The CGSC was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 2015.
The recruited new and return patients for the registry between December 21, 2015 and September 9, 2018 met the following inclusion criteria:
- Over 18 years of age.
- Clinical diagnosis of primary angle-closure suspect (PACS), primary angle-closure (PAC), PACG, acute primary angle closure (APAC), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), pigmentary glaucoma (PG), and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG), any patient with these diagnosis in 1 eye or both eyes.
- The ability of patient or legally authorized representative (primarily spouse, parents, adult children, otherwise indicated) to provide informed consent.
The definition of Glaucoma was in accordance with the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiologic Ophthalmology criteria11 and Consensus on diagnosis and treatment of primary glaucoma in China,12 as detailed below:
- POAG is defined as open-angle, with either glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) or the visual field loss, with or without raised intraocular pressure (IOP) 11.
- PACS is defined as 2 or more quadrants of iridotrabecular contact (ITC), normal IOP, no PAS, and no evidence of GON 11.
- PAC is defined as ITC resulting in PAS and, or raised IOP. No evidence of GON 11.
- PACG is defined as ITC resulting in GON, PAS, and raised IOP may be absent at the time of initial examination 11.
- APAC is defined as when iris quickly and completely contacts the entire trabecular meshwork, leading to sudden symptomatic elevation of IOP,13 pressure-induced corneal edema, a mid-dilated pupil, vascular congestion, eye pain, and/or headache.14
- PG is defined as reduction of trabecular outflow owing to melanin granules, raised IOP resulting in GON. The background condition is pigmentary syndrome 15.
- PXG is defined as pseudoexfoliative material and pigment granules accumulate in the trabecular meshwork causing decreased aqueous humor outflow and significantly elevated IOP resulting in GON.15
If there are different diagnosis in both eyes, the patient would be considered as for the more severe diagnosis. For example, if 1 eye is PACG, the other eye is PAC, we considered the patient as PACG patient. If 1 eye is APAC, the other eye is PACS, then we considered the patient as APAC patient. If 1 eye is PXG, the other eye is POAG, then we considered the patient as PXG patient.
If there is combined-mechanism glaucoma or the diagnosis is hard to make, the information of the patient will be sent to Beijing Tongren Hospital, the steering committee will help the doctors to make the diagnosis. We count the patients as the first diagnosis of glaucoma.
Other types of glaucoma such as post-traumatic glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma, inflammatory glaucoma, were not included in the CGSC, because the study was more focused on the genetic research of glaucoma.
The study will collect 10,000 primary angle-closure disease (PACD) patients, 10,000 POAG patients, and 10,000 normal controls for the end of the enrollment.
Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded from the research (ie, missing diagnosis, such as other secondary glaucoma, post-traumatic glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma, inflammatory glaucoma, etc.), patients under 18 years of age or refuse to sign the informed consent).
Collection and Management of the Data and Blood Samples
A clinical data collection protocol and case report form were designed by the CGSC steering committee. Electronic Data Capture (EDC) designed by experts from Tongren Hospital and Gauss Informed Ltd was used for data collection.
The information collected included demographics, contact information, medical and surgical history, medication use, diagnosis, disease management. Patient examination was performed and included visual acuity, IOP, slit-lamp examination, fundus photograph, gonioscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy, anatomical parameters including axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and central corneal thickness and visual field. Pupil dilation was only performed in POAG/PXG/PG patients. There are standard operating procedures of information collection, examination, blood collection. The data collection was performed by trained research coordinators from the outpatient and inpatient medical records. The examinations were conducted by experienced doctors, trained nurses, and optometrists.
All data elements were automatically checked for completeness and proper examination results by EDC. Each investigator had his own account and password to login on the EDC system. EDC also provided functions to mark the queries, summarize and finalize the report, and remind investigators and research team of the site to correct mistakes. Doctors from Tongren Hospital, check the clinical information and diagnosis and treatment in the EDC system. They give queries to the doctors of the site, to make sure the data accuracy (examination, diagnosis, and treatment, etc.).
Research coordinators were trained before and during the trial kick-off meeting. During the trial, training meetings were held every year since December 2015. Trained research coordinators timely visited each site to review the medical records to identify and monitor the patients’ data collection and blood sample collection.
Beijing Clinical Service Center, an independent research organization, was responsible for checking the whole progress and visiting each site to ensure the accuracy, completeness of the data, and the correct procedure throughout the study period.
All the aggregate data was collected and analyzed by an expert statistician from Tongren Center for research purposes.
The blood samples were collected from the peripheral vein of each patient by trained nurses and transferred to Tongren Hospital for genetic analysis by a cold chain logistics company, named JINYU, equipped with real-time temperature monitoring.
The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used for both glaucoma patients and cataract patients as controls in the CGSC. The VFQ-25 is a reliable and valid 25-item version of the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ).16,17 The self-administered questionnaire with 25 items exploring 12 dimensions can assess health-related quality of life in any vision decreased eye disease.18 The HADS is a 14-item scales with a valid and reliable self-rating scale that measures anxiety and depression in both hospital and community settings. HADS gives clinically meaningful results as a psychological screening tool and can assess the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression in patients with illness and the general population.19 Scores and grades are assigned for these questionnaires. Scores of 8 or above are “anxiety or depression” and scores of 11 or higher are “moderate to severe anxiety and depression” (normal 0 to 7, mild 8 to 10, moderate 11 to 14, severe 15 to 21). Both questionnaires were used because they were widely used in a number of quality of life studies of ocular diseases.
Frequency and percentages were used for statistical description of categorical variables including sex, ethnicity and glaucoma subtypes. Mean values and SD were used to make a statistical description for age, which was normally distributed. For other continuous variables and ordinal variables, the median values and interquartile range were used.
Between December 21, 2015 and September 9, 2018, the medical records of a total of 10,892 patients were collected. Of these, 5762 (52.9%) had complete information. However, patient recruitment has not been completed yet and therefore the medical information and blood sample collection are still ongoing.
The baseline characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 2. Sex distribution indicated that of all patients 64.75% were females, while 35.25% were male. The mean age at enrollment was 62.05±11.26 years. In Table 2 are also listed the patient diagnosis, as follows: PACD was predominant (4588, 79.63%), including PACS (160, 3.49%)/PAC (246, 5.36%)/PACG (1903, 33.03%)/APAC (2279, 39.55%), and the others were POAG (1116, 19.37%), PXG (41, 0.71%) and PG (17, 0.30%).
A total of 16,684 blood samples were collected, of these, 9917 (82.68%) were PACD, 1987 (16.57%) were POAG, 69 (0.58%) were EG, 22 (0.18%) were PG, and 4689 were normal control.
The CGSC has established the biggest glaucoma clinical information databank and blood bank.
The CGSC has enrolled patients since December 21, 2015 and the enrollment is still ongoing. During this study, the baseline characteristics of the participating hospitals and patients were reported. The CGSC has become a database of glaucoma patients from 111 hospitals covering all parts of mainland China. This study provides an opportunity to assess the level of glaucoma diagnosis and treatment across the country at different regional and economic levels. The economic development of the eastern China region is rapid, with a concentrated population and rich medical resources,20 therefore more hospitals were selected from this part of the nation. Meanwhile, the economic development of the western region lags behind, the population is scarce and the medical resources are also relatively inadequate, hence the hospitals from western China are rare in the CGSC registry.
It was observed that reports of POAG were much more common than PACG worldwide in many western-based studies, as PACG is considered a fairly rare disease in white populations.1 The prevalence of PACG was observed to be much higher in the Asian population (0.12% to 2.5%) compared with western white population (rare—0.6%) and African descent (0.5%).21 In a population-based study, the overall pooled prevalence of POAG and PACG were 0.7%, and 1.4% in China, respectively.22 However, in the hospital-based study, PACG was more predominant, the percentage of PACG varying between 45.40% 5 and 51.69% 6 because PACG patients are more likely to come to the hospital for eye pain 8. With a smaller corneal diameter, smaller anterior chamber depth and more anteriorly placed lens, PACD is much easier to diagnose than POAG 5. From the CGSC data, PACD is also in majority at 79.63%, notably more than POAG (19.37%), the POAG-to-PACD ratio being 4.11:1.
Female sex is recognized as a major predisposing factor for the development of PACG23,24 in the CGSA database as 64.75% of patients were female and the sex ratio (female/male) was 1.89. Furthermore, advancing age is one of the most consistent risk factors for glaucoma, irrespective of being POAG, PACG or secondary glaucoma.25,26 In the CGSC study, the average age was 62.05±11.26 years.
The CGSC is a special study because it collected information about history anatomy, biometry and different treatment strategies for glaucoma patients. The information collected will play an important role in understanding the medical treatment situation, geographical distribution and local level of diagnosis, and the treatment of glaucoma patients in China. The consortium is built to construct a research platform to carry out high-quality multicenter clinical research, improve clinical research capacity and promote new technology and new projects throughout China. The blood samples collected will be used in following GWAS and other genetic studies. We already collected 16,684 blood samples to establish a blood bank of glaucoma in China.
Some limitations were also noted in the CGSC study. Although the participating hospitals covered all parts of mainland China, the steering committee selected through agencies such as the China Glaucoma Association by convenience. As a result, these participating hospitals have more glaucoma patients, research resources and glaucoma specialists. Therefore, it may be difficult to represent the level of glaucoma diagnosis and treatment in primary hospitals, especially in remote areas.
Despite these limitations, CGSC was designed to be the first registry study for glaucoma patients in China. In 2016, 5 new loci associated with PACG were found in the multicenter international collaborative GWAS research27 in which blood samples of Chinese patients were from the CGSC blood bank.
The data collected by CGSC will be analyzed in order to provide reference for future clinical practice of glaucoma and the application of evidence-based medicine for glaucoma treatment in China. Hospital-based surveys and prospective clinical studies focused on glaucoma are being performed in the hospitals of CGSC.
The authors are on behalf of the investigators for The Chinese Glaucoma Study Consortium investigators and thank them for their cooperation and hard work.
1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma
worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–267.
2. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma
and projections of glaucoma
burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090.
3. Wang B, Congdon N, Bourne R. Burden of vision loss associated with eye disease in China
1990-2020: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:220–224.
4. Pan CW, Zhao CH, Yu MB, et al. Prevalence, types, and awareness of glaucoma
in a multi-ethnic population in rural China
: the Yunnan Minority Eye Study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36:664–670.
5. Yang Z, Fu JL, Li YL, et al. Epidemiology
and clinical characteristics of patients with glaucoma
: an analysis of hospital data between 2003 and 2012. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63:825–831.
6. Zheng YY, Zhang YQ, Sun XH. Epidemiologic characteristics of 10 years hospitalized patients with glaucoma
at Shanghai eye and ear, nose, and throat hospital. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e4254.
7. Lü ZP, Chen XM. Proportion and its changes in hospitalized patients with glaucoma
in West China
Hospital. Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;11:1953–1956.
8. Zhang YL, Wang CY, Peng AM. The characteristics of proportion in hospitalized patient with glaucoma
. Chin J Pract Ophthalmol. 2011;29:284–286.
9. Hu Z, Li Z, Yu J, et al. Association analysis identifies new risk loci for non-obstructive azoospermia in Chinese men. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3857.
10. Minister of Health. Acts for Hospital Classification. China
: Minister of Health; 1989.
11. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma
in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238–242.
Section, Ophthalmology Branch, Chinese Medical Association. Consensus on diagnosis and treatment of primary glaucoma
. Chin J Ophthalmol. 2014;50:382–383.
13. Sun X, Dai Y, Chen Y, et al. Primary angle-closure glaucoma
: what we know and what we don’t know. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;57:26–45.
14. Prum BE, Herndon LW, Moroi SE, et al. Primary angle closure preferred practice pattern(®) guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:P1–P40.
15. European Glaucoma
Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma
(OL). 2014. Available at: http://www.eugs.org
16. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:227–233.
17. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, et al. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1496–1504.
18. Reynaud C, Rousseau A, Kaswin G, et al. Persistent impairment of quality of life in patients with herpes simplex keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:160–169.
19. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–370.
20. Zhang J, Shia B, Yi H, et al. Illness and medical and other expenditures: observations from western and eastern China
. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:69.
21. Cho HK, Kee C. Population-based glaucoma
prevalence studies in Asians. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59:434–447.
22. Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Ma XY, et al. The prevalence of primary glaucoma
in mainland China
: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma
23. Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. The Tajimi Study report 2: prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma
in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1661–1669.
24. He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma
in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2782–2788.
25. Vijaya L, George R, Asokan R, et al. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in an urban population: the Chennai Glaucoma
Study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:477–481.
26. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Seah SK, et al. Rates of hospital admissions for primary angle-closure glaucoma
among Chinese, Malays, and Indians in Singapore. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:990–992.
27. Khor CC, Do T, Wang N, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify five new susceptibility loci for primary angle-closure glaucoma
. Nat Genet. 2016;48:556–562.
Keywords:Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
glaucoma; China; epidemiology; protocol