Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

238Pu: A Review of the Biokinetics, Dosimetry, and Implications for Human Exposures

Suslova, Klara G.*; Khokhryakov, Valentin F.*; Sokolova, Alexandra B.*; Miller, Scott C.

doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e318234899a

Plutonium-238 (238Pu) has a half-life of about 87.7 y and thus a higher specific activity than 239Pu. It is used in radioisotope thermoelectric generators and is a substantial source of plutonium alpha-radiation in spent nuclear fuels. Early animal studies demonstrated differences in the biokinetics of inhaled oxides of 238Pu and 239Pu with 238Pu having a substantially more rapid translocation from the lungs to the systemic organs, particularly the skeleton. This resulted in the predominant occurrence of skeletal cancers in animals exposed to 238Pu oxides but lung cancers in those with exposures to 239Pu oxides. The anatomical distribution of osteogenic sarcomas seen in animal studies was similar to that observed with 239Pu and also in plutonium workers but differed from naturally occurring tumors. The in vivo “solubility” of 238Pu has been associated with the relative amounts of 238Pu/239Pu in the particles and calcination temperatures during the preparation of the dioxides. There is experimental evidence of in vivo 238Pu particle fragmentation attributed to nuclear recoil during radioactive decay. The resulting conversion of microparticles to nanoparticles may alter their interactions with macrophages and transport across epithelial barriers. There are few documented cases of human exposures, but the biokinetics appeared to depend on the chemical and physical nature of the aerosols. Robust human biokinetic and dosimetric models have not been developed, due in part to the lack of data. With the acceleration of nuclear technologies and the greater demand for reprocessing and/or disposal of spent nuclear fuels, the potential for human exposure to 238Pu will likely increase in the future.

*Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, Russia; †Radiobiology Division, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Utah Nuclear Engineering Program, College of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

This study was managed by the Joint Coordinating Committee for Radiation Effects Research (JCCRER) and supported by funding from the United States Department of Energy and from the Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of the Russian Federation.

For correspondence contact: Klara Suslova, Southern Urals Biophysics Institute (SUBI), Ozyorskoe Shosse 19, Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 456780 Russia, or email at

(Manuscript accepted 25 August 2011)

© 2012 by the Health Physics Society