Journal Logo

The Impact of PI3-kinase/RAS Pathway Cooperating Mutations in the Evolution of KMT2A-rearranged Leukemia

Esposito, Maria Teresa

doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000195
Review Article
Open
SDC

Leukemia is an evolutionary disease and evolves by the accrual of mutations within a clone. Those mutations that are systematically found in all the patients affected by a certain leukemia are called “drivers” as they are necessary to drive the development of leukemia. Those ones that accumulate over time but are different from patient to patient and, therefore, are not essential for leukemia development are called “passengers.” The first studies highlighting a potential cooperating role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/RAS pathway mutations in the phenotype of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia was published 20 years ago. The recent development in more sensitive sequencing technologies has contributed to clarify the contribution of these mutations to the evolution of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia and suggested that these mutations might confer clonal fitness and enhance the evolvability of KMT2A-leukemic cells. This is of particular interest since this pathway can be targeted offering potential novel therapeutic strategies to KMT2A-leukemic patients. This review summarizes the recent progress on our understanding of the role of PI3K/RAS pathway mutations in initiation, maintenance, and relapse of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia.

Department of Life Sciences, Health Science Research Center, University of Roehampton, Whiteland College, London.

Correspondence: Maria Teresa Esposito (. e-mail: maria.esposito@roehampton.ac.uk).

Citation: Esposito MT. The Impact of PI3-kinase/RAS Pathway Cooperating Mutations in the Evolution of KMT2A-rearranged Leukemia. HemaSphere, 2019;00:00. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000195.

Funding: This work has been supported by the University of Roehampton and Leuka.

Disclosure: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Authors’ contributions: MTE planned the review, wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (www.hemaspherejournal.com).

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Received November 1, 2018

Received in revised form February 21, 2019

Accepted February 22, 2019

Online date: April 17, 2019

Back to Top | Article Outline

Background

Many cancers are the result of 2 or multiple sequential hits that damage the DNA.1 In the 2-hit model of leukemia, the initial genetic hit often leads to abnormal cell differentiation (Type II mutation) (such as PML-RARα, AML1-ETO, KMT2A rearrangements) while subsequent mutations may activate specific signaling pathways that are involved in cell proliferation, such as FLT3, c-Kit and the RAS/MAP kinase pathway (Type I mutation).2 Chromosomal translocations affecting the Histone-Lysine-N-methyl-transferase 2A gene (KMT2A, previously known as Mixed Lineage Leukemia, MLL) at 11q23 are a genetic hallmark of acute myeloid (AML) and lymphoblastic (ALL) leukemia. This subgroup of leukemia exhibits a particular poor outcome, especially in infant.3,4 To date, 135 KMT2A rearrangements have been described; these chromosomal rearrangements give rise to oncofusion proteins that impair the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) by epigenetic reprogramming.5–9

HOX genes are the prime targets of KMT2A-fusion products and regulate cellular differentiation in normal hematopoietic development.5 Despite the wide range of potential fusion partners, only 9 account for over 90% of the KMT2A rearrangements and the most frequently diagnosed are KMT2A-AFF1 (MLL-AF4), KMT2A-MLLT3 (MLL-AF9), KMT2A-MLLT10 (MLL-AF10), and KMT2A-MLLT1 (MLL-ENL).8

Analyses of neonatal blood spots, the blood collected by heel prick test, have suggested that KMT2A-AFF1 translocations arise in utero and rapidly lead to the development of overt ALL, often at or shortly after birth.10–12 This argues in favor of the existence of preleukemic clones that do not need cooperating mutations to develop a malignant disease.10,13 In the last 20 years, several groups have investigated the role of cooperating mutations in the development, maintenance, and relapse of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia. The availability of the correct mouse models and the power of sequencing technologies have represented major challenges toward a unified working model.

Several murine mouse models have been developed to study KMT2A-rearranged leukemia in vivo. While the expression of some KMT2A fusion proteins is sufficient for the development of full blown AML in mice,14–21 the development of mouse models of ALL has proved more challenging. For example, KMT2A-MLLT1 is frequently associated with B cell ALL in humans, but it generates AML in mice.22 In 2 studies, KMT2A-AFF1 has shown to induce lymphoma in mice with a latency time of 12 to 14 months for the disease phenotype to become overt.23,24 Whereas the enforced expression of KMT2A-AFF1 in human HSC does not induce leukemia, transduction of human HSCs with a KMT2A-Aff1 construct carrying the human KMT2A fused to the murine Aff1 does induce pro-B ALL within 22 weeks.25 Notably, in humans KMT2A-AFF1 translocations give rise to ALL and are mostly found in infants younger than 1 year old.8,9,12

In addition to the availability of the correct mouse models, another technical challenge is the limitation of sequencing technologies. Both solid and hematological malignancies are made of several subclones, this means that within a cancer there is a bulk of cancer cells sharing a subset of mutations, which are defined as clonal. From each of these clones, at every cell division, new subclones might emerge and they can carry new, additional mutations.26 Thus, although leukemia has a clonal origin, a leukemia is typically a collection of related but genetically distinct populations best considered to be subclones. This has important implications for treatment and clonal evolution of the disease. Recent studies have shown that somatic mutations affecting the kinase/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/RAS signaling pathway genes, including the PI3K catalytic α polypeptide, (PI3KCA), PI3K regulatory subunit α (PI3KR1), the GTPase activating protein (GAP) NF1 (NF1), the guanosine diphosphate (GDP)/guanosine triphospate (GTP) molecules NRAS and KRAS, the phosphatase SHP2 (PTPN11) and the ubiquitin ligase c-CBL are found in KMT2A-rearranged patients (Fig. 1).27–43 The PI3K/RAS pathway is activated in response to a variety of extracellular stimuli and transduce signals from the cell surface to the nuclear targets that play a key role in proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation44,45 (Fig. 1). Although the scientific community has accumulated convincing evidences on the role of activated FLT3, which also signals through the Ras pathway, in the development of adult KMT2A-AML2,40,46 and FLT3 has been proven a therapeutic target in both AML and ALL,47,48 the role of PI3K-RAS pathway mutations on KMT2A-driven AML and ALL is controversial. This review summarizes the recent progress on our understanding of the role of mutations in PI3K/RAS pathway in initiation, maintenance, and relapse of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

The detection of cooperating mutations; from the Sanger to Next-Generation Sequencing era

RAS mutations

RAS proteins act as molecular switches by cycling between an active GTP-bound (RAS-GTP) and an inactive GDP-bound (RAS-GDP) conformation that regulate cell fates by coupling receptor activation to downstream effector pathways (Fig. 1). RAS proteins are encoded by 3 genes, KRAS (v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog), NRAS (neuroblastoma RAS viral [v-ras] oncogene homolog), and HRAS. The N-terminal portion of HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS comprises a highly conserved G domain that has a common structure.45 RAS proteins diverge substantially at the C-terminal end that specifies post-translational protein modifications. In most cases, the somatic missense RAS mutations found in cancer cells affect the aminoacid positions 12, 13, and 61. These changes impair the intrinsic GTPase activity of RAS and confer resistance to GAPs. Thereby mutant RAS proteins accumulate in the active, GTP-bound conformation. Constitutively active mutants of RAS induce oncogenic transformation through activation of the MAPK cascade45 (Fig. 1).

The first study investigating the presence of RAS mutations by Sanger Sequencing in KMT2A-rearranged ALL was published 20 years ago and found no RAS mutations in these patients.27 Subsequently independent groups have reported RAS mutations in up to 80% of KMT2A-rearranged ALL and 50% KMT2A-rearranged AML (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HS/A31).27RAS mutations were most common in infant with KMT2A-AFF1-rearranged ALL28–30 (Fig. 2). Whereas in adult KMT2A-rearranged AML, a statistical significant correlation between mutations and overall survival was not found,34RAS mutations, independently, contribute to a poor outcome in KMT2A-rearranged infant ALL patients.29 In the study by Driessen et al, RAS mutations were not present in the main leukemic clone but in subclones.29 This highlights that the frequency of these mutations might have been underestimated in the previous studies due to the fact that the Sanger Sequencing could not detect mutations with a very low mutant allele frequency. The advent of the Next-Generation Sequencing technologies has enabled the detection of rare subclonal mutations.49,50 Taking advantage of this technology Andersson et al performed a detailed genome and transcriptome wide analysis on diagnostic and matched relapse samples of infant KMT2A-rearranged ALL and found that although the genome of these leukemias are “silent,” with only 1.3 somatic mutations per clone, the most mutated pathway was the RAS/PI3K pathway.31 This has been confirmed by other studies32,33,35,43 (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HS/A31). Interestingly, in the majority of the cases, the mutations were subclonal.31–33,35,43 Clonal but not subclonal mutations showed a correlation with a worse outcome.33 In agreement with previous data,29 a higher frequency of RAS mutations was detected in infants rather than in older patients, corroborating the concept that aberrant RAS expression might shorten leukemia latency.

Figure 2

Figure 2

A further confirmation of the subclonality of these mutations came from the studies of matched diagnostic and relapsed samples. These analyses showed that these mutations might be lost,30,31,33–35,43 maintained/expanded,30–34,36 or gained at relapse.33,42

These studies highlight that RAS mutations are frequent at diagnosis (25–73% frequency) in patients carrying KMT2A rearrangements, in particular in pediatric KMT2A-AFF1 cases, and that these mutations can be either clonal or subclonal secondary genetic events that might take part of a delicate selection process underlying clonal evolution of leukemia. Clonal but not subclonal mutations correlate with a worse outcome in KMT2A-AFF1 ALL.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PTPN11 mutations

PTPN11 encodes for the phosphatase SHP2, a ubiquitously expressed SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP), required for the full activation of the RAS–RAF–mitogen-activated and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK)–extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway (Fig. 1). Constitutively active mutants of SHP2 induce oncogenic transformation through activation of the MAPK and PI3K/AKT cascade.51–54PTPN11 mutations have been initially associated with the development of myeloproliferative disorders (MPD), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), and AML.45,51,55–57 More recently, a few studies have shown that single Ptpn11 gain-of-function mutations predispose mice to acute leukemias58,59 suggesting that PTPN11 mutations play a causal role in the development of this disease. More importantly, activating PTPN11 mutations have been described in KMT2A-rearranged ALL31,33 and AML34,36,40 with a frequency of ca.3% for AML and 4% to 13% in ALL (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HS/A31). These are particularly high considering that PTPN11 mutations have been found in 4% to 5% of overall AML patients and 6% of ALL patients.60

The most common mutations are located in the N-SH2 domain and include PTPN11D61Y, PTPN11A72V and PTPN11E76K. These mutants exhibit higher tyrosine phosphatase activity. Mutations in the PTB domain including PTPN11S502T and PTPN11G503A/R/L/E have been reported in a case study and exhibit higher phosphatase activity as well.18 These mutants dephosphorylates yet unknown substrates that negatively affect RAS signaling. Analysis of matched diagnostic and relapsed samples showed that PTPN11G60V were retained in pediatric ALL patient while PTPN11E76Q were gained at relapse.33

Back to Top | Article Outline

Mutations in other PI3K/RAS pathway genes

Few studies have reported mutations in other genes belonging to the PI3K/RAS pathway. BRAF is a member of the RAF kinase family45,61 (Fig. 1). Active RAS culminates in the activation of MAPK pathway via Ser/Thr kinase BRAF. BRAF phosphorylates MEK1 and/or MEK2, which in turn activates ERK1 and/or ERK2. BRAF mutations have been found in KMT2A-rearranged AML and ALL (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HS/A31).29,34,36 Most cancer-associated BRAF mutations encode gain-of-function mutants that constitutively activate the kinase and the MEK–ERK pathway. The mutations seem to disrupt the interaction of the glycine loop and activation segment, which destabilizes the inactive conformation of the protein.

NF1 encodes neurofibromin, which is a GAP that inhibits RAS signaling by hydrolysis of active RAS-GTP into inactive RAS-GDP (Fig. 1). Therefore, NF1 deficiencies act as functional equivalents of activating mutations in RAS.62 Inactivating NF1 mutations lead to the development of a human developmental disorder, the Neurofibromatosis 1, characterized by mental retardation, facial dysmorphism, and increased risk for developing malignant tumors, including JMML and AML.63,64 Few studies have also reported NF1 deletions in KMT2A-rearranged leukemias (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HS/A31).31,37

CBL encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase that negatively regulates receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and proteins regulating RAS activity, such as GRB2 and SOS (Fig. 1). Mutations in the linker region and RING finger domain of CBL impair the ability of Grb2 and SOS to suppress RAS signaling, and thereby over-activate RAS.65 CBL mutations have been found at high frequency (15%) in JMML and in 1% to 2% of adult AML.66,67 Recent studies also reported CBL mutations in KMT2A-rearranged patients (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/HS/A31).36,39,41

Activating mutations in PIK3CA and PIK3R1 have been reported in KMT2A-rearranged ALL by Andersson et al (Table 1).31

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Contribution of clonal cooperating mutations to KMT2A-driven leukemogenesis

Experimental mouse models have enabled to understand the role of cooperating mutations in initiation, maintenance, and relapse of leukemia. When modeled using murine systems, gain-of-function mutations in Ptpn11, K-Ras, and N-Ras, or loss-of-function in Nf1 and Cbl are not sufficient to induce leukemogenesis but they induce cytokine hypersensitivity in myeloid progenitors and MPD in mice.51,55,58,59,68–71 Coexpression of these mutations with KMT2A-rearrangement has provided substantial evidence to the hypothesis that some cooperating mutations may synergistically cooperate with KMT2A rearrangements in leukemogenesis.14,72–74

Back to Top | Article Outline

Syngenic mouse models of KMT2A-leukemia

The in vivo leukemogenesis assay is based on injection of mouse HSC that have been retrovirally transduced with a KMT2A-fusion gene, in syngenic mice lethally or sublethally irradiated. Serial transplantation of primary leukemia in secondary recipients allows to evaluate the impact of additional genetic and epigenetic events in the disease onset.75 However, these models are far from being perfect. The phenotype and pathogenesis of the leukemia developed in these murine models sometimes do not match those observed in human leukemia associated with the same genetic lesion, in part because of the biological differences between human and mouse HSCs.76

A controversial study by Ono et al concluded that NRASG12V cooperated with KMT2A-SEPT6. The mice receiving the HSC expressing KMT2A-SEPT6 and NRASG12V died of AML with a significantly shorter latency of those receiving KMT2A-SEPT6, which instead died of MPD (26 ± 2.4 days vs 137 ± 9.0 days). However, in this setting, mice receiving NRASG12V alone died with a similar latency than those receiving KMT2A-SEPT6 and NRASG12V (31 ± 1.4 days vs 26 ± 2.4 days), although they developed MPD rather than AML (Table 1).77

Zuber et al investigated the cooperation between KMT2A-rearrangement (KMT2A-MLLT1) and RAS mutation (NRASG12V). They found that NRASG12V accelerated the disease onset in mice injected with HSC transduced with KMT2A-MLLT1 (24 days vs 48 days) (Table 1).14 Hyrenius-Wittsten et al studied the effect of NRASG12D, FLT3ITD, and FLT3N676K on KMT2A-MLLT3 leukemia development.74FLT3 is a tyrosine kinase receptor overexpressed in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia and it is also commonly mutated in AML.2,5,40 Despite the fact that the percentage of cells coexpressing KMT2A-MLLT3 and one of the cooperating mutations was very low (1–3%), the mice receiving cotransduced cells succumbed of leukemia much earlier than those receiving cells only transduced with KMT2A-MLLT3 (median latency of 13, 23, 26 days, respectively, vs 50 days for KMT2A-MLLT3 alone) (Table 1). These data indicate that these mutations, when occurring in the founder clone, can accelerate the onset of AML driven by KMT2A-MLLT3.74 The authors then performed a serial transplantation, by transplanting primary murine KMT2A-rearranged AML in secondary recipients. Interestingly, the disease latency of the secondary KMT2A-MLLT3 mice was very similar to those of the secondary mice that coexpressed an activating mutation indicating that secondary KMT2A-MLLT3 mice had accumulated additional genetic and epigenetic events that accelerated the disease onset. Further analysis of the bone marrow of these mice indicated a consistent activation of Akt, p38, and ERK pathways. These data therefore indicate that after serial transplantation the leukemic cells expressing KMT2A-MLLT3 adapted in vivo to acquire a phenotype similar to those that coexpressed activating mutations. This suggest that these mutations might confer clonal fitness.74 Tamai et al developed a transgenic mouse carrying KMT2A-AFF1 and KRASG12V that developed B-cell lymphoma/ALL in 6 months.72 Previous mouse models failed to recapitulate the human leukemia induced by KMT2A-AFF1.20,23,24 In the study of Tamai et al, mice developed lymphoma/ALL significantly earlier than the transgenic mice carrying KMT2A-AFF1 alone (median survival 5.5 months vs 12 months), suggesting that KRAS mutations contributes to the early onset of ALL driven by KMT2A-AFF1 (Table 1).72

Limited studies have addressed the contribution of Ptpn11 to KMT2A-driven leukemia in vivo. As shown for RAS, coexpression of Ptpn11S506W and Ptpn11E67k accelerated KMT2A-MLLT3 leukemia development in syngenic mouse models.74,78 In vitro studies have demonstrated that SH2 and PTB domains PTPN11 mutants such as PTPN11E76K, PTPN11A72V, PTPN11D61Y, and PTPN11G503A lose the autoinhibitory feedback, increased phosphatase activity, and induced hypersensitivity to IL-3 and GM-CSF. This can provide a growth advantage to the leukemic clones.18,51,55,70,79,80

Overall, these studies suggest that distinct KMT2A rearrangements have different dependence on RAS signaling or that a certain threshold of RAS signaling may be necessary to establish a leukemic disease in the murine models.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Humanized mouse models of KMT2A-leukemia

Humanized mouse models have also attempted to clarify the role of cooperating mutations in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia. In these models, human cord blood-derived HSC are retro- or lentivirally transduced with a KMT2A-fusion gene and then transplanted into immunodeficient mice, such as NOD/SCID, that lack mature B and T cells, or NSG mice that lack mature NK, B, and T cells.81 Barabe et al showed that KMT2A-MLLT1 and KMT2A-MLLT3 induce AML in NOD/SCID mice in which the NK cells were depleted by an anti-NK cell antibody.21 Likewise Wei et al showed that KMT2A-MLLT3 induces AML in NOD/SCID mice that express transgenic human SCF, GM-CSF, and IL-3 genes suggesting that human cytokines may provide the KMT2A-MLLT3-transdused HSCs with additional signals for cell growth and survival, acting as oncogenic promoters.16 Interestingly, although KMT2A-MLLT10 does not induce leukemia on its own, mice transplanted with HSC expressing KMT2A-MLLT10 and KRASG12V developed AML and died within 10 weeks from transplantation (Table 1).73 In this contest, expression of KRASG12V can mimic the signaling stimulated by the cytokines reported in the study by Wei et al since stimulation with SCF and IL-3 directly activates the RAS signaling pathway in leukemogenesis.73 By contrast, the enforced expression of KMT2A-AFF1 in human HSCs does not induce leukemia,82 even in cooperation with KRASG12V83. This is in contrast with the results obtained in the syngenic model.72 Whereas the inability to generate a faithful model of KMT2A-AFF1 ALL supported the hypotheses that this oncogene could be unable to transform cells without cooperating oncogenes, the failure of models exploring the role of cooperating mutations83–85 have fuelled other hypotheses such as that KMT2A fusions might have a different dependence on RAS signaling,73 distinct KMT2A fusions might target different progenitor cells82,86,87 or strictly depend on the bone marrow microenvironment.25,76 These hypotheses are brilliantly reviewed by Sanjuan-Pla et al.13 Notably, the gene expression profile of KMT2A-AFF1-KRASG12V human HSC indicates an up-regulation of genes important in cell motility and cell migration and a down-regulation of genes important for cell adhesion, aggregation, and mesenchymal-epithelial transition.30,88 These data are in agreement with the Gene Ontology signature of KMT2A-AFF1 patients. This would also explain the clinical hallmarks of KMT2A-AFF1 patients who suffer from extramedullary hematopoiesis and central nervous system infiltration.

This suggests that clonal RAS mutations might be important in maintenance and chemotherapy resistance rather than initiation of KMT2A-AFF1-driven leukemia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

The impact of subclonal mutation on KMT2A-driven leukemogenesis

All the in vivo studies reviewed in the previous paragraphs were based on human or mouse HSC cotransduced with retro- or lentivirus vectors expressing the KMT2A-rearrangement and the cooperating mutation of interest. These models enabled the authors only to address the effect of clonal mutations in the development of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia. Very limited information is available on the impact of subclonal mutations on KMT2A-driven leukemogenesis. A recent study from Hyrenius-Wittsten et al elegantly addresses how subclonal mutations affecting FLT3N676K contribute to the development of KMT2A-MLLT3 leukemia. The authors injected cells expressing KMT2A-MLLT3 and the activating mutation FLT3N676K and cells expressing only KMT2A-MLLT3 at various ratios (from 1:28 to 1:156). Despite the low number of cells coexpressing KMT2A-MLLT3 and FLT3N676K, mice receiving cotransduced cells succumbed of leukemia much earlier than those receiving cells only transduced with KMT2A-MLLT3 (median latency 34 days vs 50 days for KMT2A-MLLT3 alone), confirming that subclonal activating mutations in FLT3 accelerate KMT2A-MLLT3 leukemogenesis Hyrenius-Wittsten.74 Disease latency in secondary recipients was just slightly different (median latency 16 days vs 21 days for KMT2A-MLLT3 alone). As the FLT3N676K construct was fused with GFP, the authors could analyze the clone size by fluorescence. The data indicate that in most of the mice the clone increased in size; however, there were also cases where the clone was maintained or lost. This, together with the shorter latency of mice receiving KMT2A-MLLT3 and FLT3N676K, suggests that the clone might have acquired de novo mutations to adapt in vivo. Sequencing revealed that the secondary recipients show de novo mutations in PI3K/RAS pathway genes such as Ptpn11, Cbl, Braf, and Kras. This suggests that the subclones KMT2A-MLLT3+FLT3N676K might influence the environment and increase the chances for other clones to acquire specific mutations. The authors investigated the expression of cytokines and growth factors and found that several genes were differentially regulated in the leukemic cells. One commonly upregulated in cells expressing KMT2A-MLLT3 and a cooperating mutation (either NRASG12D, FLT3ITD, or FLT3N676K) but not in cells expressing KMT2A-MLLT3 alone and normal healthy hematopoietic subpopulations, was the macrophage Migration Inhibitory factor (Mif).74 These data agree with previous data reporting a marked increase in inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, CCL12, CCL4, in the plasma of transgenic mice Ptpn11E76K/+Mx1-Cre+ mice, where the Ptpn11E76K mutation is expressed in HSC and bone marrow microenvironment.58 Thus, it appears that persistent high levels of proinflammatory cytokines hyperactivate the bone marrow microenvironment and displace HSC from their niches, contributing to the development of MPD that might lead to AML.58 The results of Hyrenius-Wittsten et al highlight the importance of FLT3N676K in the initiation and in the progression of KMT2A-MLLT3 leukemia and suggest that cooperating mutations might facilitate an inflammatory environment that could play an important role on the selection process underlying clonal evolution of leukemia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Are mutations in PI3K/RAS pathway second hits for early KMT2A-leukemia onset?

The studies reviewed so far highlight that mutations in the PI3K/RAS pathway are frequent at diagnosis in patients carrying KMT2A rearrangements.

It is difficult to establish the role of these mutations in pediatric versus adult KMT2A-driven ALL because only one of the studies reviewed here reports the mutation frequency in KMT2A-rearranged adult ALL. In this study, by Prelle et al, the frequency of RAS mutations is higher in pediatric than adult patients (26% vs 8%).30 Nevertheless, the authors neglect that these additional mutations might be the second hits for early onset of KMT2A-AFF1 ALL. The authors disagree with this speculation because the frequency of the mutations is not sufficient to fully sustain the 2-hit model. If we sum the frequency of all the mutations reported in the PI3K-RAS pathway in each study, we can clearly observe that in pediatric KMT2A-AFF1 cases the mutation frequency reaches 80% to 90%, at least in the most recent publications where more sensitive sequencing technologies have been applied.32,33 This can lead us to speculate that mutations in the RAS/PI3K pathway could be the second hits for early leukemia onset at least for some patients, as those carrying the translocations KMT2A-AFF1. However, the subclonality of these mutations, the fact that they are often lost at relapse and the lack of a robust in vivo model do not fully fit with this hypothesis.

Additional studies are required to determine whether in the cases with KMT2A-rearrangements without PI3K/RAS mutations or in the cases where the mutations are subclonal there are alternative modes of RAS pathway activation. For example, in chronic myeloid leukemia, where RAS mutations generally are absent, the RAS signaling pathway is deregulated by the BCR-ABL fusion protein.89 In view of this, it is interesting that both KMT2A-AFF1 and KMT2A-MLLT3 have been shown to directly activate RAS pathway through activation of ELK-1 protein, a downstream target of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway.90,91 In addition, KMT2A-AF6 has been shown to aberrantly activate RAS and its downstream signaling.92 Thus, these fusion proteins are per se able to activate the RAS/RAF signaling cascade by themselves and, therefore, RAS clonal mutations might actually not be necessary. Unfortunately appropriate in vitro and in vivo models are not yet available to fully elucidate the role of RAS activation in KMT2A-leukemogenesis. It is, however, notable that RAS mutations are a predictor of poor outcome in KMT2A-rearranged pediatric ALL and therefore this information can help to stratify patients.29

Mutations in NRAS and KRAS are more frequent at diagnosis in KMT2A-rearranged AML than KMT2A-rearranged ALL (Fig. 2). In the majority of the AML cases, the subclones with RAS pathway mutations detected at diagnosis are not detectable at relapse. An exception to this pattern is mutations in KRAS that were instead found expanded in relapse samples.34,36 However, in contrast to infant RAS-mutant KMT2A-rearranged ALL, the presence of these mutations does not impact the outcome of the patients. Again, in contrast to infant RAS-mutant KMT2A-rearranged ALL where the contribution of RAS activation is still under debate, several studies have proven that RAS activation and activation of RAS downstream targets, MAPK and PI3K signaling, confers a proliferative advantage to AML leukemic cells and is almost ubiquitous in AML.77,93 In addition to the known somatic activating mutations in RAS and RAS activating genes NF1 and PTPN11, that we have reviewed here, constitutive activation of several RTKs, such as colony stimulating factor 1 and FLT3, which also partially signals through the RAS pathway, contribute to the pathogenesis of AML.5,46 Together, these observations indicate that RAS mutations and/or activation provide a growth advantage to KMT2A-AML cells and have therefore fuelled intense interest in the development of RAS-targeted AML therapy as described below.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Targeting the RAS pathway in KMT2A-driven leukemia

The high incidence of RAS pathway mutations at diagnosis, their abundance in the major clone of relapsed leukemic cells and association with high-risk disease, provide a rationale to investigate potential novel therapies that exploit pathway activation, such as kinase inhibitors that act downstream of RAS targeting the RAF/MAPK or PI3K/AKT pathway or farnesyltransferase inhibitors preventing the post-translational modification of RAS, in KMT2A patients.94,95 MEK1/2 inhibitors are the most promising as ERK1/2 are the only downstream targets of MEK1/2, whereas ERK can phosphorylate over 150 targets.96 MEK1/2 inhibitors, such as Selumetinib, Pimasertib, and Trametinib, are in clinical trials and have moderate efficacy as single agents in AML and ALL, particularly in leukemias harboring RAS pathway mutations.42,97–101 A few studies have addressed their efficacy in KMT2A-rearranged AML and ALL.

Kerstjens et al investigated the effect of MEK inhibitors in infant KMT2A-ALL carrying RAS mutations and found that RAS mutant KMT2A-ALL cell lines and primary samples are sensitive to Trametinib, MEK162, and Selumetinib, whereas non-RAS mutant KMT2A-ALL cell lines and primary samples were insensitive to MEK1 inhibitors.102 Interestingly, MEK inhibitors increased apoptosis and enhanced the sensitivity of KMT2A-ALL cells to prednisolone, regardless of the RAS mutational status, in agreement with previously published data.100 However, when tested in vivo, MEK inhibitor Trametinib did not inhibit leukemia progression in a KMT2A-rearranged ALL in vivo model.103 Trentin et al tested PD0325901, a potent inhibitor of MEK1/2 currently in phase II clinical trials, on NRASQ61K mutated KMT2A-AFF1 B cell line MI04. The inhibitor reduced the proliferation of MI04 of 40% even at nanomolar concentrations, whereas the 2 RAS wild-type KMT2A-AFF1 cell lines showed only a modest proliferative reduction even increasing the drug concentration.32 Importantly, in 1 RAS wild-type non-KMT2A-rearranged ALL patient Trametinib had an antagonistic effect on prednisolone sensitivity.100 This is in contrast with the data published by Jones et al that reported an agonistic effect between Trametinib and prednisolone in 2 non-KMT2A rearranged ALL patients who did not carry RAS mutations.97 Notably the study by Jones et al reported the agonistic effect in 3 out of 5 patients, and only one of them carried RAS mutations. These findings warn against a broad use of MEK inhibitors and suggest that the implementation of these inhibitors needs to be guided by relevant biomarkers (eg, RAS mutation) and preclinical in vitro evidence.

Although in AML no major differences between the transcriptomes of KMT2A-rearranged RAS wild-type and KMT2A-rearranged RAS-mutant cells have been found, kinome, proteome profiling, and chemical analyses revealed that the responses of these cells to MEK inhibitors were distinct, suggesting that MEK inhibitors could be effective.36,104

MEK inhibitor U0126 effectively reduced the cell survival of primary KMT2A-rearranged AML samples in contrast to normal bone marrow cells.104 Among the samples tested by Kampen et al, the ones carrying RAS mutations showed greater sensitivity to MEK inhibitors. Kampen et al also tested a range of AML cell lines carrying NRAS mutations and/or KMT2A rearrangement. The authors found that THP1 (NRAS mutated—KMT2A rearranged) showed greater sensitivity to MEK inhibitors than HL60 and OCI-AML3 (NRAS mutated—non-KMT2A rearranged) and RAS wild-type non-KMT2A-rearranged AML cell lines. By contrast, neither knockdown nor knockout of MEK1 affected the proliferation of THP1.105 These results might suggest that simultaneous targeting of MEK1 and MEK2 might be fundamental to achieve a therapeutic effect.

Despite the encouraging preclinical data obtained with MEK inhibitors on KMT2A-rearranged AML and ALL, a monotherapy is unlikely to be successful. In vivo data and phase II clinical trials showed that MEK inhibition only resulted in nonsustained responses, suggesting aberrant feedback mechanisms.98 Kampen et al showed in response to MEK inhibitors a sustained activation of AKT/mTOR and VEGFR-2 pathways that enabled a subpopulation of KMT2A-rearranged AML cells to survive MEK inhibition, suggesting the need to target multiple pathways.104 In agreement, Lavallée et al showed increased efficacy in KMT2A-rearranged RAS mutant AML samples when MEK inhibitors were used in combinations with VEGFR-2 inhibitors.36 Notably both KMT2A-AFF1 and KMT2A-MLLT3 have been shown to directly activate RAS pathway.90,91 This suggests that KMT2A patients might benefit from inhibitor of this pathway even if they do not carry RAS mutations. This hypothesis needs to be experimentally validated.

The identification of PTPN11 mutations in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia and the requirement for SHP2 function in the RAS signaling pathway strongly suggest that small molecule SHP2 inhibitors might have important therapeutic applications. Indeed, SHP2 plays a key role in controlling apoptosis and the suppression of SHP2 expression induces differentiation, apoptosis and inhibits leukemic cell clonogenic growth.79,80,106 Unfortunately, the development of bioavailable SHP2 inhibitors has proven to be difficult. The discovery of SHP2-specific inhibitors is complicated by the extremely high homology of the catalytic core of SHP2 with those of SHP1 and other PTPs that play negative roles in growth factor and cytokine signaling. Yu et al characterized the inhibitor No. 220 to 324 in cell line and JMML primary samples and found that the drug effectively inhibited SHP2 activity and IL-3-induced ERK, AKT, and STAT5 activation in a dose-dependent manner.107

Other agents such as MEK and mTOR inhibitors might prove efficacious in RAS-mutated leukemias. Liu et al demonstrated the preclinical therapeutic efficacy of mTOR inhibitor Rapamycin in the mouse model of Ptpn11 mutation-induced MPN and also in PTPN11 mutation-positive JMML patient cells.108 Likewise Parkin et al showed that AML blasts that do not express NF1 display differential sensitivity to in vitro treatment with Rapamycin.64

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusions and perspectives

The high frequency of activating mutations in tyrosine kinase/PI3K/RAS pathway genes in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia underscores the biologic cooperativity between KMT2A fusion proteins and signaling through this pathway. Experimental models have proved that some KMT2A rearrangements synergistically cooperate with RAS mutations in leukemogenesis, suggesting that these mutations could be important in the initiation of the disease. The controversial data on the crosstalk between RAS mutations and KMT2A-AFF1 suggest that RAS mutations are not important for initiation of leukemia. Analyses of several diagnostic and relapse matched samples will be essential to address the contribution of these mutations to maintenance and relapse of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia. The mutational burden could also inform therapeutic decisions and indicate which patients could benefit from a targeted therapy. One can argue that targeting minor clones rather than the dominant one is a questionable approach; however, the experimental data indicate that RAS and PTPN11 clonal mutations are associated with chemotherapy resistance and that MEK inhibitors enhance the sensitivity to prednisolone of both RAS wild-type and mutant ALL.33,97,100,102,109 Therefore, given that effective targeted therapies are currently not available for KMT2A-rearranged leukemia patients, these findings have important therapeutic implications.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Prof. Fulvio D’Acquisto for critical reading of the manuscript and mentorship.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Knudson AG. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971;68:820–823.
2. Balgobind BV, Hollink I, Arentsen-Peters S, et al Integrative analysis of type-I and type-II aberrations underscores the genetic heterogeneity of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2011;96:1478–1487.
3. Pui C-H, Carroll WL, Meshinchi S, et al Biology, risk stratification, and therapy of pediatric acute leukemias: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:551–565.
4. Muntean AG, Hess JL. The pathogenesis of mixed-lineage leukemia. Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:283–301.
5. Armstrong S, Staunton J, Silverman L, et al MLL translocations specify a distinct gene expression profile that distinguishes a unique leukemia. Nat Genet. 2002;30:41–47.
6. Okada Y, Feng Q, Lin Y, et al hDOT1L links histone methylation to leukemogenesis. Cell. 2005;121:167–178.
7. Krivtsov AV, Armstrong SA. MLL translocations, histone modifications and leukaemia stem-cell development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:823–833.
8. Meyer C, Burmeister T, Gröger D, et al The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2017. Leukemia. 2018;32:273–284.
9. Meyer C, Hofmann J, Burmeister T, et al The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2013. Leukemia. 2013;27:2165–2176.
10. Greaves M. When one mutation is all it takes. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:433–434.
11. Ford A, Ridge S, Cabrera M, et al In utero rearrangements in the trithorax-related oncogene in infant leukaemias. Nature. 1993;363:358–360.
12. Greaves M. Pre-natal origins of childhood leukemia. Rev Clin Exp Hematol. 2003;7:233–245.
13. Sanjuan-Pla A, Bueno C, Prieto C, et al Revisiting the biology of infant t(4;11)/MLLAF41 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;126:2676–2685.
14. Zuber J, Radtke I, Pardee T, et al Mouse models of human AML accurately predict chemotherapy response. Genes Dev. 2009;23:877–889.
15. Esposito M, Zhao L, Fung T, et al Synthetic lethal targeting of oncogenic transcription factors in acute leukemia by PARP inhibitors. Nat Med. 2015;21:1481–1490.
16. Wei J, Wunderlich M, Fox C, et al Microenvironment determines lineage fate in a human model of MLL-AF9 leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:483–495.
17. Yeung J, Esposito M, Gandillet A, et al β-Catenin mediates the establishment and drug resistance of MLL leukemic stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:606–618.
18. Fu J, Liang S, Huang Y, et al Cooperation of MLL/AF10(OM-LZ) with PTPN11 activating mutation induced monocytic leukemia with a shorter latency in a mouse bone marrow transplantation model. Int J Cancer. 2017;140:1159–1172.
19. Stavropoulou V, Almosailleakh M, Royo H, et al A novel inducible mouse model of MLL-ENL-driven mixed-lineage acute leukemia. HemaSphere. 2018;2:e51.
20. Ottersbach K, Sanjuan-Pla A, Torres-Ruíz R, et al The “never-ending” mouse models for MLL-rearranged acute leukemia are still teaching us. HemaSphere. 2018;2:e57.
21. Barabé F, Kennedy JA, Hope KJ, et al Modeling the initiation and progression of human acute leukemia in mice. Science (New York, NY). 2007;316:600–604.
22. Forster A, Pannell R, Drynan LF, et al Engineering de novo reciprocal chromosomal translocations associated with MLL to replicate primary events of human cancer. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:449–458.
23. Chen W, Li Q, Hudson WA, et al A murine MLL-AF4 knock-in model results in lymphoid and myeloid deregulation and hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2006;108:669–677.
24. Metzler M, Forster A, Pannell R, et al A conditional model of MLL-AF4 B-cell tumourigenesis using invertor technology. Oncogene. 2006;25:3093–3103.
25. Lin S, Luo RT, Ptasinska A, et al Instructive role of MLL-fusion proteins revealed by a model of t(4;11) Pro-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:737–749.
26. McGranahan N, Swanton C. Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future. Cell. 2017;168:613–628.
27. Mahgoub N, Parker R, Hosler M, et al RAS mutations in pediatric leukemias with MLL gene rearrangements. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1998;21:270–275.
28. Liang D, Shih L, Fu J, et al K-ras mutations and N-ras mutations in childhood acute leukemias with or without mixed-lineage leukemia gene rearrangements. Cancer. 2006;106:950–956.
29. Driessen E, van Roon E, Spijkers-Hagelstein J, et al Frequencies and prognostic impact of RAS mutations in MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants. Haematologica. 2013;98:937–944.
30. Prelle C, Bursen A, Dingermann T, et al Secondary mutations in t(4;11) leukemia patients. Leukemia. 2013;27:1425–1427.
31. Andersson AK, Ma J, Wang J, et al The landscape of somatic mutations in infant MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Nat Genet. 2015;47:330–337.
32. Trentin L, Bresolin S, Giarin E, et al Deciphering KRAS and NRAS mutated clone dynamics in MLL-AF4 paediatric leukaemia by ultra deep sequencing analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34449.
33. Jerchel I, Hoogkamer A, Ariës I, et al RAS pathway mutations as a predictive biomarker for treatment adaptation in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2017;32:931–940.
34. Grossmann V, Schnittger S, Poetzinger F, et al High incidence of RAS signalling pathway mutations in MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2013;27:1933–1936.
35. Emerenciano M, da Barbosa TC, Lopes B, et al Subclonality and prenatal origin of RAS mutations in KMT2A (MLL)-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2015;170:268–271.
36. Lavallée V-PP, Baccelli I, Krosl J, et al The transcriptomic landscape and directed chemical interrogation of MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemias. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1030–1037.
37. Balgobind BV, Vlierberghe P, van den Ouweland AM, et al Leukemia-associated NF1 inactivation in patients with pediatric T-ALL and AML lacking evidence for neurofibromatosis. Blood. 2008;111:4322–4328.
38. Metzeler KH, Sandhöfer N, Hinrichsen T, et al Analysis of cooperating genetic events in MLLT3-MLL rearranged acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by targeted next-generation sequencing of 16 leukemia-related genes reveals frequent mutations affecting growth factor signalling pathways and provides evidence for clonal heterogeneity. ASH Abstract. 2012;120:1379.
39. Coenen EA, Driessen EM, Zwaan CM, et al CBL mutations do not frequently occur in paediatric acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2012;159:577–584.
40. Balgobind BV, den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Menezes RX, et al Evaluation of gene expression signatures predictive of cytogenetic and molecular subtypes of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2011;96:221–230.
41. Shiba N, Park M, Taki T, et al CBL mutations in infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2012;156:672–674.
42. Irving J, Matheson E, Minto L, et al Ras pathway mutations are prevalent in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and confer sensitivity to MEK inhibition. Blood. 2014;124:3420–3430.
43. Agraz-Doblas A, Bueno C, Bashford-Rogers R, et al Unravelling the cellular origin and clinical prognostic markers of infant B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia using genome-wide analysis. Haematologica. 2019;doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.206375. [Epub ahead of print].
44. Pylayeva-Gupta Y, Grabocka E, Bar-Sagi D. RAS oncogenes: weaving a tumorigenic web. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:761–774.
45. Schubbert S, Shannon K, Bollag G. Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:295–308.
46. Ono R, Nakajima H, Ozaki K, et al Dimerization of MLL fusion proteins and FLT3 activation synergize to induce multiple-lineage leukemogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:919–929.
47. Stubbs MC, Armstrong SA. FLT3 as a therapeutic target in childhood acute leukemia. Curr Drug Targets. 2007;8:703–714.
48. Annesley CE, Brown P. The biology and targeting of FLT3 in pediatric leukemia. Front Oncol. 2014;4:263.
49. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:31–46.
50. Salk JJ, Schmitt MW, Loeb LA. Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:269–285.
51. Mohi GM, Neel BG. The role of Shp2 (PTPN11) in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007;17:23–30.
52. Matozaki T, Murata Y, Saito Y, et al Protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2: a proto-oncogene product that promotes Ras activation. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1786–1793.
53. Maroun C, Naujokas M, Holgado-Madruga M, et al The tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 is required for sustained activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and epithelial morphogenesis downstream from the met receptor tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:8513–8525.
54. Agazie YM, Movilla N, Ischenko I, et al The phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP2 is a critical mediator of transformation induced by the oncogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Oncogene. 2003;22:1206798.
55. Chan G, Kalaitzidis D, Usenko T, et al Leukemogenic Ptpn11 causes fatal myeloproliferative disorder via cell-autonomous effects on multiple stages of hematopoiesis. Blood. 2009;113:4414–4424.
56. Tartaglia M, Niemeyer CM, Fragale A, et al Somatic mutations in PTPN11 in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2003;34:148–150.
57. Loh ML, Vattikuti S, Schubbert S, et al Mutations in PTPN11 implicate the SHP-2 phosphatase in leukemogenesis. Blood. 2004;103:2325–2331.
58. Dong L, Yu W-M, Zheng H, et al Leukaemogenic effects of Ptpn11 activating mutations in the stem cell microenvironment. Nature. 2016;539:304–308.
59. Xu D, Liu X, Yu W-MM, et al Non-lineage/stage-restricted effects of a gain-of-function mutation in tyrosine phosphatase Ptpn11 (Shp2) on malignant transformation of hematopoietic cells. J Exp Med. 2011;208:1977–1988.
60. Ostman A, Hellberg C, Böhmer FD. Protein-tyrosine phosphatases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:307–320.
61. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002;417:949–954.
62. Rad E, Tee AR. Neurofibromatosis type 1: fundamental insights into cell signalling and cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;52:39–46.
63. Mullally A, Ebert BL. NF1 inactivation revs up Ras in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4074–4076.
64. Parkin B, Ouillette P, Wang Y, et al NF1 inactivation in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:4135–4147.
65. Sargin B, Choudhary C, Crosetto N, et al Flt3-dependent transformation by inactivating c-Cbl mutations in AML. Blood. 2007;110:1004–1012.
66. Loh ML, Sakai DS, Flotho C, et al Mutations in CBL occur frequently in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Blood. 2009;114:1859–1863.
67. Caligiuri MA, Briesewitz R, Yu J, et al Novel c-CBL and CBL-b ubiquitin ligase mutations in human acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2007;110:1022–1024.
68. Braun BS, Tuveson DA, Kong N, et al Somatic activation of oncogenic Kras in hematopoietic cells initiates a rapidly fatal myeloproliferative disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:597–602.
69. Araki T, Mohi M, Ismat FA, et al Mouse model of Noonan syndrome reveals cell type- and gene dosage-dependent effects of Ptpn11 mutation. Nat Med. 2004;10:849–857.
70. Chan RJ, Leedy MB, Munugalavadla V, et al Human somatic PTPN11 mutations induce hematopoietic-cell hypersensitivity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 2005;105:3737–3742.
71. Sanada M, Suzuki T, Shih L-YY, et al Gain-of-function of mutated C-CBL tumour suppressor in myeloid neoplasms. Nature. 2009;460:904–908.
72. Tamai H, Miyake K, Takatori M, et al Activated K-Ras protein accelerates human MLL/AF4-induced leukemo-lymphomogenicity in a transgenic mouse model. Leukemia. 2011;25:888–891.
73. Moriya K, Suzuki M, Watanabe Y, et al Development of a multi-step leukemogenesis model of MLL-rearranged leukemia using humanized mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37892.
74. Hyrenius-Wittsten A, Pilheden M, Sturesson H, et al De novo activating mutations drive clonal evolution and enhance clonal fitness in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1770.
75. Zeisig B, So C. Retroviral/Lentiviral transduction and transformation assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;538:207–229.
76. Medyouf H. The microenvironment in human myeloid malignancies: emerging concepts and therapeutic implications. Blood. 2017;129:1617–1626.
77. Ono R, Kumagai H, Nakajima H, et al Mixed-lineage-leukemia (MLL) fusion protein collaborates with Ras to induce acute leukemia through aberrant Hox expression and Raf activation. Leukemia. 2009;23:2197–2209.
78. Chen L, Chen W, Mysliwski M, et al Mutated Ptpn11 alters leukemic stem cell frequency and reduces the sensitivity of acute myeloid leukemia cells to Mcl1 inhibition. Leukemia. 2015;29:1290–1300.
79. Chan G, Cheung LS, Yang W, et al Essential role for Ptpn11 in survival of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 2011;117:4253–4261.
80. Yang Z, Li Y, Yin F, et al Activating PTPN11 mutants promote hematopoietic progenitor cell-cycle progression and survival. Exp Hematol. 2008;36:1285–1296.
81. Bonnet D. Humanized model to study leukemic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2009;538:247–262.
82. Montes R, Ayllón V, Gutierrez-Aranda I, et al Enforced expression of MLL-AF4 fusion in cord blood CD34+ cells enhances the hematopoietic repopulating cell function and clonogenic potential but is not sufficient to initiate leukemia. Blood. 2011;117:4746–4758.
83. Prieto C, Stam RW, Agraz-Doblas A, et al Activated KRAS cooperates with MLL-AF4 to promote extramedullary engraftment and migration of cord blood CD34+ HSPC but is insufficient to initiate leukemia. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2478–2489.
84. Montes R, Ayllón V, Prieto C, et al Ligand-independent FLT3 activation does not cooperate with MLL-AF4 to immortalize/transform cord blood CD34+ cells. Leukemia. 2014;28:666–674.
85. Bueno C, Ayllón V, Montes R, et al FLT3 activation cooperates with MLL-AF4 fusion protein to abrogate the hematopoietic specification of human ESCs. Blood. 2013;121:3867–3878.
86. Bueno C, Montes R, Melen GJ, et al A human ESC model for MLL-AF4 leukemic fusion gene reveals an impaired early hematopoietic-endothelial specification. Cell Res. 2012;22:986–1002.
87. Bueno C, Calero-Nieto FJ, Wang X, et al Enhanced hemato-endothelial specification during human embryonic differentiation through developmental cooperation between AF4-MLL and MLL-AF4 fusions. Haematologica. 2019;doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.202044. [Epub ahead of print].
88. Prieto C, López-Millán B, Roca-Ho H, et al NG2 antigen is involved in leukemia invasiveness and central nervous system infiltration in MLL-rearranged infant B-ALL. Leukemia. 2017;32:633–644.
89. Cortez D, Stoica G, Pierce J, et al The BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibits apoptosis by activating a Ras-dependent signaling pathway. Oncogene. 1996;13:2589–2594.
90. Ng M-H, Ng R, Kong C-T, et al Activation of Ras-dependent Elk-1 activity by MLL-AF4 family fusion oncoproteins. Exp Hematol. 2010;38:481–488.
91. Nakanishi H, Nakamura T, Canaani E, et al ALL1 fusion proteins induce deregulation of EphA7 and ERK phosphorylation in human acute leukemias. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:14442–14447.
92. Manara E, Baron E, Tregnago C, et al MLL-AF6 fusion oncogene sequesters AF6 into the nucleus to trigger RAS activation in myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2014;124:263–272.
93. Kim W-I, Matise I, Diers MD, et al RAS oncogene suppression induces apoptosis followed by more differentiated and less myelosuppressive disease upon relapse of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2009;113:1086–1096.
94. Cox AD, Fesik SW, Kimmelman AC, et al Drugging the undruggable RAS: mission possible? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:828–851.
95. Mansur MB, Ford AM, Emerenciano M. The role of RAS mutations in MLL-rearranged leukaemia: a path to intervention? Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2017;1868:521–526.
96. Caunt CJ, Sale MJ, Smith PD, et al MEK1 and MEK2 inhibitors and cancer therapy: the long and winding road. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:577–592.
97. Jones CL, Gearheart CM, Fosmire S, et al MAPK signaling cascades mediate distinct glucocorticoid resistance mechanisms in pediatric leukemia. Blood. 2015;126:2202–2212.
98. Jain N, Curran E, Iyengar NM, et al Phase II study of the oral MEK inhibitor selumetinib in advanced acute myelogenous leukemia: a University of Chicago phase II consortium trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:490–498.
99. Knight T, Irving JA. Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway activation in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its therapeutic targeting. Front Oncol. 2014;4:160.
100. Ariës IM, van den Dungen RE, Koudijs MJ, et al Towards personalized therapy in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: RAS mutations and prednisolone resistance. Haematologica. 2015;100:e132–e136.
101. Irving JA. Towards an understanding of the biology and targeted treatment of paediatric relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2016;172:655–666.
102. Kerstjens M, Driessen EM, Willekes M, et al MEK inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for MLL-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients carrying RAS mutations. Oncotarget. 2017;8:14835–14846.
103. Kerstjens M, Pinhancos SS, Castro PG, et al Trametinib inhibits RAS-mutant MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia at specific niche sites and reduces ERK phosphorylation in vivo. Haematologica. 2018;103:e147–e150.
104. Kampen K, ter Elst A, Mahmud H, et al Insights in dynamic kinome reprogramming as a consequence of MEK inhibition in MLL-rearranged AML. Leukemia. 2014;28:589–599.
105. Nowacka JD, Baumgartner C, Pelorosso C, et al MEK1 is required for the development of NRAS-driven leukemia. Oncotarget. 2016;7:80113–80130.
106. Xu R, Yu Y, Zheng S, et al Overexpression of Shp2 tyrosine phosphatase is implicated in leukemogenesis in adult human leukemia. Blood. 2005;106:3142–3149.
107. Yu B, Liu W, Yu W-M, et al Targeting protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 for the treatment of PTPN11-associated malignancies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:1738–1748.
108. Liu W, Yu W-MM, Zhang J, et al Inhibition of the Gab2/PI3K/mTOR signaling ameliorates myeloid malignancy caused by Ptpn11 (Shp2) gain-of-function mutations. Leukemia. 2017;31:1415–1422.
109. Rambal A, Panaguiton Z, Kramer L, et al MEK inhibitors potentiate dexamethasone lethality in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells through the pro-apoptotic molecule BIM. Leukemia. 2009;23:1744–1754.

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health Inc., on behalf of the European Hematology Association.