Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Review Article

Cancer scenario in North-East India & need for an appropriate research agenda

Shanker, Neha; Mathur, Prashant; Das, Priyanka; Sathishkumar, K.; Shalini, A.J. Martina; Chaturvedi, Meesha

Author Information
Indian Journal of Medical Research: July 2021 - Volume 154 - Issue 1 - p 27-35
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_347_20
  • Open

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death globally. In lower middle-income countries such as India, the impact of cancer is high, due to low awareness, lack of access to affordable care and poor prognosis12. Due to diversity in ancestries, socio-economic and cultural attributes, eating habits and lifestyles, geographical variations exist in genetic determinants, environmental exposures and patterns of cancers between regions34. Hence, programmes conducting systematic data collection and reporting high-quality data on cancer from both urban and rural areas are essential to strengthen cancer epidemiology in the country. The National Cancer Registry Programme (NCRP) initiated by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in 1981 has developed a network of cancer registries, to collect and collate reliable cancer data from various parts of India5. The NCRP functions through population-based and hospital-based cancer registries (HBCRs) across different centres in India. Currently, under the NCRP, 38 population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) provide data on the types of cancer prevalent in particular regions and the geo-pathological variations between regions in India. In addition, 253 HBCRs are providing data on the treatment pattern and the survival (https://www.ncdirindia.org/).

Incidence rates of all sites of cancer have consistently been the highest in the north-eastern (NE) States of India since establishment of the earliest cancer registries in this region in 200367891011. In addition, this region also has a unique cancer profile with higher incidence of cancers of the upper digestive tract such as oesophagus, stomach and hypopharynx compared to other regions. A pooled analysis of the HBCR data from the North-East has also indicated low survival, lower detection of localized cases and different cancer patterns as compared to other regions of India11.

There is an urgent need to comprehend the distinctive cancer patterns of this region, develop appropriate programmes and identify priorities for targeted research. Although there have been several publications addressing various aspects of the cancer burden in the region with either a focus on specific cancer types121314 or reviews outlining the cancer profile15, but a comprehensive analysis of all relevant cancers, associated aetiological factors and possible public health measures is lacking. This study was aimed to provide an analysis of the cancer profile in the NE States of India based on the latest data published in 2020 (covering year 2012-2016) from the 11 PBCRs in the region, enumerate possible risk factors and propose key research areas to prioritize for cancer control.

Material & Methods

Cancer incidence data were derived from 11 PBCRs, which provided data for the eight NE States (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura) under the NCRP. For the process of cancer registration, records and information were obtained from hospitals, clinics and pathology laboratories on patient identification, socio-demographic variables, diagnostic and treatment details on a proforma. Death certificates were also scrutinized from municipal corporation units to collect complete data on missed cancer cases. Coding of disease was done according to the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10)16 and International Classification of Disease for Oncology-317. PBCR Data Management (PBCRDM) version 2.1 Software developed in-house was used to capture the patient’s identifying, diagnostic and treatment information, followed by transmission of data to the coordinating unit [National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR)]. The data quality was maintained by individual registries through duplicate verification and matching with mortality records and thereafter by NCDIR. The data from individual registries undergo duplicates and quality checks at the NCDIR including range, consistency, unlikely and family checks as per the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) norms1819. The checks are built into PBCRDM software and online PBCR data entry application and the cases with suspected errors are sent back to the individual registries for verification and corrections are updated in the cancer registry database.

The 11 PBCRs cover around 35 per cent of the population of the NE region. PBCRs in Manipur, Mizoram, Sikkim and Tripura have complete population coverage. PBCRs in Arunachal Pradesh and Meghalaya have 64.6 and 62.9 per cent population coverage, respectively. 32.7 per cent of the population in Nagaland and 13.7 per cent in Assam are covered by PBCRs11. For this analysis, data on incidence of all and specific cancer types in this region were utilized. Cancer incidence rates are expressed as age-adjusted rates (standardized to world standard population) per 100,000 population.

A review of literature was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar (2000 to 2020) to identify and enumerate aetiological factors for the cancers showing high incidence in North-East India. WHO-IARC monographs were also consulted to assess and enumerate aetiological factors for each of the selected cancer sites2021. In addition, data from national surveys such as the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS-2) and NCRP publications were used to analyze and correlate prevalence of risk factors and high cancer incidence in the region2223.

Results

Data quality indicators for the North-Eastern population-based cancer registries for all sites (ICD-10: C00-C97) for the period of 2012-2016 are shown in Table I. The microscopically verified (MV%) cases ranged from 78.7 (Dibrugarh district) to 96.6 per cent (Nagaland). Death Certificate Only (DCO) cases were below 10 per cent across all the 11 PBCRs. Only the Cachar district had higher (12.2%) Other and Unspecified (O&U) sites, while the other districts had less than 10 per cent6.

T1-8
Table I:
Data quality indicators of North-Eastern population-based cancer registries for all sites (ICD-10: C00-C97) for the period of 2012-2016

According to cancer incidence data for 2012-2016 from the 11 PBCRs, the highest incidence of cancer in India was in the NE region. In men, Aizawl district in Mizoram and in women, Papumpare district of Arunachal Pradesh, had the highest overall age-adjusted rates (AARs) of 269.4 and 219.8 per 100,000, respectively. The highest incidence of cancer outside the NE region was considerably lower [AAR of 147.0 per 100,000 in men (Delhi) and 146.8 per 100,000 in women (Bengaluru)]. Aizawl and Kamrup urban (Assam) had been leading in cancer incidence rates since 2003 in both men and women. However, as per the 2012-2016 NCRP data, Papumpare district had the highest incidence in women.

Cancers of the oesophagus, hypopharynx, stomach, lung, liver and cervix showed substantially higher AARs across the various districts of this region as compared to the other regions of India. Some cancers had higher incidence in specific regions such as nasopharynx in Nagaland and thyroid in women in Papumpare. The key site-specific cancers that contributed to the high cancer burden in the NE region are summarized below.

Oesophageal cancer: The highest incidence of oesophageal cancer for both men and women was found in East Khasi Hills district in Meghalaya (Table II). The AAR in East Khasi Hills district (AAR– 75.4) was 10 times higher compared to the rate in Delhi (AAR– 6.5) and Bengaluru (AAR– 7.0) in men. In women, the incidence (AAR– 33.6) was 7 to 9 times that of Bengaluru (AAR– 5.2) and Delhi (AAR– 3.8)registries. Meghalaya (AAR– 54.6 in men and 23.0 in women) and Mizoram (AAR– 30.2 in men and 7.0 in women) were the States with the highest incidence. Manipur with AAR of 3.5 per 100,000 in men and 1.1 per 100,000 in women had the lowest incidence of oesophageal cancer among the NE States6.

T2-8
Table II:
Ranking of north-eastern population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) with highest site-specific age-adjusted rate (AAR) in men and women for 2012-2016

The major risk factors for oesophageal cancer was found to be betel nut chewing in a study conducted in Assam24. Fruit consumption was low in these States ranging from 39.1 per cent in Nagaland to 64.5 per cent in Meghalaya in women, and 36.6 per cent in Mizoram to 70 per cent in Meghalaya in men25. Consumption of very spicy food and hot beverages was also high in this region26.

Stomach cancer: The highest AARs for men and women are in Aizawl district and Papumpare district (AAR of 44.2 and 27.1, respectively) (Table II). Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram had the highest incidence of stomach cancer6. A high incidence of stomach cancer in Mizoram was linked to the peculiar dietary habits followed by the locals in this region, such as the consumption of sa-um (fermented pork fat) (odds ratio [OR]– 3.4), smoked dried salted meat (OR – 2.8) and fish (OR – 2.5) and use of Soda (alkali) (OR – 2.9) as a food additive26. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection which may act as a co-carcinogen was high in this region, as shown by studies done in Sikkim2728.

Lung: Mizoram State, particularly Aizawl district, had the highest AARs for lung cancer in both men and women (Table II). Tobacco smoking was identified as the primary risk factor established for cancers causation.IARC also established a causal association between exposure to second-hand smoke and lung cancer risk20. Apart from direct exposure through cigarette smoke, inhalation of second-hand smoke was found to be high in this region, the highest being in households in Mizoram (83.2%), followed by Meghalaya (73.6%), Manipur (65.9%) and Tripura (65.2%)22.

Liver: The incidence of liver cancer in men was highest in the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Papumpare district had the highest incidence in men (AAR– 35.2) as well as in women (AAR– 14.4) (Table II). Alcohol consumption is an established cause of liver cancer21. As per the NFHS-4 data, alcohol use was the highest in the country in Arunachal Pradesh in both men (59.0%) and women (26.3%)22. There is a significant interaction between heavy smoking and heavy drinking in causing liver cancer29, both of which were prevalent in North-East India22. Other preventable risk factors such as chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)30 showed a high seroprevalence in certain isolated tribes of Arunachal Pradesh31 and intravenous drug users in Manipur32.

Gall bladder: Gall bladder cancer incidence was found to be highest in Assam for both men and women (Table II). Kamrup urban district had the highest incidence (AAR of 7.9 in men and 16.2 in women) followed by Cachar district (AAR of 5.6 in men and 11.9 in women). Gall bladder cancer was observed to be higher in women as compared to men in the North-East. A number of risk factors could be associated with gall bladder carcinoma in this region such as presence of pesticides, aromatic hydrocarbons33, nitrosamines, nitrates, nitrites and heavy metals (iron, lead and cadmium)3435 in Brahmaputra, Ganga and Pachin rivers and groundwater in some parts, and possible presence of adulterants in edible mustard oil used for cooking in eastern and NE parts of the country36. Chronic inflammation and bile acid degradation due to bacterial infection is one of the causes of gall bladder cancer. These risk factors correlated well with Salmonella typhi infection which is highly prevalent in some parts of the region3738.

Nasopharynx: The NE region showed among the highest AARs in cancer of the nasopharynx. In both men and women, Nagaland had the highest AAR, which was approximately 21 and 34 times that of Delhi in men and women, respectively (Table II). Thiruvananthapuram (AAR in men of 0.6) and Chennai (AAR in women of 0.3) had the highest incidence of nasopharyngeal cancer outside of the NE region in men and women, respectively. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma known to be associated with the consumption of smoked meat39 which was high in the NE region of India. Smoked and smokeless tobacco use was also higher in this region as compared to the rest of the country, which are risk factors in causation of head and neck cancers4041. Infection with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) has been found to be associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in several studies, particularly in North-East India424344. Other risk factors included living in poorly ventilated houses, consumption of nitrosamine-containing food items and lack of fruit intake, as shown by a study in Manipur45.

Breast (women): Aizawl district in Mizoram had the highest incidence (AAR– 30.7) among all the NE PBCRs (Table II). The incidence of breast cancer was relatively lower in the NE region compared to Hyderabad district (AAR– 48.0), Chennai (AAR– 42.2), Bengaluru (AAR–40.5), Delhi (AAR–38.6) and Patiala District (AAR–38.6)6. However, Aizawl (AAR–30.7) and Papumpare (AAR–29.6) districts, despite having a lower urban (54.9 and 78.6%) population, showed higher incidence of breast cancer compared to Ahmedabad urban (AAR–23.6), and Kolkata (AAR–21.6) both of which have completely urban populations.

Known risk factors for breast cancer include BRCA1 and 2 sequence alterations46, older age at first childbirth47, breastfeeding duration48, high body mass index and obesity49 and rural–urban differences due to lifestyle changes such as alcohol consumption or socio-economic differences50. The high incidence of breast cancer in the predominantly rural NE region was a conundrum51. This indicated contribution of lesser known risk factors in disease causation in this region. A retrospective cohort study in Assam has shown 32 per cent of breast cancer cases from NE States to be the triple-negative subtype52, a highly aggressive phenotype that presents at an early age, is associated with high-grade large tumours and high node positivity.

Cervix uteri: Incidence of cervical cancer was the highest in Papumpare district (AAR–27.7), Aizawl district (AAR–27.4) and Pasighat (AAR–20.3). In this study, cervix uteri was found to be the leading site of cancer among women in Arunachal Pradesh, Tripura, Mizoram and Nagaland and second leading site in Meghalaya and Sikkim. Persistent infection with HPV-16 and HPV-18 has been identified as an important risk factor in the aetiology of cervical cancer53. However, despite being detected in almost 100 per cent of the cases, HPV may not be sufficient to induce cervical cancer and a multifactorial aetiology is more likely54. The number of cancer-treating hospitals in the NE region was inadequate to meet the need for cancer services, as shown in Table III. Nagaland with a population of 1,978,502 had six cancer treating hospitals, while Manipur (2,855,794) and Tripura (3,673,917)55 with higher populations had only one cancer treating hospital each. There were scant radiotherapy facilities in the region, while cancer patient welfare schemes only existed in Assam and Mizoram11. The proportion of patients seeking care outside NE region was particularly high in Sikkim (98.3%), Nagaland (78.7%) and Manipur (62.4%)11.

T3-8
Table III:
Cancer-related health facilities in north-eastern States

Discussion

The NE region has a predominantly rural population (81.64%)55. There is tribal majority in Mizoram (94.5%), Nagaland (89.1%), Meghalaya (85.9%) and Arunachal Pradesh (64.2%)55. In addition to the high incidence in the region, the prognosis and survival for cancers were also found to be worse in these States and the proportion of cases exhibiting distant metastasis at diagnosis was found to be higher11. This finding, however, needs to be corroborated in the PBCR data and is open to further research. Due to low coverage in some of the States such as Assam and Nagaland, the pattern and incidence rates from PBCR data may not be generalized to the entire State.

A high prevalence of tobacco use, both smoked and smokeless, is noted in the NE region23. Fifty seven per cent of all cancers in men and 28 per cent of all cancers in women in this region are tobacco related11. The second round of the GATS found that while overall tobacco use had declined in India from 34.8 to 28.6 per cent between 2009-2010 and 2016-2017, there was a rise in tobacco use in Assam (from 39.3% in 2009-2010 to 48.2% in 2016-2017), Tripura (from 55.9% in 2009-2010 to 64.5% in 2016-2017) and Manipur (from 54.1% in 2009-2010 to 55.1% in 2016-2017)23. While the other States in the region showed a decline in the prevalence of tobacco use, the rates continued to be higher than the Indian average. Current tobacco use in Tripura (64.5%), Mizoram (58.7%) and Manipur (55.1%) was found to be more than 50 per cent. The age of initiation for tobacco use also declined in the three States of Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Sikkim, from 17.5 in 2009 to 15.9 in 2016-201723.

Lack of adequate healthcare facilities for providing cancer services was a major factor influencing cancer outcomes. The proportion of women who had been examined at least once for cervical and breast cancer was found to be much lower in NE states, according to data from the fourth round of the NFHS22. Among the NE states, Assam (5.2%) and Tripura (5.1%) had the lowest proportion of women who reported having a cervical examination. Tripura (1.3%) and Nagaland (2.0%) had the lowest proportion of women who reported having had a breast examination done at least once22. Since the NFHS questionnaire did not specifically ask about cancer screening, the actual proportion of women screened for cancer of the cervix and breast is unknown and expected to be much lower. Lack of adequate trained staff at the primary and secondary health centres to provide risk factor identification, screening and referral services and lack of accurate data on specialized healthcare staff were major obstacles to the organization of adequate cancer control in the region56. Sikkim and Mizoram had no specialists in community health centres against the requirement of 8 and 36 specialists, respectively. Arunachal Pradesh had only four specialists in position at community health centres against the required 252 specialists57.

Key research areas: There is a need to lay out a prioritized research agenda which should enable short-term resolution and also long-term redressal of the problem. The major areas for research include in depth aetiological research, health system research, operational research, research for developing cancer programmes, and programme for implementation and monitoring of research.

It is crucial to have a comprehensive and coherent approach in planning and implementing programmes targeting specific regionally prevalent cancers. If emphasized, inclusion of community in planning and development of programmes and services will have long-term benefits by enhancing acceptability of socio-behavioural interventions such as tobacco cessation, dietary modifications and lifestyle changes.

The NCRP 2020 report6 and the report on cancer burden in NE States11 provided data on the cancer incidence and common types prevalent in the NE region of India. The data also underscored the heterogeneity in incidence rates and cancer trends of various cancer types within the NE region. When addressing cancer in this region, the efforts should focus on those cancers showing the highest AARs and contributing the highest disability-adjusted life years in this region, such as cancers of the head and neck, oesophagus, stomach, lung, breast and cervix. Through strategies for addressing the knowledge gap, strengthening infrastructure, supporting human resources in local health facilities, spreading awareness and promoting community-based approaches, it would be possible to target specific cancers at the local, State and regional level for North-East India.

Financial support & sponsorship: This study was financially supported by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)–NCDIR.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Acknowledgment:

The authors acknowledge the contribution of 11 PBCRs under the National Cancer Registry Programme.

1. Chalkidou K, Marquez P, Dhillon PK, Teerawattananon Y, Anothaisintawee T, Gadelha CA, et al Evidence-informed frameworks for cost-effective cancer care and prevention in low, middle, and high-income countries Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:119–31
2. Sivaram S, Majumdar G, Perin D, Nessa A, Broeders M, Lynge E, et al Population-based cancer screening programmes in low-income and middle-income countries:Regional consultation of the International Cancer Screening Network in India Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:e113–22
3. Basu A, Sarkar-Roy N, Majumder PP. Genomic reconstruction of the history of extant populations of India reveals five distinct ancestral components and a complex structure Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:1594–9
4. Sharma JD, Kalit M, Nirmolia T, Saikia SP, Sharma A, Barman D. Cancer:Scenario and relationship of different geographical areas of the globe with special reference to North East-India Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:3721–9
5. Sahoo SS, Verma M, Parija PP. An overview of cancer registration in India:Present status and future challenges Oncol J India. 2018;2:86–9
6. Indian Council of Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research. Report of National Cancer Registry Programme 2020. Available from: https://ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/Report_2020/default.aspxaccessed on January 1, 2020
7. National Cancer Registry Programme. Indian Council of Medical Research. Consolidated Report of Population Based Cancer Registries 2001-2004. Available from: https://www.ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/PBCR_2001_04/PBCR_2001_04.pdfaccessed on January 10, 2020
8. National Cancer Registry Programme. Consolidated Report of Population Based Cancer Registries 2004-2005:Incidence and Distribution of Cancer. Available from: https://www.ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/PBCR_2004_05/PBCR_Rpt_2004_05.pdfaccessed on January 10, 2020
9. National Cancer Registry Programme. Three-year report of population based cancer registries 2006-2008: incidence and distribution of cancer. Available from: https://www.ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/PBCR_2006_08/PBCR_2006_2008.pdfaccessed on January 10, 2020
10. National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research-National Cancer Registry Programme. Indian Council of Medical Research. Three-year report of population based cancer registries 2009-2011:incidence and distribution of cancer. Available from: https://www.ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/PBCR_REPORT_2009_2011/index.htmaccessed on January 10, 2020
11. Indian Council of Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research. A Report on Cancer Burden in North Eastern States of India. Available from: https://www.ncdirindia.org/All_Reports/Reports_Ne/NE2012_2014/Files/NE_2012_14.pdfaccessed on January 10, 2020
12. Dutta U, Bush N, Kalsi D, Popli P, Kapoor VK. Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in India Chin Clin Oncol. 2019;8:33
13. Kataki AC, Sharma JD, Krishnatreya M, Baishya N, Barmon D, Deka P, et al A survival study of uterine cervical patients in the North East India:Hospital-cancer registry-based analysis J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14:1089–93
14. Bhattacharjee A, Bahar I, Saikia A. Nutritional assessment of patients with head and neck cancer in North-East India and dietary intervention Indian J Palliat Care. 2015;21:289–95
15. Ngaihte P, Zomawia E, Kaushik I. Cancer in the North East India:Where we are and what needs to be done? Indian J Public Health. 2019;63:251–3
16. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. 2011 Available from: http://www.who.intaccessed on November 26, 2019
17. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/96612/9789241548496_eng.pdf;sequence=1accessed on January 5, 2020
18. Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry:Principles and methods. Part I:Comparability, validity and timeliness Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:747–55
19. Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry:Principles and methods Part II. Completeness Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:756–64
20. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans:Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/101accessed on November 26, 2019
21. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 96 Alcohol Consumption and Ethyl Carbamate. France WHO-IARC 2010
22. International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/nfhs-4Reports/India.pdfaccessed on November 26, 2019
23. Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Global adult tobacco survey GATS 2 India 2016-17. New Delhi MoHFW 2017
24. Phukan RK, Ali MS, Chetia CK, Mahanta J. Betel nut and tobacco chewing;potential risk factors of cancer of oesophagus in Assam, India Br J Cancer. 2001;85:661–7
25. Phukan RK, Chetia CK, Ali MS, Mahanta J. Role of dietary habits in the development of esophageal cancer in Assam, the north-eastern region of India Nutr Cancer. 2001;39:204–9
26. Phukan RK, Narain K, Zomawia E, Hazarika NC, Mahanta J. Dietary habits and stomach cancer in Mizoram, India J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:418–24
27. Misra V, Pandey R, Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer:Indian enigma World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1503–9
28. Verma Y, Pradhan PK, Gurung N, Sapkota S, Giri P, Sundas P, et al Population-based cancer incidence in Sikkim, India:Report on ethnic variation Br J Cancer. 2012;106:962–5
29. Kuper H, Tzonou A, Kaklamani E, Hsieh CC, Lagiou P, Adami HO, et al Tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and their interaction in the causation of hepatocellular carcinoma Int J Cancer. 2000;85:498–502
30. Bartosch B. Hepatitis B and C viruses and hepatocellular carcinoma Viruses. 2010;2:1504–9
31. Biswas D, Borkakoty BJ, Mahanta J, Jampa L, Deouri LC. Hyperendemic foci of hepatitis B infection in Arunachal Pradesh, India Assoc Physicians India. 2007;55:701–4
32. Devi KS, Singh NB, Mara J, Singh TB, Singh YM. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus among hepatic disorders and injecting drug users in Manipur –A preliminary report Indian J Med Microbiol. 2004;22:136–7
33. Chakraborty P, Sakthivel S, Kumar B, Kumar S, Mishra M, Verma VK, et al Spatial distribution of persistent organic pollutants in the surface water of River Brahmaputra and River Ganga in India Rev Environ Health. 2014;29:45–8
34. Haloi N, Sarma HP. Heavy metal contaminations in the groundwater of Brahmaputra flood plain:An assessment of water quality in Barpeta District, Assam (India) Environ Monit Assess. 2012;184:6229–37
35. Hussain MF, Ahmad I, Konhauser KO. Major ion and heavy metal chemistry of Pachin river (Itanagar) - levels and sources J Environ Sci Eng. 2006;48:27–34
36. Dixit R, Srivastava P, Basu S, Srivastava P, Mishra PK, Shukla VK. Association of mustard oil as cooking media with carcinoma of the gallbladder J Gastrointest Cancer. 2013;44:177–81
37. Nath G, Singh YK, Gupta KK, Gulati A, Shukla VK, Khanna AK, et al Association of carcinoma of the gallbladder with typhoid carriage in a typhoid endemic area using nested PCR J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008;2:302–7
38. Roy JS, Saikia L, Medhi M, Tassa D. Epidemiological investigation of an outbreak of typhoid fever in Jorhat town of Assam, India Indian J Med Res. 2016;144:592–6
39. Chelleng PK, Narain K, Das HK, Chetia M, Mahanta J. Risk factors for cancer nasopharynx:A case-control study from Nagaland, India Natl Med J India. 2000;13:6–8
40. Rani M, Bonu S, Jha P, Nguyen SN, Jamjoum L. Tobacco use in India:Prevalence and predictors of smoking and chewing in a national cross sectional household survey Tob Control. 2003;12:e4
41. Sapkota A, Gajalakshmi V, Jetly DH, Roychowdhury S, Dikshit RP, Brennan P, et al Smokeless tobacco and increased risk of hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers:A multicentric case–control study from India Int J Cancer. 2007;121:1793–8
42. Anil Singh S, Ghosh S. Association of Epstein Barr virus and lifestyle on nasopharyngeal cancer risk among the ethnic population of northeast India Sci Technol J. 2014;2:95–102
43. Lourembam DS, Singh AR, Sharma TD, Singh TS, Singh TR, Singh LS. Evaluation of risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a high-risk area of India, the Northeastern Region Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:4927–35
44. Saikia A, Raphael V, Shunyu NB, Khonglah Y, Mishra J, Jitani AK, et al Analysis of Epstein Barr virus encoded RNA expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in north-eastern India:A chromogenic in situ hybridization based study Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;28:267–74
45. Sharma TD. Study on dietary and environmental risk factors for nasopharyngeal cancer in Manipur Int J Health Sci Res. 2011;1:8–14
46. Saxena S, Chakraborty A, Kaushal M, Kotwal S, Bhatanager D, Mohil RS, et al Contribution of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence alterations to breast cancer in Northern India BMC Med Genet. 2006;7:75
47. Butt S, Borgquist S, Anagnostaki L, Landberg G, Manjer J. Parity and age at first childbirth in relation to the risk of different breast cancer subgroups Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1926–34
48. Pakseresht S, Ingle GK, Bahadur AK, Ramteke VK, Singh MM, Garg S, et al Risk factors with breast cancer among women in Delhi Indian J Cancer. 2009;46:132–8
49. Fortner RT, Katzke V, Kühn T, Kaaks R. Obesity and breast cancer Recent Results Cancer Res. 2016;208:43–65
50. World Cancer Research Fund. American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Report. Diet, nutrition, physical activity, and Breast Cancer. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Breast-cancer-report.pdfaccessed on November 26, 2019
51. Moss JL, Liu B, Feuer EJ. Urban/rural differences in breast and cervical cancer incidence:The mediating roles of socioeconomic status and provider density Womens Health Issues. 2017;27:683–91
52. Sharma M, Sharma JD, Sarma A, Ahmed S, Kataki AC, Saxena R, et al Triple negative breast cancer in people of North East India:Critical insights gained at a regional cancer centre Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:4507–11
53. World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans:Human Papilomavirus. Available from: https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono90.pdfaccessed on November 26, 2019
54. Haverkos HW. Multifactorial etiology of cervical cancer:A hypothesis Med Gen Med. 2005;7:57
55. Census of India - 2011. Census India Library. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Government of India. Available from: http://censusindia.gov.in/DigitalLibrary/MFTableSeries.aspxaccessed on November 26, 2019
56. Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region;North Eastern Council. North eastern region:Vision. 2020;2008 Available from: http://necouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/about-us/Vision_2020.pdfaccessed on November 26, 2019
57. National Health Mission. Rural health statistics 2018-19. New Delhi MoHFW Statistics Division 2019
Keywords:

Cancer; cancer facilities; cancer incidence; cancer research needs; North-East India; research agenda

© 2021 Indian Journal of Medical Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow