Secondary Logo

Body mass regulation at altitude

Westerterp, Klaas R.a; Kayser, Bengtb

European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology: January 2006 - Volume 18 - Issue 1 - p 1-3
Leading Article

Altitude exposure decreases energy intake and thus induces an energy deficit resulting in the loss of body mass. The energy deficit is worsened when energy expenditure is increased by exercise because the increase is not matched by an increased energy intake. The indicated fuel for the optimal use of the rarefied oxygen at altitude is carbohydrate. For optimal taste and maximizing energy intake, fat is the best. Protein should rather be limited because of its high thermic effect. Intestinal malabsorption probably does not play a role in the energy deficit. Even though the sensation of exertion during climbing at high altitude is intense, the actual energy expenditure is not high.

aDepartment of Human Biology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

bInstitute of Movement Sciences and Sports Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland

Correspondence to Klaas R. Westerterp, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

Tel: +31 43 3881628; fax: +31 43 3670976;


Received 26 September 2005 Accepted 2 October 2005

Back to Top | Article Outline


In this issue of the journal, Hamad and Travis [1] review the present understanding of the effects of altitude on human energy balance. They find that many studies reported a loss of body mass during high altitude sojourns. Overall, it seems that 5000–5500 m is an altitude limit beyond which the maintenance of body mass and body composition are challenged. The postulated mechanisms for the disturbance of the energy balance are a reduction of energy intake, a reduction of intestinal energy uptake as a result of an impaired intestinal function and increased energy expenditure. The authors discuss these mechanisms and address practical implications. The aim of this leading paper is to comment and complement the paper by Hamid and Travis [1] and to suggest further avenues for research.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Energy intake

Hamad and Travis [1] discuss several possible explanations for the reduction in energy intake at high altitude. A complementary hypothetical explanation may be a reduction in energy intake for reasons of survival. As digestion implies a considerable metabolic load on the organism, Woods [2] hypothesized that food provides a potential threat to the organism, and that intake and postprandial behaviour are controlled to limit this threat. The author also proposes that in certain circumstances these defence mechanisms may become inappropriately activated. The increased satiety scores observed at high altitude, as referred to by Hamad and Travis [1], can be explained by the modulation of energy intake under limited oxygen availability conditions. This phenomenon is comparable to that observed in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who quickly feel dyspnoeic when feeding [3]. If this mechanism indeed plays a role at high altitude, this would imply that a low-protein diet should be used to reduce diet-induced thermogenesis and thus maintain appetite at high altitude. Thermogenesis values for nutrients are 0–3% for fat, 5–10% for carbohydrate, but as high as 20–30% for protein [4]. Obviously, in the long term, low protein diets will negatively affect protein balance. In addition, there is some evidence that hypoxia may interfere with protein synthesis. So an altitude effect on protein balance might be inevitable and will be worsened by a negative energy balance, and thus the advice would be to try and overcome at least the latter by keeping the total energy intake high. To maximize energy intake, fat is preferable for its low thermogenesis, good taste and higher energy density per gram than carbohydrate. On the other hand, oxygen consumption yields 21.1 kJ/l for carbohydrate oxidation and 19.6 kJ/l for fat oxidation [5]. A diet richer in carbohydrates thus requires less oxygen, possibly the most important criterion at high altitude, and should be advised. In addition, with regard to gas exchange, as correctly pointed out by Hamad and Travis [1], a diet rich in carbohydrates, as a result of an increase in the respiratory quotient, is also advantageous because, for a given carbon dioxide production, it will be accompanied by higher alveolar pressures of oxygen thus enhancing diffusion from air to blood and potentially leading to a higher saturation. It has indeed been reported that a diet high in carbohydrate may reduce the level of hypoxemia [6]. On the other hand, this may not necessarily reduce the risk and severity of acute mountain sickness [7]. As energy balance is so hard to maintain in the difficult conditions encountered on the mountain, the bottom line advice for alpinists should be to keep intake as high as possible.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Intestinal function

Hamad and Travis [1] cite the seminal book of Ward et al. [8] to argue that above 5500 m hypoxia-induced malabsorption may play a role in the negative energy balance at high altitude. However, the evidence is not very strong. The few studies that actually measured energy digestibility at high altitude, using bomb calorimetry of faeces, have all reported that the excellent low altitude energy digestibility levels of approximately 95% are well maintained up to altitudes of 6500 m in the field [9,10], and even during a simulated Everest climb in a hypobaric chamber [11]. The only field evidence for reduced energy digestibility comes from the American Research Expedition to Mount Everest, when Boyer and Blume reported increased fat levels in faeces collected from climbers at 6300 m [12]. On the other hand, as appropriately discussed in detail by Hamad and Travis [1], there is good evidence for changes in intestinal sugar transport in conditions of hypoxia, but the point is that these changes apparently have no impact on overall energy digestibility. A recent study [13] found that in conditions of acute hypoxia an increased sympathetic tone leads to a reduction in the postprandial increase of superior mesenteric artery blood flow. At altitude as compared with low altitude, less blood, which is in addition less saturated with oxygen, thus supplies the gut. But again, as evidenced by the digestibility data discussed above, the gut seems to cope well in spite of hypoxemia and relative ischaemia.

So what could be an explanation for the reported malabsorption? A recent report on intestinal flora changes during a mountaineering expedition to the Himalayas provided an interesting hypothesis [14]. The authors reported changes in intestinal flora and signs of immunological stress in seven climbers in field conditions, of whom five had episodes of diarrhoea. The authors speculated that hypoxia per se had an effect on intestinal flora composition, but could not distinguish between altitude, exertion, changes in nutrition and exposure to different bacterial strains while in the Himalayas. It thus would seem plausible that in actual field conditions changes in intestinal flora leading to clinical or subclinical infection malabsorption might become apparent.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Energy expenditure

Daily energy expenditure is a function of body size, food intake and physical activity. Body size is a determinant of energy expenditure for maintenance or the basal metabolic rate. Food intake determines diet-induced thermogenesis, as mentioned before, and the remaining part is activity-induced energy expenditure. In situations in which heat production from maintenance, food processing and activity is not sufficient to maintain body temperature at 37°C, additional heat is generated through non-shivering and shivering thermogenesis. In humans, in well-controlled conditions, hypoxia induces a decrease in energy expenditure, as shown during progressive hypoxia in a hypobaric chamber [11]. Six subjects were studied with doubly labelled water over 31 days at 452–253 Torr, corresponding to 4500–8848 m altitude. Daily energy expenditure was 1.2±0.6 MJ/day (P<0.001) lower over the second 15-day interval spent at the highest altitudes. The decrease in expenditure could partly be explained by the decrease in energy intake of 2.1±0.7 MJ/day (P<0.001) over the corresponding interval. Assuming diet-induced thermogenesis to be 10% of intake [15], on average 1.2–0.2=1.0 MJ/day was left for a decrease in the other components: basal metabolic rate and activity-induced energy expenditure. Therefore under the thermoneutral and confined conditions of a hypobaric chamber, the overall energy requirement is reduced. In actual field conditions cold exposure and exercise will certainly increase energy requirements when climbing at high altitude, as discussed by Hamad and Travis [1]. Energy expenditure in men climbing Mount Everest was 14.7 MJ/day compared with 12.1 MJ/day for similar individuals while staying in a hypobaric chamber at 7000–8000 m [16]. It is noteworthy that these levels are not extraordinarily high but correspond to levels of active individuals at low altitude. At high altitude the perceived levels of effort are very high, but the actual levels of energy expenditure are in fact quite low because maximum oxygen consumption is curtailed in proportion to altitude, so that on the summit of Everest slow walking corresponds to maximum exercise capacity. However, in spite of these low levels of energy expenditure the duration of exertion is sufficiently long to induce energy misbalance.

If the energy expenditure in the men climbing Mount Everest and in the hypobaric chamber at 7000–8000 m was 14.7±1.1 MJ/day and 12.1±1.8 MJ/day, respectively, clearly showing that the effect of the additional climbing activity on energy expenditure [11,16]; energy intake on Mount Everest and in the hypobaric chamber at 7000–8000 m was very similar, respectively, 7.9±1.6 and 8.3±1.9 MJ/day. The energy deficit at Mount Everest was thus on average 6.8±1.7 MJ/day compared with 3.9±1.4 MJ/day in the hypobaric chamber. The rate of change of body mass was approximately twice as high climbing than being sedentary at the simulated altitude of 7000–8000 m, i.e. respectively, −0.22±0.06 kg/day and −0.09±0.05 kg/day.

The overall conclusion must be that energy intake is the dominant determinant of body weight loss under hypoxic conditions at high altitude. An increased energy requirement through exercise further deteriorates the negative energy balance, as exercise does not seem to elicit a corresponding increase in energy intake. As discussed by Hamad and Travis [1] this negative energy balance necessarily leads to a loss of body mass, partitioned between fat and lean mass, of which the reported proportions vary depending on the duration of the exposure to hypoxia, the initial body composition and the level of physical activity.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Altitude has a profound impact on energy balance and body composition. Hypoxia clearly plays a key role, but especially in field conditions the interplay between changes in dietary habits, in activity patterns, and an exposure to foreign pathogens is not easy to disentangle. Up to altitudes of 5000–6000 m sojourners should be advised to eat a diet high in carbohydrate and fat, according to personal taste, but rather low in protein, aiming at maintaining energy balance. The length of stay and duration of endurance exercise at higher altitudes should be kept limited. Climbing at very high altitude thus truly seems a difficult balancing act, keeping exercise levels high enough to prevent the detrimental effects of detraining and low enough to keep energy misbalance limited.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Hamad N, Travis S. Weight loss at high altitude: pathophysiology and practical implications. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 18:5–10.
2. Woods SC. The eating paradox: how we tolerate food. Psychol Rev 1996; 98:488–505.
3. Cochrane WJ, Afolabi OA. Investigation into the nutritional status, dietary intake and smoking habits of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Hum Nutr Diet 2004; 17:3–11.
4. Tappy L. Thermic effect of food and sympathetic nervous system activity in humans. Reprod Nutr Dev 1996; 36:391–397.
5. Brouwer E. On simple formulae for calculating the heat expenditure and the quantities of carbohydrate and fat oxidized in metabolism of men and animals, from gaseous exchange (oxygen intake and carbonic acid output) and urine-N. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Neerlandica 1957; 6:795–802.
6. Lawless NP, Dillard TA, Torrington KG, Davis Q, Kammimori G. Improvement in hypoxemia at 4600 meters of simulated altitude with carbohydrate ingestion. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999; 70:874–877.
7. Swenson ER, MacDonald A, Vatheuer M, Maks C, Treadwell A, Allen R, Schoene RB. Acute mountain sickness is not altered by a high carbohydrate diet nor associated with elevated circulating cytokines. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1997; 68:499–503.
8. Ward MP, Milledge JS, West JB.High altitude medicine and physiology, 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 2000.
9. Kayser B, Acheson K, Decombaz J, Fern E, Cerretelli P. Protein absorption and energy digestibility at high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73:2425–2431.
10. Westerterp KR, Kayser B, Wouters L, Le Trong J-L, Richalet J-P. Energy balance at high altitude: 6542 m. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77:862–866.
11. Westerterp KR, Meijer EP, Rubbens M, Robach P, Richalet J-P. Operation Everest III: energy and water balance. Eur J Physiol 2000; 439:483–488.
12. Boyer SJ, Blume FD. Weight loss and changes in body composition at high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1984; 57:1580–1585.
13. Loshbaugh JE, Loeppky JA, Greene ER. Effects of acute hypobaric hypoxia on resting and postprandial superior mesenteric artery blood flow. High Alt Med Biol 2005; in press.
14. Kleessen B, Schroedl W, Stueck M, Richter A, Rieck O, Krueger M. Microbial and immunological responses relative to high-altitude exposure in mountaineers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37:1313–1318.
15. Westerterp KR. Diet induced thermogenesis. Nutr Metab 2004; 1:1–5.
16. Westerterp KR, Kayser B, Brouns F, Herry JP, Saris WHM. Energy expenditure climbing Mt. Everest. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73:1815–1819.

body weight; diet composition; energy expenditure; food intake; malabsorption

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.