Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Favourable prognostic factors of subsequent screen-detected breast cancers among women aged 50–69

Chiarelli, Anna M.a,b; Edwards, Sarah A.a,b; Sheppard, Amanda J.c; Mirea, Luciad; Chong, Nelsone; Paszat, Lawrencee,f; Shumak, Rene S.a; O'Malley, Frances P.gthe Breast Screening Study Group

European Journal of Cancer Prevention: November 2012 - Volume 21 - Issue 6 - p 499–506
doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328350b0f4
Review Article: Breast Cancer

Most studies reporting more favourable biological features of screen-detected breast cancers compared with symptomatic or interval cancers include initial or prevalent screens and therefore may not indicate the real benefit of screening on breast cancer mortality. We conducted case–case comparisons within a cohort of eligible women (N=771 715) who were aged 50–69 between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2003. A randomly selected sample of breast cancers (N=1848) diagnosed among these women were compared by detection method. Tumour characteristics of interval cancers (N=362) diagnosed after 6–24 months of a negative screen or symptomatic breast cancers (N=491) were compared with subsequent screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed within 6 months of a positive screen (N=995) using polytomous logistic regression. Tumours were evaluated for clinical presentation, histology and expression of hormone receptors. Women with symptomatic detected [odds ratio (OR)=7.48, 95% confidence interval (CI)=5.38–10.38] and interval cancers (OR=2.20, 95% CI=1.56–3.10) were more often diagnosed at stage III–IV versus I than women with rescreen-detected cancers. After adjusting for tumour size, women with symptomatic cancers had tumours of higher grade (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.05–2.15) and mitotic score (OR=1.69, 95% CI=1.15–2.49) and women with interval cancers had tumours of higher mitotic score (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.01–2.28) compared with women diagnosed at screening. Subsequent screen-detected cancers are not only detected at an earlier stage but are also less aggressive, leading to a better prognosis. As long-term mortality reduction for breast screening may depend on subsequent screens, our study indicates that mammography screening can be effective in women aged 50–69.

aPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario

bDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto

cThe Hospital for Sick Children

dSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

eInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences

fDepartment of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto

gDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto and St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

The Breast Screening Study Group, members include: Norman Boyd, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research, Ontario Cancer Institute; Paul Ferner, London Regional Cancer Programme; Amanda Hey, Hôpital régional de Sudbury Regional Hospital – Regional Cancer Program; Alison McMullen, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre; John Shaw, Windsor Regional Cancer Program; Carol Rand, Juravinski Cancer Centre; Vincent Young, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre.

Correspondence to Anna M. Chiarelli, PhD, Senior Scientist, Research, Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2L7, Canada Tel: +416 971 9800; fax: +416 971 6888; e-mail:

Received November 18, 2011

Accepted November 30, 2011

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.