Intrauterine Device Use and Cervical Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis : Obstetrics & Gynecology

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Contents: Dysplasia: Review

Intrauterine Device Use and Cervical Cancer Risk

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Cortessis, Victoria K. PhD; Barrett, Malcolm MPH; Brown Wade, Niquelle MS; Enebish, Temuulen MBBS, MPH; Perrigo, Judith L. MSW, LCSW; Tobin, Jessica MS; Zhong, Charlie MS, MPH; Zink, Jennifer BA; Isiaka, Vanessa MD; Muderspach, Laila I. MD; Natavio, Melissa MD, MPH; McKean-Cowdin, Roberta PhD

Author Information
Obstetrics & Gynecology 130(6):p 1226-1236, December 2017. | DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002307


To estimate the association between use of an intrauterine device (IUD) and risk of cervical cancer by subjecting existing data to critical review, quantitative synthesis, and interpretation.


We searched PubMed, Web of Science,, and catalogs of scientific meetings and abstracts, theses, and dissertations queried from inception through July 2016.


Examination of abstracts from 225 reports identified 34 studies with individual-level measures of use of an IUD and incident cervical cancer. By critically assessing the full text of these reports, independent reviewers identified 17 studies conducted without recognized sources of systematic error, of which 16 could be harmonized for meta-analysis.


Point and interval estimates of the association between use of an IUD and incident cervical cancer were extracted from original reports into a structured database along with key features of study design and implementation. A random-effects meta-analysis was implemented to quantitatively synthesize extracted estimates and assess likely influence of publication bias, residual confounding, heterogeneity of true effect size, and human papillomavirus prevalence and cervical cancer incidence in source populations. Women who used an IUD experienced less cervical cancer (summary odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.53–0.77). Neither confounding by recognized risk factors nor publication bias seems a plausible explanation for the apparent protective effect, which may be stronger in populations with higher cervical cancer incidence.


Invasive cervical cancer may be approximately one third less frequent in women who have used an IUD. This possible noncontraceptive benefit could be most beneficial in populations with severely limited access to screening and concomitantly high cervical cancer incidence.

© 2017 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid