Share this article on:

A Web-Based Lifestyle Intervention for Women With Recent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Nicklas, Jacinda M. MD, MPH; Zera, Chloe A. MD, MPH; England, Lucinda J. MD, MSPH; Rosner, Bernard A. PhD; Horton, Edward MD; Levkoff, Sue E. ScD, MSW; Seely, Ellen W. MD

doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000420
Contents: Original Research

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility and effectiveness of a Web-based lifestyle intervention based on the Diabetes Prevention Program modified for women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus to reduce postpartum weight retention.

METHODS: We randomly allocated 75 women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus to either a Web-based lifestyle program (Balance after Baby) delivered over the first postpartum year or to a control group. Primary outcomes were change in body weight at 12 months from 1) first postpartum measured weight; and 2) self-reported prepregnancy weight.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups including age, body mass index, race, and income status. Women assigned to the Balance after Baby program (n=36, three lost to follow-up) lost a mean of 2.8 kg (95% confidence interval –4.8 to −0.7) from 6 weeks to 12 months postpartum, whereas the control group (n=39, one lost to follow-up) gained a mean of 0.5 kg (−1.4 to +2.4) (P=.022). Women in the intervention were closer to prepregnancy weight at 12 months postpartum (mean change −0.7 kg; −3.5 to +2.2) compared with women in the control arm (+4.0 kg; +1.3 to +6.8) (P=.035).

CONCLUSION: A Web-based lifestyle modification program for women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus decreased postpartum weight retention.



The Web-based lifestyle intervention program Balance after Baby leads to decreased postpartum weight retention in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus.

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, the Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine and the Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, and the Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts; the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; the Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and the College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Corresponding author: Jacinda M. Nicklas, MD, MPH, MA, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12348 E Montview Boulevard, C263, Aurora, CO 80045, e-mail:

The Balance after Baby study was supported by the Centers for Disease Control (Cooperative Agreement Number MM-1094–09/09, announcement number CD05-050), and work by the investigators was supported by an Institutional National Research Service Award #T32AT000051 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine at the National Institutes of Health and a K24 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health (9K24HL096141).

The authors thank the women who participated in the Balance after Baby trial, the Greater Boston YMCA for providing low-cost memberships for the study, and the Clinical and Informatics cores of the Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Award for providing nursing and laboratory services.

Presented at the Society for General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, April 26, 2013.

The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Postpartum weight retention is a key risk factor for long-term maternal obesity. Cohort studies have demonstrated an association between postpartum weight retention at 6 months1,2 and 1 year3 postpartum with future overweight and obesity. Women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a sevenfold increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes within 10 years postpartum4 and are therefore uniquely vulnerable to the effects of postpartum weight retention.5–7 Although recommendations for women with a history of GDM include weight loss if overweight or obese,8 women with prior GDM are no more likely to engage in healthy lifestyle behaviors9,10 or return to prepregnancy weight9 than women without a history of GDM.8

The Diabetes Prevention Program demonstrated that an intensive, face-to-face lifestyle intervention could achieve weight loss and reduce incidence of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged adults at high risk, including women with a remote GDM history.11 However, face-to-face lifestyle intervention studies in postpartum women have had limited success.12,13 We and others have described barriers to lifestyle modification in women with GDM in the postpartum period, including lack of time and energy, competing work and family demands, and lack of child care.14,15 Given the multiple barriers to face-to-face interventions, and the widespread use of the Internet,16 using Web-based technology to deliver lifestyle change interventions for women with recent GDM may be more successful.14 We therefore adapted the Diabetes Prevention Program into a Web-based lifestyle intervention modified for postpartum women. We conducted a randomized trial of the Web-based lifestyle intervention program (Balance after Baby) to decrease postpartum weight retention in women with recent GDM.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We recruited women aged 18–45 years, with GDM in their most recent pregnancy, from the Diabetes in Pregnancy Program at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, Massachusetts) from May 2010 to August 2011. We defined gestational diabetes as a 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test result (OGTT) meeting Carpenter-Coustan criteria17 or by medical record–documented clinician diagnosis. We excluded women with a personal history of type 2 diabetes or bariatric surgery, women taking medications known to affect body weight as well as women unable to read eighth grade-level English or planning to move out of the area. Additionally, we excluded women delivering before 32 weeks of gestation and with net weight loss during pregnancy. We restricted participants to those whose body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight (kg)/[height (m)]2) increased their risk for diabetes using the same lower cutoffs as the Diabetes Prevention Program (BMI 24 or less; 22 or less for Asian participants). We excluded women with BMIs higher than 50 because we felt they would require a more intensive program. At the time of recruitment, we gave all patients the National Diabetes Education Program's handout for women with prior GDM, “It's Never Too Early to Prevent Diabetes.” The human subjects committee at Brigham and Women's Hospital approved the study; all patients gave written informed consent.

At the initial study visit at 6 weeks postpartum, we randomized eligible patients into the Balance after Baby intervention or control group using a permuted block scheme with randomly varying block sizes. A statistician not otherwise involved in the study prepared sealed sequentially numbered envelopes containing group assignment, and clinical research staff opened these at the end of the first study visit. Women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at the first study visit (by two abnormal values on OGTT or by a single abnormal value that was repeated and again found to be abnormal) were not eligible to continue. We asked women in both arms to return for in-person visits at 6 and 12 months postpartum. Participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at the 6-month visit returned for the 12-month study visit but did not undergo an OGTT.

The two primary outcomes were change in measured body weight at 12 months from 1) first postpartum measured weight and 2) self-reported prepregnancy weight. We recorded self-reported prepregnancy weight at enrollment, either during pregnancy (63/75 [84%]) or after delivery and before the randomization study visit (12/75 [16%]). We reviewed medical records to ascertain insulin use during pregnancy, gestational age at delivery, and mode of delivery. We used the pregnancy weight recorded in the anesthesia record within 2 days before delivery (71/75 [95%]) or the last recorded prenatal weight within 10 days of delivery (4/75 [5%]) to calculate gestational weight gain. We used measured height with self-reported prepregnancy weight to calculate prepregnancy BMI. For participants who did not attend a follow-up study visit, we extracted clinically measured weights from the electronic medical record where available.

At each visit, trained staff measured body weight; the lifestyle coach and study physician did not conduct measurements so as to remain blinded. The protocol for study visits included a 2-hour 75-g OGTT, during which women were asked to refrain from breastfeeding. Glucose, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels, and urine human chorionic gonadotropin were measured using standard assays. Patients completed sociodemographic, medical history, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale,18 food frequency (Harvard Food Frequency Questionnaire),19 International Physical Activity,20 and breastfeeding questionnaires at study visits. We collected data submitted by participants' online forms through Research Electronic Data Capture. Participants submitted online forms after watching modules and also reported modules watched to their lifestyle coach. We collected anonymous web site traffic data to analyze trends in use.

Participants allocated to the intervention were offered a Web-based lifestyle modification program (Balance after Baby). We adapted the 16 core Diabetes Prevention Program modules to 12 core modules tailored for postpartum women with recent GDM. Adaptation included content review by a multidisciplinary team and by subject matter experts at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Women in the Balance after Baby program were given a goal to return to prepregnancy weight over the study period. If participants were still overweight once they had reached their prepregnancy weight, they were encouraged to continue to lose weight with a goal of total 7% weight loss from the 6-week postpartum weight. The intervention program emphasized dietary choices that would transition readily from the pregnancy GDM diet, including lower glycemic index, higher fiber, and controlled portion sizes. The program recommended gradually increasing physical activity to 150 minutes per week or more, including resistance training. We suggested participants track diet and physical activity in log books and participate in telephone or e-mail sessions with their lifestyle coach, a licensed registered dietitian trained in patient-centered counseling. We encouraged women who were breastfeeding to continue.

We created the secure password-protected Balance after Baby web site, including animated videos narrated by a study physician. We asked participants to watch one module each week for the first 12 weeks, and there were six optional “Balance after Core” modules available. The web site provided secure communication with the lifestyle coach, forms to enter goals, weekly weight and physical activity, shopping lists, recipes, menu planning tips, exchange lists, and physical activity education. The breastfeeding section contained four additional breastfeeding modules and a mechanism to contact a lactation consultant.

We suggested participants connect with their lifestyle coach weekly for the first 12 weeks, every other week for the second 12 weeks, and monthly thereafter. A study physician reviewed recorded calls and e-mails to ensure adherence to patient-centered counseling techniques. We provided laptop computers for participants without regular computer access and Internet access for those without sufficient access to participate regularly. Intervention participants received body weight scales, measuring cups and spoons, pedometers, and complimentary membership to the Greater Boston YMCA for up to 10 months if interested.

Patients allocated to the control arm did not receive any additional information to support weight loss beyond the handout they received at recruitment.

We compared baseline characteristics with Pearson's χ2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables. Patients were categorized based on treatment allocation in an intent-to-treat fashion for analyses. We compared differences between groups over time for weight, BMI, fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose, and HbA1c. Women who became pregnant, started assisted reproductive treatment, or had an neonatal death were censored at the time of these events. We accounted for missing values by estimating mixed-effects regression models using a random intercept and an unstructured covariance matrix adjusting for baseline weight. Data after censoring events were considered missing at random, except that we carried forward glucose and HbA1c values for women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at 6 months. We also estimated models that adjusted for gestational weight gain and breastfeeding. We developed linear regression models controlling for baseline kilocalorie intake and breastfeeding to assess changes in dietary intake. We conducted sensitivity analyses for the primary weight outcomes: one without 12 months values for two women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at 6 months, one including self-reported weights when measured weights were not available, one using last value carried forward, and one imputing weight gain at the same rate as mean weight gain in the control group. For our primary outcome of weight change from postpartum to the 12-month study visit, we had 80% power with a sample size of 76 to detect a 3.2-kg mean difference in weight change between groups. We performed analyses using JMP 10 Pro and SAS 9 and analysts were blinded to treatment assignment.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Of 156 women assessed for study eligibility, 118 met eligibility criteria, and 107 of those consented to participate. Of 78 women who attended the baseline visit, three were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and excluded, leaving 75 women randomized into the study. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two arms (Table 1). The study group was diverse with 57% white, 29% African American, 15% Asian, and 20% identifying as Hispanic. Thirty-four percent of patients were low income, and 59% had graduated from college. There were no significant differences between groups for number of women using hormonal forms of contraception or for the types of hormonal contraceptives being used at 6 or 12 months postpartum. We obtained weight for 82% of eligible participants at 6 months postpartum and 88% of eligible participants at 12 months postpartum (Fig. 1).

Table 1

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

At 6 months postpartum, women assigned to the Balance after Baby arm lost 2.6 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] −4.4 to −0.8) from baseline weight, whereas the control group gained 1.4 kg (95% CI −0.4 to +3.1) (P=.002). By 12 months postpartum, the intervention group lost 2.8 kg (95% CI −4.8 to −0.7) compared with a gain of 0.5 kg (95% CI −1.4 to +2.4) in the control arm for a difference between groups of 3.3 kg adjusting for baseline weight (Fig. 2A) (P=.022 for difference between groups). Adjustment for gestational weight gain strengthened the association between the intervention and weight loss at both time points (Table 2).



Table 2

Table 2

In a separate model adjusting for gestational weight gain, women in the intervention were 0.7 kg below prepregnancy weight (−3.5 to +2.2) at 12 months postpartum compared with control arm women who were 4.0 kg above prepregnancy weight (+1.3 to +6.8; P=.035; Fig. 2B). Further adjustment for breastfeeding did not substantially change the findings. Women in the intervention arm decreased their BMI at 12 months (−1.1, 95% CI −1.9 to −0.4) compared with women in the control group (+0.2, −0.5 to +0.9; P=.004; Table 2). In three separate sensitivity analyses, using self-reported weights, last value carried forward, and missing weights imputed at the rate of weight gain in the control group, findings were similar in both arms. Exclusion of women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes during the study period also did not change the findings.

Of women who underwent an OGTT, 10 of 30 (33%) in the control group compared with 6 of 27 (22%) in the intervention group had impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes at 12 months postpartum (P = nonsignificant). There were no significant differences in OGTT glucose values, HbA1c, type 2 diabetes, or Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores (data not shown) between groups at any of the study visits. Three women in the control group were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (two at 6 months and one at 12 months postpartum) compared with none in the intervention group.

In linear regression models controlling for baseline kilocalorie intake and breastfeeding, lifestyle intervention was associated with total daily dietary intake of 177±84 kcal less at 6 months (P=.041) and 180±101 kcal less at 12 months (P=.079). There were no significant differences between groups in time spent walking or time engaged in moderate or heavy physical activity. There were no differences in breastfeeding prevalence between groups at 6 or 12 months postpartum.

Intervention participants reported watching a median of 9 of 12 modules with 33% watching all 12 core modules at least once and all participants watching at least one module. The median number of contacts with the lifestyle coach was seven (range 0–12; only one participant had no contact) over the first 12 weeks of the program, four (range 0–9) over the second 12 weeks of the program, and two (range 0–10) over the last 6 months of the program. Four women contacted the lactation consultant. Participants accessed the web site on all days of the week and at all times of day and night. Women accessed the web site from home, work, and from mobile phones. We provided laptops and Internet for three and two women, respectively. Sixty-one percent of participants logged dietary intake at least once and 67% used pedometers. One-third of participants used the YMCA at least once but only six used it for more than 1 month.

Back to Top | Article Outline


This study demonstrates the feasibility and efficacy of the Web-based Balance after Baby lifestyle modification program to decrease postpartum weight retention in the first postpartum year for women with recent GDM. Intervention participants returned to their prepregnancy weight at 1 year, whereas control participants remained significantly above prepregnancy weight. Our study findings are important given that pregnancy weight retained at 6 months postpartum is highly predictive for future obesity,1,2 and weight retention at 1 year postpartum is predictive of BMI higher than 25 15 years later.3 In contrast to many weight loss interventions in nonpostpartum populations in which maximal weight loss is typically reached at approximately 6 months,21 women in our study continued to lose weight from 6 to 12 months postpartum. Although we were not powered to detect a difference in glucose tolerance over the first 12 months, it is notable that all three cases of type 2 diabetes occurred in the control group.

This study was powered to detect differences in postpartum weight retention. Caloric intake and physical activity were examined as secondary outcomes. There was greater reduction in calorie intake in the intervention compared with the control group, which may have contributed to the weight loss difference between groups. We did not detect significant differences in physical activity between groups, and the YMCA membership was underused. Other studies have shown that postpartum women did not increase exercise despite targeted interventions.12,22,23

Strengths of our study include the randomized controlled design in a diverse population. Unlike prior studies of weight loss in postpartum women, we achieved substantial engagement by using Web-based delivery and lifestyle coaching by phone or e-mail to decrease barriers to participation. There are several limitations to the study. As a single-center trial, results may not be generalizable to other populations. Prepregnancy weight was based on self-report, which could result in recall bias; however, mean weight changes from self-reported prepregnancy weight to 12 months measured weight were similar to that from measured 6 weeks' weight. In addition, because these self-reported data were obtained before randomization, the effect of the bias on the primary outcome should be minimized. Other studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between self-reported and clinically measured prepregnancy weight.24,25 Some participants were lost to follow-up (5%), and we accounted for this using an intent-to-treat analysis. We were not able to measure cost-effectiveness in this study.

The successful weight loss in our study may translate to short-term benefits including decreased complications in future pregnancies26–28 and long-term reduction in obesity and cardiometabolic disease. A post hoc analysis of women with GDM in the Diabetes Prevention Program found a net weight loss of 1.6 kg on average was associated with a 53% decreased risk for type 2 diabetes at 3 years.11 Because women with GDM tend to retain or gain weight postpartum,9 we believe our findings demonstrating a 3.3-kg difference between groups is of clinical significance. Given that obesity is the strongest modifiable risk factor for type 2 diabetes,29 novel strategies to increase postpartum weight loss in women with recent GDM may decrease the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Because this program can be delivered remotely through a web site and lifestyle coach, we believe that it would be low cost to implement and has potential for broad dissemination. A larger and longer study is needed to determine whether the Web-based Balance after Baby lifestyle program would decrease progression to type 2 diabetes in women with recent GDM.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Rooney BL, Schauberger CW. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: one decade later. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:245–52.
2. Schmitt NM, Nicholson WK, Schmitt J. The association of pregnancy and the development of obesity—results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on the natural history of postpartum weight retention. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:1642–51.
3. Linné Y, Dye L, Barkeling B, Rössner S. Long-term weight development in women: a 15-year follow-up of the effects of pregnancy. Obes Res 2004;12:1166–78.
4. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373:1773–9.
5. Baptiste-Roberts K, Barone B, Gary T, Golden S, Wilson L, Bass E, et al.. Risk factors for type 2 diabetes among women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review. Am J Med 2009;122:207–214.e4.
6. Peters RK, Kjos SL, Xiang A, Buchanan TA. Long-term diabetogenic effect of single pregnancy in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1996;347:227–30.
7. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Arky RA, et al.. Weight as a risk factor for clinical diabetes in women. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:501–13.
8. American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(suppl 1):S103–5.
9. Bennett WL, Liu SH, Yeh HC, Nicholson WK, Gunderson EP, Lewis CE, et al.. Changes in weight and health behaviors after pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: the CARDIA study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013;21:1269–75.
10. Kieffer EC, Sinco B, Kim C. Health behaviors among women of reproductive age with and without a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1788–93.
11. Ratner RE, Christophi CA, Metzger BE, Dabelea D, Bennett PH, Pi-Sunyer X, et al.. Prevention of diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes: effects of metformin and lifestyle interventions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:4774–9.
12. Østbye T, Krause KM, Lovelady CA, Morey MC, Bastian LA, Peterson BL, et al.. Active mothers postpartum: a randomized controlled weight-loss intervention trial. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:173–80.
13. Sarwer DB, Allison KC, Gibbons LM, Markowitz JT, Nelson DB. Pregnancy and obesity: a review and agenda for future research. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15:720–33.
14. Nicklas JM, Zera CA, Seely EW, Abdul-Rahim ZS, Rudloff ND, Levkoff SE. Identifying postpartum intervention approaches to prevent type 2 diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:23.
15. Swan W, Kilmartin G, Liaw ST. Assessment of readiness to prevent type 2 diabetes in a population of rural women with a history of gestational diabetes. Rural Remote Health 2007;7:802.
16. Pew Research Center's Internet & Americal Life Project Spring Tracking Survey, April 17–May 19. 2013. Available at: Retrieved September 30, 2013.
17. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768–73.
18. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:782–6.
19. Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Litin LB, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:1114–36.
20. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al.. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1381–95.
21. Wadden TA, Crerand CE, Brock J. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2005;28:151–70, ix.
22. Hu G, Tian H, Zhang F, Liu H, Zhang C, Zhang S, et al.. Tianjin gestational diabetes mellitus prevention program: study design, methods, and 1-year interim report on the feasibility of lifestyle intervention program. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;98:508–17.
23. Wilkinson S, Huang CM, Walker LO, Sterling BS, Kim M. Physical activity in low-income postpartum women. J Nurs Scholarsh 2004;36:109–14.
24. Shin D, Chung H, Weatherspoon L, Song WO. Validity of prepregnancy weight status estimated from self-reported height and weight. Matern Child Health J 2013 [Epub ahead of print].
25. Oken E, Taveras EM, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW. Gestational weight gain and child adiposity at age 3 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:322.e1–8.
26. Glazer NL, Hendrickson AF, Schellenbaum GD, Mueller BA. Weight change and the risk of gestational diabetes in obese women. Epidemiology 2004;15:733–7.
27. Catalano PM, Ehrenberg HM. The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. BJOG 2006;113:1126–33.
28. Ehrlich S, Hedderson M, Feng J, Davenport E, Gunderson E, Ferrara A. Change in body mass index between pregnancies and the risk of gestational diabetes in a second pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1323–30.
29. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al.. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289:76–9.
© 2014 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.