Share this article on:

Handedness and Time to Pregnancy

Zhu, Jin Lianga; Obel, Carstena,b; Basso, Olgac; Bech, Bodil Hammera; Henriksen, Tine Brinkb; Olsen, Jørna,d

doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818b47d1
Fertility: Brief Report

Background: Nonright-handedness, particularly mixed-handedness, has been associated with a number of medical conditions. We examined whether handedness was associated with fecundity, measured by time to pregnancy.

Methods: We used data on parental handedness and time to pregnancy from 2 regional birth cohorts in Denmark: the Aalborg-Odense Birth Cohort (1984–1987) and the Aarhus Birth Cohort (1990–1992) (n = 5808 and 3426, respectively). We applied discrete-time survival analysis to assess fecundity in relation to handedness.

Results: In both cohorts, we saw a slightly lower fecundity in individuals who reported being mixed-handed.

Conclusions: Our data showed a modest association between mixed-handedness and subfecundity, which suggests that these traits may share a common etiology, perhaps tracing back to the prenatal period.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

From the aDanish Epidemiology Science Centre, Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark; bPerinatal Epidemiological Research Unit, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; cEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC; dDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

Submitted 21 February 2008; accepted 29 April 2008; posted 2 December 2008.

Supported by a grant from the Danish Medical Research Council (No. 271-05-0115) and, in part, by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Supplemental material for this article is available with the online version of the journal at; click on “Article Plus.”

Correspondence: JL Zhu, The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail:

Back to Top | Article Outline


Click on the links below to access all the ArticlePlus for this article.

Please note that ArticlePlus files may launch a viewer application outside of your web browser.

Although the etiology of handedness is unclear,1–4 brain lateralization is probably determined during embryogenesis,4 and more than 80% of fetuses show more right-arm than left-arm movements as early as at 10 gestational weeks.5,6 Nonright-handedness is considered by some to be a marker of neurotoxic exposures during fetal life7,8 and has been associated with schizophrenia,9,10 autism,11 homosexuality,12 and asthma.13 Exposure to abnormal steroid levels during fetal life is a possible cause.12,14,15 In this study, we examined the association between handedness and fecundity measured by time to pregnancy.16–19

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study Population

We used data from 2 regional population-based birth cohorts in Denmark: the Aalborg-Odense Birth Cohort (1984–1987)20,21 and the Aarhus Birth Cohort (1990–1992).22,23 Both studies collected data through questionnaires on sociodemographic, environmental, and lifestyle factors during pregnancy, and the children were followed up since birth. Detailed information on the study populations is available in the online version of this article.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Parents’ Handedness

In the follow-up questionnaires, we collected information on parents’ handedness by asking the parent the following questions: “Which hand does your child’s biologic mother use the most?” and “Which hand does your child’s biologic father use the most?” The response categories were (1) exclusively the right hand, (2) mostly the right hand, (3) both hands equally, (4) mostly the left hand, or (5) exclusively the left hand. We defined parents as strong dextral, dextral, mixed-handed, sinistral, and strong sinistral, respectively.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Time to Pregnancy

In the pregnancy questionnaires, women were asked if their pregnancy was planned (yes, no, don’t know), if they had ever been examined or treated for infertility (yes, no), and for how long they had tried to become pregnant before succeeding (3 categories for the Aalborg-Odense Birth Cohort: 0–6, 7–12, and >12 months; and exact number of months for the Aarhus Birth Cohort). We restricted all analyses to planned pregnancies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analysis

We calculated fecundity ratios (FRs) by using discrete-time survival analysis with complementary log-log link, which has an interpretation in terms of hazard ratio (HR) and is more appropriate and robust to the choice of time-to-pregnancy categories than logit link,24–27 in STATA 9.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Strong dextrals were used as the reference category. We defined fecundity as the probability of conception in a given time-to-pregnancy category, conditionally on not having conceived in the previous interval. The discrete-time survival analysis with complementary log-log link expresses the hazard as a ratio of the incidence (conception) density to the survival function. In the Aarhus Birth Cohort, we additionally performed Cox regression by treating time to pregnancy (in months) as a continuous variable. Data were analyzed separately for mothers and fathers, as well as for each birth cohort.

Reported handedness may correlate with age, especially in older parents, if they had been “corrected” as children. Different lateralization, perception of being different, or living in a world designed for right-handed people may result in different lifestyles, which could, in turn, affect fecundity. We thus examined whether including parents’ age at the time of birth of the child (<25, 25–29, 30–34, 35+ years) and mother’s smoking before pregnancy (yes, no) in the models for each cohort changed the estimates. We also examined our results in the Aalborg-Odense Birth cohort by further adjusting for alcohol intake, coffee consumption, and body mass index before pregnancy in women, and for smoking and alcohol intake in men.

Back to Top | Article Outline


In the Aalborg-Odense Birth Cohort we had 5808 couples for analysis, with 10.0% left- or mixed-handed women and 12.5% left- or mixed-handed men. In the Aarhus Birth Cohort we had 3426 couples, with 9.2% left- or mixed-handed women and 12.4% left- or mixed-handed men (eTable1).

Mixed-handed individuals had a lower fecundity in the Aalborg-Odense Birth Cohort, regardless of adjustment. We saw similar estimates in the Aarhus Birth Cohort (Table 1). Estimates in the Aarhus Birth Cohort were unchanged when treating time to pregnancy as a continuous variable in Cox regression models (adjusted HR 0.94 [95% confidence interval = 0.74–1.19] for mixed-handed women and 0.87 [0.72–1.04] for mixed-handed men; eTable 2). Further adjustment for alcohol intake, coffee consumption, and body mass index before pregnancy in women, and for smoking and alcohol intake in men in the Aalborg-Odense Birth Cohort did not change the results (data not shown).



Some types of handedness run in families,28 and familial handedness may represent a distinct phenotype. Excluding mixed-handed women or men whose children were mixed-handed or left-handed had no effect on the estimates in either cohort (Aalborg-Odense Birth Cohort: adjusted HR 0.85 [0.68–1.07] and 0.81 [0.69–0.96] for mixed-handed women and men, respectively; Aarhus Birth Cohort: adjusted HR 0.96 [0.64–1.43] and 0.87 [0.70–1.08] for mixed-handed women and men, respectively).

Back to Top | Article Outline


We found a modest association between mixed-handedness and a longer time to pregnancy in 2 Danish birth cohorts. Our findings suggest that handedness and fecundity may share a common genetic background or common causes, perhaps operating during fetal life.

Our study populations arose from parents enrolled in 2 birth cohorts (the Aalborg-Odense and the Aarhus birth cohorts). Participation at enrollment was high (87% and 95%, respectively), but moderate for the follow-up questionnaires (74% and 72%, respectively). However, it is unlikely that participation depended on both time to pregnancy and handedness. It is also highly unlikely that respondents reported handedness differentially depending on their time to pregnancy, because the information on time to pregnancy was provided at least a decade earlier. Information on time to pregnancy was obtained in the pregnancy questionnaires, and the recall period was less than 1 year in both cohorts. The distribution of handedness as well as that of time to pregnancy were comparable with results from other studies.22,29

In most cases the mother reported handedness for herself and the child’s father by answering 1 question for each, and the resulting distribution of handedness was close to the expected.29 We do not know whether those reporting equal use of both hands referred to the ability to perform the same task or different tasks. As expected, there were more nonright-handed or mixed-handed men than women, and the frequency of mixed-handedness was lower than what has been reported in more detailed assessments.30,31 We cannot rule out that using a different set of questions would have yielded different results.32

In addition to psychopathologic disorders,9 weak lateralization has been associated with a wide range of conditions including impaired spatial performance, dyslexia, and asthma.13 Prenatal stress has been studied as a potential cause of mixed-handedness.30,33,34 In line with these reports, we found an association of lower fecundity with mixed-handedness but not left-handedness. This may suggest that abnormal levels of steroids in fetal life lead to incomplete lateralization, manifested as mixed-handedness. However, our and others’ findings do not necessarily imply that mixed-handedness is pathologic. Some “corrected” left-handers could be among the right- and, more likely, mixed-handed individuals, and the stress of having to operate with the nonprimary hand may have resulted in compromised fertility or other adverse health conditions. It is thus expected that mixed-handed individuals would appear to deviate from the statistical norm, whereas the influx of “corrected” left-handers into the group of right-handers would not be noticeable.35

Our results suggest that mixed-handedness is associated with lower fecundity, perhaps because these 2 traits share a common etiology, but other explanations are also possible. Future studies should examine direct associations between hormonal levels during fetal life and subsequent handedness, as well as fecundity later in life.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We thank Clarice R. Weinberg and Freya Kamel for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Annett M. Handedness and cerebral dominance: the right shift theory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998;10:459–469.
2. Hatfield JS. The genetic basis of hair whorl, handedness, and other phenotypes. Med Hypotheses. 2006;66:708–714.
3. Klar AJ. A 1927 study supports a current genetic model for inheritance of human scalp hair-whorl orientation and hand-use preference traits. Genetics. 2005;170:2027–2030.
4. Levin M. Is the early left-right axis like a plant, a kidney, or a neuron? The integration of physiological signals in embryonic asymmetry. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2006;78:191–223.
5. Hepper PG, McCartney GR, Shannon EA. Lateralised behaviour in first trimester human foetuses. Neuropsychologia. 1998;36:531–534.
6. McCartney G, Hepper P. Development of lateralized behaviour in the human fetus from 12 to 27 weeks’ gestation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1999;41:83–86.
7. Olsen J. Moderate alcohol consumption in pregnancy and subsequent left-handedness. Scand J Soc Med. 1995;23:162–166.
8. Salvesen KA, Vatten LJ, Eik-Nes SH, et al. Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development. BMJ. 1993;307:159–164.
9. Satz P, Green MF. Atypical handedness in schizophrenia: some methodological and theoretical issues. Schizophr Bull. 1999;25:63–78.
10. Sommer I, Ramsey N, Kahn R, et al. Handedness, language lateralisation and anatomical asymmetry in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:344–351.
11. Hauck JA, Dewey D. Hand preference and motor functioning in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001;31:265–277.
12. Lalumiere ML, Blanchard R, Zucker KJ. Sexual orientation and handedness in men and women: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:575–592.
13. Peters M, Reimers S, Manning JT. Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255,100 subjects: the BBC internet study. Brain Cogn. 2006;62:177–189.
14. Mathews GA, Fane BA, Pasterski VL, et al. Androgenic influences on neural asymmetry: Handedness and language lateralization in individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29:810–822.
15. Smith LL, Hines M. Language lateralization and handedness in women prenatally exposed to diethylstilbestrol (DES). Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2000;25:497–512.
16. Rachootin P, Olsen J. Prevalence and socioeconomic correlates of subfecundity and spontaneous abortion in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol. 1982;11:245–249.
17. Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:470–480.
18. Joffe M. Time to pregnancy: a measure of reproductive function in either sex. Asclepios Project. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54:289–295.
19. Olsen J, Andersen PK. We should monitor human fecundity, but how? A suggestion for a new method that may also be used to identify determinants of low fecundity. Epidemiology. 1999;10:419–421.
20. Olsen J, Frische G, Poulsen AO, et al. Changing smoking, drinking, and eating behaviour among pregnant women in Denmark. Evaluation of a health campaign in a local region. Scand J Soc Med. 1989;17:277–280.
21. Magnusson LL, Olesen AB, Wennborg H, et al. Wheezing, asthma, hayfever, and atopic eczema in childhood following exposure to tobacco smoke in fetal life. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35:1550–1556.
22. Henriksen TB, Baird DD, Olsen J, et al. Time to pregnancy and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:594–599.
23. Obel C. Epidemiological studies of stress during pregnancy and fetal brain development [PhD thesis]. Faculty of Health Science, University of Aarhus; 2003.
24. Zhu JL, Knudsen LE, Andersen AM, et al. Time to pregnancy among Danish laboratory technicians who were a part of the National Birth Cohort. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31:108–114.
25. Laara E, Matthews JNS. The equivalence of two models for ordinal data. Biometrika. 1985;72:206–207.
26. Sallmen M, Lindbohm ML, Anttila A, et al. Time to pregnancy among the wives of men exposed to organic solvents. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:24–30.
27. Rodriguez G. Discrete time models [Lecture notes]. Available at: Accessed 4 April 2008.
28. McManus C. Right hand, left hand. The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms, and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University; 2002;156–157.
29. Lippa RA. Handedness, sexual orientation, and gender-related personality traits in men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32:103–114.
30. Obel C, Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, et al. Psychological factors in pregnancy and mixed-handedness in the offspring. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:557–561.
31. Preti A, Sardu C, Piga A. Mixed-handedness is associated with the reporting of psychotic-like beliefs in a non-clinical Italian sample. Schizophr Res. 2007;92:15–23.
32. Annett M, Kilshaw D. Right- and left-hand skill II: estimating the parameters of the distribution of L-R differences in males and females. Br J Psychol. 1983;74:269–283.
33. Glover V, O’Connor TG, Heron J, et al. Antenatal maternal anxiety is linked with atypical handedness in the child. Early Hum Dev. 2004;79:107–118.
34. Gutteling BM, de Weerth C, Buitelaar JK. Prenatal stress and mixed-handedness. Pediatr Res. 2007;62:586–590.
35. Basso O. Right or wrong? On the difficult relationship between epidemiologists and handedness [Commentary]. Epidemiology 2007;18:191–193.
© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.