Brain Injury and Intimate Partner Violence : The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Preface

Brain Injury and Intimate Partner Violence

Colantonio, Angela PhD, OT Reg. (Ont.); Valera, Eve M. PhD

Editor(s): Valera, Eve M. PhD; Colantonio, Angela PhD, OT Reg. (Ont.)

Author Information
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation: January/February 2022 - Volume 37 - Issue 1 - p 2-4
doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000763
  • Open

We wish to thank Dr John Corrigan for the invitation to orchestrate this topical issue on brain injury (BI) resulting from intimate partner violence (IPV). The articles in this issue address a long-neglected gap in research, education, and practice in both the IPV and BI literature. We include articles on traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by external forces to the head and also potential hypoxic-ischemic brain injuries (HIBIs) from strangulation assaults. With 1 in 3 women globally reporting physical or sexual IPV, and up to 92% of blows being to the head, face, or neck,1 it is imperative that practitioners, decision/policy makers, and affected women be aware of this co-occurrence of IPV and BI and have access to necessary supports. IPV has been called the “shadow” or “parallel pandemic” to COVID-19, with BIs from IPV being recognized as a significantly increased concern now and for the foreseeable future.2,3 Furthermore, addressing violence and abuse among women with TBI has been identified as a research and practice priority including among women with lived experience of TBI and IPV.4,5 As such, the importance of the articles in this issue of the Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (JHTR) should be particularly apparent as they highlight a range of topics pertaining to IPV-related BI, including prevalence data, clinical characteristics, and correlates, promising/tailored interventions as well as health systems data with national policy relevance.

UNDERSTANDING CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOMES OF NONFATAL STRANGULATION

This issue describes characteristics and correlates of nonfatal strangulation. We start with this to stress the importance of recognizing the potential of acquired BIs, or HIBIs, occurring from a strangulation assault. First, Bergin and colleagues6 recount information from women presenting for care to a community-based emergency department. Victims of nonfatal strangulation most commonly reported not only symptoms of neck pain and headaches but also signs of more severe injury such as loss of consciousness, dysphagia, and dysphonia. In addition, Valera and colleagues7 provide the first report of assessment of strangulation-related alterations in consciousness and relate them to objective measures of cognitive and psychological functioning. The data show relationships between a history of strangulation-related alterations in consciousness and working memory, long-term memory, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.7

INCREASING OUR UNDERSTANDING OF NEUROBEHAVIORAL SYMPTOMS IN BOTH SURVIVORS AND PERPETRATORS

To further understand symptoms of women from a lifetime of trauma perspective, Saadi and colleagues8 examined the relations between child abuse and an IPV-related BI score reflecting neurobehavioral outcomes. They show that childhood trauma is positively associated with emotional and somatic neurobehavioral symptoms independent of BI; furthermore, they found that BI is positively associated with cognitive neurobehavioral symptoms in women who had experienced IPV-related BI. These data underscore the need to consider neurobehavioral symptoms in the context of the entire life experience of women rather than isolated to outcomes of BIs. Examining perpetrators of IPV, Portnoy and colleagues9 found that persistent postconcussive symptoms significantly predicted IPV perpetration after controlling for other common predictors. These data highlight the importance of evaluating and addressing postconcussive symptoms to decrease the risk of IPV perpetration.

UNDERSTANDING NEUROIMAGING CORRELATES OF IPV-RELATED BI

Adding to the growing number of IPV-related neuroimaging articles,10–12 Likitlersuang and colleagues13 conducted a pilot study that included groups of women who have sustained either IPV-related or other trauma-related TBI. Their data suggest that there may be effects on cortical thickness depending on whether TBIs were from IPV or other types of trauma.

PREVALENCE OF IPV-RELATED BI

Offering a global perspective, this issue presents novel contributions concerning the prevalence of IPV-related BI in 3 countries. Manoranjan and colleagues14 report a high suspicion of lifetime IPV-related TBI among 29% of adult women presenting to an Acquired Brain Injury Clinic in Ontario, Canada, with confirmed or suspected concussion. Gabbe and colleagues15 compared outcomes of major trauma patients with IPV-related BI with other interpersonal violence–related BI captured by a population-based statewide trauma registry in Australia. The findings reveal a higher proportion of IPV-related major traumas in women, with more severe and poorer long-term outcomes, including employment, than in persons affected by other types of violence.15 Finally, Saleem and colleagues16 report on IPV-related TBI from a New York Community Justice Center. Although all women who reported IPV had sustained a partner-related BI, only 40% of these women screened positive on a common BI screener (the HELPS). The authors noted that refugee status was associated with the number of IPV-related BIs, highlighting the importance of carefully assessing for BIs in this population.

ADDRESSING THE IMPACT OF IPV ON BOTH SERVICE USERS AND PROVIDERS DURING COVID-19

Two studies addressed the impact on service users and providers of IPV during the COVID-19 pandemic—one study from the perspective of survivors, executive directors/managers, frontline workers, and employer/union representatives,17 and the other from an emergency summit that involved a diverse set of stakeholders from a national IPV-TBI Knowledge to Practice Network.18 These studies report increased rates and severity of IPV, increased risks and complex challenges to mental health for service providers, as well as impact on employment for survivors. Key priorities identified include flexibility and adaptability of services through the use of technology; increased outreach; trauma-informed, anti-racist, equitable systems of care; the need for cross-pollination of knowledge between disciplines; and integrated and coordinated care at the system level. IPV-TBI resource materials from the summit are available in the Abused and Brain Injured Toolkit (www.abitoolkit.ca).19

PROMISING NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN PROGRAMMING AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER

Finally and critically, this issue highlights the impact of a promising health advocacy intervention, CARE (Connect, Acknowledge, Respond, and Evaluate),20 revealing improvements in agencies' and advocates' provision of instructional and functional social support to survivors of IPV-related BI. Survivors increased their knowledge, personal validation, and agency. These tools can be downloaded from the Centre for Partner Inflicted Brain Injury website (www.odvn.org/brain-injury). Also, a letter by Katherine Snedaker21 of Pink Concussion (www.pinkconsussions.com) provides information about the Partner Inflicted Brain Injury (PIBI) task force created in 2018. The task force meets monthly and serves as a focal point for professional education and networking that has led to collaborative research and knowledge transfer activities.21

We are very excited about this issue and extend sincere gratitude to all the contributors, the JHTR editorial board, and the reviewers for making this possible. The articles are highly relevant to the rehabilitation field as persons with disabilities, including persons with BI, are at risk of IPV and victimization. Women, in particular, have reported susceptibility to violence and abuse22 and, unfortunately, are often overlooked in the context of recognizing BI in IPV survivors. We are optimistic that the articles in this issue will further the field and prepare the way for additional research that will expand knowledge of IPV-related BI to other marginalized groups (eg, transgender women) yet to be examined.

Angela Colantonio, PhD, OT Reg. (Ont.)
Canada Research Chair in Traumatic Brain Injury
in Underserved Populations
Professor and Director
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute
Department of Occupational Science and Occupational
Therapy
Temerty Faculty of Medicine
Dalla Lana School of Public Health
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Senior Scientist and Team Leader
Acquired Brain Injury & Society Team
KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health
Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Eve M. Valera, PhD
Associate Professor in Psychiatry
Psychiatric Neuroscience Division
Department of Psychiatry
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
Research Scientist
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts
Issue Editors

REFERENCES

1. Haag HL, Jones D, Joseph T, Colantonio A. Battered and brain injured: traumatic brain injury among women survivors of intimate partner violence—a scoping review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019:1524838019850623. doi:10.1177/1524838019850623
2. Valera EM. When pandemics clash: gendered violence-related traumatic brain injuries in women since COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;24:100423. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100423
3. Saleem GT, Fitzpatrick JM, Haider MN, Valera EM. COVID-19-induced surge in the severity of gender-based violence might increase the risk for acquired brain injuries. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:20503121211050197. doi:10.1177/20503121211050197
4. Harris JE, Colantonio A, Bushnik T, et al. Advancing the health and quality-of-life of girls and women after traumatic brain injury: workshop summary and recommendations. Brain Inj. 2012;26(2):177–182. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.635361
5. Haag HL, Sokoloff S, MacGregor N, Broekstra S, Cullen N, Colantonio A. Battered and brain injured: assessing knowledge of traumatic brain injury among intimate partner violence service providers. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(7):990–996. doi:10.1089/jwh.2018.7299
6. Bergin A, Blumenfeld E, Anderson JC, Campbell JC, Patch M. Describing non-fatal intimate partner strangulation presentation and evaluation in a community-based hospital: partnerships between the emergency department and in-house advocates. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):5–14.
7. Valera EM, Daugherty JC, Scott O, Berenbaum H. Strangulation as an acquired brain injury in intimate partner violence and its relationship to cognitive and psychological functioning: a pilot study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):15–23.
8. Saadi A, Chibnik L, Valera E. Examining the association between childhood trauma, brain injury, and neurobehavioral symptoms among survivors of intimate-partner violence: a cross-sectional analysis. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):24–33.
9. Portnoy GA, Relyea MR, Presseau C, et al. Longitudinal analysis of persistent postconcussion symptoms, probable TBI, and intimate partner violence perpetration among veterans. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):34–42.
10. Valera E, Kucyi A. Brain injury in women experiencing intimate partner-violence: neural mechanistic evidence of an “invisible” trauma. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11(6):1664–1677. doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9643-1
11. Valera EM, Cao A, Pasternak O, et al. White matter correlates of mild traumatic brain injuries in women subjected to intimate-partner violence: a preliminary study. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(5):661–668. doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5734
12. Daugherty JC, Verdejo-Román J, Pérez-García M, Hidalgo-Ruzzante N. Structural brain alterations in female survivors of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2020:0886260520959621. doi:10.1177/0886260520959621
13. Likitlersuang J, Brown EM, Salat DH, et al. Neural correlates of traumatic brain injury in women survivors of intimate partner violence: a structural and functional connectivity neuroimaging study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):E30–E38.
14. Manoranjan B, Scott T, Szasz OP, et al. Prevalence and perception of intimate partner violence-related traumatic brain injury (PIVOT). J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):53–61.
15. Gabbe BJ, Braaf S, Cameron PA, Berecki-Gisolf J. Epidemiology and 6- and 12-month outcomes of intimate partner violence and other violence-related traumatic brain injury in major trauma: a population-based trauma registry study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):E1–E9.
16. Saleem G, Champagne M, Haider MN, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for intimate partner physical violence-related acquired brain injury among visitors of justice center in New York. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):E10–E19.
17. Haag HL, Toccalino D, Estrella MJ, Moore A, Colantonio A. The shadow pandemic: a qualitative exploration of the impacts of COVID-19 on service providers and women survivors of intimate-partner violence and brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):43–52.
18. Toccalino D, Haag HL, Estrella MJ, et al; the COVID TBI-IPV Consortium. The intersection of intimate partner violence and traumatic brain injury: findings from an emergency summit addressing system-level changes to better support women survivors. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):E20–E29.
19. Haag H, MacGregor N, Samsa S, Sing G, Colantonio A. The abused and brain injured toolkit: understanding the intersection of intimate partner violence and traumatic brain injury. Accessed October 1, 2021. www.abitoolkit.ca
20. Kemble H, Sucaldito A, Kulow E, et al. How CARE tools are being used to address brain injury and mental health struggles with survivors of domestic violence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):E39–E47.
21. Snedaker KPS. Bridging the gap between IPV and brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(1):E48.
22. Haag HL, Caringal M, Sokoloff S, Kontos P, Yoshida K, Colantonio A. Being a woman with acquired brain injury: challenges and implications for practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(2)(suppl):S64–S70. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.018
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.