Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Particulate Air Pollution Exposure and C-reactive Protein During Early Pregnancy

Lee, Pei-Chena; Talbott, Evelyn O.a; Roberts, James M.a,b; Catov, Janet M.a,b; Sharma, Ravi K.c; Ritz, Beated

doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821c6c58
Air Pollution: Original Article
Free
SDC

Background: It is not well understood how air pollution leads to adverse pregnancy outcomes. One pathway may be through C-reactive protein, a biomarker of systemic inflammation that has been reported to increase the risk of preterm delivery. We examined whether air pollution influences serum concentrations of C-reactive protein in early pregnancy.

Methods: We studied 1696 pregnant women in Allegheny County, PA, from 1997 through 2001. C-reactive protein concentrations were assayed in blood collected before the 22nd week of gestation. We estimated levels of particles of less than 10 μm (PM10) and less than 2.5 μm diameter (PM2.5), carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone at the maternal zip code using Kriging interpolation for measurements obtained from ambient stations. Associations between air pollution and high C-reactive protein concentrations (≥8 ng/mL) were evaluated using logistic regression.

Results: Among nonsmokers, an observed 9.2 μg/m3 increase in PM10 (averaged over 28 days prior to the blood sample) was associated with an odds ratios of 1.41 for high C-reactive protein concentrations (95% confidence interval = 0.99–2.00). Similarly, a 4.6 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 was associated with an odds ratio of 1.47 (1.05–2.06). The odds ratio was 1.49 (0.75–2.96) per 7.9 ppb increase in ozone during summer. There were no associations in smokers or for other air pollutants, and there was no evidence for effect-measure modification by obesity.

Conclusions: PM10, PM2.5, and ozone exposures were associated with increased C-reactive protein concentrations in early pregnancy, suggesting that these air pollutants contribute to inflammation and thereby possibly to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT IS AVAILABLE IN THE TEXT.

From the aDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, and cDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; and dDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, CA.

Submitted 17 August 2010; accepted 17 January 2011; posted 22 April 2011.

Supported by the Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh.

Supplemental digital content is available through direct URL citations in the HTML and PDF versions of this article (www.epidem.com).

Correspondence: Pei-Chen Lee, Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, 507 Parran Hall 130 DeSoto St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. E-mail: pel27@pitt.edu.

Numerous studies have linked ambient air pollution to adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), small size for gestational age (SGA), whereas a few have also investigated preeclampsia, perinatal mortality, and cardiac birth defects.1–7 Positive associations have been described most consistently for particulate matter exposures and preterm birth, especially particulate exposure during the first and third trimester of pregnancy.8 Some studies relying on measures of traffic density have suggested that motor vehicle exhaust may be an important source of particulates.9,10 The biologic mechanisms by which air pollution might affect pregnancy, however, are not well understood.

Inflammation is one pathway believed to be involved in particulate-induced adverse health outcomes (particularly cardiovascular diseases),11,12 and has also been hypothesized to influence birth outcomes.13 Animal studies provide strong evidence that particulate exposure can cause localized inflammation. Particles of less than 10 μm diameter (PM10) and less than 2.5 μm diameter (PM2.5) elicit pulmonary inflammation in rats.12,14 Similarly, exposures to diesel exhaust particles and ultrafine carbon particles have been reported to induce an inflammatory reaction in the lungs of mice.15 Growing epidemiologic evidence suggests that exposure to air pollution, especially particulates, is associated with not only pulmonary inflammatory and immune responses but also with systemic inflammation as measured by interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and white cell counts.16–20 C-reactive protein is a sensitive marker of inflammation and infection.21 Previous studies have described positive associations of C-reactive protein with air pollution in various populations including healthy men, the elderly, and people with coronary heart disease.17–20,22

To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated whether air pollution exposure increases the systemic inflammatory response in pregnant women. This is of particular interest because the special state of immune response during pregnancy allows the mother to tolerate the semi-allogeneic fetus.23 Particulate exposure during pregnancy has been hypothesized to induce acute placental inflammation. Alternatively, systemic inflammatory responses may lead to alterations in maternal immunity, and in turn increase the risk of adverse birth outcomes.13 We explore this hypothesis in a cohort of pregnant women in Pennsylvania, among whom we have previously demonstrated that inflammation (measured by C-reactive protein) during early pregnancy is associated with increased risk of preterm delivery.24

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Study Population

The study population was drawn from the Prenatal Exposures and Preeclampsia Prevention study, which enrolled 2211 Pennsylvania women from clinics and private practices between 1997 and 2001. Briefly, this prospective study recruited healthy women, ages 14–44 years and pregnant for less than 16 weeks, and followed them to delivery. A comprehensive questionnaire was administered at baseline and postpartum. Information obtained in the baseline questionnaire included maternal demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, active and passive cigarette smoking, consumption of alcohol, other lifestyle factors, and medical history. We also obtained maternal residential zip code information at delivery from the hospital record. We excluded women with preexisting medical conditions (n = 37), including chronic hypertension, chronic diabetes, and HIV, to avoid large variations in C-reactive protein concentrations resulting from these conditions. Because we were interested in inflammation in the first half of pregnancy, we also excluded women without a blood sample taken before 22 weeks of gestation (n = 145). Additionally, we limited our analysis to singleton births and first-time participants in the study who had a maternal residence zip code in Allegheny County, PA. There were 1696 women included in this analysis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Biomarker Assessment

Maternal nonfasting blood samples were stored and frozen at −80°C. We measured C-reactive protein concentrations with a high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on the SpectraMax Me analyzer (Molecular Devices, United States), as described elsewhere.25 The detection limit of the assay was 0.03 ng/mL, with an intra-assay variability of 7%.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Exposure Assessment

We obtained ambient air pollution data, from the Allegheny County Health Department and the Air Quality System (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/detaildata/downloadaqsdata.htm) of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the years 1996–2001. These data included concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), PM10, and PM2.5 for Allegheny County and its neighboring counties (within 50 km of the Allegheny County boundary). From 1999 to 2001, PM2.5 data were collected at 23 monitoring stations, including 13 monitoring stations in Allegheny County and 10 monitoring stations in neighboring counties. PM10 measurements were available from 40 stations (18 monitoring stations in Allegheny County), SO2 from 32 stations (7 monitoring stations in Allegheny County), and O3 from 15 stations (3 monitoring stations in Allegheny County), whereas only 11 stations measured NO2 and CO during the study period (3 and 2 monitoring stations, respectively, in Allegheny County). For each station, the data include 1-hour concentrations for CO, NO2, O3, and SO2, and 24-hour concentrations (some collected every day and others collected every third or sixth day) for PM2.5 and PM10. Although not every PM2.5 and PM10 monitoring station collected information every day, there are very few days during our study period on which no monitoring station collected data. Meteorologic variables, including hourly temperature and daily relative humidity for the Pittsburgh International Airport, Pittsburgh, PA monitoring station, were obtained from the National Climate Data Center (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html).

We used the space-time ordinary Kriging interpolation method to estimate daily air pollution concentrations at the zip code level by calculating the average estimated zip code concentration for each pollutant based on all grid centroid values (grid size = 13.4 m2) that fall within a zip code. Spatial and temporal variograms were fitted into a spherical semivariogram model separately, based on temporally detrended residuals (eTable 1, http://links.lww.com/EDE/A478). In addition, we combined the spatial and temporal variograms into a space-time variogram by fitting a general product-sum model.26 This modification of space-time ordinary kriging has been shown to increase mean precision compared with ordinary kriging.27

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analysis

We used logistic regression analyses to evaluate the associations between air pollution and C-reactive protein during early pregnancy. We dichotomized C-reactive protein concentrations at 8 ng/mL, a threshold we previously found associated with an increased risk of preterm birth.24,28 We also evaluated C-reactive protein as a continuous measure in linear regression models after log transformation, which was necessary to normalize the residuals of C-reactive protein and air pollution concentrations. We present our results from these models as percentage changes. For all regression models, we used the robust cluster variance estimator to account for clustering of maternal residences in zip codes. Our primary interest was to explore the influence of medium- to long-term pollutant concentrations for 3 periods before the blood draw (ie, 8-day averages [Day 0–7], 22-day averages [Day 0–21], and 29-day averages [Day 0–28 before blood collection]). These averaging periods were chosen a priori. In addition, we explored short-term (single-day) exposures; ie, on the same day (lag 0) and to a maximum of 7 days before a blood draw (lag 1–lag 7), based on previous reports suggesting that systemic inflammation may increase within 7 days after a pollutant exposure.18,22,29 To estimate the influence of both short- and longer- term exposures, we relied on continuous pollutant measures and interquartile ranges (IQR).

In all models, we controlled for gestational week in which the sample was collected (weeks), maternal body mass index (BMI) at enrollment or time of blood draw (kg/m2), maternal age (years), maternal race (white, African American), maternal education (less than high school, high school, completed high school but did not complete college, completed college or greater), parity (first birth, second or subsequent birth), maternal cigarette exposure during early pregnancy (active smoker, nonactive smoker but exposed to cigarette smoke at home or indoors elsewhere, nonactive and nonpassive smoker), household income (<$10,000, $10,000–$19,999, $20,000–$49,999, ≥$50,000), season of sample collection (spring, summer, fall, winter), and year entering the study (for PM10 and other pollutants, spanning 1997–2001; for PM2.5, 1999–2001). We also evaluated other potential confounders including marital status, alcohol intake during pregnancy, multivitamin or prenatal vitamin use, aspirin use within a year prior to pregnancy, employment, public assistance, daily mean temperature, and relative humidity. Because these factors did not change the estimates for pollutants by more than 10%, they were not included in the models we present here.30

Previous studies have suggested that obesity and smoking status may modify the influence of air pollution on inflammation.20,22,31,32 Thus, we also conducted stratified analyses for obesity (defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and analyses for nonsmokers only. Although women entered the study at various gestational ages, the mean BMI of women whose baseline blood was collected before 8 gestational weeks, at 8 to less than 12 weeks, and at 12 to 22 weeks of gestation were quite similar; (27.0 kg/m2 [standard deviation = 7.4], 25.9 kg/m2 [6.1], and 26.7 kg/m2 [6.5], respectively). In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses restricting analyses to nonsmokers without environmental tobacco smoke exposure (ETS; nonsmokers who reported exposure to cigarette smoke at home or indoors elsewhere). Only one monitoring station measured ozone between October and March in the study period; thus, the analysis for ozone was restricted to the summer months (April–September) when data were available for more stations.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Blood samples were collected at a mean of 10.2 (SD = 4.0) gestational weeks. The mean BMI in early pregnancy (at baseline) was 26.5 kg/m2 (SD = 6.7). In univariate and adjusted models, the crude odds ratio for elevated C-reactive protein concentrations (≥8 ng/mL) was higher in women for whom samples were collected later in gestation, who had higher BMI, were older, or were African-American (Table 1), but not in women actively smoking or passively exposed to cigarette smoke during early pregnancy.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

Table 2 summarizes means and correlations for mean pollutant concentrations 0 to 7 days before blood collection; correlations were very similar for longer averaging periods, but means were slightly lower. Average 8-day PM10 concentrations were highly correlated with PM2.5 (r = 0.9) and moderately with O3 (r = 0.5), but very weakly correlated with CO, SO2, and NO2. Similarly, PM2.5 was moderately correlated with O3 (r = 0.5) but only weakly correlated with CO, SO2, and NO2.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Ambient Air Pollution and C-reactive protein

Longer averaging periods (ie, 0–21 and 0–28 day averages for PM10) increased the odds of having a C-reactive protein concentration >8 ng/mL (Table 3). For an IQR increase in PM10, the odds ratios of a C-reactive protein >8 ng/mL were 1.23 (95% CI = 0.97–1.57) based on a 22-day average and 1.18 (CI = 0.91–1.53) based on a 29-day average, in adjusted single-pollutant models for the entire population. PM2.5 exposures also increased the ORs for high C-reactive protein concentrations when using longer averaging periods; for a 22-day average, the ORs were 1.32 (95% CI =1.05–1.67) and for a 29-day average, 1.26 (0.97–1.63) per IQR increase in adjusted single-pollutant models (Table 3). When we restricted our analyses to nonsmokers only, effect estimates were generally larger for both PM10 and PM2.5. For each IQR increase in PM10 exposure, the ORs for elevated C-reactive protein concentrations were 1.47 (1.06–2.02) based on a 22-day average, and 1.41 (0.99–2.00), based on a 29-day average, in adjusted single-pollutant models for nonsmokers; for each IQR increase in PM2.5 exposure, they were 1.55 (1.15–2.11) and 1.47 (1.05–2.06), respectively (Table 3).

TABLE 3

TABLE 3

Generally, effect estimates for both PM10 and PM2.5 were larger between lag days 2 and 5. For nonsmokers, a per-IQR increase in PM10 exposure was associated with increased C-reactive protein during lag days 4 and 5, whereas PM2.5 exposure was associated with modestly increased C-reactive protein during lag days 1, 2, 4, and 5 (eTable 2, http://links.lww.com/EDE/A478). When we examined associations based on percentage change of log-transformed C-reactive protein in linear regression single-pollutant models, C-reactive protein increased by 6%–17% per IQR increase in PM10 or PM2.5 among smokers (Figure). For nonsmokers, there was only a 2% increase in C-reactive protein per IQR increase in PM2.5 during a 22-day average period, and 3%–5% increases for an IQR increase in PM10 for longer periods (ie, 0–21 and 0–28 day averages). When we examined interactions between BMI and particulates, the 95% confidence intervals of the estimates included 1.0 (data not shown). We found no evidence for effect measure modification by obesity; ie, the effect estimates (ORs) for particulates on C-reactive protein were similar in women with a BMI >30 kg/m2 and <30 kg/m2 in early pregnancy.

FIGURE.

FIGURE.

Positive associations were also observed between O3 and C-reactive protein for all longer averaging periods (Table 3). Generally, the estimates for particulates (PM10 and PM2.5) and O3 air pollution were slightly larger for nonsmokers not exposed to ETS (eTable 3, http://links.lww.com/EDE/A478). However, excluding those with ETS exposure from the nonsmoking group greatly reduced the sample size and precision of our estimates. For CO, SO2, and NO2, associations were negligible for both the entire population and nonsmokers only (eg, per IQR increase in the 29-day average of CO in adjusted single-pollutant models, OR = 1.05 [CI = 0.86–1.30] in the entire population; for nonsmokers only, OR = 0.95 [0.71–1.27]).

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

We observed positive associations between particulate (both PM2.5 and PM10) and O3 air pollution and elevated concentrations of a systemic inflammatory biomarker, C-reactive protein, in nonsmoking women during early pregnancy. These findings support the hypothesis that these exposures during pregnancy induce an inflammatory response that may result in an increased risk for adverse birth outcomes—especially preterm birth, which we have previously shown to be associated with these higher C-reactive protein concentrations (>8 ng/mL).24

To date, few studies have examined associations between air pollution and inflammation in pregnant women, even though this has been studied extensively in other susceptible populations such as the elderly and children.17,19,22,32 We found primarily medium-term particulate exposures (up to 28 days prior to blood collection) to be associated with C-reactive protein concentrations above 8 ng/mL, a level that previous studies had linked to an increase in preterm birth risk.24,28 However, because of insufficient sample size (99 preterm births among 1129 nonsmoking women) and thus low statistical power, we are unable to examine whether inflammation (specifically C-reactive protein) plays a mediating role for the associations between air pollutants and adverse birth outcomes. Nevertheless, our findings that particulates and O3 increase the odds of having elevated C-reactive protein concentrations in early pregnancy provide some insight into pathways through which air pollution may influence birth outcomes.

Although the air pollutants related to gaseous combustion (CO, NO2, and SO2) have also previously been associated with adverse birth outcomes,1,2,8 we did not find associations with high C-reactive protein in our study. In Allegheny County, the major sources of CO, NO2, and particles are motor vehicles and industrial plants. With the same sources of origin, we would expect particles, CO, and NO2 to be positively correlated. However, we observed only very weak correlations between measures of particle, CO, and NO2. This is most likely due to a very small number of monitoring stations that measured CO and NO2 (2 and 3 monitoring stations, respectively) in all of Allegheny County. Because CO is highly spatially heterogeneous (ie, its distributional peaks basically follow roadways), data from only 2 monitoring stations will not effectively represent these sources and their spatial distribution. Our findings that particulates were associated with inflammation indicate that particles from sources such as motor vehicles or industrial plants present potentially important adverse exposures for pregnant women and that our spatial model based on a larger number of particulate monitoring stations likely captured particulate exposures from these sources better than the monitoring for gaseous combustion products. However, ozone is spatially more homogenously distributed than other gaseous pollutants, and we expect the 3 monitoring stations, combined with our spatial interpolation model, to have adequately represented ozone exposures.

Previous studies investigated various lag times for air pollution exposures and inflammatory markers and generally assumed effects to be acute and to occur within 7 days prior to sample collection. Only a few studies have examined longer periods (ie, months or years).20,31,33 Our results for particulate exposures are generally consistent with other studies. Zeka et al20 reported that a 7.95 μg/m3 increase in a 4-week average PM2.5 resulted in a 4.4% (95% CI = −3.3% to 12.0%) increase in C-reactive protein among 710 healthy men. Similarly, we observed that a 5.0 μg/m3 increase in 29-day average PM2.5 before blood collection was associated with a 3.8% increase in C-reactive protein (95% CI = −6.7% to 15.6%) for the entire population. Rückerl et al19 studied the influence of air pollution on markers of inflammation and coagulation among 57 men with coronary heart disease. For a C-reactive protein concentration greater than 8.5 mg/L, they reported an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% CI = 0.9–2.3) for an IQR (12.2 μg/m3) increase in 5-day average PM2.5, and an odds ratio of 2.0 (1.2–3.7) for an IQR (12.8 μg/m3) increase in 5-day average PM10. In this repeated-measures panel study in men, the estimated effect for PM2.5 was in the range of our finding in nonsmoking women (OR = 1.17 [95% CI = 0.90–1.52] for C-reactive protein ≥8 ng/mL per 5.8 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 8-day average); our estimated effect size for PM10, however, was much smaller and did not suggest an association for this short averaging period (1.05 [0.77–1.44] per 11 μg/m3 increase in PM10 8-day average).

We also found consistent positive associations between O3 in summer (April to September) and high C-reactive protein concentrations. Exposure to ozone has been associated with airway inflammation as well as systemic inflammation.16,34 O3 has a strong oxidative potential and is likely to generate reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and to increase inflammatory reactions.35 Ozone exposures are associated with increased concentrations of interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in asthmatic children and nonsmoking adults.16,35 Recently, a longitudinal study36 following 40 healthy persons reported a 5.9% (95% CI = −6.8% to 18.7%) increase in C-reactive protein for a 42 μg/m3 increase on lag day 4 for O3 exposure; this was similar to our finding (3.6% increase [95% CI = −8.5% to 17.3%] on lag day 4 per 14.0 ppb) in the summer months for nonsmokers.

We found no indication that BMI modifies the associations between particulates and C-reactive protein in pregnant women; ie, the sizes of our effect measures were similar for normal-weight and obese women. Our results are not consistent with previous studies in which associations between short-term air pollution and inflammation markers (ie, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6) were more pronounced in obese persons and those with diabetes or hypertension.20,22 This inconsistency may be due to the fact that we excluded pregnant women with preexisting health conditions, such as chronic hypertension and chronic diabetes, and that our BMI measure was inaccurate, because our study weight at baseline was measured as early as 3 and as late as 22 weeks of gestation. However, very few women had their blood collected later than 20 weeks of gestation, when weight during pregnancy increases rapidly.

Much evidence has accumulated to demonstrate that maternal exposure to air pollution is associated with adverse birth outcomes or pregnancy complications. C-reactive protein concentrations are generally higher in pregnant than in nonpregnant women,37 and placentally derived microparticles or soluble products from the placenta are suspected of driving systemic inflammation during normal pregnancy.23 An increased inflammatory response during pregnancy is present for preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age infants, and preterm birth.24,28,38,39 Two studies have examined the associations between maternal plasma C-reactive protein concentrations in early pregnancy (before 21 weeks of gestation) and the risk of preterm delivery; they found 2.6- to 2.9-fold increases in risk of preterm delivery with early pregnancy inflammation (C-reactive protein ≥8 ng/mL).24,28 Cord blood concentrations of inflammatory markers such as interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, thrombopoietin, and C-reactive protein were reported to be higher in SGA infants compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age controls.38 Thus, our findings provide some evidence that inflammation is one possible pathway through which air pollution may increase the risk of adverse birth outcomes.

The primary strength of our study is that we were able to examine potential confounders including active and passive smoking, maternal nutrition (ie, multivitamin or prenatal vitamin use), and BMI. Our BMI information was based on measurements in early pregnancy, not self-report. Our study also has several limitations. First, we did not have maternal infection information during the period when blood was collected. Because we were unable to control for acute infections, this may have confounded our short-term results (0–7 lag days). However, some infections, such as respiratory infections, are likely to be on the same causal pathway as air pollution and C-reactive protein increases, and it would be inappropriate to control for intermediate factors. Second, when performing Kriging interpolation for estimating PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations, we relied on data collected in different monitoring cycles (ie, every day, every third or sixth day) and with different EPA reference or equivalent sampling methods (ie, the Federal Reference Method and Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance). This might also have contributed to measurement error. Because in Allegheny County only one PM10 and PM2.5 monitoring station collected data every day with the same sampling method, restricting our exposure measures to these everyday ones would not have captured the spatial variability of particles when performing Kriging. (Many EPA particle monitoring sites used in previous publications have the same restrictions.) Third, we relied on residential information at birth rather than at the time we collected the blood samples, and we assumed that mothers did not move during pregnancy and that the estimates of residential air pollution were representative of the woman's personal exposures—all of which may have resulted in exposure measurement error. Because our study population was drawn from a longitudinal cohort, in which participants received their prenatal care and delivered in the same hospital, we believe that it is reasonable to assume that most women in our study either did not move or moved only within the same neighborhood (or zip code) during pregnancy, as was also suggested by Chen et al.40 Furthermore, we do not have maternal residential address available for this cohort; thus, we were unable to evaluate traffic-related air pollution exposures. While we conducted a large number of statistical tests, the consistency and magnitude of our findings for the relationships of particulates and O3 air pollution with high C-reactive protein concentrations make it less likely that our results are due to chance only.

Our study suggests that particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) air pollution and ozone exposures during early pregnancy contribute to systemic inflammation, as measured by C-reactive protein. Our findings provide some new evidence that effects of particulate air pollution on adverse birth outcomes may be mediated by systemic inflammation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all the Prenatal Exposures and Preeclampsia study participants for their participation, Marcia Gallaher for help measuring the C-reactive protein, and Shawn Brown of the Pittsburgh Supercomputer Center for providing the access to the server. We also thank Kirit Dalal and Jason Maranche of the Pennsylvania Department of Health, and the Allegheny County Health Department for providing electronic air monitoring data.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Bell ML, Ebisu K, Belanger K. Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1118–1124.
2. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, Ghosh JK. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1045–1052.
3. Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Zhao Y. Air pollution and infant death in southern California, 1989–2000. Pediatrics. 2006;118:493–502.
4. Ritz B, Yu F, Fruin S, et al. Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in Southern California. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:17–25.
5. Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1212–1221.
6. Wu J, Ren C, Delfino RJ, Chung J, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Association between local traffic-generated air pollution and preeclampsia and preterm delivery in the south coast air basin of California. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1773–1779.
7. Xu X, Ding H, Wang X. Acute effects of total suspended particles and sulfur dioxides on preterm delivery: a community-based cohort study. Arch Environ Health. 1995;50:407–415.
8. Ritz B, Wilhelm M. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an emerging field. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102:182–190.
9. de Medeiros AP, Gouveia N, Machado RP, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and perinatal mortality: a case-control study. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:127–132.
10. Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles county, California, 1994–1996. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:207–216.
11. Donaldson K, Stone V, Seaton A, MacNee W. Ambient particle inhalation and the cardiovascular system: potential mechanisms. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(suppl 4):523–527.
12. Schins RP, Lightbody JH, Borm PJ, Shi T, Donaldson K, Stone V. Inflammatory effects of coarse and fine particulate matter in relation to chemical and biological constituents. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;195:1–11.
13. Kannan S, Misra DP, Dvonch JT, Krishnakumar A. Exposures to airborne particulate matter and adverse perinatal outcomes: a biologically plausible mechanistic framework for exploring potential effect modification by nutrition. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1636–1342.
14. Saldiva PH, Clarke RW, Coull BA, et al. Lung inflammation induced by concentrated ambient air particles is related to particle composition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1610–1617.
15. Saber AT, Bornholdt J, Dybdahl M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor is not required for particle-induced genotoxicity and pulmonary inflammation. Arch Toxicol. 2005;79:177–182.
16. Barraza-Villarreal A, Sunyer J, Hernandez-Cadena L, et al. Air pollution, airway inflammation, and lung function in a cohort study of Mexico City schoolchildren. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:832–838.
17. Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Tjoa T, et al. Circulating biomarkers of inflammation, antioxidant activity, and platelet activation are associated with primary combustion aerosols in subjects with coronary artery disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:898–906.
18. Peters A, Frohlich M, Doring A, et al. Particulate air pollution is associated with an acute phase response in men; results from the MONICA-Augsburg Study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1198–1204.
19. Ruckerl R, Ibald-Mulli A, Koenig W, et al. Air pollution and markers of inflammation and coagulation in patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:432–441.
20. Zeka A, Sullivan JR, Vokonas PS, Sparrow D, Schwartz J. Inflammatory markers and particulate air pollution: characterizing the pathway to disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1347–1354.
21. Ablij H, Meinders A. C-reactive protein: history and revival. Eur J Intern Med. 2002;13:412.
22. Dubowsky SD, Suh H, Schwartz J, Coull BA, Gold DR. Diabetes, obesity, and hypertension may enhance associations between air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:992–998.
23. Thornton CA. Immunology of pregnancy. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69:357–365.
24. Catov JM, Bodnar LM, Ness RB, Barron SJ, Roberts JM. Inflammation and dyslipidemia related to risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1312–1319.
25. Hubel CA, Powers RW, Snaedal S, et al. C-reactive protein is elevated 30 years after eclamptic pregnancy. Hypertension. 2008;51:1499–1505.
26. DeIaco S, Myers DE, Posa D. Space-time analysis using a general product-sum model. Stat Probab Lett. 2001;52:21–28.
27. Gething P, Atkinson P, Noor A, Gikandi P, Hay S, Nixon M. A local space-time kriging approach applied to a national outpatient malaria dataset. Comput Geosci. 2007;33:1337–1350.
28. Pitiphat W, Gillman MW, Joshipura KJ, Williams PL, Douglass CW, Rich-Edwards JW. Plasma C-reactive protein in early pregnancy and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:1108–1113.
29. Seaton A, Soutar A, Crawford V, et al. Particulate air pollution and the blood. Thorax. 1999;54:1027–1032.
30. Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:125–137.
31. Hoffmann B, Moebus S, Dragano N, et al. Chronic residential exposure to particulate matter air pollution and systemic inflammatory markers. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1302–1308.
32. Panasevich S, Leander K, Rosenlund M, et al. Associations of long- and short-term air pollution exposure with markers of inflammation and coagulation in a population sample. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:747–753.
33. Forbes LJ, Patel MD, Rudnicka AR, et al. Chronic exposure to outdoor air pollution and markers of systemic inflammation. Epidemiology. 2009;20:245–253.
34. Thompson AM, Zanobetti A, Silverman F, et al. Baseline repeated measures from controlled human exposure studies: associations between ambient air pollution exposure and the systemic inflammatory biomarkers IL-6 and fibrinogen. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:120–124.
35. Risom L, Moller P, Loft S. Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution. Mutat Res. 2005;592:119–137.
36. Rudez G, Janssen NA, Kilinc E, et al. Effects of ambient air pollution on hemostasis and inflammation. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:995–1001.
37. Fialova L, Malbohan I, Kalousova M, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation in pregnancy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2006;66:121–127.
38. Amarilyo G, Oren A, Mimouni FB, et al. Increased cord serum inflammatory markers in small-for-gestational-age neonates. J Perinatol. 2010;31:30–32.
39. Belo L, Santos-Silva A, Caslake M, et al. Neutrophil activation and C-reactive protein concentration in preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2003;22:129–141.
40. Chen L, Bell EM, Caton AR, Druschel CM, Lin S. Residential mobility during pregnancy and the potential for ambient air pollution exposure misclassification. Environ Res. 2010;110:162–168.

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.