Characteristics of the participants according to the apnea–hypopnea index at baseline are shown in Table 1. In early pregnancy, older age, higher BMI, larger neck circumference, non-Hispanic black race–ethnicity, smoking, and chronic hypertension were all associated with increased apnea–hypopnea index. Similar findings were seen with the midpregnancy apnea–hypopnea index (Appendix 5, available online at http://links.lww.com/AOG/A905).
Gestational diabetes mellitus occurred in 134 of 3,245 women without pregestational diabetes (4.1%). The median gestational age in weeks at the time of GDM testing was 27 with an interquartile range of 25–28. Of the patients with GDM, 55% (n=74) were diet-controlled; 36% (n=48) required treatment with insulin, an oral hypoglycemic, or both; and in 9% of patients (n=12), information on therapy modality was not available.
The adjusted OR for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (preeclampsia and antepartum gestational hypertension) when sleep-disordered breathing was present compared with absent in early pregnancy did not reach statistical significance (adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.91–2.32), but in midpregnancy, the adjusted analysis was statistically significant (adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.19–2.52). Statistically significant linear trends were observed between increasing apnea–hypopnea index and the rate of all hypertensive disorders in unadjusted analyses (early and midpregnancy) and remained significant for midpregnancy apnea–hypopnea index in the adjusted analyses (P<.001).
We examined the timing between the sleep study and the diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder. Hypertensive complications were diagnosed between 45 and 229 days after the early pregnancy sleep study and from 44 days before to 113 days after the midpregnancy sleep study. Only 4.1% of hypertension diagnoses were made before the midpregnancy sleep-disordered breathing assessment; 91.7% of hypertension diagnoses were made more than 2 weeks after the midpregnancy assessment.
Both race–ethnicity and smoking were considered for covariate adjustment to the analyses presented in Tables 2 and 3. Neither met the criteria for inclusion as a confounder. Specifically, adding either variable to a univariate model with sleep-disordered breathing (apnea–hypopnea index 5 or greater) for hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and for GDM modified the crude ORs by 0.0–2.6% and 0.4–4.1%, respectively. Adding either variable to the multivariate models shown in the tables modified the adjusted ORs by 0.0–1.4% and 0.3–1.1%, respectively.
Given the clear relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and BMI, we also ran analyses with BMI as a continuous variable and considered the interaction between apnea–hypopnea index and BMI. Adjusting for BMI as a continuous variable (linear and quadratic terms) did not alter the direction, magnitude, or statistical significance of effects (data not shown). For both hypertensive disorders and GDM, the interaction of BMI and sleep-disordered breathing was nonsignificant (early pregnancy: P=.90 and P=.31, respectively; and midpregnancy: P=.61 and P=.95, respectively).
Furthermore, we considered that weight gain from early to midpregnancy could be an intermediate variable in the causal pathway between apnea–hypopnea index and pregnancy outcomes. However, the direction, magnitude, and significance of effects were similar to those in Tables 2 and 3 when we excluded weight gain as a covariate in the midpregnancy models (Appendices 6 and 7, available online at http://links.lww.com/AOG/A905).
In this prospective analysis of objectively assessed sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy, the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing was 3.6% and 8.3% in early pregnancy and midpregnancy, respectively. Nearly all participants in this cohort identified as sleep-disordered breathing-positive (apnea–hypopnea index 5 or greater) had a nocturnal respiratory pattern consistent with OSA. There was an independent association between sleep-disordered breathing and preeclampsia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and GDM after adjustment for age, BMI, chronic hypertension, and pregnancy-related weight gain. Increasing exposure–response relationships were observed between apnea–hypopnea index and pregnancy-related hypertension and GDM.
Before this report, the largest studies evaluating sleep-disordered breathing and pregnancy-related hypertension have been retrospective or cross-sectional and limited by the quality of sleep-disordered breathing exposure and pregnancy outcome assessment.26 Data from smaller prospective cohorts, using objective assessments of sleep-disordered breathing, have yielded conflicting results.16–18 Louis et al16 reported on a cohort of 175 obese women and demonstrated that women with sleep-disordered breathing (apnea–hypopnea index 5 or greater) were more likely to develop preeclampsia (adjusted OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3–9.9). However, two other small studies failed to demonstrate a positive association between sleep-disordered breathing and pregnancy-related hypertension.17,18 In our large prospective study, in which sleep-disordered breathing was diagnosed using objective criteria and confounding variables carefully considered, we found an association between sleep-disordered breathing and preeclampsia and pregnancy-related hypertension. In adjusted analyses, an early pregnancy apnea–hypopnea index of 5 or greater was associated with preeclampsia. In midpregnancy, an apnea–hypopnea index of 5 or greater was associated with the development of preeclampsia and the composite of preeclampsia and antepartum gestational hypertension. In regard to our midpregnancy apnea–hypopnea index data, because rapid weight gain and extravascular fluid retention may result in an increase in apnea–hypopnea index, we additionally adjusted for weight gain between visits in the midpregnancy analyses. We also examined the timing of the midpregnancy sleep assessment in relation to hypertension diagnosis and found that 91.7% of diagnoses were made more than 2 weeks after the midpregnancy sleep test. In summary, the associations and dose–response relationships observed in this study among apnea–hypopnea index, preeclampsia, and pregnancy-related hypertension could potentially signify a causal link between sleep-disordered breathing exposure in pregnancy and the subsequent development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Our data regarding the association between sleep-disordered breathing and GDM are robust. By excluding women with pregestational diabetes and defining GDM, we optimized case ascertainment. We observed increasing apnea–hypopnea index with increasing incidence of GDM in both early and midpregnancy, independent of important covariates. The early pregnancy apnea–hypopnea index data (6–15 weeks of gestation) predated the GTT testing by more than 1 week in more than 96% of our cohort.
A major strength of this study is the prospective design in which the apnea–hypopnea index results were blinded to the care providers, investigators, and participants. This limited the possibility of ascertainment bias. Our sleep-disordered breathing ascertainment was optimized using an independent and blinded central reading center. We were able to control for important confounding factors including BMI and weight gain, and we evaluated the interaction between apnea–hypopnea index and BMI. We did observe a lower than expected rate of sleep-disordered breathing in early pregnancy (early pregnancy 3.6% observed compared with 5% expected, midpregnancy 8.3% compared with 10%), but despite the lower rates, we detected statistically significant differences in our primary outcome. The observed differences were substantially greater than what we powered to detect. Nonetheless, given the observational and voluntary nature of the study and moderate adjusted ORs (particularly for association with hypertensive disorders), the possibility of residual confounding resulting from selection bias and unmeasured or unknown confounders cannot be definitively excluded. Finally, we recognize the limitations of utilizing a level 3 home sleep apnea test for measuring apnea–hypopnea index. Although a full in-laboratory polysomnogram is considered the gold standard for the objective measurement of sleep-related breathing disorders, it is often not feasible to use a full polysomnogram for large sleep-related studies given the cost and limited availability of sleep laboratory space as well as difficulties recruiting a larger number of participants in research requiring such in-laboratory monitoring. Data indicate that unattended home sleep testing can reliably detect sleep-disordered breathing at substantively lower cost compared with in-laboratory polysomnogram.27 Furthermore, most insurers now routinely require home sleep tests as the first-line diagnostic modality for the majority of patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing and without certain comorbidities.28,29 Unattended home sleep testing may modestly underestimate the apnea–hypopnea index as a result of this overestimation of sleep time.30 However, studies were scored after editing movement and artifact, reducing the effect of wake time on the apnea–hypopnea index estimates.
Although we found an association with sleep-disordered breathing preceding the development of both pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders and GDM, we cannot conclude that universal screening for and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy would reduce the risks of these adverse outcomes. The most widely prescribed treatment for sleep-disordered breathing is CPAP during sleep. The benefit of treatment with CPAP has been consistently demonstrated when excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep quality are used as endpoints.31,32 However, even in nonpregnant populations, data conflict regarding whether treatment of sleep-disordered breathing can reduce the risk of developing hypertension or diabetes.33–35 This is especially true for milder forms of sleep-disordered breathing (apnea–hypopnea index less than 30), which our study confirms represents the vast majority of sleep-disordered breathing cases in young pregnant women. Pregnancy is an ideal scenario in which to better understand the role of CPAP as a preventive strategy for reducing cardiometabolic morbidity because the timeframe needed to measure outcomes after initiating therapy is significantly contracted. To date, studies examining the effect of CPAP treatment on pregnancy have been small and limited in the scope of endpoints.36–42
In summary, in this prospective analysis of objectively assessed sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy, the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing was 3.6% in early pregnancy and increased to 8.3% in midpregnancy. The majority of sleep-disordered breathing cases identified were mild. Our data demonstrate that even modest elevations of apnea–hypopnea index in pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders and an increased incidence of GDM. These findings are important because sleep-disordered breathing is a risk factor that is amenable to therapeutic intervention. The underlying mechanistic pathways linking sleep-disordered breathing and adverse pregnancy outcomes are likely multifactorial. Sleep-disordered breathing is linked to oxidative stress, autonomic dysfunction, inflammation, endothelial damage, and altered hormonal regulation of energy expenditure.11 These same biologic pathways have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.12 Further research should help to establish whether screening for and treating sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy can mitigate the risk and consequences of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and GDM.
1. Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ, Gozal D, Iber C, Kapur VK, et al. Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 2012;8:597–619.
2. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1230–5.
3. Young T, Finn L, Austin D, Peterson A. Menopausal status and sleep-disordered breathing in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1181–5.
4. Pien GW, Schwab RJ. Sleep disorders during pregnancy. Sleep 2004;27:1405–17.
5. Pien GW, Fife D, Pack AI, Nkwuo JE, Schwab RJ. Changes in symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing during pregnancy. Sleep 2005;28:1299–305.
6. Facco FL, Kramer J, Ho KH, Zee PC, Grobman WA. Sleep disturbances in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:77–83.
7. Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M, Skatrud J. Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1378–84.
8. Punjabi NM, Shahar E, Redline S, Gottlieb DJ, Givelber R, Resnick HE; Sleep Heart Health Study Investigators. Sleep-disordered breathing, glucose intolerance, and insulin resistance: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:521–30.
9. Reichmuth KJ, Austin D, Skatrud JB, Young T. Association of sleep apnea and type II diabetes: a population-based study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:1590–5.
10. Jelic S, Le Jemtel TH. Inflammation, oxidative stress, and the vascular endothelium in obstructive sleep apnea. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2008;18:253–60.
11. Dempsey JA, Veasey SC, Morgan BJ, O'Donnell CP. Pathophysiology of sleep apnea. Physiol Rev 2010;90:47–112.
12. Romero R, Badr MS. A role for sleep disorders in pregnancy complications: challenges and opportunities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:3–11.
13. O'Brien LM, Bullough AS, Owusu JT, Tremblay KA, Brincat CA, Chames MC, et al. Pregnancy-onset habitual snoring, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia: prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:487.e1–9.
14. Chen YH, Kang JH, Lin CC, Wang IT, Keller JJ, Lin HC. Obstructive sleep apnea and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:136.e1–5.
15. Bourjeily G, Raker CA, Chalhoub M, Miller MA. Pregnancy and fetal outcomes of symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing. Eur Respir J 2010;36:849–55.
16. Louis J, Auckley D, Miladinovic B, Shepherd A, Mencin P, Kumar D, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with obstructive sleep apnea in obese pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1085–92.
17. Facco FL, Ouyang DW, Zee PC, Strohl AE, Gonzalez AB, Lim C, et al. Implications of sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:559.e1–6.
18. Pien GW, Pack AI, Jackson N, Maislin G, Macones GA, Schwab RJ. Risk factors for sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy. Thorax 2014;69:371–7.
19. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Practice Bulletin No. 137. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:406–16.
20. Facco FL, Parker CB, Reddy UM, Silver RM, Louis JM, Basner RC, et al. NuMoM2b Sleep-Disordered Breathing study: objectives and methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:542.e1–127.
21. Haas DM, Parker CB, Wing DA, Parry S, Grobman WA, Mercer BM, et al. A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:539.e1–539.e24.
22. Executive summary: hypertension in pregnancy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1122–31.
23. Roberts JM, Myatt L, Spong CY, Thom EA, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Vitamins C and E to prevent complications of pregnancy-associated hypertension. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1282–91.
24. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1217–39.
25. Ananth CV, Keyes KM, Wapner RJ. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980–2010: age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ 2013;347:f6564.
26. Pamidi S, Pinto LM, Marc I, Benedetti A, Schwartzman K, Kimoff RJ. Maternal sleep-disordered breathing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J obstetrics Gynecol 2014;210:52.e1–52.e14.
27. Rosen CL, Auckley D, Benca R, Foldvary-Schaefer N, Iber C, Kapur V, et al. A multisite randomized trial of portable sleep studies and positive airway pressure autotitration versus laboratory-based polysomnography for the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: the HomePAP study. Sleep 2012;35:757–67.
28. Ahmed M, Patel NP, Rosen I. Portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 2007;132:1672–7.
29. Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, Claman D, Goldberg R, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 2007;3:737–47.
30. Chai-Coetzer CL, Antic NA, Rowland LS, Catcheside PG, Esterman A, Reed RL, et al. A simplified model of screening questionnaire and home monitoring for obstructive sleep apnoea in primary care. Thorax 2011;66:213–9.
31. Weaver TE, Mancini C, Maislin G, Cater J, Staley B, Landis JR, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure treatment of sleepy patients with milder obstructive sleep apnea: results of the CPAP Apnea Trial North American Program (CATNAP) randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:677–83.
32. Jenkinson C, Davies RJ, Mullins R, Stradling JR. Comparison of therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised prospective parallel trial. Lancet 1999;353:2100–5.
33. Haentjens P, Van Meerhaeghe A, Moscariello A, De Weerdt S, Poppe K, Dupont A, et al. The impact of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: evidence from a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:757–64.
34. Bratton DJ, Stradling JR, Barbé F, Kohler M. Effect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with minimally symptomatic obstructive sleep apnoea: a meta-analysis using individual patient data from four randomised controlled trials. Thorax 2014;69:1128–35.
35. Barbé F, Durán-Cantolla J, Sánchez-de-la-Torre M, Martínez-Alonso M, Carmona C, Barceló A, et al. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the incidence of hypertension and cardiovascular events in nonsleepy patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;307:2161–8.
36. Blyton DM, Sullivan CE, Edwards N. Reduced nocturnal cardiac output associated with preeclampsia is minimized with the use of nocturnal nasal CPAP. Sleep 2004;27:79–84.
37. Blyton DM, Skilton MR, Edwards N, Hennessy A, Celermajer DS, Sullivan CE. Treatment of sleep disordered breathing reverses low fetal activity levels in preeclampsia. Sleep 2013;36:15–21.
38. Guilleminault C, Kreutzer M, Chang JL. Pregnancy, sleep disordered breathing and treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Sleep Med 2004;5:43–51.
39. Guilleminault C, Palombini L, Poyares D, Takaoka S, Huynh NT, El-Sayed Y. Pre-eclampsia and nasal CPAP: part 1. Early intervention with nasal CPAP in pregnant women with risk-factors for pre-eclampsia: preliminary findings. Sleep Med 2007;9:9–14.
40. Poyares D, Guilleminault C, Hachul H, Fujita L, Takaoka S, Tufik S, et al. Pre-eclampsia and nasal CPAP: part 2. Hypertension during pregnancy, chronic snoring, and early nasal CPAP intervention. Sleep Med 2007;9:15–21.
41. Reid J, Taylor-Gjevre R, Gjevre J, Skomro R, Fenton M, Olatunbosun F, et al. Can gestational hypertension be modified by treating nocturnal airflow limitation? J Clin Sleep Med 2013;9:311–7.
42. Edwards N, Blyton DM, Kirjavainen T, Kesby GJ, Sullivan CE. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure reduces sleep-induced blood pressure increments in preeclampsia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:252–7.