Share this article on:

Treatments for Emotional Issues After Traumatic Brain Injury

Neumann, Dawn PhD

Section Editor(s): Neumann, Dawn PhD

The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation: September/October 2017 - Volume 32 - Issue 5 - p 283–285
doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000337
Preface

Guest Editor Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indiana

Dr Neumann is the owner of a small business funded by an NIH STTR Phase I grant. She was financially compensated for efforts pertaining to research she briefly discusses in this preface.

OF the vast array of consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI), emotional deficits are among the most prevalent, persistent, and challenging to treat. However, they remain grossly understudied compared with other impairments, especially with respect to interventions. As emotional functioning is integral to well-being and quality of life, it is our obligation as rehabilitation researchers and clinicians to endeavor to narrow this gap. To enhance awareness of this void and inspire momentum needed to fill it, this Topical Issue presents empirical studies evaluating treatments for emotional deficits in people with TBI.

Emotional functioning pertains to the awareness, recognition, expression, and regulation of emotions, all of which are susceptible to disruption from a TBI. The articles in this issue describe clinical trials of interventions that target emotional functioning deficits frequently observed after a TBI, including poor emotional self-awareness, impaired recognition of emotional cues from others, anger and aggression, depression, and reduced emotional and behavioral self-control. With regard to emotional rehabilitation following a TBI, each article contributes information sorely needed to advance our knowledge of different treatment approaches, offer directions for future research, and provide evidence needed to inform clinical decision-making.

This Topical Issue contains the first clinical trial of a treatment option for people with TBI who have poor emotional self-awareness, a deficit known as alexithymia. It is alarming that some studies have found the incidence of alexithymia in the TBI population to be as high as 60%.1 The significance of this deficit lies in the fact that it has been associated with poor coping skills, substance abuse, suicidal ideation, somatization, reduced empathy, low relationship satisfaction, and poor quality of life.2–6 Notably, many studies show a link between alexithymia and poor emotional control, and it is believed that emotional awareness is a critical foundation for regulating emotions.7 This issue presents findings from a small phase I study trialing a computer-based training program to reduce alexithymia in participants with TBI. The outcomes from this study concern changes in emotional self-awareness as well as generalization to emotion regulation including anxiety, depression, anger, and affect.

Just as it is important to have awareness and recognition of self-emotions, the ability to recognize others' emotions (socioemotion perception) is also essential to overall emotional functioning and regulation. Others' emotions have an effect on our own affect and how we respond to others. If another person's emotions are misperceived, the result can be emotional responses (or lack thereof) that lead to unexpected and socially inappropriate behaviors. To date, a handful of treatment studies have successfully confronted emotion perception problems following TBI.8–10 However, the major caveat of these studies is that they failed to find changes in related outcomes such as empathic behavior and relationship satisfaction.11 This shortcoming has been attributed to the fact that past programs do not directly train these broader related skills. In this Special Issue, Dr Westerhof-Evers and colleagues describe an enhanced training program that they created to address some of the past study limitations. Their intervention incorporates both emotion perception training and lessons for acceptable behavioral responses to others' emotions. This level 1b randomized controlled trial represents an important advance in our knowledge and understanding of evidence-based treatment approaches for emotion perception deficits after TBI.

This Topical Issue also presents 2 randomized controlled trials addressing anger and aggression after TBI. We know that many challenges often accompany anger and aggression including interpersonal difficulties and relationship problems, caregiver burden, social isolation, violent criminal offenses, and decreased community reintegration (eg, employment failures).7,12 With very little evidence for strategies to effectively manage anger and aggression in persons with TBI, there is an urgent need for progress in this area, and the 2 articles in this issue are steps in the right direction. The study by Dr Hart and colleagues examines the effect of a behavioral intervention, whereas Dr Hammond and colleagues investigate the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical treatment of anger and aggression. Both studies make significant contributions toward establishing more effective treatments of anger and aggression following TBI.

Depression is another prevalent disorder experienced by people with TBI (ranging between 25% and 61%)13 for which consensus regarding effective treatment approaches is still lacking. As rigorous studies investigating different treatments of depression are scarce,13 the requisite levels of evidence to support treatment recommendations are deficient. Depression can be a challenging disorder to study. Entangled in and confounded by many other problems (eg, substance abuse, anxiety, premorbid depression), especially after TBI, it can be an elusive target for treatment. This Topical Issue offers 2 articles describing outcomes from randomized controlled trials of treatment of post-TBI depression. The article by Dr Fann and colleagues is impressively the largest class I pharmacological antidepressant study to date. The second article by Dr Bombardier and colleagues examines factors (ie, cognitive, behavioral, and physical activity) that influenced participants' responsiveness to a cognitive-behavioral therapy trial for depression. The outcomes of this novel examination can inform the development of more effective treatments of depression.

Finally, Tsaousides et al took a more global approach to improving emotional functioning with an intervention they designed to teach people with TBI the skills needed to more effectively regulate their emotions. Emotion regulation, which pertains to one's ability to control (eg, initiate, inhibit, alter) his or her emotional states and behaviors based on situational context and his or her personal goals, is a necessity for healthy emotional functioning.14 Frequently disrupted following TBI, poor emotional control has been linked with disinhibited and socially undesirable behaviors.14 In addition to offering a novel intervention, this study leveraged the advances in online videoconferencing technology to deliver this group treatment remotely. This broadened the therapeutic reach by overcoming common distance and transportation barriers for this population. The authors describe posttreatment changes in emotion regulation, affect, and satisfaction with life at the end of treatment delivery and a 3-month follow-up.

The contributions of the authors to this Special Issue and to this field are to be applauded. Emotions are complex in nature, often confounded by other factors (eg, cognition, pain) and systems (eg, familial, social, societal). Emotions are intangible and subjective and thus are a challenge to measure. The heterogeneity of TBI further exacerbates this complexity. Is it any wonder that progress has been slow? Rehabilitation researchers must be innovative to overcome these challenges rather than being deterred by them.

The works in this issue significantly progress our understanding about interventions for emotional deficits following TBI. However, the state of the science for studying and treating emotional deficits in people with TBI is sorely lagging behind the needs, and a lot more evidence-based research is required to support more confident treatment recommendations. As such, high-quality studies aimed at improving emotional functioning following TBI need to be a priority; the well-being and life quality of our patients depend on it.

—Dawn Neumann, PhD

Guest Editor

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Indiana University School of Medicine

Indianapolis, Indiana

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Williams C, Wood RL. Alexithymia and emotional empathy following traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32(3):259–267.
2. Neumann D, Zupan B, Malec J, Hammond F. Relationships between alexithymia, affect recognition, and empathy after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(1):E18–E27.
3. Williams C, Wood RL. The impact of alexithymia on relationship quality and satisfaction following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(5):E21–E30.
4. Wood RL, Doughty C. Alexithymia and avoidance coping following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(2):98–105.
5. Wood RL, Williams C, Kalyani T. The impact of alexithymia on somatization after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23(7/8):649–654.
6. Wood RL, Williams C, Lewis R. Role of alexithymia in suicide ideation after traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16(06):1108–1114.
7. Neumann D, Malec JF, Hammond FM. The relations of self-reported aggression to alexithymia, depression, and anxiety after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017;32(3):205–213. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000261.
8. Radice-Neumann D, Zupan B, Tomita M, Willer B. Training emotional processing in persons with brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(5):313–323.
9. Bornhofen C, Mcdonald S. Treating deficits in emotion perception following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(1):22–44.
10. Neumann D, Babbage DR, Zupan B, Willer B. A randomized controlled trial of emotion recognition training after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015;30(3):E12–E23.
11. Driscoll DM, Dal Monte O, Grafman J. A need for improved training interventions for the remediation of impairments in social functioning following brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(2):319–326.
12. Slaughter B, Fann JR, Ehde D. Traumatic brain injury in a county jail population: prevalence, neuropsychological functioning and psychiatric disorders. Brain Inj. 2003;17(9):731–741.
13. Fann JR, Hart T, Schomer KG. Treatment for depression after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(12):2383–2402.
14. Gross JJ, Thompson RA. Emotion regulation: conceptual foundations. In: Gross JJ, ed. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2007:1–10.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.