Journal Logo

Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation in High-Risk Hematological Patients

A Phase II Study Focusing on the Mechanism of Graft Predominance

Kalin, Burak1; ter Borg, Mariëtte1; Wijers, Rebecca2; Somers, Judith A.E.1,3; van der Holt, Bronno4; van Bergen, Cornelis A.M.5; Petersen, Eefke J.6; Kuball, Jurgen6; Meijer, Ellen7; Schaap, Nicolaas P.M.8; Zeerleder, Sacha S.9; Broers, Annoek E.1; Braakman, Eric1; Falkenburg, J.H. Frederik5; Lamers, Cor H.J.2; Cornelissen, Jan J.1

doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000285
Letter
Open
SDC

1Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

2Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

3Sanquin Blood Supply, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Rotterdam, Netherlands

4Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, HOVON Data Center, Department of Hematology, Rotterdam, Netherlands

5Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Leiden, Netherlands

6University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Hematology, Utrecht, Netherlands

7Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

8Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Nijmegen

9Amsterdam Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Correspondence: Jan J. Cornelissen (. e-mail: j.cornelissen@erasmusmc.nl).

Citation: Kalin B, ter Borg M, Wijers R, et al. Double umbilical cord blood transplantation in high-risk hematological patients: a phase II study focusing on the mechanism of graft predominance. HemaSphere, 2019;00:00. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000285.

Received 5 August, 2019

Accepted 7 September, 2019

Mariëtte ter Borg and Rebecca Wijers contributed equally to this work.

Clinical Trial Number: EudraCT 2012-001188-55.

We thank the Dutch Cancer Society (Grant HOV 2013–6099) for financial support of data and trial management and monitoring.

Author contributions: B.K., J.A.E.S., C.H.J.L. and J.J.C. contributed to the study design; all authors provided study materials or patients; all authors were involved in collection and assembly of clinical data; B.K., B.H., B.v.d.H., C.H.J.L. and J.J.C. were involved in analyzing and interpreting the data and writing this report; and all authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (www.hemaspherejournal.com).

Online date: August 9, 2019

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is an important alternative treatment modality for patients in need of an allogeneic stem cell transplantation but lacking a matched-sibling or unrelated stem cell donor.1 However, the availability of a sufficiently sized cord blood unit may pose a problem for adult patients.2 Double-UCBT (dUCBT) was developed in order to increase cell dose and allow adult patients lacking a sufficiently sized single cord blood unit (CBU) to proceed for transplantation.3 Strikingly, it appeared that hematopoietic recovery originated only from a single CBU in the majority of the cases.3 Gutman et al showed that alloreactive interferon-γ secreting CD8+ T-cells were present early after dUCBT.4 Subsequently, we showed that CD4+ T-cells expand early after transplantation and CD4+ T-cell chimerism predicts for graft predominance.5,6 Given these observations we hypothesized that HLA-class II specific CD4+ T-cells from the ‘winner’ cord may be responsible for rejection of the ‘loser’ cord. That hypothesis was retrospectively supported by demonstrating the presence of alloreactive, HLA-class II specific effector CD4+ T-cells in a limited number of patients.7 In addition, alloreactivity was also detected towards primary leukemic cells when the HLA-class II allele mismatches were shared with de NE-CBU. In the present study, we set out to prospectively test this hypothesis in a phase II study.7

A total of 70 patients aged 18 to 70 years, with high-risk hematological disease, eligible for a UCBT were included in the HOVON 115 study, a prospective, multicenter phase II trial (EudraCT 2012-001188-55). The primary endpoint was the proportion of evaluable patients with activated class-II specific T-cells. Patients received reduced intensity conditioning consisting of cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg; fludarabine 4 × 40 mg/m2; TBI 2 × 2 Gy. Peripheral blood (PB) from patients were collected at 1 to 3 months after dUCBT for chimerism analysis and isolating PB-mononuclear cells (PBMCs). HLA-class II negative HeLa cells were retrovirally transduced with single HLA-DRA1/B1, HLA-DQA1/B1 or HLA-DPA1/B1 molecules, based on the mismatched allele from the NE-CBU. Post-dUCBT PBMCs were cocultured with irradiated single HLA-class II molecule transduced HeLa cells and with addition of a cytokine mixture to propagate T-cells.7 Subsequently CD4+ T-cell activation was assessed by flow cytometry using antigens and effector markers, as described.7 Alloreactivity was measured as ‘fold increase (FI) [%CD137+/CD4+]’ of reactivity toward HeLa cells transduced with mismatched HLA-class II alleles relative to reactivity towards the not-transduced ‘empty’ HeLa cell.

Two patients were not transplanted because of withdrawal of consent and rapid progression of the underlying disease, and were therefore excluded from all analyses. Patients’ characteristics of the remaining 68 patients are described in Table 1. The majority of the patients were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome with a low WHO performance- and HCT-CI score. There were no significant differences in the number of infused nucleated-, viable CD34+ and CD3+ cells between winner- and loser-CBU (Table 2; P0.81, P0.19 and P0.27, respectively; Mann-Whitney test). One-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from 1st UCBT were 61% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49–72%) and 60% (95% CI 47–70%) respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HS/A42), with median follow-up of 48.2 months (range, 3.2–65.7 months) among the 36 patients still alive. Non-relapse mortality at 12 months was 28% (standard error (SE), 5%) and the cumulative incidence of relapse (or progression) at 12 months was 12% (SE, 4%). Engraftment was observed in 62 out of 68 (91%) patients with a median time to neutrophil recovery >0.5 × 109/L of 31 days. Primary graft failure occurred in 3 patients. Complete single donor chimerism was established in 62 out of 68 (91%) patients. HLA-class II mismatches between the 2 transplanted cords were present in 42 out of these patients. In vitro tests could be performed for 20 of the 42 patients for which an HLA-class II–transduced HeLa cell was available. T-cell numbers increased 6.7-fold (median; range, 0.2–192.4) after the HLA-class II allele-specific propagation of the post-dUCBT PBMC samples. In 18 out of the 20 (90%) patients tested, alloreactive CD4+ T-cells toward 1 or more HLA-class II mismatched alleles of the NE-CBU were detected, which is much higher than the 50% which we used for the sample size calculation. Of note, our in-vitro expansion protocols may have favored CD4+ T-cells over CD8+ T-cells as a result of the use of HLA-class II antigens for expansion. In total, CD4+ T-cell alloreactivity toward 24 of 26 (92%) mismatched alleles was detected, including 9 out of 9 (100%) for DR, 10 out of 12 (83%) for DQ and 5 out of 5 (100%) for DP alleles early (median: 1 month; range: 1–3 months) after double cord blood transplantation (Fig. 1). CD4+ T-cell alloreactivity towards DR, DQ and DP alleles were 9.3-fold (range, 3.4–44.0), 8.9-fold (range, 1.7–37.8) and 7.3-fold (5.7–31.4) increased as compared to reactivity towards the not transduced ‘empty’ HeLa cell, respectively. A positive CD4+ T-cell response towards ‘control’ matched alleles of the PD-CBU were observed in 7 out of 26 (27%) tested alleles. The magnitude of the CD4+ T-cell response was significantly higher towards mismatched alleles as compared to matched alleles, median FI 8.9 (range, 1.7–44) vs median FI 1.7 (range, 0.2–10.1; P < .01; Mann–Whitney test), respectively.

Table 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 2

Figure 1

Figure 1

Double UCBT was initially developed to allow transplantation for adult patients lacking a sufficiently sized single CBU. It resulted in less graft failure in comparison to single UCBT, but with only 1 cord surviving in most cases. We recently reported the presence of alloreactive HLA-class II specific CD4+ T-cells early after transplantation.7 In the current study, we set out to prospectively test the hypothesis whether alloreactive HLA-class II specific CD4+ T-cells from the dominant UCB unit expand early after and transplantation and might be responsible for rapid rejection of the "loser” unit. Here we show the presence of such T-cells in 18 out of 20 patients and alloreactivity towards 24 of 26 tested alleles, further suggesting an important role for alloreactive CD4+ T-cells from the ‘winner’ cord in rapid rejection of the ‘loser’ cord. Rapid immunization of alloreactive CD4+ T-cells by mismatched HLA-class II antigens might occur by circulating class II expressing cells after infusion of both UCB's. Strong expression and/or a high number of class II + cells might then evoke a rapid CD4+ T-cell response. This hypothesis may, in part, be supported by findings by Purtill et al,8 who showed that the NE-CBU total nucleated cell dose (as a surrogate of a high number of class II expressing cells) was significantly associated with neutrophil engraftment. Type and number of class II mismatches might also play a role. Avery et al9 showed that a better HLA match between both units is associated with a mixed unit chimerism, but it is unclear how class II mismatches behave in that respect as compared to class I mismatches. Given the relatively low number of patients in our previous7 and present study, we could not clarify the relative value of class I vs class II mismatched in this respect. However, given the matching criteria for UCB-search, class II mismatches are more abundant than class I mismatches.

The graft-vs-graft T-cell alloreactivity towards mismatched precursor cells may result in unit predominance but also into enhanced graft vs leukemia (GvL),10 especially if the alloreactive CD4+ T-cell response is also directed towards a mismatched allele present on recipient tissue and recipient leukemia cells.7 The relevance of HLA-class II was indirectly supported recently by Christopher et al,11 who showed that loss of HLA-class II expression is a mechanism by which relapsing tumors may escape immune surveillance. Immunization of CD4+ T-cells might occur by mismatched class II presenting leukemic cells and antigen presenting cells (APCs) in tissues, in which these cells are abundantly present accompanied by contributing inflammatory signals. Such tissues may include the spleen, lung, and intestine, in which large numbers of antigen presenting cells are present. Thus, a CD4+ T-cell mediated graft-vs-graft alloreactivity may involve and enhance GvL in the dUCBT setting and thereby provide a possible explanation for the relatively low relapse rate associated with dUCBT.10 Encouragingly, the cumulative incidence of relapse in was only 12% (SE, 4%) in our cohort of high risk patients. Of note, although dUCBT may be associated with a stronger GvL in comparison to a single UCBT, dUCBT is often accompanied by a higher incidence of acute and chronic GvHD with similar survival outcome.12,13 However, patients with a high risk of relapse, such as those with detectable minimal residual disease, might benefit from a dUCBT.14,15

In conclusion, this study prospectively showed a rapid and strong alloreactive CD4+ T-cell response towards the majority of class II mismatches present and available for analysis in 24 of 26 testes alleles. These observations might explain, at least in part, the mechanism behind single unit dominance and the lower incidence of relapse after dUCBT in comparison to single UCBT. However, predicting graft predominance remains a challenge and further research into that direction is needed. In addition, the question to what extent such alloreactive T-cells are present after haplo-identical alloHSCT is of importance. While class II mismatches are abundantly present in haplo-identical alloHSCT, the stronger immunosuppression, especially anti-thymocyte globulin and/or cyclophosphamide, needed to prevent GvHD might blunt the CD4+ T-cell response with possible loss of GvL activity. Currently we are conducting a study evaluating the presence of these classes II specific T-cells after haplo-id alloHSCT.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgments

We thank the HOVON Data Center for overall trial management and central data management.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Copelan EA. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:1813–1826.
2. Gragert L, Eapen M, Williams E, et al. HLA match likelihoods for hematopoietic stem-cell grafts in the U.S. registry. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:339–348.
3. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, et al. Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy. Blood 2005; 105:1343–1347.
4. Gutman JA, Turtle CJ, Manley TJ, et al. Single-unit dominance after double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation coincides with a specific CD8+ T-cell response against the nonengrafted unit. Blood 2010; 115:757–765.
5. Somers JA, Braakman E, van der Holt B, et al. Rapid induction of single donor chimerism after double umbilical cord blood transplantation preceded by reduced intensity conditioning: results of the HOVON 106 phase II study. Haematologica 2014; 99:1753–1761.
6. Somers JA, Brand A, van Hensbergen Y, et al. Double umbilical cord blood transplantation: a study of early engraftment kinetics in leukocyte subsets using HLA-specific monoclonal antibodies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19:266–273.
7. Lamers CH, Wijers R, van Bergen CA, et al. CD4+ T-cell alloreactivity toward mismatched HLA class II alleles early after double umbilical cord blood transplantation. Blood 2016; 128:2165–2174.
8. Purtill D, Stevens CE, Lubin M, et al. Association between nondominant unit total nucleated cell dose and engraftment in myeloablative double-unit cord blood transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015; 21:1981–1984.
9. Avery S, Shi W, Lubin M, et al. Influence of infused cell dose and HLA match on engraftment after double-unit cord blood allografts. Blood 2011; 117:3277–3285. quiz 3478.
10. Verneris MR, Brunstein CG, Barker J, et al. Relapse risk after umbilical cord blood transplantation: enhanced graft-versus-leukemia effect in recipients of 2 units. Blood 2009; 114:4293–4299.
11. Christopher MJ, Petti AA, Rettig MP, et al. Immune escape of relapsed AML cells after allogeneic transplantation. N Engl J Med 2018; 379:2330–2341.
12. Wang L, Gu ZY, Liu SF, et al. Single- versus double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation for hematologic diseases: a systematic review. Transfus Med Rev 2019; 33:51–60.
13. Michel G, Galambrun C, Sirvent A, et al. Single- vs double-unit cord blood transplantation for children and young adults with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 2016; 127:3450–3457.
14. Milano F, Gooley T, Wood B, et al. Cord-blood transplantation in patients with minimal residual disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:944–953.
15. Balligand L, Galambrun C, Sirvent A, et al. Single-unit versus double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation in children and young adults with residual leukemic disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:734–742.

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health Inc., on behalf of the European Hematology Association.