Cognitive leisure activities and their role in preventing dementia: a systematic review : JBI Evidence Implementation

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Cognitive leisure activities and their role in preventing dementia

a systematic review

Stern, Cindy BHSc(Hons)1,2,3; Munn, Zachary BMR(NM)2,3

Author Information
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 8(1):p 2-17, March 2010. | DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2010.00150.x

Abstract

Background 

Dementia inflicts a tremendous burden on the healthcare system. Identifying protective factors or effective prevention strategies may lead to considerable benefits. One possible strategy mentioned in the literature relates to participation in cognitive leisure activities.

Aim 

To determine the effectiveness of cognitive leisure activities in preventing Alzheimer's and other dementias among older adults.

Inclusion criteria 

Types of participants. Adults aged at least 60 years of age with or without a clinical diagnosis of dementia that resided in the community or care setting.

Types of interventions. Cognitive leisure activities, defined as activities that required a mental response from the individual taking part in the activity (e.g. reading).

Types of outcomes. The presence or absence of dementia was the outcome of interest.

Types of studies. Any randomised controlled trials, other experimental studies, as well as cohort, case–control and cross-sectional studies were considered for inclusion.

Search strategy. A search for published and unpublished studies in the English language was undertaken with no publication date restriction.

Methodological quality 

Each study was appraised independently by two reviewers using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute instruments.

Data collection and analysis 

Information was extracted from studies meeting quality criteria using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Because of the heterogeneity of populations and interventions, meta-analyses were not possible and results are presented in narrative form.

Results 

There were no randomised controlled trials located that met inclusion criteria. Thirteen observational studies were included in the review; the majority were cohort design. Because of the heterogeneity of interventions, the study design, the way in which they were grouped and the different stages of life they were measured at, statistical pooling was not appropriate. Studies were grouped by stage of adult life participation when interventions were undertaken, that is, early adulthood, middle adulthood and late life. Five out of six studies showed a positive association between participating in activities and a reduced risk of developing Alzheimer's disease and other dementias when interventions were undertaken in middle adulthood and six out of seven studies produced a positive association for late life participation. Results indicated that some activities might be more beneficial than others; however, results should be interpreted with caution because of the subjective nature of activity inclusion.

Conclusion 

  • Actively participating in cognitive leisure activities during mid- or late life may be beneficial in preventing the risk of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in the elderly; however, the evidence is currently not strong enough to infer a direct causal relationship.
  • Participating in selected cognitive leisure activities may be more favourable than others but currently there is no strong evidence to recommend one over the other.
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2010 The Joanna Briggs Institute

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid

A video commentary on implementation project titled: How do health professionals prioritise clinical areas for implementation of evidence into practice? The commentary is provided by Andrea Rochon RN, MNSc, Research Assistant, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada