Contents: Questioning Clinical PracticePathologic Assessment of the Placenta Evidence Compared With TraditionPolnaszek, Brock E. MD; Clark, Steven L. MD; Rouse, Dwight J. MD Author Information Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; and the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Corresponding author: Brock E. Polnaszek, MD, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; email: [email protected]. Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest. Each author has confirmed compliance with the journal's requirements for authorship. Dr. Rouse, Deputy Editor (Obstetrics) of Obstetrics & Gynecology, was not involved in the review or decision to publish this article. Peer reviews are available at https://links.lww.com/AOG/C635. Obstetrics & Gynecology: April 2022 - Volume 139 - Issue 4 - p 660-667 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004719 Buy SDC Metrics In Brief With few exceptions, adherence to ethical, outcomes-focused, evidence-based, and cost-effective medicine does not support placental pathology examination. © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.