Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Special Focus, Pediatric Ophthalmology, Original Article

Effects of low-concentration atropine eye drops on the optical quality of the eyes in myopic children

Li, Weiran1,2,*; Cao, Yiting1,2,*; Zhou, Jibo1,2,

Author Information
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology: June 2022 - Volume 70 - Issue 6 - p 2107-2110
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2886_21
  • Open

Abstract

Myopia is the most common ocular disorder worldwide and its prevalence has been increasing over the past several decades, especially in East Asia.[1234] A number of methods are available to control the progression of myopia, including orthokeratology, peripheral defocus contact lenses, and increased outdoor activity.[5678] Atropine eye drops have been shown to be an effective method to control the progression of myopia in children.[9101112] Atropine has a dose-related effect on the progression of myopia with greater effects and more obvious side effects, including photophobia, poor near vision, and rebound effects after withdrawal, observed at higher doses.[10] All of these risks seem to be mitigated by treatment with lower concentrations of atropine. Many studies have shown that moderate and low concentrations of atropine (e.g., 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%, and 0.1%) could control the progression of myopia in children with reasonable efficacy, minimal side effects, convenience of application, and slight rebound effects after discontinuation.[9101112] However, the efficacy and side effects (reduction in the degree of pupil dilation during accommodation and symptoms, such as photophobia and blurred near vision) of low-dose atropine differ according to the dose applied.[101113] Yam et al.[11] and Moon and Shin[14] reported that different doses of atropine (0.01%, 0.025%, and 0.05%) exerted different effects on the progression of myopia, but only Yam et al.[11] reported the dose-dependent side effects.

This study was performed to determine whether there were differences in the optical quality of the eyes of myopic children after treatment with different doses of atropine (0.05% or 0.01%) administered as eye drops.

Methods

The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee, and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of all participants, and verbal consent was obtained from the participants. All procedures were based on the intention-to-treat principle.

Participants

71 children (131 eyes), aged 5–15 years, with spherical power between -0.50 and -6.00 diopters (D) in at least one eye, astigmatism ≤2.5 D, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, that is, log-MAR) no worse than 0.096 were enrolled in this trial. The average age of all children was 9.43 ± 2.03 years. The exclusion criteria were ocular diseases (e.g., cataracts, congenital retinal diseases, amblyopia, and strabismus), previous regular use of atropine or pirenzepine, or orthokeratology or other optical methods for myopia control, allergies to atropine, or systemic diseases (e.g., endocrine, cardiac, and respiratory diseases). The participants were randomized to receive 0.05% or 0.01% atropine eye drops, and both sex and age were balanced across the two groups.

Procedure

The patients in this study were examined and their sex, age, spherical power, cylinder power, and axial length (AL) were recorded on the first visit to our clinic. Myopic eyes were treated with 0.05% or 0.01% atropine eye drops (once nightly). All examinations were repeated after two weeks of treatment. The cycloplegia regimen was to apply one drop (six times, at five-minute intervals) of 0.5% tropicamide phenylephrine (Santen, Osaka, Japan) into both eyes. Refraction was measured with an autorefractor (RM-1; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) ten minutes after applying the final drop. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was calculated as spherical power plus half the cylinder power. The AL was measured by optical biometry (IOL Master 500; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and the intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by tonometry (iCare IC100; iCare, Vantaa, Finland). Only treated eyes were recorded, while the healthy eyes were not. All examinations were performed and results were recorded by a technician blinded to the groups.

Optical quality measurement

The modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, objective scattering index (OSI), and predicted visual acuities (PVAs 100%, 20%, and 9%) were measured under photopic lighting conditions using an Optical Quality Analysis System™ (OQAS; Visiometrics, Terrassa, Spain) preoperatively and after two weeks of atropine treatment. During measurement, the subjects placed their chin on the chinrest of the instrument tray and were asked to fix the center of a figure. With the exception of OSI where the system automatically set the pupil diameter to 4 mm, all other parameters were measured according to the corresponding pupil diameter of the patient. The OQAS system could automatically correct refractive errors from -8 D to +8 D.[15] To ensure the accuracy of the results, the measurements were repeated three times, and the average of the three results was calculated.

The OQAS system assesses optical quality in a completely objective manner. OSI objectively reflected the situation of scattered light in the eye, and its value was defined as the ratio of the peripheral light intensity of the dual-channel image to the central peak light intensity, with a higher OSI value indicating a higher level of intraocular scatter. The MTF cutoff value (i.e., the cutoff value of the MTF on the x-axis) represents the highest spatial frequency in a low-contrast environment in units of cycles per degree (cpd).[1617] The MTF cutoff in the double-pass system was the frequency at which the MTF reached a value of 0.01. As the point spread function (PSF) images recorded by the double-pass system were disturbed by high-frequency signals and high-frequency signals inevitably appeared in the camera equipment, the frequency measurement may be unstable when the MTF is extremely small. To solve this problem, the system set the MTF threshold to 0.01, corresponding to 1% contrast. Therefore, the MTF cutoff value was equivalent to the highest frequency at which the optical system could focus an object on the retina under conditions of 1% contrast. The Strehl ratio reflected the influence of the wavefront aberration of the optical system on the light intensity at the imaged center point and was defined as the ratio of the measured PSF peak to the ideal perfect optical system (without aberrations). PVA 100%, 20%, and 9% only considered the optical system of the eye (i.e., predicted the best visual acuity of the patient at 100%, 20%, and 9% contrast based on the measured aberrations and intraocular scatter).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using StatView software (ver. 9.4; SAS, Cary, NC). Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the data before and after medication, and the data between different groups. The results are expressed as mean ± standard error. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.

Results

A total of 71 children (131 eyes) were enrolled in this study, and none were lost to follow-up. In total, 34 children (63 eyes) were treated with 0.01% atropine eye drops and 37 children (68 eyes) were treated with 0.05% atropine eye drops. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or optical quality before treatment between the two groups [Table 1].

T1
Table 1:
Demographic characteristics and optical quality of the study population before treatment

Table 2 shows the changes in visual quality parameters before and after treatment with 0.01% and 0.05% atropine eye drops. After treatment with 0.05% atropine eye drops for two weeks, the Strehl ratio decreased from 0.27 ± 0.07 to 0.23 ± 0.07 (P = 0.0026), PVA 20% decreased from 1.15 ± 0.32 to 1.03 ± 0.36 (P = 0.0344), and PVA 9% decreased from 0.74 ± 0.23 to 0.64 ± 0.23 (P = 0.0073).

T2
Table 2:
Optical quality before and after atropine treatment

Table 3 shows the difference in optical quality between 0.01% and 0.05% atropine eye drops after two weeks of treatment. The OSI was significantly higher after using 0.05% than 0.01% atropine eye drops (P = 0.0396), whereas both the Strehl ratio and PVA 20% were lower after using 0.05% than 0.01% atropine eye drops (P = 0.0087 and P = 0.0492, respectively).

T3
Table 3:
Comparison of the optical quality after 2 weeks of treatment with 0.01% and 0.05% atropine eye drops

Discussion

The OQAS system was used to examine changes in objective optical quality in the eyes of myopic children after treatment with 0.05% or 0.01% atropine eye drops. The results indicate that the optical quality did not change significantly after two weeks of treatment with 0.01% atropine eye drops, but decreased after two weeks of treatment with 0.05% atropine eye drops.

There have been no previous studies regarding the changes in visual quality after treatment with low-concentration atropine eye drops. In 2019, Liu et al.[18] examined the changes in visual quality after orthokeratology in 35 myopic children with an average age of 11.46 ± 2.33 years, and found that the OSI value increased significantly after 1 month and then recovered slowly. Although orthokeratology and atropine both had an effect in controlling myopia, their mechanisms of action were different. The decrease in optical quality after orthokeratology was related to stray light, while that associated with atropine was related to changes in pupillary diameter and ciliary muscle adjustment function.

Kaymak et al.[19] reported that 24 h of using 0.01% atropine eye drops had a significant impact on pupil size and adaptability in young people, with a lower concentration of atropine in the eye drops showing a smaller effect on pupil size. In another study, Fu et al.[20] reported a stronger effect in eye drops containing 0.02% than 0.01% atropine in controlling the progression of myopia, but both 0.02% and 0.01% atropine eye drops increased the pupillary diameter after 1 year of treatment (all P < 0.001). Our results show that the optical quality decreased after two weeks of treatment with 0.05% atropine eye drops. Previous studies showed that pupil size showed different changes according to the concentration of atropine in the eye drops; thus, we propose that the optical quality may have decreased because of the change in pupil diameter.[212223]

In the present study, the OSI was decreased in children treated with 0.05% atropine eye drops. This indicates that children treated with 0.05% atropine eye drops needed better refractive correction than those with normal eyesight. For example, some children with mild myopia did not need to wear glasses generally, but required glasses when they began using 0.05% atropine eye drops. The decreases in PVA 20% and PVA 9% indicate that children treated with 0.05% atropine eye drops had poorer vision than those with normal eyesight when reading materials with poor contrast. These observations suggest that reading materials with higher contrast should be provided to children using 0.05% atropine eye drops.

This study has some limitations. First, the follow-up period was short and we could not determine the changes in optical quality after long-term use of low-concentration atropine eye drops. Second, we had only objective examination results and did not use questionnaires to analyze subjective optical quality after using the atropine eye drops. Third, we compared only two atropine concentrations—0.05% and 0.01%—and therefore could not determine the optimal concentration with good therapeutic effects and minimal side effects. In addition, the measurement of OQAS can only subjectively reflect the changes of optical quality. Our further studies aim to assess the impact of atropine on visual quality subjectively by using or designing a formal questionnaire survey with a score grade. Finally, we only measured changes in visual quality in a bright environment, and did not compare the effects of different concentrations of eye drops on optical quality in bright and dark environments.

Conclusion

In summary, the optical quality of the eyes of myopic children did not change significantly after two weeks of treatment with 0.01% atropine eye drops, while the optical quality decreased after two weeks of treatment with 0.05% atropine eye drops. These results indicate that children using 0.05% atropine eye drops require better living and study environments.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Foundation Number 8137050, and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai (17DZ2260100). The funding agency had no role in the design or conduct of the study; data collection; management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation; review; approval of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/ibkbA8.

References

1. Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia:Prevalence and risk factors for myopia Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012 32 3 16
2. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, Chua WH Myopia and associated pathological complications Oph Phys Optics 2005 25 381 91
3. Sun J, Zhou J, Zhao P, Lian J, Zhu H, Zhou Y, et al. High prevalence of myopia and high myopia in 5060 Chinese university students in Shanghai Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012 53 7504 9
4. Jung SK, Lee JH, Kakizaki H, Jee D Prevalence of myopia and its association with body stature and educational level in 19-year-old male conscripts in Seoul, South Korea Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012 53 5579 83
5. Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, Liu M, Wang D, Chen Y, et al. Correction:Orthokeratology to control myopia progression:A meta-analysis PLoS One 2015 10 e0130646 doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0130646
6. Kwok E, Patel B, Backhouse S, Phillips JR Peripheral refraction in high myopia with spherical soft contact lenses Optom Vis Sci 2012 89 263 70
7. Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, Khawaja AP, Mackey DA, Foster PJ The association between time spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents:A systematic review and meta-analysis Ophthalmology 2012 119 2141 51
8. Zadnik K, Mutti DO Outdoor activity protects against childhood myopia-let the sun shine in JAMA Pediatr 2019 173 415 6
9. Chua WH, Balakrishnan V, Chan YH, Tong L, Ling Y, Quah BL, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia Ophthalmology 2006 113 2285 91
10. Chia A, Lu QS, Tan D Five-year clinical trial on atropine for the treatment of myopia 2:Myopia control with atropine 0.01% eyedrops Ophthalmology 2016 123 391 9
11. Yam JC, Jiang Y, Tang SM, Law AKP, Chan JJ, Wong E, et al. Low-concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study:A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops in myopia control Ophthalmology 2019 126 113 24
12. Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Chen H, et al. Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children:A network meta-analysis Ophthalmology 2016 123 697 708
13. Chen Z, Li T, Yao P, Xu Y, Zhou X Effects of 0.05% racanisodamine on pupil size and accommodation Optom Vis Sci 2010 87 966 70
14. Moon JS, Shin SY The diluted atropine for inhibition of myopia progression in Korean children Int J Ophthalmol 2018 11 1657 62
15. Tian M, Miao H, Shen Y, Gao J, Mo X, Zhou X Intra- and Intersession Repeatability of an Optical Quality and Intraocular Scattering Measurement System in Children PLoS One 2015 10 e0142189 doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0142189
16. Artal P, Benito A, Pérez GM, Alcón E, De Casas A, Pujol J, et al. An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts PLoS One 2011 6 e16823 doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0016823
17. Jiang B, Liu Y An analysis on the equivalence of the eye to a system with aberration Sci Sin B 1982 25 970 80
18. Liu G, Jin N, Bi H, Du B, Gu T, Zhang B, et al. Long-term changes in straylight induced by overnight orthokeratology:An objective measure using the double-pass system Curr Eye Res 2019 44 11 8
19. Kaymak H, Fricke A, Mauritz Y, Löwinger A, Klabe K, Breyer D, et al. Short-term effects of low-concentration atropine eye drops on pupil size and accommodation in young adult subjects Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018 256 2211 7
20. Fu A, Stapleton F, Wei L, Wang W, Zhao B, Watt K, et al. Effect of low-dose atropine on myopia progression, pupil diameter and accommodative amplitude:Low-dose atropine and myopia progression Br J Ophthalmol 2020 104 1535 41
21. Ha A, Kim S, Shim S, Kim Y, Jung J Efficacy and safety of 8 atropine concentrations for myopia control in children:A network meta-analysis Ophthalmology 2022 129 322 33
22. Joachimsen L, Farassat N, Bleul T, Böhringer D, Lagrèze W, Reich M Side effects of topical atropine 0.05% compared to 0.01% for myopia control in German school children:A pilot study Int Ophthalmol 2021 41 2001 8
23. Kuo H, Ke C, Chen S, Sun H The impact of clinical atropine use in Taiwanese school children:Changes in physiological characteristics and visual functions Children (Basel, Switzerland) 2021 8 doi:10.3390/children8111054
Keywords:

Low-concentration atropine eyedrops; myopia; myopic children; optical quality analysis system (OQAS); optical quality

Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology