quality surgery is needed. MSICS, with its frugal need of equipment, relatively lesser time (suturing would consume half the surgery time in conventional extracapsular cataract extraction), and the lesser cost in terms of consumables, equipment, and manpower, has a distinct advantage.[45]

However, in a private practice setting where the patient-consumer is the king, phacoemulsification and newer femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) are supposed to rule the roost. Their smaller incision, predictability of astigmatism, faster rehabilitation, and the use of topical anesthesia all add to their attraction, especially in settings where cost is not the chief concern. The better unaided distance (6/6 or 6/9) vision, coupled with good unaided near vision (N6 or N8) with multi-focal intraocular lens implants, is a unique selling point.[3]

In market-driven health care, patient comfort sometimes overrides surgeon comfort, and it is easier to do phacoemulsification rather than SICS under topical or sub-Tenon anesthesia.[6] Cataract surgery is marketed as a no-injection, no-stitch, and no-pad technique. The last two are dubious, but “no injection” certainly has a reassuring ring as fear of being poked in the eyes is one of the barriers to cataract surgery.[7]

But there are types of cataracts which are difficult to do by phacoemulsification and impossible to do by FLACS. Very hard brunescent or black cataracts, hypermature and intumescent cataracts, cataracts with compromised cornea that make visualization difficult, and even some types of subluxated cataracts can all be done more safely with MSICS, as the nucleus does not have to be fragmented inside the eye, and is removed in totality in one go.[28] A larger wound may need a suture, but a clear cornea allows earlier rehabilitation without a significant increase in astigmatism. And such cataracts form a significant proportion of even private paying patients in the Indian sub-continent. They are common in very old patients and those whose cataract surgery has been delayed for medical or social reasons. MSICS thus has a role for managing such cataracts even in developed countries.[9] Recent studies have shown that the needle-prick-free cataract surgery can also be done by SICS using the lying down looking down test.[10] Newer techniques of MSICS—as elucidated in this issue of the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology—promise better unaided distance and near vision. MSICS is a necessary skill in the armament of every cataract surgeon. In spite of all the advancements in equipment and instrumentation, the cataract surgeon is still the most important component in a successful cataract surgery.

About the author

Dr. Parikshit Gogate

Dr Gogate is MBBS from B.J. Medical College, Pune, MS Ophthalmology with gold medal from Govt. Medical College, Miraj, DNB, FRCS Edinburg and MSc (Community Eye Health) from International Centre for Eye Health, University College, London, UK. He has worked with PBMA and HV Desai Eye Hospital from 1998-2009, heading the Paediatric Ophthalmology and Community Ophthalmology departments and as the Medical Director. He was a visiting faculty, African Vision Research Institute, Durban, South Africa and ICARE, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad. He is presently in private practice, Trustee of Community Eye Care Foundation, Pune; Associate Professor at DY Patil Medical College, and the Medical Director of Atharva Netralaya. He was the sub-editor, Indian Journal of Ophthalmology; Member West Zone, Academic and Research Committee and Scientific Committee, All India Ophthalmology Society; Chairperson Scientific Committee, Maharashtra Ophthalmology Society (MOS) and President MOS. He was the Secretary, International Society of Geographic & Epidemiologic Ophthalmology and the International Society of Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgeons. He has 102 papers in peer reviewed journals with interest in cataract, glaucoma, community eye health, paediatric ophthalmology, training and research. Dr Gogate is a much-loved academic speaker, having been invited world-over for lectures.


1. Biswas P, Gogate PM, Maskati QB, Natarajan S, Verma L, Bansal P Residency evaluation &adherence design study III:Ophthalmology residency training in India:Improving with time? Indian J Ophthalmol 2018 66 785 92
2. Ruit S, Tabin G, Chang D, Bajracharya L, Kline DC, Richheimer W, et al. Aprospective randomized clinical trial of phacoemulsification vs manual suture less small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery in Nepal Am J Ophthalmol 2007 143 32 8
3. Gogate P, Jaggernath J, Deshpande S, Naidoo K Meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2015 22 362 9
4. Muralikrishnan R, Venkatesh R, Prajna NV, Frick KD Economic cost of cataract surgery procedures in an established eye care centre in Southern India Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004 11 369 80
5. Jaggernath J, Gogate P, Moodley V, Naidoo KS Comparison of cataract surgery techniques:Safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness Eur J Ophthalmol 2014 24 520 6
6. Dole K, Kulkarni S, Shisode KD, Deshpande R, Kakade N, Khandekar R, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes, patient, and surgeon satisfaction following topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia for phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation:A randomized, controlled trial Indian J Ophthalmol 2014 62 927 30
7. Dharmadhikari S, Bakare PN, Deshpande M, Hegade A, Kesari A Study on barriers causing delay in cataract surgery of bilateral cataract blind at a tertiary eye care centre in urban India J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2017 5 69 72
8. Venkatesh R, Tan CS, Sengupta S, Ravindran RD, Krishnan KT, Chang DF Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for white cataract J Cataract Refract Surg 2010 36 1849 54
9. Gogate P, Thomas R The role of manual small incision cataract surgery in Australia and developed nations Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014 42 709 10
10. Rajput VK, Bhalsing S, Bhalsing S, Raut P Lying down looking down test:Evaluating patient suitability for small incision cataract surgery using assisted topical anaesthesia Indian J Ophthalmol 2021 69 268 73
Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology