Impact of performance-based budgeting on quality outcomes in U.S. military health care facilities : Health Care Management Review

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Features

Impact of performance-based budgeting on quality outcomes in U.S. military health care facilities

Decker, Kimberly L.; Schwab, Stephen D.; Bazzoli, Gloria J.; Chukmaitov, Askar S.; Wernz, Christian

Author Information
Health Care Management Review 48(3):p 249-259, 7/9 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000372

Abstract

Background 

Performance-based budgeting (PBB) is a variation of pay for performance that has been used in government hospitals but could be applicable to any integrated system. It works by increasing or decreasing funding based on preestablished performance thresholds, which incentivizes organizations to improve performance. In late 2006, the U.S. Army implemented a PBB program that tied hospital-level funding decisions to performance on key cost and quality-related metrics.

Purpose 

The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of PBB on quality improvement in U.S. Army health care facilities.

Approach 

This study used a retrospective difference-in-differences analysis of data from two Defense Health Agency data repositories. The merged data set encompassed administrative, demographic, and performance information about 428 military health care facilities. Facility-level performance data on quality indicators were compared between 187 Army PBB facilities and a comparison group of 241 non-PBB Navy and Air Force facilities before and after program implementation.

Results 

The Army’s PBB programs had a positive impact on quality performance. Relative to comparison facilities, facilities that participated in PBB programs increased performance for over half of the indicators under investigation. Furthermore, performance was either sustained or continued to improve over 5 years for five of the six performance indicators examined long term.

Conclusion 

Study findings indicate that PBB may be an effective policy mechanism for improving facility-level performance on quality indicators.

Practice Implications 

This study adds to the extant literature on pay for performance by examining the specific case of PBB. It demonstrates that quality performance can be influenced internally through centralized budgeting processes. Though specific to military hospitals, the findings might have applicability to other public and private sector hospitals who wish to incentivize performance internally in their organizational subunits through centralized budgeting processes.

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid