Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Brief Communications

Novel occurrence of Axenfeld

Rieger syndrome in a patient with blepharophimosis ptosis epicanthus inversus syndrome

Shah, Bhavin M; Dada, Tanuj; Panda, Anita; Tanwar, Mukesh1; Bhartiya, Shibal; Dada, Rima1

Author Information
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology: March 2014 - Volume 62 - Issue 3 - p 358-360
doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.121144
  • Open

Abstract

Blepharophimosis ptosis epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES) is a rare genetic disorder occurring either sporadically or as an autosomal dominant disorder. Patients with BPES have a combination of congenital anomalies of the eyelids characterized by reduction of horizontal fissure length, congenital ptosis, epicanthus inversus, and telecanthus.[1] BPES is reported to be caused by mutation in the FOXL2 gene on chromosome 3q23 and recently also by mutation in the region of chromosome 7p13-p21.[23] Axenfeld–Rieger Syndrome (ARS), on the other hand, represents the spectrum of anterior segment developmental abnormalities that include angle anomalies such as prominent anteriorly displaced Schwalbe's line, iridocorneal tissue strands with high insertion of iris into the posterior trabecular meshwork, iris abnormalities including corectopia, iris atrophy, iris hole with or without systemic abnormalities.[4] Genetic analysis in patients with ARS has indentified three distinct loci at chromosome 4q25, 6p25, and 13q14. The genes at the first two loci have been identified as PITX2 and FOXC1 respectively.[5] Recently we examined a patient of BPES who also had findings consistent with ARS. The novel simultaneous occurrence of these two syndromes has not been reported in the literature till date.

Case Report

A 20-year-old male patient presented in our out-patient department with chief complaint of drooping of both the upper lids since birth. There was no history of consanguineous marriage of parents and no family history was found of any syndrome in parents or siblings. A comprehensive ophthalmic and systemic examination was performed. The patient had a refractive error of-1.5DS/-0.5 DC @ 1800 in each eye and the best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 in both the eyes. There was no facial asymmetry; however, flattening of the mid face and synophresis were present. There was bilateral severe ptosis (left >right) with frontalis muscle overaction only on the right side. The upper lid crease and the levator palpebebrae superioris function were absent on both the sides with a good Bells phenomenon. The horizontal palpebral apertures measured 25 mm in both the eyes with the vertical apertures being 4 mm and 0 mm respectively. The patient had a telecanthus with the intercanthal distance being 35 mm with an interpupillary distance of 60 mm. The outer canthal distance was 85 mm. Eyelid examination revealed bilateral epicanthus inversus [Fig. 1].

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Clinical photograph showing bilateral blepharophimosis, epicanthus inversus, and ptosis with frontalis overaction

Slit lamp examination revealed corectopia with iris hole in the right eye. Gonioscopically, the features were similar in both the eyes and included a prominent anteriorly shifted Schwalbe's line with prominent iridocorneal tissue strands, anterior insertion of the iris, and a few broad based peripheral anterior synechiae [Fig. 2]. The intraocular pressures were 18 and 20 mm of Hg respectively with the Goldmann applanation tonometry. Fundus examination revealed a vertically oval optic disk with 0.2 cups and sharp foveal reflex in both the eyes. Visual field examinations with the Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard protocol did not reveal any glaucomatous changes. Systemic examination was unremarkable except for mild mental retardation (IQ range: 62-66). PCR-based mutation detection of the PITX2 gene showed the absence of any mutations in all exons and promoter region in proband and siblings, suggesting that other loci may be responsible for the phenotype.

Figure 2
Figure 2:
Goniophotograph showing a prominent Schwalbe's line with peripheral broad based anterior synechiae and iris hole

Discussion

Since its original description by Vignes,[6] BPES has been reported to be associated with other ocular anomalies such as euryblepharon, strabismus, nystagmus, amblyopia, microphthalmos, microcornea, lacrimal drainage apparatus abnormality, extra ocular muscle abnormalities, and colobomas of the optic disc.[167] Chismire and Witkop also reported associated trabecular dysgenesis with anterior insertion of iris and optic nerve hypoplasia in a patient with BPES.[8] The patient however had a normal Schwalbe's line with absence of any iridocorneal tissue strands or any iris abnormalities characteristic of ARS.

ARS, a “neurocristopathy,” is caused by a maldevelopment of neural crest cells causing characteristic anterior segment abnormalities.[2] Glaucoma, developing in more than half the cases of ARS, usually presents in childhood or young adulthood. The patho-mechanism of glaucoma appears to be due to incomplete maturation of the trabecular meshwork and Schlems canal.[9]

Although BPES and ARS have been well described in the literature, their simultaneous occurrence in a patient has never been described before. Our patient had all the classical eyelid manifestation of BPES and also the characteristic iris and gonioscopic findings of ARS, though fortunately there was no evidence of any glaucomatous damage. The two syndromes are distinctly different in their clinical presentation, associations and also in the locus of genetic mutations. Moreover, despite the fact that both the syndromes are caused by mutation in the same class of genes, namely the winged-helix/forked transcription factors, the locus of genetic mutation is distinct for each of them. These genes are involved in variety of developmental process in the body. However no mutation was detected in either the promoter or coding/noncoding region of the PITX2 gene.

Studies have shown that other genes may also be responsible for anterior segment dysgenesis. Recently PAX6 and MAF genes have been shown to cause anterior segment dysgenesis. Mutation of PAX6 (located on 11p13) has been reported in an isolated case of ARS.[1011] Another study has reported that mutations in MAF (transcription factor gene on 16q33.2) gene may lead to corneal opacity, cataract, microcornea, iris coloboma, and anterior segment dysgenesis.[12] During embryonic eye development, MAF is expressed in surface ectodermal component of lens placode and vesicle.[13] So a lens-specific signaling malformation may lead to blocking anterior chamber formation during development of eye. And it has been suggested that lens epithelium generates signals which are required for induction of corneal endothelium. Thus lens-cornea signaling may account for ARS.

Thus, this case report is unique in reporting the simultaneous occurrence of these two genotypically and phenotypically distinct syndromes. The importance of this novel association lies in early identification of angle abnormalities in patients with BPES which may predispose these patients to development of glaucoma. As glaucoma may manifest only in late childhood or even adulthood, these patients must be closely followed up for glaucoma even after they have been managed for the correction of eyelid abnormalities of BPES in order to prevent irreversible sight-threatening damage secondary to glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

1. Allen CE, Rubin PA. Blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus Syndrome: Clinical manifestation and treatment Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2008;48:15–23
2. Maw M, Kar B, Biswas J, Biswas B, Nancarrow D, Bridges R, et al Linkage of Blepharophimosis Syndrome in a large Indian pedigree to chromosome 7p Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:2049–54
3. Nallathambi J, Neethirajan G, Usha K, Jitendra J, De Baere E, Sundaresan P. FOXL2 mutations in Indian families with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome J Genet. 2007;86:165–8
4. Beauchamp GR, Knepper PA. Role of neural crest in anterior segment development and disease J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1984;21:209–14
5. Lines MA, Kozlowski K, Walter MA. Molecular genetics of Axenfeld-Rieger malformations Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:1177–84
6. Vignes A. Epicanthus hereditaire Rev Gen Ophthalmol. 1889;8:438–9
7. Jethani J, Kim U, Kharzei H, Vijayalakshmi P. Blepharophimosis syndrome and its association with amblyopia and refractive errors in south Indian population Asian J Ophthalmol. 2007;9:68–71
8. Chismire KJ, Witkop GS. Optic nerve hypoplasia and angle dysgenesis in a patient with Blepharophimosis Syndrome Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:676–77
9. Shields MB. Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome: A theory of mechanisms and distinctions from iridocornael endothelial syndrome Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1983;81:736–84
10. Jordan T, Hanson I, Zaletayev D, Hodgson S, Prosser J, Seawright A, et al The human PAX6 gene is mutated in two patients with aniridia Nat Genet. 1992;1:328–32
11. Davis A, Cowell JK. Mutations in the PAX6 gene in patients with hereditary aniridia Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:2093–7
12. Jamieson RV, Perveen R, Kerr B, Carette M, Yardley J, Heon E, et al Domain disruption and mutation of the bZIP transcription factor, MAF, associated with cataract, ocular anterior segment dysgenesis and coloboma Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:33–42
13. Beebe DC, Coats JM. The lens organizes the anterior segment: Specification of neural crest cell differentiation in the avian eye Dev Biol. 2000;220:424–31

Source of Support: Nil.

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Keywords:

Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome; anterior segment dysgenesis; blepharophimosis ptosis epicanthus inversus syndrome; glaucoma

© 2014 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow