Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Review Article

Role of microbial dysbiosis in carcinogenesis & cancer therapies

Vimal, Joseph; Himal, Iris; Kannan, S.

Author Information
Indian Journal of Medical Research: December 2020 - Volume 152 - Issue 6 - p 553-561
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1026_18
  • Open

Abstract

Microbiome plays an important role in maintaining the normal physiology of the human body. The changes occurring in the microbial composition induce production of toxins, chronic inflammations and carcinogenic metabolites through several mechanisms. Dysbiosis can be defined as an imbalance in number and types of microbial population, which can modulate microenvironment and homeostasis in host through over proliferation of a certain microbial species. Thus, dysbiosis may directly or indirectly contribute to carcinogenesis in human beings1. Studies on microbiome are mainly concentrated on regions such as hair2, mouth3, nostrils4, gut5, stomach6 and colon7 of the human body.

The conventional culture-based microbial studies are inadequate to understand species diversity and relative abundance. In the conventional microbial culture based technique, 16s rRNA gene sequencing is a PCR based technique, which provides a method for the identification of bacterial member in microbiome. The mechanism involves amplification of prokaryotic small ribosomal RNA (16s rRNA) gene by PCR89. The primer used in PCR binds to a conserved region of rRNA, while the extension step occurs on a highly variable region of rRNA, which is specific for each species. To overcome limitations, emerging molecular techniques for the microbiome research including next-generation sequencing, advanced culture technologies and its combination with metabolomics are also used in research10.

Role of dysbiosis of skin microbiome in carcinogenesis

Human skin microbiome contains a highly diverse community of hundreds of species inhabiting the skin11. Each area of skin provides a different environment with varying, temperature, moisture, pH, salinity, sebum content and intrinsic factors. These differences along with other lifestyle related factors determine the composition of microbiota on different skin habitats. Skin contains highly uneven surface having many invaginations with hairs and follicles, sebaceous glands; these protruding structures along with the presence of sweat glands make skin a diverse habitat and consequently, the microbes present on the skin are different in each part of the body12. The microbial diversity is more abundant in moist body sites, where the sweat gland produce unfavourable growth condition for the microorganisms and thereby allow the colonization of only certain microorganisms. Sebaceous glands secrete hydrophobic lipid rich sebum which acts as an antimicrobial agent in hairy areas of the skin1314 whereas, Staphylococcus epidermidis survive in commensal relationship with the skin surface and forms a part of commensal microbiota in skin. It secretes a serine protease enzyme that inhibits Staphylococcus aureus colonization15. These regulatory mechanisms on skin surface prevent changes in microbial population and resist over proliferation of certain microbial strains over the other. The microbiome inside the body is involved in the activation of immune cells, especially cells that produce inflammation16.

An in vivo study on skin cancer mice model demonstrated that the colonization of certain flagellated microorganisms promoted carcinogenesis through inherent signalling mechanism in the host. The microenvironments around the wound provide favourable environment for the growth of opportunistic microorganisms, especially flagellated bacteria like Escherichia coli and Pseuodomonas aeruginosa17. Flagellin and other microbial particles induce inflammation and activate toll-like receptor 5 (TLR-5) mediated signalling mechanisms in wound18. A study confirms that topical application of flagellin on the wound increases tumour growth, while antibiotic treatment and ablation of TLR-5 produce an anti-tumourogeic effect19. This indicates that through microbial dysbiosis human immune system can induce tumour formation. Multiple immunity-related mechanisms have been suggested to explain the link between skin microbiome and cancer20, but a detailed profiling of microbial population is necessary to unmask the molecular mechanisms which induce the carcinogenesis21.

Dysbiosis of oral microbiota influences carcinogenesis

Oral microbiome occupies different ecological niches in an oral cavity, and each niche contains a different composition of microbiota. It is one of the most diverse microbial communities with more than 500-700 species22. Each part of the oral cavity including lips, gingivae, teeth, hard palate, buccal mucosa, tongue and floor of the mouth provides an optimum environment for the proliferation of different microorganisms in a symbiotic manner. This environmental diversification contributes to the existence of a large number of species in a small ecosystem. Epidemiological studies indicate differences in the species abundance from one site to another23. The oral cavity itself contains several physical and chemical factors secreted by the commensal microbiota, which render protection from various microbial pathogens through immune system activation and resource competition24. The commensal microbiota not only provides resistance against infectious agents but also plays a vital role in the digestion, maintenance of homeostasis, signal transduction and other cellular processes25.

In some oral cancers, an over proliferation of some commensal microbial species such as Streptococcus anginosus or Fusobacterium nucleatum has been observed. The infection of S. anginosus in oral mucosa induces overproduction of nitric oxide which leads to DNA damage and finally lead to carcinogenesis26. Similar to S. anginosus, F. nucleatum is a pro-inflammatory, anaerobic, adherent bacterial oral pathogen. Typically, F. nucleatum is seen in the oral cavity, but in chronic periodontitis, the balance between the host-microbiota interactions is broken27. Increase in the number of F. nucleatum represents an example of an opportunistic infection at an immunocompromised site28. The chronic periodontitis leads to chronic inflammation, so the infected cells have a high risk to develop into premalignant lesions and finally into tumour29. A study using chronic inflammation associated tumourigenesis animal model has demonstrated that F. nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis modulate Interleukin 6 (IL-6) – signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT 3) axis of inflammatory signalling pathways27. These bacteria also help in tumour progression through atypical activation of immunocytes, which then produce DNA damage through generation of reactive chemical species27. In addition to IL-6 mediated immune responses, F. nucleatum also promotes lipopolysaccharide-induced production of inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor α (TNF α), IL-1β and IL-12 and IL-1730. These immune responses result in the upregulation of inflammation induced transcription factor such as nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB), which promotes tumourigenesis at the site of infection31. Another bacterium P. gingivalis increases prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase expression through cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression and thereby causes symptoms of inflammation by bringing pro-inflammatory mediators into the site of infection32. These microbial mechanisms can indirectly induce inflammation mediated carcinogenesis and tumour progression.

Role of dysbiosis of gut microbiota in carcinogenesis

F. nucleatum is rarely seen in healthy human gastrointestinal tract. F. nucleatum has the ability to induce damage to the epithelial lining of colon30. An in vivo studies with murine models has demonstrated that specific myeloid cell group penetrates into the tumour and produces pro-inflammatory signals3132. Cancer promoting property of F. nucleatum is mediated through FadA adhesion mechanism33. FadA bind to E-cadherin in the host cell and activates the β-catenin signalling pathways. FadA also promotes expression of oncogenes and regulates the inflammatory responses when the Fusobacterium adheres to it34. Unlike the chronic inflammation mediated mechanism of tumourigenesis, Fusobacterium can induce tumour formation by reconstruction of microenvironment around the host cells and in turn infiltrates into the tumour and promotes cell proliferation. The binding and activation of the F. nucleatum to the FadA motif promotes the signalling mechanism that alters epithelial barrier which leads to the loss of tight junction interactions, the mucus layer integrity, epithelial cell polarity and cell to cell adhesion35. These alterations in the epithelial barrier induce the invasion of the Fusobacterium species and accelerate cell-mediated immunity against the bacterium inside the tumour36. The inflammatory genotoxic condition produced by the immune cells triggers DNA damage and finally promotes cell proliferation37 (Figure). Similar to the β-catenin signal activation by F. nucleatum, the pathogenic bacteria species Bacteroides fragilis produces a toxin with an additional oncogenic function. This toxin cleaves β-catenin and activates signalling pathway for cell proliferation. In addition to the interactions between the immune cells and the microbial products, it will also induce DNA damage and contribute to tumourogenesis in the host. The epithelial barrier functions to separate the immune cells from this microbial microenvironment. When a tumour developes, the immune/inflammatory cells (CD4, TH1 cells, TH-17 cells, etc.) infiltrates the epithelial barrier and come in contact with the tumour as well as the microbial community38. Activated microbial products will induce the production of IL-17 and IL-23 from myeloid cells35. These ILs are mediators of inflammation and promote a chronic inflammation around the tumour to form a favourable microenvironment for the growth of the tumour39 (Figure).

F1-5
Figure:
Fusobacterium nucleatum through FadA activates NF- kB and C-MYC transcription factors mediated cell proliferation pathway. Fusobacterium species produces short peptides or short chain fatty acids which act as chemo-attractants, and attracts TH 17 cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) to the tumour site. TH 17 cells produce interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF α), while myeloid suppressor cells suppress some T cell subpopulations such as CD4+ cells in tumour microenvironment. Fusobacterium also leads to the increased presence of tumour associated macrophages near tumour. Fusobacterium express FadA ligand molecules on its surface which binds to E cadherin which is an adhesion molecule in epithelial cells and activates E cadherin mediated β catenin cell proliferation pathway. Activation of β catenin signalling leads to its translocation inside the nucleus where it leads to increase in expression of oncogenes such as C-MYC and NF-kB by binding to coactivator transcription factors lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) and T cell factor (TCF).

Enterococcus faecalis forms a part of the intestinal microbiome. The abnormal proliferation of this bacterial strain induces DNA damage and generates colorectal carcinomas40. E. faecalis can produce extracellular superoxide (O*2), hydroxyl radical and H2O2 through demethylmenaquinone-mediated autoxidation. The ability of E. faecalis to induce DNA damage was proved in a mice model and it was found that these free radicals were the cause of chromosomal instability and these were associated with colorectal cancer41. The gastrointestinal tract develops adaptive immunity with the help of intestinal microbiota in the peripheral region. The interaction between intestinal mucosa and microbiota is mediated through Toll – like receptors, (TLRs) these interactions play a vital role in maintaining homeostasis. When the mucosal barrier ruptures, immune cells such as T cells and macrophages activate TLR-dependent pathway which increases epithelial cell proliferation and recruits inflammatory cells to the site. The TLRs may also be activated by the infectious microorganism like; Helicobacter pylori and Listeria monocytogenes through which this natural mechanism turns into a carcinogenic mechanism4243.

Dysbiosis of microbiome and gynaecologic cancers

As mentioned earlier, inflammatory mediated mechanisms and cytotoxic mechanisms induce tumour progression mediated by the human microbiota. The gynaecologic cancers also form a part of such cancers which develop into tumours through dysbiosis of microbiota. Studies on dysbiosis have revealed the association between change in microbial community and human papillomavirus infection44. A woman whose vaginal microbiota is low in Lactobacillus gasseri species and high in Atopobium possesses a healthy composition of the microbiota, while HPV-positive women show higher number of L. gasseri and Gardnerella vaginalis species45. The pH of the vaginal region supports the invasion and sustainability of the HPV virus46. Similarly, ovarian cancer is also influenced by the upper reproductive tract microbiota. The colonization of the pathogenic bacteria activates the inflammatory pathways in uterus and fallopian tubes which promote immunomodulation and tumourigenesis47.

The vaginal microbiota and uterine cancer are linked by two inflammatory diseases viz. pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and bacterial vaginosis. Bacterial vaginosis promotes the dysbiosis of vaginal microbiota, especially the population of G. vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum4849. Changes in the relative population size lead to PID, as a consequence of which epithelial dysfunction and chronic inflammation occur simultaneously in the uterine region. These conditions together promote tumour growth and invasion49.

Factors influencing dysbiosis of microbiome

Studies indicate that development of cancers is also linked to lifestyle-related risk factors. These factors form a major cause of dysbiosis, and these include smoking, diet imbalance, alcohol consumption, obesity and lack of physical exercise505152. These changes can be studied through metagenomic studies, which help to identify dysbiosis and their relationship with genetic susceptibility in a comprehensive way. Diet imbalance or a specific food pattern may contribute towards cancer development via dysbiosis53. The risk factors such as alcohol consumption and tobacco use form a common cause of cancer when compared to other lifestyle-related factors. Although the diet related disorders account for a negligible portion of cancer cases, but some dietary habits such as high meat or pork intake, low vegetable or fruit consumption increase susceptibility to cancer54. Cancer preventive diet can overcome some effects caused due to changes in the microbial community. The diet with green vegetables and fruits has high level of antioxidants and carotenoids that protect cells from triplet sensitizers, singlet oxygen, and radical intermediates and maintains a normal commensal microflora inside the body55.

Acetaldehyde is considered as teratogenic, genotoxic and mutagenic agent because it reacts with DNA and produces a N2-ethylidenedeoxyguanosine adduct565758. It also interacts with deoxyguanosine in the DNA to form 1 N2-propano-2-deoxyguanosine adduct59. Therefore, the accumulation of acetaldehyde may lead to permanent alterations in the genetic material. Many investigations on microorganisms in the oral cavity have shown that one of the reasons for an increase in the alcohol dehydrogenase level when compared to aldehyde dehydrogenase is due to dysbiosis in the oral microbiome60. Neisseria is the part of commensal microflora of oral cavity, some of the non-pathogenic Neisseria species produce extremely high amount of alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme in the oral cavity and may lead to carcinogenesis6162. On the other hand, an elevated level of Streptococcus salivarius, Candida albicans and some Gram-positive bacteria and yeast show ability to produce acetaldehyde in the presence of alcohol in the oral cavity63.

Another reason for the dysbiosis in the oral cavity is tobacco consumption. The immunomodulatory functions of tobacco allow invasion of pathogenic microorganisms to the oral cavity, nasal mucosa, throat, trachea and lungs64. In a comparative study on smokers and non-smokers, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, Tannerella forsythensis, Campylobacter rectus, Eikenella corrodens, Peptostreptococcus micros, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and tar-resistant S. aureus infections were present in most smokers656667. These infectious agents can activate inflammatory molecules; which mainly involves an increase in the production of TNF α, IL-1β and IL-661. Therefore, the increase in free radical exposure, reduced nutrient metabolism, tumour-promoting enzyme activation, blockage of detoxifying enzyme, change in the hormone status and carcinogenic components from alcohol or smoke may promote cancer through dysbiosis in the oral cavity.

Dietary changes may induce carcinogenesis through microbial activity in intestines. For example, protein-rich diet will increase protein fermentation and production of amino acid derivatives in the intestine. Some of the amino acid derivatives such as branched-chain fatty acids and phenylacetic acids are produced by bacteria belonging to the phylum Bacteriodetes and Firmicutes68. The overproduction of these amino acid derivatives leads to the nitrosation of these products leading to Liposuction of N-nitroso compounds. These compounds are potential carcinogens; and may damage DNA through alkylation and cause mutations69. Red meat consumption also modulates the microenvironment in the intestinal region. The tumour-associated microorganism F. nucleatum produces hydrogen sulphide in the presence of red meat which cause DNA damage in the colonic epithelium and the cells surrounding the tumour aid in the tumour formation and progression70. The polyamines are organic molecules derived from the arginine produced in the host tissues; these play vital role in maintaining the integrity of cell membrane and synthesis of nucleic acids71. Protein-rich diet will lead to the activation of protein fermenting microbiota and an increase in their number. This alteration causes overproduction of polyamines not only from the host tissues but also from gut microbial population72 such as B. fragilis, Salmonella enterica, H. pylori, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Shigella flexneri, etc. The catabolism of polyamines produces oxidative stress and DNA damage in the intestinal mucosa73.

Future research and therapeutic applications of the microbiome in cancer

Changes in microbial composition tend to disturb the cell microenvironment leading to an increase in proliferation of a particular species of microorganism. These alterations may cause DNA damage or tumour development, but in some exceptional cases, it might inhibit tumour as well74. The microbiome has the ability to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic treatments by modulation of host immune system. Therefore, microbiome does not always act to promote tumour formation but also play a vital and unique role to suppress tumour development with the aid of certain composition of microbes7576. The tumour cells adapt certain immune checkpoint pathways to desensitize the host immune system against T cell and the antibody attack77. The immune checkpoint pathways are a self-defensive mechanism of the host to prevent autoimmune disorders. If these pathways are inhibited in tumour, the immune system can attack the tumour cells without any resistance78. The bacterial species of the commensal microbiome, Bifidobacterium strengthen the immunity against the tumour and intensify the activity of host dendritic cells77. It also suggests the manipulation of gut microbiome to enhance the efficiency of cancer immune therapy77 (Table I).

T1-5
Table:
Involvement of microbial dysbiosis in carcinogenesis

Colorectal cancer shows high permeability towards inflammatory cytokine-producing cells. These tumour-infiltrating cells are able to activate intracellular pathways which help the colorectal tumour cells to grow79. The spent medium from the culture of tumour-infiltrating leukocytes has been shown to enhance the growth of colorectal carcinoma cell lines by activation of intracellular pathways and transcription factors such as STAT 3 and NF-kB79. T helper 17 cells from the tumour infiltrating leukocytes produce a large number of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21 and IL-22), TNF-α and IL-6. These cytokines increase proliferation of colorectal cancer cells80. The gut microbiome can shift through intake of an oral probiotic, which contains a unique probiotic mixture enriched with certain beneficial bacterial genera like, Alistipes, Butyricimonas, Mucispirillum, Oscillibacter, Parabacteroides, Paraprevotella and Prevotella81. Presence of these microorganisms downregulates the Th 17 cell infiltration and presence of inflammatory cytokines in the tumour. The metabolites released from the probiotic bacterial community inhibit the tumour-promoting activity of immune cells by activate the polarization of anti-inflammatory Type 1 regulatory T cells (Treg/Tr1) and promote their differentiation in the gut region82. Experiments conducted on hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines showed that these probiotic infused therapies might reduce tumour volume up to 40 per cent when compared to control81.

As mentioned earlier the interaction between the tumour-associated immune cells and the microbiota induce inflammation, which contributes to the development of cancer. Therefore, the removal of the microorganism from the tumour surface may greatly reduce the production of a pro-inflammatory cytokine by the tumour-associated immune cells16. CpG-oligonucleotide immunotherapy and platinum chemotherapy are common treatment methodologies followed for gastrointestinal cancers83.

Conclusion

The unique environment present in the human body promotes a specific composition of microbes to grow and contribute distinct functions. Through mutual interactions, each and every microorganism contributes toward the proper functioning of the human body. The diversity and relative abundance of the microbiome vary from site to site. Therefore, alterations in the microbiome can be uncovered only through comparative studies between normal and disease conditions. The microbiota may possibly give rise to cancer through the inflammation mediated mechanisms such as modulation of immune responses, or production of carcinogenic metabolites and genotoxins, or through activation of cell proliferative signalling pathway. The identification of these molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis will aid to improve treatment strategies. Along with new improved cancer therapies favourable microbiota inducing diet, anti-inflammatory drugs administration, prebiotic or probiotic treatment, transplantation of microbiome, administration of genotoxin neutralizing agents may aid in improving treatment outcomes.

Acknowledgment:

In first author (JV) acknowledges the University Grants Commission, Government of India, New Delhi for providing Junior Research Fellowship.

1. Wang L, Ganly I. The oral microbiome and oral cancer Clin Lab Med. 2014;34:711–9
2. Dréno B, Araviiskaia E, Berardesca E, Gontijo G, Sanchez Viera M, Xiang LF, et al Microbiome in healthy skin, update for dermatologists J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:2038–47
3. Sharma N, Bhatia S, Sodhi AS, Batra N. Oral microbiome and health AIMS Microbiol. 2018;4:42–66
4. Nicola I, Cerutti F, Grego E, Bertone I, Gianella P, D’Angelo A, et al Characterization of the upper and lower respiratory tract microbiota in Piedmontese calves Microbiome. 2017;5:152
5. Kho ZY, Lal SK. The human gut microbiome – A potential controller of wellness and disease Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1835
6. Yu G, Torres J, Hu N, Medrano-Guzman R, Herrera-Goepfert R, Humphrys MS, et al Molecular characterization of the human stomach microbiota in gastric cancer patients Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:302
7. Cremer J, Arnoldini M, Hwa T. Effect of water flow and chemical environment on microbiota growth and composition in the human colon Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:6438–43
8. Dethlefsen L, McFall-Ngai M, Relman DA. An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human-microbe mutualism and disease Nature. 2007;449:811–8
9. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project Nature. 2007;449:804–10
10. Arnold JW, Roach J, Azcarate-Peril MA. Emerging technologies for gut microbiome research Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:887–901
11. Somerville DA. The normal flora of the skin in different age groups Br J Dermatol. 1969;81:248–58
12. Byrd AL, Belkaid Y, Segre JA. The human skin microbiome Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:143–55
13. Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:244–53
14. Gallo RL, Hooper LV. Epithelial antimicrobial defence of the skin and intestine Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:503–16
15. Sugimoto S, Iwamoto T, Takada K, Okuda K, Tajima A, Iwase T, et al Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp degrades specific proteins associated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and host-pathogen interaction J Bacteriol. 2013;195:1645–55
16. Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA, Smith L, Bouladoux N, Weingarten RA, et al Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment Science. 2013;342:967–70
17. Grice EA, Segre JA. Interaction of the microbiome with the innate immune response in chronic wounds Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;946:55–68
18. Hajam AI, Dar PA, Shahnawaz I, Jaume JC and Lee JH. Bacterial flagellin-a potent immunomodulatory agent Exp Mol Med. 2017;49:373
19. Hoste E, Arwert EN, Lal R, South AP, Salas-Alanis JC, Murrell DF, et al Innate sensing of microbial products promotes wound-induced skin cancer Nat Commun. 2015;6:5932
20. Jensen-Jarolim E, Bax HJ, Bianchini R, Crescioli S, Daniels-Wells TR, Dombrowicz D, et al AllergoOncology: Opposite outcomes of immune tolerance in allergy and cancer Allergy. 2018;73:328–40
21. Salava A, Aho V, Pereira P, Koskinen K, Paulin L, Auvinen P, et al Skin microbiome in melanomas and melanocytic nevi Eur J Dermatol. 2016;26:49–55
22. Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu WH, et al The human oral microbiome J Bacteriol. 2010;192:5002–17
23. Balaram P, Sridhar H, Rajkumar T, Vaccarella S, Herrero R, Nandakumar A, et al Oral cancer in southern India: The influence of smoking, drinking, paan-chewing and oral hygiene Int J Cancer. 2002;98:440–5
24. Meurman JH. Infectious and dietary risk factors of oral cancer Oral Oncol. 2010;46:411–3
25. Dzutsev A, Goldszmid RS, Viaud S, Zitvogel L, Trinchieri G. The role of the microbiota in inflammation, carcinogenesis, and cancer therapy Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:17–31
26. Castellarin M, Warren RL, Freeman JD, Dreolini L, Krzywinski M, Strauss J, et al Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma Genome Res. 2012;22:299–306
27. Binder Gallimidi A, Fischman S, Revach B, Bulvik R, Maliutina A, Rubinstein AM, et al Periodontal pathogens Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum promote tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model Oncotarget. 2015;6:22613–23
28. Tezal M, Sullivan MA, Hyland A, Marshall JR, Stoler D, Reid ME, et al Chronic periodontitis and the incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:2406–12
29. Baqui AA, Meiller TF, Chon JJ, Turng BF, Falkler WA Jr. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor amplification of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha production in THP-1 human monocytic cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide of oral microorganisms Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998;5:341–7
30. Bashir A, Miskeen AY, Hazari YM, Asrafuzzaman S, Fazili KM. Fusobacterium nucleatum, inflammation, and immunity: The fire within human gut Tumour Biol. 2016;37:2805–10
31. Dharmani P, Strauss J, Ambrose C, Allen-Vercoe E, Chadee K. Fusobacterium nucleatum infection of colonic cells stimulates MUC2 mucin and tumor necrosis factor alpha Infect Immun. 2011;79:2597–607
32. Sakurai Y, Yamaguchi M, Abiko Y. Inhibitory effect of low-level laser irradiation on LPS-stimulated prostaglandin E2 production and cyclooxygenase-2 in human gingival fibroblasts Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:29–34
33. Nithianantham S, Xu M, Yamada M, Ikegami A, Shoham M, Han YW. Crystal structure of FadA adhesin from Fusobacterium nucleatum reveals a novel oligomerization motif, the leucine chain J Biol Chem. 2009;284:3865–72
34. Rubinstein MR, Wang X, Liu W, Hao Y, Cai G, Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:195–206
35. Grivennikov SI, Wang K, Mucida D, Stewart CA, Schnabl B, Jauch D, et al Adenoma-linked barrier defects and microbial products drive IL-23/IL-17-mediated tumour growth Nature. 2012;491:254–8
36. Keku TO, McCoy AN, Azcarate-Peril AM. Fusobacterium spp. and colorectal cancer: cause or consequence? Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:506–8
37. Kostic AD, Chun E, Robertson L, Glickman JN, Gallini CA, Michaud M, et al Fusobacterium nucleatum potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis and modulates the tumor-immune microenvironment Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:207–15
38. Borroni EM, Qehajaj D, Farina FM, Yiu D, Bresalier RS, Chiriva-Internati M, et al Fusobacterium nucleatum and the Immune System in Colorectal Cancer Curr Colorectal Can Rep. 2019;15:149–56
39. Wu J, Li Q, Fu X. Fusobacterium nucleatum Contributes to the Carcinogenesis of Colorectal Cancer by Inducing Inflammation and Suppressing Host Immunity Translational Oncology. 2019;12:846–51
40. Huycke MM, Abrams V, Moore DR. Enterococcus faecalis produces extracellular superoxide and hydrogen peroxide that damages colonic epithelial cell DNA Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:529–36
41. Wang X, Huycke MM. Extracellular superoxide production by Enterococcus faecalis promotes chromosomal instability in mammalian cells Gastroenterology. 2007;132:551–61
42. Huang B, Zhao J, Shen S, Li H, He KL, Shen GX, et al Listeria monocytogenes promotes tumor growth via tumor cell toll-like receptor 2 signaling Cancer Res. 2007;67:4346–52
43. Fukata M, Abreu MT. Role of Toll-like receptors in gastrointestinal malignancies Oncogene. 2008;27:234–43
44. Lin D, Kouzy R, Jaoude JA, Noticewala SS, Delgado Medrano AY, Klopp AH, et al Microbiome factors in HPV-driven carcinogenesis and cancers PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008524
45. Gao W, Weng J, Gao Y, Chen X. Comparison of the vaginal microbiota diversity of women with and without human papillomavirus infection: A cross-sectional study BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:271
46. Clarke MA, Rodriguez AC, Gage JC, Herrero R, Hildesheim A, Wacholder S, et al A large, population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and human papillomavirus infection BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:33
47. Poole EM, Lee IM, Ridker PM, Buring JE, Hankinson SE, Tworoger SS. A prospective study of circulating C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor α receptor 2 levels and risk of ovarian cancer Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:1256–64
48. Sharma H, Tal R, Clark NA, Segars JH. Microbiota and pelvic inflammatory disease Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:43–9
49. Ness RB, Kip KE, Hillier SL, Soper DE, Stamm CA, Sweet RL, et al A cluster analysis of bacterial vaginosis-associated microflora and pelvic inflammatory disease Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:585–90
50. Yang T, Santisteban MM, Rodriguez V, Li E, Ahmari N, Carvajal JM, et al Gut dysbiosis is linked to hypertension Hypertension. 2015;65:1331–40
51. Jin D, Wu S, Zhang YG, Lu R, Xia Y, Dong H, et al Lack of Vitamin D receptor causes dysbiosis and changes the functions of the murine intestinal microbiome Clin Ther. 2015;37:996–1009.e7
52. Hold GL. Western lifestyle: A ‘master’ manipulator of the intestinal microbiota? Gut. 2014;63:5–6
53. Fayfman M, Flint K, Srinivasan S. Obesity, motility, diet, and intestinal microbiota-connecting the dots Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019;21:15
54. Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, Ghissassi FE, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, et al Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1599–600
55. Black HS, Boehm F, Edge R, Truscott TG. The Benefits and Risks of Certain Dietary Carotenoids that Exhibit both Anti- and Pro-Oxidative Mechanisms-A Comprehensive Review Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9:264
56. Stein S, Lao Y, Yang IY, Hecht SS, Moriya M. Genotoxicity of acetaldehyde- and crotonaldehyde-induced 1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine DNA adducts in human cells Mutat Res. 2006;608:1–7
57. Suo C, Yang Y, Yuan Z, Zhang T, Yang X, Qing T, et al Alcohol intake interacts with functional genetic polymorphisms of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) to increase esophageal squamous cell cancer risk J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:712–25
58. Voulgaridou GP, Anestopoulos I, Franco R, Panayiotidis MI, Pappa A. DNA damage induced by endogenous aldehydes: Current state of knowledge Mutat Res. 2011;711:13–27
59. Theruvathu JA, Jaruga P, Nath RG, Dizdaroglu M, Brooks PJ. Polyamines stimulate the formation of mutagenic 1, N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts from acetaldehyde Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:3513–20
60. Li F, McClain CJ, Feng W. Microbiome dysbiosis and alcoholic liver disease Liver Research. 2019;3:218–26
61. Liu G, Tang CM, Exley RM. Non-pathogenic Neisseria: Members of an abundant, multi-habitat, diverse genus Microbiology. 2015;161:1297–312
62. Muto M, Hitomi Y, Ohtsu A, Shimada H, Kashiwase Y, Sasaki H, et al Acetaldehyde production by non-pathogenic Neisseria in human oral microflora: Implications for carcinogenesis in upper aerodigestive tract Int J Cancer. 2000;88:342–50
63. Pavlova SI, Jin L, Gasparovich SR, Tao L. Multiple alcohol dehydrogenases but no functional acetaldehyde dehydrogenase causing excessive acetaldehyde production from ethanol by oral streptococci Microbiology. 2013;159:1437–46
64. Jaspers I. Cigarette smoke effects on innate immune mechanisms in the nasal mucosa. Potential effects on the microbiome Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(Suppl 1):S38–42
65. Capurso G, Lahner E. The interaction between smoking, alcohol and the gut microbiome Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;31:579–88
66. Bizzarro S, Loos BG, Laine ML, Crielaard W, Zaura E. Subgingival microbiome in smokers and non-smokers in periodontitis: An exploratory study using traditional targeted techniques and a next-generation sequencing J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:483–92
67. Fujiki H, Takeuchi H, Nishitani N, Yamanaka H, Suzuki K, Kurusu M, et al Carcinogenic potential of tobacco tar-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in buccal cavity J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004;130:301–5
68. Windey K, De Preter V, Verbeke K. Relevance of protein fermentation to gut health Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012;56:184–96
69. Mirvish SS. Role of N-nitroso compounds (NOC) and N-nitrosation in etiology of gastric, esophageal, nasopharyngeal and bladder cancer and contribution to cancer of known exposures to NOC Cancer Lett. 1995;93:17–48
70. Bultman SJ. The microbiome and its potential as a cancer preventive intervention Semin Oncol. 2016;43:97–106
71. Di Martino ML, Campilongo R, Casalino M, Micheli G, Colonna B, Prosseda G. Polyamines: Emerging players in bacteria-host interactions Int J Med Microbiol. 2013;303:484–91
72. Hanfrey CC, Pearson BM, Hazeldine S, Lee J, Gaskin DJ, Woster PM, et al Alternative spermidine biosynthetic route is critical for growth of Campylobacter jejuni and is the dominant polyamine pathway in human gut microbiota J Biol Chem. 2011;286:43301–12
73. Pegg AE. Toxicity of polyamines and their metabolic products Chem Res Toxicol. 2013;26:1782–800
74. Al-Hilu SA, Al-Shujairi WH. Dual Role of Bacteria in Carcinoma: Stimulation and Inhibition Internat J Microbiol. 2020:4639761
75. Fong W, Li Q, Yu J. Gut microbiota modulation: a novel strategy for prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer Oncogene. 2020;39:4925–43
76. Zou S, Fang L and Lee MH. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota in promoting the development of colorectal cancer Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018;6:1–12
77. Sivan A, Corrales L, Hubert N, Williams JB, Aquino-Michaels K, Earley ZM, et al Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy Science. 2015;350:1084–9
78. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:252–64
79. De Simone V, Franzè E, Ronchetti G, Colantoni A, Fantini MC, Di Fusco D, et al Th17-type cytokines, IL-6 and TNF-α synergistically activate STAT3 and NF-kB to promote colorectal cancer cell growth Oncogene. 2015;34:3493–503
80. De Simone V, Pallone F, Monteleone G, Stolfi C. Role of T17 cytokines in the control of colorectal cancer Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:E26617
81. Li J, Sung CY, Lee N, Ni Y, Pihlajamäki J, Panagiotou G, et al Probiotics modulated gut microbiota suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma growth in mice Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E1306–15
82. Elinav E, Nowarski R, Thaiss CA, Hu B, Jin C, Flavell RA. Inflammation-induced cancer: Crosstalk between tumours, immune cells and microorganisms Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:759–71
83. Bourquin C, Schreiber S, Beck S, Hartmann G, Endres S. Immunotherapy with dendritic cells and CpG oligonucleotides can be combined with chemotherapy without loss of efficacy in a mouse model of colon cancer Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2790–5

Financial support & sponsorship: None.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Keywords:

Cancer therapies; carcinogenesis; dysbiosis; immunomodulation; microbiome

© 2020 Indian Journal of Medical Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow