Share this article on:

Potentially Preventable Stillbirth in a Diverse U.S. Cohort

Page, Jessica M. MD; Thorsten, Vanessa MPH; Reddy, Uma M. MD, MPH; Dudley, Donald J. MD; Hogue, Carol J. Rowland PhD; Saade, George R. MD; Pinar, Halit MD; Parker, Corette B. DrPH; Conway, Deborah MD; Stoll, Barbara J. MD; Coustan, Donald MD; Bukowski, Radek MD, PhD; Varner, Michael W. MD; Goldenberg, Robert L. MD; Gibbins, Karen MD; Silver, Robert M. MD

doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002421
Contents: Original Research

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of potentially preventable stillbirths in the United States.

METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of 512 stillbirths with complete evaluation enrolled in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network from 2006 to 2008. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network was a multisite, geographically, racially, and ethnically diverse, population-based case–control study of stillbirth in the United States. Cases of stillbirth underwent standard evaluation that included maternal interview, medical record abstraction, biospecimen collection, postmortem examination, placental pathology, and clinically recommended evaluation. Each stillbirth was assigned probable and possible causes of death using the Initial Causes of Fetal Death algorithm system. For this analysis, we defined potentially preventable stillbirths as those occurring in nonanomalous fetuses, 24 weeks of gestation or greater, and weighing 500 g or greater that were 1) intrapartum, 2) the result of medical complications, 3) the result of placental insufficiency, 4) multiple gestation (excluding twin–twin transfusion), 5) the result of spontaneous preterm birth, or 6) the result of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

RESULTS: Of the 512 stillbirths included in our cohort, causes of potentially preventable stillbirth included placental insufficiency (65 [12.7%]), medical complications of pregnancy (31 [6.1%]), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (20 [3.9%]), preterm labor (16 [3.1%]), intrapartum (nine [1.8%]), and multiple gestations (four [0.8%]). Twenty-seven stillbirths fit two or more categories, leaving 114 (22.3%) potentially preventable stillbirths.

CONCLUSION: Based on our definition, almost one fourth of stillbirths are potentially preventable. Given the predominance of placental insufficiency among stillbirths, identification and management of placental insufficiency may have the most immediate effect on stillbirth reduction.

Almost one fourth of stillbirths in the United States may be preventable.

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; the University of Virginia. Charlottesville, Virginia; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas; Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island; the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; the University of Texas Health Science Center at Austin, Austin, Texas; and Columbia University, New York, New York.

Corresponding author: Robert M. Silver, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, Room 2B308, Salt Lake City, UT 84132; email:

This work, including the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript, was supported by grant funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development: U10-HD045953 Brown University, Rhode Island; U10-HD045925 Emory University, Georgia; U10-HD045952 University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas; U10-HDO45955 University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, Texas; U10-HD045944 University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Utah; and U01-HD045954 RTI International, RTP.

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Presented as a poster at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine’s 36th Annual Pregnancy Meeting, February 1–6, 2016, Atlanta, Georgia.

Comments and views of the author(s) do not necessarily represent the views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Each author has indicated that he or she has met the journal's requirements for authorship.

The stillbirth rate in the United States in 2013 was 5.96 per 1,000 births.1 The rate declined from 6.61 to 6.05 per 1,000 births from 2000 through 2006 and has remained relatively stable for the past decade.2 Although the rate of stillbirth worldwide has decreased as well, the global rate is much higher (18.4/1,000 births) with the majority of stillbirths occurring in middle- and low-income countries.3 Furthermore, stillbirth rates are higher in the United States than in many other high-income countries, and rates continue to decrease in other high-income countries, suggesting there may be opportunities in the United States for improvement.3 Thus, the objective of our study was to determine the proportion of potentially preventable stillbirths in a diverse U.S. sample.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network conducted a multicenter, population-based case–control study that attempted to enroll all stillbirths and a representative sample of live births in five distinct geographically defined areas between March 2006 and September 2008. Details of the study design and methodology have been published.4,5 Stillbirths were defined as births at or after 20 weeks of gestation with Apgar scores of 0 at 1 and 5 minutes and no signs of life on direct observation. Deliveries resulting from termination of a live fetus were excluded. Gestational age was determined using data from assisted reproductive technology, first day of last menstrual period, and ultrasonography.5 All participants gave written informed consent and the study was approved by the institutional review boards of each clinical site and the data coordinating and analysis center.

Cases of stillbirth were enrolled in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network at the time of ascertainment of stillbirth. They had a standardized maternal interview, medical record abstraction, biospecimen collection, postmortem examination and placental pathology, and attempted karyotype.4 The postmortem and placental examinations were performed by perinatal pathologists with a systematic protocol and using diagnostic criteria that had been determined before initiation of the study.6,7 Designated study pathologists underwent centralized training. Additional clinically indicated testing (suggested by Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network investigators) was performed at the discretion of the primary clinician. Recommended testing included karyotype, antibody screen, syphilis serology, toxicology screen, assessment for fetal-maternal hemorrhage, and antiphospholipid antibodies.4,5 Biospecimens including maternal blood, fetal umbilical blood, placental tissue, and fetal tissue were collected and stored to complete clinically recommended and experimental testing that was not performed at the time of delivery. These tests included antibody screen, syphilis serology, parvovirus serology, anticardiolipin, and anti-β-2-glycoprotein-I antibodies, fructosamine, bile acids, and chromosomal microarray.

For our analysis, only those stillbirths with complete postmortem evaluation and placental histopathology were included. Demographic details of this population have been previously published.8 Results of karyotype and microarray were combined and considered collectively as “genetic testing results.”9 The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies was determined using anticardiolipin antibody and β-2 glycoprotein antibody testing as previously described.10

The Initial Causes of Fetal Death algorithm developed by the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network11 was used in an attempt to assign causes of death for each stillbirth. The Initial Causes of Fetal Death distinguishes among probable causes, possible causes, or “condition present” for each potential cause of stillbirth. The Initial Causes of Fetal Death defines a “probable cause of death” as a condition or disease with a high likelihood of causing the stillbirth and a “possible cause of death” as one for which there is reasonable certainty it is involved in the pathophysiologic pathway leading to stillbirth. Conditions present but not meeting criteria for probable or possible causes of death were considered “present.”11 Potential causes of stillbirth were further divided into broad categories including maternal medical conditions, obstetric complications, placental conditions, infection, fetal genetic or structural abnormalities, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, umbilical cord abnormalities, and other.5,11

There is no generally accepted definition of what constitutes a “preventable” cause of stillbirth. In theory, many stillbirths may be ultimately preventable and ideally most stillbirths would be eliminated. Nonetheless, there is some degree of subjectivity in what constitutes a “preventable” stillbirth. Accordingly, we developed a definition for potentially preventable stillbirths specific for this analysis considering a wide range of possibly preventable causes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

First, we categorized stillbirths that occurred before 24 weeks of gestation and those in fetuses weighing less than 500 g as not preventable. Such fetuses would be considered previable or periviable and might not be candidates for operative delivery and resuscitation in many centers. We also categorized fetuses with major anomalies or genetic conditions that are not considered compatible with ex utero life or life of meaningful quality as not preventable.11 Although in utero death of some of these fetuses might be preventable, the overall perinatal mortality would not change, because these would become neonatal deaths.

We then considered categories of potentially preventable stillbirths based on currently available knowledge and obstetric practices and using the Initial Causes of Fetal Death criteria for probable and possible causes of death (Table 1). The diagnostic criteria for these conditions were based on the definitions set forth in the Initial Causes of Fetal Death classification tool.11 First, we considered intrapartum stillbirths because intervention with cesarean delivery likely could have prevented these losses. Second, we evaluated maternal medical complications such as diabetes, chronic hypertension, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Perinatal mortality associated with these conditions is dramatically improved with contemporary medical care.12,13 The third category included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Like with medical complications, optimal medical care substantially reduces fetal death in women with these conditions.14 Fourth, we considered stillbirths resulting from placental insufficiency as defined by the Initial Causes of Fetal Death.11 This included clinical evidence of placental insufficiency such as fetal growth restriction and oligohydramnios as well as rare and serious placental pathology such as decidual vasculopathy.11 Obstetric surveillance throughout the pregnancy and subsequent care is intended to screen for these conditions and prevent stillbirth, albeit imperfectly.15 Fifth, we assessed uncomplicated multiple gestations because appropriate obstetric care reduces the risk of stillbirth.16 We defined uncomplicated multiple gestations as those without twin–twin transfusion syndrome, twin reversed arterial perfusion, and monoamnionicity. Finally, we analyzed stillbirths associated with preterm birth (and related pathways) because some proportion of these may be prevented by treatment with cerclage, progestins, or both.17,18

Table 1

Table 1

Descriptive statistics were used to characterize stillbirths by preventable category and cause. Preventable stillbirths were compared by race, ethnicity, and gestational age using contingency table analysis. Univariate regression analysis was used to assess associations between potentially preventable stillbirth and pregnancy characteristics. Analyses were performed with STATA.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Of the 663 women (676 stillbirths) enrolled in the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network, 500 women (75.4%) consented to their 512 stillbirths undergoing a complete postmortem examination and are included in this analysis. Of these, 114 stillbirths (22.3%) were classified as potentially preventable and were included in one or more of the potentially preventable categories. Table 2 depicts the number of stillbirths in each category of potential preventable etiologies. Twenty-seven stillbirths were included in more than one category. Twenty-three fit two categories, and four were included in three categories. Many of the stillbirths that fit more than one category included placental insufficiency (21/27 [77.8%]). For example, placental insufficiency often overlapped with antiphospholipid syndrome or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; in fact, 32.3% (21/65 stillbirths) of stillbirths with placental causes had another cause identified as well. Many of the intrapartum stillbirths were associated with abruption, and review indicated that clinical management, including the use of emergent cesarean delivery,19 appeared to be appropriate in most cases. Nonetheless, we retained these intrapartum stillbirths as part of the potentially preventable cohort as a result of the fact that intrapartum stillbirths occurring at a viable gestational age represent a target for stillbirth prevention.

Table 2

Table 2

Table 3 shows each category of potentially preventable stillbirth stratified by gestational age at stillbirth. There was a nonsignificant increase in the proportion of preventable stillbirths resulting from placental insufficiency with increasing gestational age, with the most common gestational age window of stillbirth for these cases being after 37 weeks of gestation. Other causes of stillbirth did not vary by gestational age. Figure 2 displays the distribution of potentially preventable stillbirth cases overall compared with those that were not deemed potentially preventable. There was an increase in the proportion of potentially preventable stillbirths with increasing gestational age (P=.023). Notably, 39 (34.2%) potentially preventable stillbirths occurred after 37 weeks of gestation when there would have been minimal risk of complications of prematurity. Indeed, nearly half of all stillbirths after 37 weeks of gestation were “potentially preventable” by our definitions. An additional 32 (28.1%) occurred between 32 and 37 weeks of gestation, an epoch associated with a meaningful risk of complications as a result of prematurity but a high probability of survival and relatively good long-term outcomes.

Table 3

Table 3

Potentially preventable stillbirth stratified by gestational age

Potentially preventable stillbirth stratified by gestational age

We also stratified cases of potentially preventable stillbirth by race and ethnicity. Potentially preventable stillbirths accounted for 25% of stillbirths among Hispanic (n=42), 19% in non-Hispanic white (n=35), 27% in non-Hispanic black women (n=30), and 19% in other race–ethnicity categories (n=7). These proportions were not significantly different (P=.474).

In the cohort of Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network stillbirths with complete evaluation, there were many stillbirths that did not meet our criteria of potentially preventable but represent groups of interest in stillbirth prevention. For example, 75 stillbirths (14.6%) were extremely preterm births occurring before 24 weeks of gestation. Most had obstetric causes of stillbirth based on the Initial Causes of Fetal Death, including preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, cervical insufficiency, and chorioamnionitis. In ideal circumstances, a proportion of these cases would be detected with cervical length screening and appropriate interventions taken when shortening is identified. This pathophysiologic pathway remains a major target for prevention of stillbirth, preterm birth, and previable birth. Of term stillbirths (between 37 0/7 weeks and 41 6/7 weeks of gestation), 38 (46.9%) were considered potentially preventable and 43 (53.1%) did not meet potentially preventable criteria based on our definition.

Characteristics associated with preventable stillbirth are shown in Table 4. Women with public insurance (publicly funded sources, excluded self-pay patients) were more likely to be in the potentially preventable group (60.8% vs 41.7%; P=.001). Tobacco use was also more common in the potentially preventable group (18.6% vs 10.5%; P=.022). Of interest, women without prenatal care were less likely to have preventable stillbirth (1.8% vs 7.2%; P=.039) than those with care. The remaining categories were similar among groups, although small numbers in many of these categories yielded little statistical power. Given the small number of variables associated with preventable stillbirth and the small numbers in some categories, we did not perform multivariable regression analysis.

Table 4

Table 4

Back to Top | Article Outline


Using prespecified and conservative criteria, approximately one fourth of stillbirths that occur in the United States are potentially preventable. The most common cause of potentially preventable stillbirths was placental insufficiency followed by maternal medical disorders, hypertensive conditions, and spontaneous preterm birth. These conditions can be targeted for stillbirth reduction.

The concept of preventable stillbirth is subjective and debatable. In theory, many stillbirths are potentially preventable and under ideal circumstances, many would be avoided. Even some lethal genetic conditions might be “prevented” by using preimplantation genetic screening. Nonetheless, some stillbirths are more easily prevented than others, and when faced with limited resources and knowledge gaps, it makes sense to focus on these.

There is no question that a majority of stillbirths in low-resource settings could be avoided. Half or more of stillbirths that occur in these locations are intrapartum at viable gestational ages,20–23 and many are associated with potentially preventable infections.3 In contrast, it is less clear how many stillbirths can be prevented in high-resource settings. There is some thought that all stillbirths other than those resulting from major genetic abnormalities or fetal malformations (approximately 10%) are preventable.24,25 However, this may be unrealistic given our present knowledge base.

Many high-resource settings have considerably lower stillbirth rates than the United States.24 Currently, the United States ranks 25th in the world in third-trimester stillbirths, and many countries have a more than 33% lower rate.25 In addition, other high-resource countries have recently reported dramatic decreases in stillbirth. For example, the stillbirth rate in the Netherlands decreased 6.8% (1.8/1,000 births) from 2000 to 2015, whereas the U.S. rate declined only 0.4% (3.0/1,000 births) during the same period.25

One could make a compelling argument that many of the stillbirths we did not include as potentially preventable were, in fact, preventable. For example, there were many cases of obstetric complications such as preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, and cervical insufficiency resulting in delivery at previable or periviable gestational ages (the vast majority). In theory, some of those cases could have been identified through obstetric history or cervical length screening and prevented with progestational agents, cerclage, or both.17,18 In addition, one is tempted to consider all stillbirths with fetal growth restriction at viable gestational ages or all stillbirths after 34 or 37 weeks of gestation to be preventable. However, given the relatively poor ability of risk factors to predict stillbirth, the potential for causing harm, for example through iatrogenic prematurity, must be weighed against the potential for stillbirth prevention. Improved prediction of stillbirth risk in the third trimester warrants further research and we look forward to data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development–sponsored Human Placenta Project. Another area of uncertainty is the effect of risk factor modification. Smoking, obesity, advanced maternal age, and multiple gestation are all associated with stillbirth. Although one can estimate attributable risks,26 it is unclear how many stillbirths could be prevented by reduction in these risk factors, because they are risk factors for rather than causes of stillbirth.

There was no association with race, ethnicity, and preventable stillbirth using our definitions. This may have been the result of the small sample size after stratification. Also, non-Hispanic black race is associated with stillbirth resulting from preterm labor pathways, many of which result in stillbirths occurring between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation.8 In contrast, a higher percentage of stillbirths in non-Hispanic white women is the result of placental causes, which were considered preventable in this study. Regardless, reduction in stillbirth disparity warrants focus and resources. Preventable stillbirth was more common in those women with public insurance, highlighting socioeconomic disparity in health outcomes and warranting further research. We were surprised that lack of prenatal care was not associated with potentially preventable stillbirth, although very small numbers in the study preclude meaningful conclusions. As expected, smoking and low socioeconomic status were associated with preventable stillbirth.

Our study had several weaknesses. The concept of “preventable stillbirth” is subjective and open to debate. Accordingly, we used several definitions in an attempt to acknowledge this subjectivity. Also, our definitions were conservative and most likely underestimate the percentage of preventable stillbirths based on rates in other countries. We also may have had too few stillbirths in each preventable category to identify maternal risk factors for preventable stillbirth. The study also had numerous strengths. The study included a large number of well-characterized stillbirths. The study was population-based and participants reflected racial, ethnic, and geographic diversity. Also, causes of death were ascertained using the evidence-based Initial Causes of Fetal Death algorithm after extensive evaluation of stillbirths.

In summary, we speculate that almost 25% of stillbirths in a large U.S. cohort are potentially preventable using conservative definitions. The most common causes of preventable stillbirths were placental abnormalities or insufficiency as well as maternal medical disorders, hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, and preterm labor. These findings underscore the importance of obstetric surveillance to identify potential placental insufficiency as well as other maternal conditions that can be targeted in efforts to reduce stillbirth in the United States and other high-resource settings.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. MacDorman MF, Gregory EC. Fetal and perinatal mortality: United States, 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015;64:1–24.
2. Gregory EC, MacDorman MF, Martin JA. Trends in fetal and perinatal mortality in the United States, 2006-2012. NCHS Data Brief 2014:1–8.
3. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet 2016;387:587–603.
4. Parker CB, Hogue CJR, Koch MA, Willinger M, Reddy U, Thorsten VR, et al. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network: design, methods and recruitment experience. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol 2011;25:425–35.
5. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA 2011;306:2469–79.
6. Pinar H, Koch MA, Hawkins H, Heim-Hall J, Shehata B, Thorsten VR, et al. The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) placental and umbilical cord examination. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:781–92.
7. Pinar H, Koch MA, Hawkins H, Heim-Hall J, Abramowsky CR, Thorsten VR, et al. The stillbirth collaborative research network postmortem examination protocol. Am J Perinatol 2012;29:187–202.
8. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Causes of death among stillbirths. JAMA 2011;306:2459–68.
9. Reddy UM, Page GP, Saade GR, Silver RM, Thorsten VR, Parker CB, et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2185–93.
10. Silver RM, Parker CB, Reddy UM, Goldenberg R, Coustan D, Dudley DJ, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:641–57.
11. Dudley DJ, Goldenberg R, Conway D, Silver RM, Saade G, Varner MV, et al. A new system for determining the causes of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:254–60.
12. Starikov R, Dudley D, Reddy UM. Stillbirth in the pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2015;15:11.
13. Johnstone FD, Lindsay RS, Steel J. Type 1 diabetes and pregnancy: trends in birth weight over 40 years at a single clinic. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1297–302.
14. Ahmad AS, Samuelsen SO. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and fetal death at different gestational lengths: a population study of 2 121 371 pregnancies. BJOG 2012;119:1521–8.
15. Silver RM, Page JM. Interventions to prevent stillbirth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;22:135–45.
16. Saccone G, Berghella V. Planned delivery at 37 weeks in twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:685–9.
17. Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Aguedo A, Tabor A, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:124.e1–19.
18. Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:663–71.
19. Boyle A, Preslar JP, Hogue CJ, Silver RM, Reddy UM, Goldenberg RL, et al. Route of delivery in women with stillbirth: results from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:693–8.
20. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al. What will it take to avert preventable newborn deaths and stillbirths and at what cost? Lancet 2014;384:347–70.
21. McClure EM, Saleem S, Goudar SS, Moore JL, Esamai F, Garces A, et al. Stillbirth trends in low-middle income countries 2010-2013: a population-based, multi-country cohort study from the Global Network. Reprod Health 2015;12(suppl 2):S7.
22. Goldenberg RL, Saleem S, Pasha O, Harrison M, McClure EM. Reducing stillbirths in low-income countries.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:135–43.
23. Goldenberg RL, Griffin J, Harrison M, Rouse DJ, Moran K, Jones BJ, et al. An analysis of the impact of clinical interventions to reduce stillbirths in sub-Saharan Africa. BJOG 2016 Oct 5 [Epub ahead of print].
24. de Bernis L, Kinney MV, Stones W, Ten Hoope-Bender P, Vivio D, Leisher SH, et al. Stillbirths: ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet 2016;387:703–16.
25. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, Ellwood D, Erwich JJ, Coory M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet 2016;387:691–702.
26. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011;377:1331–40.


© 2018 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.