Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Cytokines in the liver

Ramadori, Giuliano; Armbrust, Thomas

European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology: July 2001 - Volume 13 - Issue 7 - p 777-784
Review in Depth

Cytokines comprise a group of small proteins released from cells in order to influence the function of other cells. By binding to highly specific cell-surface receptors, they trigger a vast array of intracellular signalling cascades. Cytokines have been described as interleukins, growth factors, interferons and chemokines. Unlike hormones, which act in a similar way, cytokines are produced by many different types of cell and act on many other types. Most of them are produced only after certain stimuli. The most intense field of cytokine activity is without doubt host defence.

The liver resembles a central organ of cytokine activity due to the fact that it hosts hepatocytes, which are highly susceptible to the activity of cytokines in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Moreover, the non-parenchymal cells of the liver, in particular Kupffer cells (KCs), the resident tissue macrophages of the liver, are able to synthesize a variety of cytokines that may act systemically on any other organ of the body, or in a paracrine manner on hepatocytes and other non-parenchymal liver cells. A classic example of how cytokines act can be observed during the acute phase reaction discussed in this article. The role of cytokines in liver development, acute liver injury, liver regeneration, liver fibrosis and liver metastasis is also discussed.

Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Correspondence to G. Ramadori, Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany Tel: +49 551 396 301; fax: +49 551 398 279; e-mail: gramado@med.uni-goettingen.de

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Cytokines are small proteins that are produced and released from many cells under physiological and pathological conditions. They bind to specific cell-surface receptors present on target cells, inducing an intracellular signalling cascade that may alter certain cell functions, such as cell-specific functions, proliferation, migration, adhesion and apoptosis. Many cytokines act synergistically either by binding to the same cell-surface receptor, or by overlapping of intracellular signalling molecules. Many cytokines have pleiotropic functions that even allow induction of antagonistic effects by a single cytokine. Cytokines were first described as immunomodulating agents, and to date host defence ranks as their most prominent function. Without cytokines, the fast, efficient and multifaceted immune response challenged every day would not be possible. Many more features have been ascribed to cytokines, giving rise to cytokine subgroups with specific activities. These include interleukins, growth factors, interferons and chemokines. In embryonal development, cytokines induce or suppress regulators that are essential for patterning, development of organs and differentiation of cells. These cytokines may have functions in the adult that are totally different to those in embryogenesis, or they may be closely related. These examples demonstrate that the cytokine network spun between single cells, tissues and organs follows highly complicated rules that are far from understood [1].

The liver follows these rules by hosting cells that are highly susceptible for the action of cytokines [2,3]. Hepatocytes bear a variety of cytokine receptors. Receptors for interleukin 1 alpha (IL-1α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) may gain control over synthesis of plasma proteins that are produced mainly by hepatocytes. Moreover, receptors for growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-α) may control proliferation of hepatocytes during embryogenesis or loss of hepatocytes after acute liver injury. Cytokine receptors of hepatocytes may also be involved in the development of liver diseases such as hepatocarcinogenesis.

Non-parenchymal cells complete the picture of the liver being a cytokine-administrated organ by their ability to synthesize a variety of cytokines. Kupffer cells (KCs), resident tissue macrophages, are shown to synthesize pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6 and TNF-α upon activation due to phagocytosis or binding of activation-triggering compounds such as endotoxin [4]. Released cytokines may stimulate hepatocytes and other non-parenchymal cells in a paracrine manner. Activation of KCs may also be induced by cytokines such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ), whose receptors are expressed on KCs. Chemokines are released by KCs and mediate immigration of neutrophils and blood monocytes supported by chemokine release from hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Sinusoidal endothelial cells are targets for pro-inflammatory cytokines to express cell adhesion molecules and may also produce such cytokines. In liver fibrosis, KCs and HSCs are important sources for transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), the paracrine or autocrine key mediator of increased deposition of extracellular matrix proteins [5,6].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cytokines in liver development

Development of the liver during early embryogenesis may share similarities with pathophysiological processes seen in adulthood, such as acute liver injury and liver regeneration. The regulation of this complex cascade of signalling events under the influence of cytokines may lead to conclusions with high clinical impact. We will give a short overview of what is known about the involvement of cytokines in liver development (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1

The liver derives from the endoderm, which in whole needs the activity of the TGF-β signalling molecules Vg1 and VegT for development in Xenopus eggs from which most of the data of early embryogenesis have been collected [7]. In turn, both induce a variety of signalling molecules that are related closely to TGF-β. The liver then develops from a dorsal region of the early endoderm. The homeobox gene Hex is expressed in those cells that differentiate into the embryonal liver, indicating that this gene may have a specific regulatory function for the differentiation of the early liver. Again, TGF-β signalling is involved in the regulation of Hex expression.

Differentiation of the hepatic endoderm then may be dependent on fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF-1) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) [8], while proliferation of the hepatoblasts seems to depend strongly on hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) [9]. Further differentiation of hepatocytes, which can be monitored through the expression of a variety of liver-specific marker proteins, is likely to depend on the activity of further cytokines such as oncostatin M (OSM), a member of the IL-6 cytokine family [10].

These data suggest that the molecular events during liver development are related to liver pathophysiology in the adult. Availability of (hepatic) stem cells and knowledge of the signalling pathways that lead to hepatocyte differentiation may also allow attempts to manage liver diseases. Moreover, the option to redirect single molecular cascades, primarily by cytokines, could be a new approach to manage liver diseases.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cytokines in liver regeneration

Unlike other organs, the liver has the unique ability to restore the original organ mass (e.g. after partial hepatectomy or acute toxic injury) within 1 week [11,12]. Cytokines are thought to play a key role in the initial phase of hepatocyte proliferation, as well as in termination of the regenerative process. While many cytokines have proved to stimulate hepatocyte DNA synthesis in vitro, their exact role in vivo remains to be elucidated. In fact, the stimulation of hepatocyte DNA synthesis is preceded by the activation of intracellular signalling pathways, such as signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), as well as induction of transcription factors such as nuclear factor-κB and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β [13], which are activated by IL-6 and TNF-α. Serum levels of both increase shortly after partial hepatectomy.

TNF-α resembles a multifunctional cytokine [14], and has been shown to be essential for normal liver regeneration. TNF-α antibodies inhibit liver regeneration [15], and TNF-α receptor-1 (TNF-α R1) knock-out mice also show deficient liver regeneration [16]. Furthermore, TNF-α has been shown to augment liver DNA synthesis when administered after partial hepatectomy that depends on NF-κB activation [17]. Blocking of TNF-α signalling in TNF-α R1-deficient mice caused a strong inhibition of NF-κB and STAT3 activation. Furthermore, these mice show only a minor increase in IL-6 serum levels, indicating that IL-6 is induced primarily by TNF-α. Exogenous administration of IL-6 in these animals reversed STAT3 inhibition as well as defect liver regeneration. Moreover, IL-6-deficient mice develop liver failure after partial hepatectomy [18]. Since TNF-α may not have a mitogenic effect on hepatocytes, it has been suggested that TNF-α primes hepatocytes [19] to respond to growth factors such as HGF [20], TGF-α, and EGF [21]. HGF represents a pleiotropic cytokine with a strong DNA synthesis stimulatory effect on hepatocytes in vitro [22]. Moreover, it resembles a mediator of the acute phase response, has morphogenic and mitogenic effects on cells [23], and has been shown to act as an antifibrotic agent in experimental liver fibrosis [24]. Expression of HGF increases 6–8 h after partial hepatectomy.

TGF-α can be produced by hepatocytes themselves [25], thus inducing an autocrine loop. Interestingly, elevation of TGF-α levels after partial hepatectomy occurs in parallel to DNA synthesis, but TGF-α knock-out animals feature normal development and liver regeneration, indicating that in vivo TGF-α may be replaced by EGF.

Back to Top | Article Outline

The hepatic acute phase response

When tissue injury exceeds a certain extent, alterations of functions of single cell populations and even whole organ systems can be observed that are summarized as the acute phase response (APR; Fig. 1) [26]. Cytokines are key factors in mediation of the APR. They are released from activated cells (mainly mononuclear phagocytes but also fibroblasts and myofibroblasts) in response to tissue injury, and bind to specific cell-surface receptors on target cells. These cytokines of the APR have pleiotropic effects on many cells of the body. One major part of the APR is focused on the liver [27], due to the fact that this organ is a prominent source as well as a target of cytokines [28]. First, macrophages, which after activation are generally considered to be the main source of inflammatory cytokines, are present within the liver – KCs lining the hepatic sinusoids are the largest population of resident tissue macrophages of the body [29]. Second, hepatocytes are targets of cytokines of the APR. They synthesize the majority of plasma proteins [30]. The rate of synthesis of many of these proteins is altered during acute phase conditions (acute phase proteins, APPs). Plasma levels of positive APPs increase, and those of negative APPs decrease. The reason for the changes in plasma concentrations of APPs is not well understood, but the fact that many proteins that participate in host defence are positive APPs suggests that changes in plasma concentrations are involved in the resolution of the underlying pathological condition [31].

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

KCs have been shown to synthesize a vast array of inflammatory mediators, such as oxygen radicals, complement components, proteases and cytokines [4]. In vitro data from endotoxin-treated KC cultures (experimental endotoxaemia represents the best studied model of the APR) indicate clearly that these cells have a high potential to synthesize the key cytokines of the APR [32–34]. In fact, by being highly phagocytic, they clear the portal blood from endotoxins, bacteria and other pathological agents, and prevent their entry into the systemic circulation [35]. Cytokines are released from activated KC directly into the blood, and are likely to induce the APR in any other organ. Moreover, KC-derived cytokines act in a paracrine manner on protein synthesis of hepatocytes.

The cytokines of the APR can be classified according to their functions into two major groups (Table 2). IL-1-type cytokines include IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α and TNF-β. They stimulate the synthesis of some of the positive APPs (type-I APPs), such as C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, and haemopexin, and inhibit negative APPs such as albumin. IL-6-type cytokines (IL-6, interleukin 11 (IL-11), leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), OSM) stimulate type-2 APPs, such as fibrinogen, α1-antitrypsin, haptoglobin and ceruloplasmin. APPs differ from species to species [36], with new APPs emerging regularly [37,38]. Moreover, some cytokines act on synthesis of APPs similar to IL-1 or IL-6 [39], or they may enhance or even inhibit their effects [40].

Table 2

Table 2

New insights into the role of single cytokines have come from knock-out mice. IL-6-deficient mice show a severely impaired APR upon tissue damage and infection, such as after turpentine injection, whereas endotoxin-induced alterations are affected only moderately [41]. Moreover, IL-6-deficient mice behave like wild-type animals in response to TNF-α [42]. On the other hand, mice lacking the TNF receptor 1 are resistant to D-galactosamine/endotoxin [43–45].

Turpentine injection induces production of IL-1β and TNF-α, resulting in increased production of IL-6 and subsequent alterations of hepatic APP synthesis. In IL-1β-deficient mice, induction of APP synthesis is almost completely inhibited, probably due to the lack of IL-6 production [46]. In fact, similar results were obtained from IL-6-deficient mice [41]. In contrast, endotoxin treatment of knock-out mice did not reduce induction of APP synthesis, indicating a sequestrial induction of cytokines only in turpentine-induced (local) inflammation [47,48]. The importance of local factors in turpentine injection may be concluded from data of IL-1β converting enzyme (ICE)-deficient mice. In these animals, turpentine injection induces hepatic APP production similar to wild-type animals. Proteases released locally may be responsible for the cleavage of pro-IL-1β, resulting in biologically active IL-1β. In endotoxaemia of ICE-deficient mice, serum concentrations of IL-1β may not be increased due to the lack of locally released proteases [49].

Moreover, type-I IL-1 receptor-deficient mice had a reduced hepatic APR after turpentine injection, but behaved similarly to wild-type animals in endotoxaemia [50]. Similarly, TNF receptor-deficient mice (55 kDa and 75 kDa) exhibited a wild-type APR in response to endotoxin [51], suggesting a major redundancy of cytokine action in systemic inflammation.

Intracellular signalling induced by IL-1-type cytokines involves the transcription factors NF-κB and activator protein 1; that induced by the IL-6-type cytokines involves the STAT3/5 transcription factors. An overlapping signalling involving both cytokine families is provided by the mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway activating the transcription factors of the C/EBPβ family [52]. They may stimulate types 1 and 2 APP.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cytokines in acute liver injury

In the last few years, it has been suggested that in most cases hepatocellular injury is due not to the damaging agent itself but to the inflammatory cells that have been attracted by the stressed hepatocytes. In contrast to sustained hepatocellular damage, acute hepatitis is a temporary event that finishes with normal liver histology and function (restitutio ad integrum). In fact, hepatotoxins (drugs, infectious agents) may induce a stress situation in hepatocytes with subsequent release of chemokines followed by accumulation of inflammatory cells and subsequent hepatocellular damage (Fig. 2) [53]. Hepatotropic infectious agents such as viruses or activated T-cells may act in a similar manner [54] and induce accumulation of inflammatory cells that kill hepatocytes [55].

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Hepatocellular stress may activate resident liver macrophages. Moreover, KCs can be activated directly, e.g. by binding of endotoxins via the CD14 receptor. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α, IL-1β and TNF-α are released from KCs, which induces cell adhesion molecules such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) on sinusoidal endothelial cells involved in the recruitment of inflammatory cells, such as blood monocytes [56]. Moreover, pro-inflammatory cytokines may be released from mesenchymal liver cells [57]. In fact, it is debated whether mononuclear phagocytes of the liver are the main source of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Further induction of chemokines amplifies the inflammatory cascade [58,59]. Deteriorated hepatocytes may then be removed by mononuclear phagocytes. The classical hypothesis that toxic liver injury is permitted by hepatocellular death and subsequent attraction of inflammatory cells, the latter removing dead hepatocytes, has come into debate, since newer data have shown that ICAM-1, which is crucial for immigration of inflammatory cells into the liver tissue, may be expressed from sinusoidal cells before the appearance of necrotic hepatocytes in the rat model of carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury [56]. TNF-α released early after carbon tetrachloride intoxication participates in the down-regulation of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, which may represent an important event in the sinusoidal transmigration of inflammatory cells [60,61].

As hepatocellular integrity can be maintained in patients with chronic inflammation due to hepatitis C virus infection where biochemical response is achieved by interferon treatment, this mechanism may also come into play in virally induced chronic liver disease.

TNF-α proved to be the key mediator in many experimental liver injury models [62,63], including endotoxaemia/D-galactosamine and concanavalin A-induced hepatitis. Due to an early rise of TNF-α levels, pro-inflammatory genes, including cytokines, chemokines, nitric oxide synthetase and adhesion molecules, are induced. This pro-inflammatory activity resembles one of the cascades that are initiated by binding of TNF-α to its receptors TNF-RI or TNF-RII. It is mediated by the transcription factor NF-κB. Downstream signalling of TNF-α may also result in activation of caspases, with induction of apoptosis. Since NF-κB may inhibit apoptosis by induction of anti-apoptotic factors, the balance of these cascades seems to determine the cellular fate. In endotoxaemia/D-galactosamine-induced hepatitis, inhibition of cellular transcription by D-galactosamine blocks the expression of the anti-apoptotic factors by NF-κB, thus favouring apoptosis.

A protective role of interleukin 4 (IL-4) and interleukin 13 (IL-13) has been shown in hepatic injury in the ischaemia/reperfusion model that depended on the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 [64]. On the other hand, concanavalin A-induced liver injury is augmented by interleukin 12 (IL-12). One mechanism could be the induction of IFN-γ [65]. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) again has been shown to be protective in this model [66]. Similarly, IL-6 seems to cut hepatocellular losses in carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic injury by limiting hepatic apoptosis and accelerating hepatocyte replication [67].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cytokines in liver fibrosis

Chronic hepatocellular damage results in development of liver fibrosis and subsequent liver cirrhosis, which represents a critical step in liver disease with high clinical impact (Fig. 3). The last decade has revealed intriguing news about the cellular and molecular aspects of liver fibrosis [68]. HSCs are viewed as the cell population within the liver that is mainly responsible for increased deposition of extracellular matrix proteins. They must be activated to transform from a resting, fat-storing cell type into myofibroblast-like cells, which then synthesize a broad spectrum of extracellular matrix proteins [69,70]. Sustained hepatocellular damage induces activation of KCs as well as immigration of blood monocytes, which develop into inflammatory mononuclear phagocytes. Together with sinusoidal endothelial cells, these cell lineages release cytokines that act in a paracrine manner to induce activation of HSCs. The key factors involved in the activation of HSCs are TGF-β, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and IGF-I [71–73]. They have a high impact on induction of DNA synthesis (IGF-I, PDGF) and on synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins (TGF-β) in HSCs. Furthermore, inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α are also thought to modulate HSC extracellular matrix protein synthesis [74]. On the other hand, HSCs are able to release cytokines (chemokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) [58] that are involved in recruitment of inflammatory cells [59], including mast cells [75], which in turn further activate HSCs by releasing cytokines such as TGF-β and PDGF. This interactive cytokine loop could explain the fatal accumulation of extracellular matrix that eventually results in the multifaceted clinical complications of chronic liver disease also by acting as surviving factors for activated HSCs and activated myofibroblasts [74,76]. TGF-β and TNF-α also up-regulate the synthesis of protease inhibitors in activated HSCs, thus reducing matrix degradation [77]. Liver myofibroblasts that differ morphologically and functionally from activated HSCs may represent a second cell population that is involved in altered matrix production and deposition during liver fibrogenesis [78] (Fig. 3). They may contribute to liver fibrogenesis by driving fibrosis starting from periportal and pericentral areas, and that eventually connects to fibrotic sinusoids generated by activated HSCs. Interruption of the cytokine networking represents a hopeful new attempt to inhibit development of liver fibrosis. Recent years have heralded the development of a new therapeutic option for the treatment of liver disease: antifibrotic therapy. According to current theory, attempts have been made to block HSC activation by soluble TGF-β receptor [79], or by adenovirus-mediated transfer of dominant negative TGF-β receptor [80], delivering initial promising results. A complete resolution of experimental cirrhosis in rats has been observed after transduction of HGF, probably mediated, at least in part, by suppression of TGF-β [24]. Application of anti-inflammatory IL-10 to patients with chronic hepatitis C also showed a decrease of hepatic fibrosis without any impact on viral replication [81]. Even in those cases where treatment of the underlying liver disease is not effective, such as in non-responders to interferon treatment of viral hepatitis, an antifibrotic treatment could be performed. However, further studies are needed to prove the clinical benefit of these strategies.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Cytokines in liver cancer and metastasis

The liver represents a critical organ in human cancer. Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most frequent cancers worldwide with increasing incidence, and the liver is the target of most other cancers due to metastasis. Hepatocellular carcinoma is related closely to chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis, implying that alterations in growth control mechanisms during regeneration, which in part are mediated by cytokines, may be involved in hepatic carcinogenesis. Therefore, the involvement of cytokines as mitogens for hepatocytes has been studied in detail in this context. HGF is a considerable hepatic mitogen during liver regeneration. Nevertheless, transformation in hepatoma cells of the HGF gene resulted in a strong decrease of proliferation [82]. IGF-II, another strong mitogen for hepatocytes found in the liver during development, was detected in hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoma cells [83]. It is expressed in precancerous lesions [84], and is suggested to be related closely to hepatocarcinogenesis [85]. Furthermore, TGF-α is expressed in hepatoma cells [86]. TGF-α-overexpressing mice develop multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma [87], and TGF-β-overexpressing animals develop hepatomas at a frequency of about 60%.

The observation that carcinoembryonic antigens can induce TNF-α and IL-1 in KCs with subsequent induction of cell adhesion molecules in sinusoidal endothelial cells may be one mechanism by which circulating cancer cells metastasize to the liver [88]. Generally, it is thought that the microenvironment of the liver plays an important role in liver metastasis by supplying factors that are essential for tumour cell survival and growth. On the other hand, tumour cells need the corresponding receptors to be able to respond to these local factors. Tumour cells, even those deriving from one primary tumour, may be very heterogeneous regarding expression of cytokine receptors. Therefore, adhesion, survival and growth of tumour cells reaching the liver resemble a natural selection. However, this selection may be an organ-specific cascade of events depending on the expression profiles of both tumour cells and the liver. It is evident in those cases where metastases occur only in the liver. Although the single steps of the metastasis cascade are well defined, little is known about the actual factors (cytokines, adhesion molecules, proteases, proteinase inhibitors) that determine growth of liver metastases. It is assumed that detailed knowledge of these factors will deliver powerful new approaches in cancer treatment.

Adhesion of circulating tumour cells resembles a critical step in metastasis to the liver. IL-1β and TNF-α have been shown to augment liver metastasis by inducing vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 on sinusoidal endothelial cells. IL-1 has been suggested to mediate increased adherence of tumour cells by induction of IL-18 [89]. However, selective adherence of tumour cells may not explain exclusively the growth of tumour cells in the liver. Dependency on growth factor receptors such as the HGF and EGF receptors has been demonstrated [90,91].

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Balkwill F (editor). The Cytokine Network. London: Oxford University Press; 2000.
2. Ramadori G, Armbrust T. Cytokines and the liver. In: Oxford Textbook of Clinical Hepatology, 2nd edition. Bircher J, McIntyre N (editors). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 169–172.
3. Wisse E, Braet F, Luo D, Vermijlen D, Luo D, Eddouks M. et al. Sinusoidal liver cells. In: Oxford Textbook of Clinical Hepatology, 2nd edition. Bircher J, McIntyre N (editors). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 33–50.
4. Decker K. Biologically active products of stimulated liver macrophages (Kupffer cells). Eur J Biochem 1990; 192: 245–261.
5. Ramadori G, Rieder H, Knittel T. Biology and pathobiology of sinusoidal liver cells. In: Hepatic Transport and Bile Secretion. Tavoloni N, Berk PD (editors). New York: Raven Press; 1992. pp. 83–102.
6. Ramadori G, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH. Die Leberzellen und ihre besonderen Funktionen. In: Pathologie der Leber und Gallenwege. Seifert G (editor). Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. pp. 53–71.
7. Henry GL, Brivanlou IH, Kessler DS, Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Melton DA. TGF-β signals and a pattern in Xenopus laevis endodermal development. Development 1996; 122: 1007–1015.
8. Jung J, Zheng M, Goldfarb M, Zaret KS. Initiation of mammalian liver development from endoderm by fibroblast growth factors. Science 1999; 284: 1998–2003.
9. Schmidt C, Bladt F, Goedecke S, Brinkmann V, Zschiesche W, Sharpe M. et al. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor is essential for liver development. Nature 1995; 373: 699–702.
10. Kamiya A, Kinoshita T, Ito Y, Matsui T, Morikawa Y, Emiko S. et al. Fetal liver development requires a paracrine action of oncostatin M through the gp130 signal transducer. EMBO J 1999; 18: 2127–2136.
11. Fausto N. Liver regeneration. J Hepatol 2000; 32: 19–31
12. Strain AJ, Diehl AM (editors). Liver Growth and Repair. London: Chapman and Hall; 2000.
13. Taub R. Transcriptional control of liver regeneration. FASEB J 1996; 10: 413–427.
14. Beutler BA. The role of tumor necrosis factor in health and disease. J Rheumatol 1999; 26 (suppl 57) : 16–21.
15. Akerman P, Cote P, Yang SQ, McClain C, Nelson S, Bagby GJ, Diehl AM. Antibodies to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibit liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Am J Physiol 1992; 263: G579–585.
16. Yamada Y, Kirillova I, Peschon JJ, Fausto N. Initiation of liver growth by TNF-α: deficient regeneration in mice lacking type I TNF receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 1441–1446.
17. Plümpe J, Malek NP, Bock CT, Rakemann T, Manns MP, Trautwein C. NF-κB determines between apoptosis and proliferation in hepatocytes during liver regeneration. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2000; 278: G173–183.
18. Cressman DE, Greenbaum LE, DeAngelis RA, Ciliberto G, Furth EE, Poli V, Taub R. Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Science 1996; 274: 1379–1383.
19. Webber EM, Bruix J, Pierce RH, Fausto N. Tumor necrosis factor primes hepatocytes for DNA replication in the rat. Hepatology 1998; 28: 1226–1234.
20. Phaneuf D, Chen SJ, Wilson JM. Intravenous injection of an adenovirus encoding hepatocyte growth factor results in liver growth and has a protective effect against apoptosis. Mol Med 2000; 6: 96–103.
21. Fausto N, Laird AD, Webber EM. Role of growth factors and cytokines in hepatic regeneration. FASEB J 1995; 9: 1527–1536.
22. Tsubouchi H. Hepatocyte growth factor for liver disease. Hepatology 1999; 30: 333–334.
23. Zarnegar R, Michalopoulos GK. The many faces of hepatocyte growth factor: from hepatopoiesis to hematopoiesis. J Cell Biol 1995; 129: 1177–1180.
24. Ueki T, Kaneda Y, Tsutsui H, Nakanishi K, Sawa Y, Morishita R. et al. Hepatocyte growth factor gene therapy of liver cirrhosis in rats. Nat Med 1999; 5: 226–230.
25. Date M, Matsuzaki K, Matsushita M, Sakitani K, Shibano K, Okajima A. et al. Differential expression of transforming growth factor-beta and its receptors in hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells of rat liver after CCl4 administration. J Hepatol 1998; 28: 572–581.
26. Baumann H, Gauldie J. The acute phase response. Immunol Today 1994; 15: 74–80.
27. Ramadori G, Christ B. Cytokines and the hepatic acute phase response. Semin Liver Dis 1999; 19: 141–173.
28. Moshage H. Cytokines and the hepatic acute phase response. J Pathol 1997; 181: 257–266.
29. Jones EA, Summerfield JA. Kupffer cells. In: The Liver: Biology and Pathobiology. Arias IM, Jakoby WB, Popper H, Schachter D, Shafritz DA (editors). New York: Raven Press; 1988. pp. 683–704.
30. Barle H, Nyberg B, Essen P, Andersson K, McNurlan MA, Wernerman J, Garlick PJ. The synthesis rates of total liver protein and plasma albumin determined simultaneously in vivo in humans. Hepatology 1997; 25: 154–158.
31. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 448–454.
32. Busam K, Bauer T, Bauer J, Gerok W, Decker K. Interleukin-6 release by rat liver macrophages. J Hepatol 1990; 11: 367–373.
33. Karck U, Peters T, Decker K. The release of tumor necrosis factor from endotoxin-stimulated rat Kupffer cells is regulated by prostaglandin E2 and dexamethasone. J Hepatol 1988; 7: 352–361.
34. Armbrust T, Schmitt E, Ramadori G. Viable rat Kupffer cells synthesize but do not secrete interleukin-1: indications for necrosis-induced maturation of interleukin-1 alpha, but not of interleukin-1 beta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995; 207: 637–645.
35. Toth CA, Thomas P. Liver endocytosis and Kupffer cells. Hepatology 1992; 16: 255–266.
36. Heinrich PC, Castell JV, Andus T. Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response. Biochem J 1990; 265: 621–636.
37. Ramadori G, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH, Tobias PS, Mathison JC, Ulevitch RJ. Biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in rabbit hepatocytes. Pathobiology 1990; 58: 89–94.
38. Knittel T, Fellmer P, Neubauer K, Kawakami M, Grundmann A, Ramadori G. The complement-activating protease P100 is expressed by hepatocytes and is induced by IL-6 in vitro and during the acute phase reaction in vivo. Lab Invest 1997; 77: 221–230.
39. Guillen MI, Gomez-Lechon MJ, Nakamura T, Castell JV. The hepatocyte growth factor regulates the synthesis of acute phase proteins in human hepatocytes: divergent effect on interleukin-6-stimulated genes. Hepatology 1996; 23: 1345–1352.
40. Campos SP, Wang Y, Koj A, Baumann H. Divergent transforming growth factor-β effects on IL-6 regulation of acute phase plasma proteins in rat hepatoma cells. J Immunol 1993; 151: 7128–7137.
41. Kopf M, Baumann H, Freer G, Freudenberg M, Lamers M, Kishimoto T. et al. Impaired immune and acute phase responses in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Nature 1994; 368: 339–342.
42. Libert C, Takahashi N, Cauwels A, Brouckaert P, Bluethmann H, Fiers W. Response of interleukin-6-deficient mice to tumor necrosis factor-induced metabolic changes and lethality. Eur J Immunol 1994; 24: 2237–2242.
43. Rothe J, Lesslauer W, Lotscher H, Lang Y, Koebel P, Kontgen F. et al. Mice lacking the tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 are resistant to TNF-mediated toxicity but highly susceptible to infection by Listeria monocytogenes. Nature 1993; 364: 798–802.
44. Nowak M, Gaines GC, Rosenberg J, Minter R, Bahjat FR, Rectenwald J. et al. LPS-induced liver injury in D -galactosamine-sensitized mice requires secreted TNF-alpha and the TNF-p55 receptor. Am J Physiol 2000; 278: R1202–1209.
45. Josephs MD, Bahjat FR, Fukuzuka K, Ksontini R, Solorzano CC, Edwards CK. et al. Lipopolysaccharide and D -galactosamine-induced hepatic injury is mediated by TNF-alpha and not by Fas ligand. Am J Physiol 2000; 278: R1196–1201.
46. Fantuzzi G, Dinarello CA. The inflammatory response in interleukin-1 beta-deficient mice: comparison with other cytokine-related knock-out mice. J Leukoc Biol 1996; 59: 489–493.
47. Fattori E, Cappelletti M, Costa P, Sellitto C, Cantoni L, Carelli M. et al. Defective inflammatory response in interleukin 6-deficient mice. J Exp Med 1994; 180: 1243–1250.
48. Taniguchi T, Takata M, Ikeda A, Momotani E, Sekikawa K. Failure of germinal center formation and impairment of response to endotoxin in tumor necrosis factor alpha-deficient mice. Lab Invest 1997; 77: 647–658.
49. Li P, Allen H, Banerjee S, Franklin S, Herzog L, Johnston C. et al. Mice deficient in IL-1 beta-converting enzyme are defective in production of mature IL-1 beta and resistant to endotoxic shock. Cell 1995; 80: 401–411.
50. Labow M, Shuster D, Zetterstrom M, Nunes P, Terry R, Cullinan EB. et al. Absence of IL-1 signaling and reduced inflammatory response in IL-1 type I receptor-deficient mice. J Immunol 1997; 159: 2452–2461.
51. Leon LR, Kozak W, Peschon J, Kluger MJ. Exacerbated febrile responses to LPS, but not turpentine, in TNF double receptor-knockout mice. Am J Physiol 1997; 272: R563–569.
52. Takiguchi M. The C/EBP family of transcription factors in the liver and other organs. Int J Exp Pathol 1998; 79: 369–391.
53. Diehl AM. Cytokine regulation of liver injury and repair. Immunol Rev 2000; 174: 160–171.
54. Tiegs G. Experimental hepatitis and role of cytokines. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1997; 60: 176–179.
55. Arii S, Imamura M. Physiological role of sinusoidal endothelial cells and Kupffer cells and their implication in the pathogenesis of liver injury. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000; 7: 40–48.
56. Neubauer K, Eichhorst ST, Wilfling T, Buchenau M, Xia L, Ramadori G. Sinusoidal intercellular adhesion molecule-1 up-regulation precedes the accumulation of leukocyte function antigen-1-positive cells and tissue necrosis in a model of carbon tetrachloride-induced acute rat liver injury. Lab Invest 1998; 78: 185–194.
57. Tiggelman AM, Boers W, Linthorst C, Brand HS, Sala M, Chamuleau RA. Interleukin-6 production by human liver (myo)fibroblasts in culture. Evidence for a regulatory role of LPS, IL-1 beta and TNF alpha. J Hepatol 1995; 23: 295–306.
58. Marra F, Valente AJ, Pinzani M, Abboud HE. Cultured human liver fat-storing cells produce monocyte chemotactic protein-1. Regulation by proinflammatory cytokines. J Clin Invest 1993; 92: 1674–1680.
59. Marra F, DeFranco R, Grappone C, Milani S, Pastacaldi S, Pinzani M. et al. Increased expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 during active hepatic fibrogenesis: correlation with monocyte infiltration. Am J Pathol 1998; 152: 423–430.
60. Neubauer K, Ritzel A, Saile B, Ramadori G. Decrease of platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1-gene expression in inflammatory cells and in endothelial cells in the rat liver following CCl4-administration and in vitro after treatment with TNF-α. Immunol Lett 2000; 74: 153–164.
61. Knittel T, Dinter C, Kobold D, Neubauer K, Mehde M, Eichhorst S, Ramadori G. Expression and regulation of cell adhesion molecules by hepatic stellate cells (HSC) of rat liver. Involvement of HSC in recruitment of inflammatory cells during hepatic tissue repair. Am J Pathol 1999; 154: 153–167.
62. Schümann J, Tiegs G. Pathophysiological mechanisms of TNF during intoxication with natural or man-made toxins. Toxicology 1999; 138: 103–126.
63. Bradham CA, Plumpe J, Manns MP, Brenner DA, Trautwein C. Mechanisms of hepatic toxicity. I. TNF-induced liver injury. Am J Physiol 1998; 275: G387–392.
64. Kato A, Yoshidome H, Edwards MJ, Lentsch AB. Regulation of liver inflammatory injury by signal transducer and activator of transcription-6. Am J Pathol 2000; 157: 297–302.
65. Nicoletti F, Marco R, Zaccone P, Salvaggio A, Magro G, Bendtzen K, Meroni P. Murine concanavalin A-induced hepatitis is prevented by interleukin-12 (IL-12) antibody and exacerbated by exogenous IL-12 through an interferon-gamma-dependent mechanism. Hepatology 2000; 32: 728–733.
66. Di Marco R, Xiang M, Zaccone P, Leonardi C, Franco S, Meroni P, Nicoletti F. Concanavalin A-induced hepatitis in mice is prevented by interleukin-10 and exacerbated by endogenous IL-10 deficiency. Autoimmunity 1999; 31: 75–83.
67. Kovalovich K, DeAngelis RA, Li W, Furth EE, Ciliberto G, Taub R. Increased toxin-induced liver injury and fibrosis in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Hepatology 2000; 31: 149–159.
68. Friedman SL. Molecular regulation of hepatic fibrosis, an integrated cellular response to tissue injury. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 2247–2250.
69. Ramadori G, Knittel T, Saile B. Fibrosis and altered matrix synthesis. Digestion 1998; 59: 372–375.
70. Eng FJ, Friedman SL. Fibrogenesis. I. New insights into hepatic stellate cell activation: the simple becomes complex. Am J Physiol 2000; 279: G7–G11.
71. Wells RG. Fibrogenesis. V. TGF-β signaling pathways. Am J Physiol 2000; 279: G845–850.
72. Britton RS, Bacon BR. Intracellular signaling pathways in stellate cell activation. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999; 23: 922–925.
73. Scharf JG, Knittel T, Dombrowski F, Muller L, Saile B, Braulke T. et al. Characterization of the IGF axis components in isolated rat hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 1998; 27: 1275–1284.
74. Knittel T, Muller L, Saile B, Ramadori G. Effect of tumour necrosis factor-alpha on proliferation, activation and protein synthesis of rat hepatic stellate cells. J Hepatol 1997; 27: 1067–1080.
75. Armbrust T, Batusic D, Ringe B, Ramadori G. Mast cells distribution in human liver disease and experimental rat liver fibrosis. Indications for mast cell participation in development of liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 1997; 26: 1042–1054.
76. Saile B, Matthes N, Knittel T, Ramadori G. Transforming growth factor beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibit both apoptosis and proliferation of activated rat hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology 1999; 30: 196–202.
77. Knittel T, Mehde M, Kobold D, Saile B, Dinter C, Ramadori G. Expression patterns of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells of rat liver: regulation by TNF-alpha and TGF-beta1. J Hepatol 1999; 30: 48–60.
78. Knittel T, Kobold D, Saile B, Grundmann A, Neubauer K, Piscaglia F, Ramadori G. Rat liver myofibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells: different cell populations of the fibroblast lineage with fibrogenic potential. Gastroenterology 1999; 117: 1205–1221.
79. George J, Roulot D, Koteliansky VE, Bissell DM. In vivo inhibition of rat stellate cell activation by soluble transforming growth factor beta type II receptor: a potential new therapy for hepatic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 12 719–12 724.
80. Qi Z, Atsuchi N, Ooshima A, Takeshita A, Ueno H. Blockade of type beta transforming growth factor signaling prevents liver fibrosis and dysfunction in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 2345–2349.
81. Nelson DR, Lauwers GY, Lau JY, Davis GL. Interleukin 10 treatment reduces fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a pilot trial of interferon nonresponders. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 655–660.
82. Shiota G, Rhoads DB, Wang TC, Nakamura T, Schmidt EV. Hepatocyte growth factor inhibits growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 373–377.
83. Su TS, Liu WY, Han SH, Jansen M, Yang-Fen TL, P'eng FK, Chou CK. Transcripts of the insulin-like growth factors I and II in human hepatoma. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 1773–1777.
84. Schirmacher P, Held WA, Yang D, Chisari FV, Rustum Y, Rogler CE. Reactivation of insulin-like growth factor II during hepatocarcinogenesis in transgenic mice suggests a role in malignant growth. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 2549–2556.
85. Cariani E, Dubois N, Lasserre C, Briand P, Brechot C. Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) mRNA expression during hepatocarcinogenesis in transgenic mice. J Hepatol 1991; 13: 220–226.
86. Liu C, Tsao MS, Grisham JW. Transforming growth factors produced by normal and neoplastically transformed rat liver epithelial cells in culture. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 850–855.
87. Lee GH, Merlino G, Fausto N. Development of liver tumors in transforming growth factor alpha transgenic mice. Cancer Res 1992; 52: 5162–5170.
88. Gangopadyay A, Bajenova O, Kelly TM, Thomas P. Carcinoembryonic antigen induces cytokine expression in Kupffer cells: implications for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 4805–4810.
89. Vidal-Vanaclocha F, Fantuzzi G, Mendoza L, Fuentes AM, Anasagasti MJ, Martin J. et al. IL-18 regulates IL-1beta-dependent hepatic melanoma metastasis via vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 734–739.
90. Lin S, Rusciano D, Lorenzoni P, Hartmann G, Birchmeier W, Giordano S. et al. C-met activation is necessary but not sufficient for liver colonization by B16 murine melanoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis 1998; 16: 253–265.
91. Parker C, Roseman BJ, Bucana CD, Tsan R, Radinsky R. Preferential activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human colon carcinoma liver metastases in nude mice. J Histochem Cytochem 1998; 46: 595–602.
Keywords:

cytokines; hepatic acute phase response; hepatic stellate cells; hepatocytes; interferon; interleukins; Kupffer cells; liver development; liver fibrosis; liver injury; liver metastasis; sinusoidal endothelial cells

© 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.