Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Management of Endometrial Precancers

Trimble, Cornelia L. MD; Method, Michael MD, MPH; Leitao, Mario MD; Lu, Karen MD; Ioffe, Olga MD; Hampton, Moss MD; Higgins, Robert MD; Zaino, Richard MD; Mutter, George L. MD

doi: http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826bb121
Current Commentary

In the United States, endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer of the female reproductive system. Strategies to sensitively and accurately diagnose premalignant endometrial lesions are sorely needed. We reviewed studies pertaining to the diagnostic challenges of endometrial precancers, their predictive value, and evidence to support management strategies. Currently, two diagnostic schemas are in use: the four-class 1994 World Health Organization hyperplasia system, based on morphologic features of architectural complexity and nuclear atypia and, more recently, the two-class endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia system, which is quantitative. Diagnosis should use criteria and terminology that distinguish between clinicopathologic entities that can be managed differently. In some instances, such as for women with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, biomarkers may aid in diagnosis, but the clinical utility of biomarkers has yet to be determined. Total hysterectomy is curative for atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, and provides a definitive standard for assessment of a concurrent carcinoma, when clinically appropriate. If hysterectomy is performed for atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, then intraoperative assessment of the uterine specimen for occult carcinoma is desirable, but optional. Nonsurgical management may be appropriate for patients who wish to preserve fertility or those for whom surgery is not a viable option. Treatment with progestin therapy may provide a safe alternative to hysterectomy; however, clinical trials of hormonal therapies for atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia have not yet established a standard regimen. Future studies will need to determine the optimal nonsurgical management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, standardizing agent, dose, schedule, clinical outcomes, and appropriate follow-up.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Oncology, and Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, and the Department of Pathology, University of Maryland Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland; the Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium, South Bend, Indiana; Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center of the Permian Basin, Odessa, Texas; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; the Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Corresponding author: Cornelia L. Trimble, MD, Phipps 255, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287; e-mail:

For more information about the process used to generate this article, see the Appendix online at

The authors thank medical editor Michael Linde for assisting in the preparation of the manuscript. Manuscript editing was funded by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

© 2012 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.