Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Obesity Prevalence and Determinants among Young Adults, with Special Focus on Normal-Weight Obesity; A Cross-Sectional Study in Mumbai

Hadaye, Rujuta Sachin; Manapurath, Rukman Mecca; Gadapani, Barsha Pathak

Author Information
Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Jul–Sep 2020 - Volume 45 - Issue 3 - p 358-362
doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_408_19
  • Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is one of the major public health problem affecting every region of the globe. Currently, India is facing the double burden of undernutrition as well as over nutrition. There are >135 million people who are obese in India.[1] Obesity, a prevalent form of malnutrition, can lead to adverse metabolic effects. The risk of heart disease and diabetes increases steadily with increasing body mass index (BMI).[2] These diseases, directly and indirectly, burden the already weak health system of the country. The WHO developed BMI classification of obesity, which is as follows: <18.5 - underweight, 18.5–24.9 - normal weight, 25–29.9 overweight, and >30 obesity; developed mainly on Western standards.[3] Later, the WHO suggested a lower cutoff for therapeutic interventions in Asians because obesity-related complications develop among Asians at lower BMI.[3] In order to find out comparison in research, the WHO classification continued to be used in various obesity studies across the globe. The WHO Asian modification of BMI defines obesity as BMI >25 kg/m24 which is applied in the study to determine the combined values of overweight and obesity.

Obesity is often expressed in terms of BMI, which has very high specificity and low sensitivity. Later, studies demonstrate the importance of central body fat (BF) measurements as a reliable predictor of metabolic diseases. BMI cannot differentiate with lean muscle mass from BF. Those with enhanced muscle mass and lower BF may be misclassified as obese and those with lower muscle mass and higher fat content as normal also.[5] Ruderman et al., in 1981, derived the concept of metabolically obese normal weight, for whom BMI is normal but having deranged metabolic parameters like dyslipidemia and elevated blood sugar.[6] Then, the concept of normal-weight obesity (NWO) was defined for those individuals with normal body weight and BMI (18.5–24.9) with increased BF %, i.e., >17.6% males and >31.6% in females. In India, very few studies are done on NWO. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome is four times higher in NWO individuals than the normal population.[7] Hence, the main objective of this study is to find the prevalence of obesity and its determinants with a special focus on NWO among the young adult population at a medical teaching institute and also to give recommendations based on the findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After obtaining the ethical clearance, this descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in a medical college in Mumbai. This institution has 900 undergraduate students and those between the age group of 18–24 years were enrolled. There were no exclusion criteria for the study. For the purpose of sample selection, systematic random sampling was used based on the admission muster in the academic section. Using the formula Z2 pqN/[e2(N − 1) + Z2pq, sample size was 269 where Z = 1.96 by taking confidence interval (CI) as 95%, estimated prevalence (p) taken as 50%, q = 100 − P = 50, e = relative precision (10% of prevalence) = 5, N total number of students (900).[8] The first person was selected randomly between 1 and 10 from the junior-most batch, and then every 3th person was selected. Sampling interval “3” was calculated by dividing the total number of students by the estimated sample size. The study period was from September 2016 to October 2018.

Height, weight, and waist circumference were measured using stadiometer, digital weighing machine, and nonstretchable measuring tape, respectively, as per the standard protocol. A Harpenden caliper was used for accurately measuring skinfold thickness. Up to 80 mm thickness, this caliper gives 99% accuracy if used repeatedly, compared to other methods of BF estimation.[4] Using skin-fold thickness, BF percentage was calculated using the Jackson and Pollock method. This is most commonly used to estimate body composition using the sum of skinfolds. This method estimates body density (BD) from the sum of skinfolds and age. Once BD was derived, the Siri two-component model was used to convert BD to percentage BF. NWO is taken as BMI in the normal range and BF >17.6% for males and 31.6% for females. Those below these cutoff were taken as normal-weight lean (NWL).

Despite the limitations of skinfold assessment, it is a method widely used in research as it is easy to use, less expensive, high accuracy in repeated measurements, and no complex machinery required.[9] Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 16. Developer: IBM Corporation, Newyork City, Newyork, United States. To find the interaction between different exposure variables on the outcome, different approaches have been used.

Binary logistic regression was applied in the first method, making the outcome variables categorical and binary. NWL and underweight were combined and coded, similarly normal weight obese, overweight, and obese were also combined into a single variable.

RESULTS

Of 269 study samples, 53.5% were male with a mean age of 21.1 (±1.75) years and 46.5% were female with a mean age of 20.55 (±2.14) years. About 20.1% were from 1st year, 21.9% were from the 2nd year, 20.1% of students were from 3rd year, 20.1% were from the final year and 23.4% interns. About 22.68% of the participants belong to upper lower, 3% of students belong to the lower middle class, 40.89% of the study participants belong to the upper-middle-class and 33.46% of students belong to Upper class as per the Modified Kuppuswamy scale. About 86.2% of students were residing at the hostel, while 13.8% were day scholars. Mean weight and height of males and females was 73.33 (±12.5) kg, 171.1 (±6.4) cm and 68.9 (±12.8) kg, 165.14 cm (±5.9), respectively.

Prevalence of obesity

The proportion of obesity (BMI >30) in the present study was 10.03%, that of overweight and obesity (BMI >25) was 42.01% (51.4% males, 31.2% females). The prevalence of NWO was 16.4% (males 11.1%, females 22.4%). NWL and underweight constitute 28.6% and 13.01%, respectively. Male participants had a higher prevalence of obesity (P = 0.001), whereas, for NWO, females had a higher prevalence. Age of the participant, religion, academic year of the study, socioeconomic status, and obesity in first-degree relative was not found to be having a statistically significant association with obesity. A mixed or vegetarian diet was also not found to be significantly associated with obesity. Table 1 shows the association of various factors related to diet and lifestyle with obesity. Binomial logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of various factors on the likelihood that participants have obesity. The logistic regression model was statistically significant, P < 0.0005. The model explained 63.0% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in obesity and correctly classified 82.9% of cases. From these predictor variables, five were statistically significant, as shown in Table 2.

T1-25
Table 1:
The association between obesity and diet, lifestyle-related factors
T2-25
Table 2:
Binary logistic regression analysis of risk factors for obesity

Table 3 illustrates the comparison of NWO among normal-weight individuals-based on sociodemographic, diet, and lifestyle-related factors. Sex, snacking pattern, skipping breakfast, fish consumption, intake of high protein and high fiber, restaurant visit, physical activity, and sleep habits were seen to be significantly associated with NWO.

T3-25
Table 3:
Comparison of normal-weight obesity among normal-weight individuals

DISCUSSION

Prevalence of obesity

The study has found the prevalence of obesity to be 10.03%, whereas the prevalence of overweight or obese (i.e. BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) is 42.01. As per Asian BMI classification, prevalence of obesity is 42.01%. This is in agreement with the presumed prevalence of the study. The findings of the study are comparable to the systematic review conducted by Poobalan et al.[10] The prevalence of obesity among males was almost double that of females, which adds to the existing literature.[11]

The overall prevalence of NWO was 16.4%; prevalence among females was double that of males. This is almost similar to the findings of the study conducted by Marques-Vidal et al.[12] among young adults. We did not find published Indian data for comparison of the prevalence of NWO.

Obesity was more prevalent among males, whereas NWO among females, despite having higher cutoff for BF. This is contrary to the popular belief that females are heavier. This emphasizes the importance of BF assessment for early intervention, as BMI can be misleading for females.

Determinants of obesity

Taking a mixed diet was not a determinant of either obesity or NWO, which is supported by the literature.[11] Decreased prevalence of obesity among those taking homemade tiffin might be attributed to the quantity of oil and the other ingredients used in tiffin services. Contrary to the finding by Bo et al.[13] among Italian adolescents, mid-meal snacking was not found to be associated with obesity but seen to be significant for increased adiposity.

Even though no association was seen between fish consumption and BMI, adiposity was seen well associated with it, as two-third fish consumers were NWL. Fish diet has increased omega-3 fatty acids, and currently, there are very few evidence to prove its anti-obesity effect.[14] Simultaneously, the less omega-3 fatty acid in the diet has seen to be having increased adiposity.[15] Regular breakfast consumers were found to be on the normal spectrum of BMI, supported by the WHO technical report on obesity.[16] One-third NWO used to skip breakfast regularly. This may slow down metabolism and also lead to overconsumption of food later, leading to overweight.[17]

Frequent restaurant visitors were found to be on the heavier side, which supports the findings of Binkley et al.[18] This emphasizes the need for healthy food options for students and the working population. Consistent with literature[1819] it has been found that consuming junk food for more than twice a week may contribute to obesity. Increased frequency of restaurant visits and junk food intake found to be one of the determinants of NWO.

One of the most significant findings to emerge from the study is that two-third of the participants who consumed green leafy vegetables regularly were nonobese. However, leafy veggie consumption was not significant for determining NWO.

Majority of those who consume high fiber cereal in the diet were nonobese. Diet rich in high fiber cereals was found to have an effect on BMI, supported by the literature[2021] The association between dietary protein intake and BMI was shown to be inverse in a larger multicenter trial.[19] Diet with low protein and less high fiber cereal were found to be more common among participants with NWO.

In accordance with the findings of ICMR study,[22] majority of the participants who did the moderate and heavy physical activity for >4 days a week were nonobese. Most of the normal-weight participants who did the heavy physical activity for more than 3 days a week were NWL and was found to be a protective factor against adiposity. This ascertains the importance of providing recreational space and gymnasiums for young adults in their work or study area.

Alcohol intake has found to be associated with obesity but not with NWO. Supporting the literature, a minimum 6 h of sleep regularly has an impact on BMl.[23] Irregular sleep pattern or inadequate sleep increases the risk of overweight and obesity, as poor sleep cause altered metabolic responses in the body and may contribute to the deposition of increased fat. Day-time sleep has no effect on obesity in this study. Majority of the normal-weight participants who were not getting adequate sleep and more than half of the normal-weight participants who used to sleep during day time were NWO. This will help us understand the importance of quality and pattern of sleep in adiposity.

The scope of this study was limited in terms of sample size and localized to a particular institute. Notwithstanding the relatively limited sample, this study offers valuable insights into the determinants of obesity as well as NWO among young adults, which is not that extensively studied in this part of the world. This involves domains of physical activity, dietary habits, dietary, and other lifestyle-related factors. The method of BF assessment using body calipers is a simple and cost-effective tool and can be repeated in the same individual for better results over time, unlike other imaging techniques.

CONCLUSION

The study has identified that males had more obesity, whereas NWO was more among females. Diet-related factors like eating more protein diet, high fiber, fish diet, green leafy vegetables, having regular breakfast have shown to protect against obesity. Less physical activity, inadequate sleep, and alcohol addiction also may contribute to obesity as well as NWO. Similar studies with larger sample sizes across the country can estimate the real burden of NWO in the country.

Financial support and sponsorship

Research Grant provided by Diamond Jubilee Society Trust, KEM Hospital Mumbai.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Research grant availed as financial assistance from Diamond Jubilee Society Trust (DJST), SETH GSMC, and KEM Hospital Mumbai.

REFERENCES

1. Ahirwar R, Mondal PR. Prevalence of obesity in India: A systematic review Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13:318–21
2. Kalra S, Unnikrishnan AG. Obesity in India: The weight of the nation J Med Nutr Nutraceuticals. 2012;1:37–41 doi:10.4103/2278-019X.94634
3. Purnell JQFeingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman K, et al Definitions, Classification, and Epidemiology of Obesity Endotext [Internet]. 2000 South Dartmouth (MA) MDText.com, Inc. Endotext 2018
4. Harpenden skinfold caliper 0120. 2011:1–17 doi:HSK-BI-2.DOC ISSUE 17/09/98 1
5. Oliveros E, Somers VK, Sochor O, Goel K, Lopez-Jimenez F. The concept of normal weight obesity Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56:426–33
6. Ruderman N, Chisholm D, Pi-sunyer X, Schneider S. Perspectives in Diabetes The Metabolically Obese, Normal-Weight Individual Revisited Diabetes. 1998;47:699–713 doi:10.2337/diabetes.47.5.699.
7. Madeira FB, Published S, Veloso HF, Goldani MZ, Kac G, Cardoso VC, et al 3/7/2017 Normal Weight Obesity Is Associated with Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance in Young Adults from a Middle­Income Country Normal Weight Obesity Is Associated with Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance in Young Adults from a Middle-Incom PLoS One. 2013;8:1–10 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060673.
8. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35:121–6
9. Nevill AM, Metsios GS, Jackson AS, Wang J, Thornton J, Gallagher D. Can we use the Jackson and Pollock equations to predict body density/fat of obese individuals in the 21st century? Int J Body Compos Res. 2008;6:114–21
10. Poobalan A, Aucott L. Obesity among young adults in developing countries: A systematic overview Curr Obes Rep. 2016;5:2–13
11. Berg C, Strandhagen E, Mehlig K, Subramoney S, Lissner L, Björck L. Normal weight adiposity in a Swedish population: How well is cardiovascular risk associated with excess body fat captured by BMI? Obes Sci Pract. 2015;1:50–8
12. Marques-Vidal P, Chiolero A, Paccaud F. Large differences in the prevalence of normal weight obesity using various cut-offs for excess body fat E SPEN. 2008;3:e159–62
13. Bo S, De Carli L, Venco E, Fanzola I, Maiandi M, De Michieli F, et al Impact of snacking pattern on overweight and obesity risk in a cohort of 11- to 13-year-old adolescents J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59:465–71
14. Du S, Jin J, Fang W, Su Q. Does fish oil have an anti-obesity effect in overweight/obese adults? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142652
15. Olafsdottir AS, Torfadottir JE, Arngrimsson SA. Health behavior and metabolic risk factors associated with normal weight obesity in adolescents PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161451
16. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i
17. Farshchi HR, Taylor MA, Macdonald IA. Deleterious effects of omitting breakfast on insulin sensitivity and fasting lipid profiles in healthy lean women Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:388–96
18. Binkley JK, Eales J, Jekanowski M. The relation between dietary change and rising US obesity Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:1032–9
19. Goyal RK, Shah VN, Saboo BD, Phatak SR, Shah NN, Gohel MC, et al Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Indian adolescent school going children: Its relationship with socioeconomic status and associated lifestyle factors J Assoc Physicians India. 2010;58:151–8
20. Krusińska B, Wuenstel JW, Kowalkowska J, Wądołowska L, Słowińska MA. Dietary fiber sources consumption and overweight among Polish male students A cross-sectional study Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2017;68:131–41
21. Mu M, Xu L, Hu D, Wu J, Bai M. Dietary Patterns and Overweight / Obesity: A Review Article Iran J Public Health. 2017;46:869–76
22. Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Das AK, Deepa M, Bhansali A, Joshi SR, et al Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – Results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:26
23. Cha E, Talman MS, Massey AH, Yan F, Rogers AE. Sleep, lifestyle behaviors, and cardiometabolic health markers in overweight/obese young adults: A pilot study using the SenseWear® Armband Biol Res Nurs. 2018;20:541–8
Keywords:

Body calipers; central adiposity; dietary intake; lifestyle diseases; normal-weight lean

© 2020 Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow