Patient Perspectives Regarding Clinician Communication During Telemedicine Compared With In-Clinic Abortion

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: 

To explore patient perspectives regarding patient–clinician communication during telemedicine medication abortion compared with traditional, facility based, in-clinic visits.

METHODS: 

We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants who received either live, face-to-face telemedicine or in-clinic medication abortion from a large, reproductive health care facility in Washington State. Using Miller's conceptual framework for patient–doctor communication in telemedicine settings, we developed questions exploring participants' experiences of the medication abortion consultation, including the clinician's verbal and nonverbal interpersonal approach and communication of relevant medical information, and the setting where care was received. We used inductive-deductive constant comparative analysis to identify major themes. We summarize patient perspectives using patient–clinician communication terms outlined in Dennis' quality abortion care indicator list.

RESULTS: 

Thirty participants completed interviews (aged 20–38 years), 20 of whom had medication abortion by telemedicine and 10 who received in-clinic services. Participants who received telemedicine abortion services reported high-quality patient–clinician communication, which came from their freedom to choose their consultation location, and reported feeling more relaxed during clinical encounters. In contrast, most in-clinic participants portrayed their consultations as lengthy, chaotic, and lacking comfort. In all other domains, both telemedicine and in-clinic participants reported similar levels of interpersonal connection to their clinicians. Both groups appreciated medical information about how to take the abortion pills and relied heavily on clinic-based printed materials and independent online resources to answer questions during the at-home termination process. Both telemedicine and in-clinic participant groups were highly satisfied with their care.

CONCLUSION: 

Patient-centered communication skills used by clinicians during facility based, in-clinic care translated well to the telemedicine setting. However, we found that patients who received medication abortion through telemedicine favorably ranked their patient–clinician communication overall as compared with those in traditional, in-clinic settings. In this way, telemedicine abortion appears to be a beneficial patient-centered approach to this critical reproductive health service.

In Brief

Telemedicine appears to be a beneficial, patient-centered approach to critically needed first-trimester abortion services.