Effect of Wearable Technology on Self-Care Behaviors, Physical Activity and Quality of Life : JBI Evidence Implementation

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

ABSTRACTS

Effect of Wearable Technology on Self-Care Behaviors, Physical Activity and Quality of Life

Inouye, J.; Lukkahatai, N.; Soivong, P.; Li, D.

Author Information
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 14():p S10-S11, December 2016. | DOI: 10.1097/01.XEB.0000511627.82819.6c
  • Free

Abstract

Background: 

Self-care and management have been associated with the ability to monitor behaviors. For diabetic patients, it is important to manage physical activity and diet. It is not known if self-monitoring in a Thai population improves health outcomes.

Objective: 

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of wearable technology on physical activity and relationships of self-care behaviors and quality of life.

Methods: 

A randomized controlled group design was used. Thai persons aged 21 or older with diabetes from two diabetic clinics in Chiang Mai Thailand were recruited. They were randomly assigned into 3 groups: control group (no wearable devices), aware group (received wearable device with feedback) and unaware group (received wearable device with no feedback). During their first visit, participants were asked to complete questionnaires about self-care behavior and their quality of life (SF-12). Participants in the aware and unaware groups wore the device for 3 days. Data analysis was conducted using SAS software version 9.4.

Results: 

One hundred and twenty five Thai participants with diabetes ages ranged from 39 to 75 years old were included in this analysis. The majority was female (n = 86, 69%) and married (n = 103, 82%). The number of steps taken for both aware and unaware group was positively associated with their physical functions (r = 0.225, p = 0.041) and their body pain (r = 0.300, p = 0.0059). No significant differences of self-care behaviors were found among the three groups. The number of steps in both groups was not significantly different.

Conclusion: 

The wearable assessment device was feasible and results of steps taken was associated with better physical function and pain, but not determined by awareness of their steps taken. While the device had no significant impact on exercise more information is needed on the usefulness of this information and its relationship to pain and how it can be utilized to enhance physical activity.

Correspondence should be addressed to Jillian Inouye; [email protected]

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2016 The Joanna Briggs Institute

A video commentary on implementation project titled: How do health professionals prioritise clinical areas for implementation of evidence into practice? The commentary is provided by Andrea Rochon RN, MNSc, Research Assistant, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada