Immunonutrition of perioperative therapy for colorectal cancer : Formosan Journal of Surgery

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

REVIEW ARTICLES

Immunonutrition of perioperative therapy for colorectal cancer

Wu, Jin-Minga,∗; Chang, Kai-Hsingb; Hsu, Francis Li-Tienc

Author Information
Formosan Journal of Surgery 56(1):p 9-11, January 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/FS9.0000000000000002
  • Open

Abstract

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer and the second most common etiology of cancer-related deaths worldwide.[1] Although genetic abnormalities play an important role in the occurrence of colorectal cancer, several elements of a so-called Western lifestyle are associated with its development, such as a lack of regular physical activity, obesity, a diet low in fruit/vegetables, and high-fat and low-fiber diet.[2] Surgery in conjunction with chemotherapy is usually prescribed as a curative treatment. With the advancement of instruments and the application of minimal invasive surgery, the outcomes have improved significantly in the modern era, leading to lower rates of surgical complications and better patient quality of life (less wound pain, shorter hospital stay, and earlier recovery of bowel function).[3]

Malnutrition has been considered a risk factor for surgical complications among patients with major trauma,[4] breast cancer,[5] hepatocellular carcinoma,[6] and pancreatic cancer.[7] Malnutrition is less common in colorectal cancer patients than in gastric or periampullary cancer patients,[8] whereas overweight is more common, which may contribute to the occurrence of medical complications due to the associated cardiovascular dysfunction and poor physical reserve capacity. Further, colorectal patients who are overweight or obese carry 20%–50% higher odds of developing surgical site infection (SSI) after colectomy compared with normal-weight patients.[9] The reasons why colectomy is associated with increased rates of SSI include contamination and immunosuppression due to surgical stress or cancer cachexia.[10] As the occurrence of SSI causes both prolonged hospital stays and increased medical costs,[11] an effective strategy to prevent SSI can reduce healthcare costs by as much as US $27,000 per patient.[12]

Immunonutrition is a modified nutritional formula that involves the addition of glutamine, arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, nucleotides, and other potential compounds to the diet that has become popular since the 1990s.[13] The guidelines from both the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition[14] and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism[15] recommend the use of immunonutrition for cancer patients undergoing major surgery. Notably, the evidence supporting the guidelines mostly comes from randomized clinical trials conducted with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer patients. According to these studies, the perioperative use of immunonutrition helps decrease infectious complications, especially in the SSI.[16] At present, few studies have elucidated the benefits of immunonutrition for colorectal cancer patients undergoing colectomy. The main aim of this mini-review is to investigate whether the current academic evidence supports the use of perioperative immunonutrition to improve surgical outcomes and enhance recovery for this population.

2. Trends of Associated Published Articles

Studies focused on the administration of perioperative immunonutrition in colorectal cancer patients have become more and more common over the past 20 years. Using the PubMed database, the search terms (“colorectal cancer” OR “colorectal carcinoma”) AND (“immunonutrition”) AND (“preoperative” OR “perioperative” OR “postoperative”) were used to conduct a thorough review of the relevant studies. The search was conducted on August 10, 2022. Figure 1 illustrates the trends of the published articles. As we know, immunonutrition may have the potential to modulate immunologic and inflammatory responses, which may augment host defense mechanisms and improve surgical outcomes. From the clinical experiences of cancer patients other than colorectal cancer patients, the clinical studies emphasize some of the study aims, including change in the immune system, timing of the supplementation of immunonutrition, and surgical outcomes. The next paragraph presents the evolution of high-quality research on the application of perioperative immunonutrition in colorectal cancer patients undergoing colectomy over time. To ensure sufficient evidence quality, only prospective studies (randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies) are described in the following section.

F1
Figure 1:
Trend of published articles regarding application of perioperative immunonutrition in general (blue) and in colorectal cancer patients (red) (2022: only enrolled January to September). The search terms (“immunonutrition”) AND (“preoperative” OR “perioperative” OR “postoperative”) AND (“colorectal cancer” OR “colorectal carcinoma”) AND (“immunonutrition”) AND (“preoperative” OR “perioperative” OR “postoperative”) were used, respectively.

3. Review of High-Quality Articles

One randomized double-blind clinical trial (RCT) used four groups to investigate not only the impact of immunonutrition on the surgical outcomes between preoperative use and perioperative use but also the differences between immunonutrition and conventional treatment (no supplementation).[17] It concluded that preoperative immunonutrition with a formula enriched with oral arginine and n-3 fatty acids decreases the infection rate and that prolonged immunonutrition supplementation during the postoperative period has no additional benefit.[17] The change in immune response after surgery caused Th-2 dominance, which is associated with early cancer recurrence and infectious complications.[18] Matsuda et al.[19] conducted a prospective observation study investigating whether 5-day preoperative immunonutrition supplementation (arginine, ω-3 fatty acids, and ribonucleic acid) corrected the imbalance of type 1/2 CD4+ T cells (Th1/Th2), which showed that preoperative immunonutrition was beneficial for correcting the impaired Th1/Th2 balance on both postoperative day (POD) 0 and at the end of the postoperative period (POD 14). With the popularity of minimally invasive surgery for colectomy, we may wonder whether immunonutrition still improves surgical outcomes for this population. Finco et al.[20] conducted an RCT to answer this question, which proved that perioperative immunonutrition was useful for enhancing the abilities of the perioperative immunologic cells by improving the cleansing and relaxation of the intestines. Further, another RCT found that perioperative supplementation with immunonutrients lowered surgical wound infection rates in colorectal cancer patients undergoing colorectal surgery.[21] Furthermore, a multicenter RCT found that perioperative supplementation with immunonutrition had the benefit of reducing infectious complications, even with the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols.[22] Finally, the role of arginine in enhancing natural killer cell function in colorectal surgery has been showcased in a single-center translational RCT study.[23]Table 1 summarizes the study designs in these articles.

Table 1 - Effect of Perioperative Immunonutrition Supplementation on Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Colectomy
Authors Braga et al., 2002[17] Matsuda et al., 2006[19] Finco et al., 2007[20] Moya et al., 2016[21] Moya et al., 2016[22] Angka et al., 2022[23]
Study design Randomized controlled trial Prospective observation study Randomized controlled trial Randomized controlled trial Randomized controlled trial Randomized controlled trial
Study place Italy Japan Italy Spain Spain Canada
No. study groups 4 2 2 2 2 2
Sample size 200 36 28 128 264 24
Formula compounds Arginine, 12.5 g/L; omega-3 fatty acids, 3.3 g/L Arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA (IMPACT) Arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, and RNA (IMPACT) ATEMPERO ATEMPERO Arginine, 4.2 g/85 g (EMN, Enhanced Medical Nutrition)
Timing and duration
Preoperative 5 d; 1 L/d 5 d; 750 mL/d 6 d; 750 mL/d 7 d; 800 mL/d 7 d; 800 mL/d 5 d; 12.6 g arginine per day
Postoperative 5–7 d No use No use 5 d; 800 mL/d 5 d; 800 mL/d 5 d; 12.6 g arginine per day
End points Infectious complications Th1/Th2 balance No. immune cells Infectious complications Infectious complications NK cell cytotoxicity
Suggestion Recommend Recommend Recommend Recommend Recommend Recommend

4. Considerations for Immunonutrition

There are a few special considerations that we must bear in mind before recommending that patients undergo immunonutrition supplementation. First, immunonutrition with arginine is contraindicated in patients with shock or concomitant hemodynamic instability because arginine causes vasodilatation.[24] Second, glutamine supplementation should be avoided in patients with moderate to severe renal or hepatic insufficiency, who may have poor prognoses.[25] Third, the administration of immunonutrition during the postoperative period may be specifically selected for malnourished subjects.[24] Fourth, there are many commercial formulae for immunonutrition, but most lack academic evidence for their efficacy. As medical professionals, we should suggest a formula to patients with sufficient high-quality evidence for its efficacy. Fifth, one main criticism goes that few studies demonstrate clinical benefits other than preventing surgical infectious complications. There are some explanations for this negative result, including that different study populations have different percentages of malnourished patients, different formulae, and different definitions of complications.[26] Further prospective studies should be conducted to provide new information for the surgical community.

5. Conclusions

This mini-review demonstrates the current academic evidence elucidating the impact of perioperative immunonutrition supplementation on colorectal cancer patients receiving colectomy. Preoperative use is recognized as the most efficient strategy to improve surgical outcomes, especially for the prevention of surgical infectious complications. Prolonged use during the postoperative period should be considered if patients are malnourished. However, more high-quality studies should be conducted in the future so that immunonutrition can be upgraded to a more imperative role: pharmaconutrition.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to Taiwan regulation of IRB but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with regard to the content of this report.

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249.
2. Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014;383:1490–1502.
3. Warps AK, Saraste D, Westerterp M, et al. National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:5986–6001.
4. Wahlen BM, Mekkodathil A, Al-Thani H, El-Menyar A. Impact of sarcopenia in trauma and surgical patient population: a literature review. Asian J Surg. 2020;43:647–653.
5. Yabe S, Nakagawa T, Oda G, et al. Association between skin flap necrosis and sarcopenia in patients who underwent total mastectomy. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:465–470.
6. Hayashi H, Shimizu A, Kubota K, et al. Combination of sarcopenia and prognostic nutritional index to predict long-term outcomes in patients undergoing initial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian J Surg. 2022.
7. Dang C, Wang M, Zhu F, Qin T, Qin R. Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score-based nomogram to predict overall survival of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing radical surgery. Asian J Surg. 2022;45:1237–1245.
8. Arends J, Baracos V, Bertz H, et al. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:1187–1196.
9. The Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) Working Group. The Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program — building a research foundation for 21st century medicine. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2015. Available at: http://www.nih.gov/precisionmedicine/09172015-pmi-working-group-report.pdf. Accessed December 2, 2018.
10. Tanaka S, Inoue S, Isoda F, et al. Impaired immunity in obesity: suppressed but reversible lymphocyte responsiveness. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1993;17:631–636.
11. de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:387–397.
12. Sparling KW, Ryckman FC, Schoettker PJ, et al. Financial impact of failing to prevent surgical site infections. Qual Manag Health Care. 2007;16:219–225.
13. Kubota T, Shoda K, Konishi H, Okamoto K, Otsuji E. Nutrition update in gastric cancer surgery. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;4:360–368.
14. Huhmann MB, August DA. Review of American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) clinical guidelines for nutrition support in cancer patients: nutrition screening and assessment. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23:182–188.
15. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:11–48.
16. Yu K, Zheng X, Wang G, et al. Immunonutrition vs standard nutrition for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (part 1). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44:742–767.
17. Braga M, Gianotti L, Vignali A, Carlo VD. Preoperative oral arginine and n-3 fatty acid supplementation improves the immunometabolic host response and outcome after colorectal resection for cancer. Surgery. 2002;132:805–814.
18. Yun AJ, Lee PY. The link between T helper balance and lymphoproliferative disease. Med Hypotheses. 2005;65:587–590.
19. Matsuda A, Furukawa K, Takasaki H, et al. Preoperative oral immune-enhancing nutritional supplementation corrects TH1/TH2 imbalance in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:507–516.
20. Finco C, Magnanini P, Sarzo G, et al. Prospective randomized study on perioperative enteral immunonutrition in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1175–1179.
21. Moya P, Miranda E, Soriano-Irigaray L, et al. Perioperative immunonutrition in normo-nourished patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4946–4953.
22. Moya P, Soriano-Irigaray L, Ramirez JM, et al. Perioperative standard oral nutrition supplements versus immunonutrition in patients undergoing colorectal resection in an enhanced recovery (ERAS) protocol: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (SONVI study). Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e3704.
23. Angka L, Martel AB, Ng J, et al. A translational randomized trial of perioperative arginine immunonutrition on natural killer cell function in colorectal cancer surgery patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(12):7410–7420.
24. Mariette C. Immunonutrition. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(Suppl 1):S14–S17.
25. Wu JM, Lin MT. Effects of specific nutrients on immune modulation in patients with gastrectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020;4:14–20.
26. Klek S, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K. Perioperative immunonutrition in surgical cancer patients: a summary of a decade of research. World J Surg. 2014;38:803–812.
Keywords:

Colorectal cancer; Immunonutrition

Copyright © 2022 Taiwan Surgical Association. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Taiwan Surgical Association.