To evaluate the incidence rate and relative risk of a seizure disorder after eclampsia.
We evaluated 1,565,733 births in a retrospective data linkage cohort study in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2014. We included females aged 15–50 years and excluded patients with epilepsy, conditions predisposing to seizure, and those who died within 30 days of the delivery discharge date. The exposure was defined as a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, namely 1) eclampsia, 2) preeclampsia, or 3) gestational hypertension. The referent was an unaffected pregnancy. The primary outcome was the risk of seizure disorder starting 31 days after a hospital birth discharge. Risk was expressed as an incidence rate and a hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI. The predefined study hypothesis was that women with eclampsia would have an increased risk of future seizure disorder.
There were 1,615 (0.10%) pregnancies exclusively affected by eclampsia, 17,264 (1.1%) with preeclampsia, 60,863 (3.9%) with gestational hypertension, and 1,485,991 (94.9%) unaffected. A future seizure disorder was significantly more likely after a pregnancy with eclampsia (4.58/10,000 person-years) than a pregnancy without a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (0.72/10,000 person-years; crude HR 6.09, 95% CI 2.73–13.60). The adjusted HR was minimally attenuated from 6.09 to 5.42 (95% CI 2.42–12.12) after multivariable adjustment for confounders at the index birth as well as adjusting for traumatic brain injury, stroke, cerebral tumor, aneurysm or hemorrhage, and multiple sclerosis. The risk of seizure disorder was doubled in pregnancies affected by preeclampsia (adjusted HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.21–3.17), but not by gestational hypertension (adjusted HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.71–1.43).
Women with eclampsia should be reassured that, although the relative risk of a seizure disorder is higher than unaffected women, the absolute risk is extremely low (approximately one seizure/2,200 person-years).
Women with eclampsia have an increased long-term relative risk of a seizure disorder compared with unaffected women, but the absolute risk is extremely low.
Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, and the Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; the Keenan Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital Research Institute, the Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, the Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Hospital Research Institute, the Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, and the Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Corresponding author: Kara A. Nerenberg, MD, Department of Medicine, Foothills Hospital, HSC 1410, 3330 Hospital Drive, NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada; email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
This study was funded by the University of Toronto's Department of Medicine. This study was also supported by the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Dr Ray is supported by an Applied Research Chair in Reproductive and Child Health Services and Policy Research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this article are those of the authors and are independent from the funding or supporting sources.
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Each author has indicated that he or she has met the journal's requirements for authorship.