Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Alcohol Consumption and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Benefit of Alcohol Consumed With Meals?

Augustin, Livia S.A.*†; Gallus, Silvano; Tavani, Alessandra; Bosetti, Cristina; Negri, Eva; La Vecchia, Carlo‡§

doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000142146.36594.9a
Brief Report
Free

Background: The apparent favorable effect of alcohol on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI) may be related to its hypoinsulinemic effect when consumed with meals. We studied how the timing of alcohol consumption in relation to meals might affect the risk of MI in a population with relatively high regular alcohol consumption.

Methods: We conducted a case-control study between 1995 and 1999 in Milan, Italy. Cases were 507 subjects with a first episode of nonfatal acute MI, and controls were 478 patients admitted to hospitals for other acute diseases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by multiple logistic regression models.

Results: Compared with nondrinkers, an inverse trend in risk was observed when alcohol was consumed during meals only (for ≥3 drinks per day: OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.30–0.82). In contrast, no consistent trend in risk was found for subjects drinking outside of meals (for ≥3 drinks per day: 0.98; 0.49–1.96). The pattern of risk was similar when we considered people who drank only wine.

Conclusions: Alcohol drinking during meals was inversely related with risk of acute MI, whereas alcohol drinking outside meals only was unrelated to risk.

From the *Servizio di Epidemiologia, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano (PN), Italy; the †Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; ‡Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri,” Milan, Italy; and §Istituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Submitted 12 September 2003; final version accepted 16 July 2004.

Partly supported by “Ministero della Salute” (contract No. 177, RF 2001) and by the European Research Advisory Board (ERAB).

Correspondence: Alessandra Tavani, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri,” Via Eritrea, 62-20157, Milan, Italy. E-mail: tavani@marionegri.it.

Alcohol consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in several studies worldwide.1 This inverse relation has been seen for wine, beer, and spirits2–5 and for regular drinking, whereas binge drinking seems to exert an unfavorable effect on the risk of heart disease.6

The relation of acute MI risk with drinking during or outside of meals has rarely been investigated. In the Health Professional Study, no difference in the effect on risk of MI was shown for alcohol consumed mostly outside of meals (≥75% of the times) or mostly during meals (≥75% of the times), but the number of cases among drinkers of 30 g/day of alcohol or more was limited.3

The lower risk of coronary heart disease among drinkers may be partly accounted for by changes in glucose and insulin metabolism,7 hence the importance of considering the relation between alcohol drinking during and outside of meals. Italy offers a good opportunity for such studies because of its large proportion of alcohol drinkers. In this case-control study, we analyzed the risk of nonfatal acute MI in relation to alcohol drinking during or outside of meals.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

The data were derived from a case-control study of nonfatal acute MI, conducted between 1995 and 1999 in the greater Milan area, in northern Italy.5 Cases were 507 patients (378 men and 129 women) with a first episode of nonfatal acute MI (International Classification of Disease [ICD-9]: 410) admitted to a network of general hospitals in the area. Controls were 478 patients (297 men and 181 women) from the same geographic areas and admitted to the same network of hospitals for a wide spectrum of acute conditions unrelated to known or potential risk factors for MI. In particular, patients were excluded if they had had a previous MI or if they had been admitted to the hospital for neoplastic, metabolic, and smoking- or alcohol-related conditions. Among controls, 34% had been admitted for trauma, 30% had nontraumatic orthopedic disorders, 14% had acute surgical conditions, and 22% had miscellaneous illnesses (such as eye, ear, nose, throat, and dental disorders). The median age of cases was 61 years (range, 25–79 years) and of controls it was 59 years (range, 25–79 years). The study was approved by the ethical committee and informed consent was obtained from study participants. Fewer than 5% of cases and controls who were approached refused to participate.

All interviews were conducted in hospitals using a structured questionnaire that obtained information on sociodemographic factors, anthropometric variables, physical activity, smoking and other lifestyle habits, medical history, a validated food frequency section, and history of cardiovascular disease in first-degree relatives.

The section on alcohol drinking included questions on number of drinking days per week and on the weekly number of drinks for each type of alcoholic beverage consumed: wine (125 mL); beer (330 mL); “grappa,” “amari,” and “digestives” (Italian liquors consumed after meals, 30 mL); and spirits (30 mL). Each of these drinks includes approximately 12–15 g of ethanol. Patients were also asked their age at starting and stopping each category of alcoholic beverages and whether they drank only during meals, only outside meals, or both. Total alcohol intake was calculated as the sum of all alcoholic beverages reported. Nondrinkers included lifelong abstainers from any type of alcoholic drinks, as well as subjects who had stopped drinking alcohol at least 1 year previously. Binge drinkers were subjects who drank at least 4 drinks per week on one occasion or at least 8 drinks per week on 2 occasions. There was a satisfactory level of reproducibility and validity of the pattern of alcoholic consumption.8

Odds ratios (ORs) of acute MI, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were derived using unconditional multiple logistic regression models fitted by the method of maximum likelihood. These models included terms for age, sex, education, body mass index, coffee and tobacco consumption, total calorie intake, physical activity, serum cholesterol level, and history of diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the relation between acute MI risk and alcohol drinking pattern. Compared with nondrinkers, alcohol drinking only during meals was associated with a reduced risk of MI (for 3 or more drinks per day OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.30–0.82). The OR for an increment of 1 drink per day was 0.91 (0.84–0.98). The age- and sex-adjusted OR for drinkers of 3 or more drinks per day only during meals was 0.59 (0.38–0.91), and the multivariate fully adjusted OR when exdrinkers were excluded was 0.39 (0.22–0.68). No consistent trend in risk was observed among subjects drinking during and outside meals or outside meals only (for 3 or more drinks per day OR = 0.98; 0.49–1.96), and the OR for an increment of 1 drink per day was 1.01 (0.92−1.1). The age- and sex-adjusted OR for drinkers of 3 or more drinks per day during and outside of meals or outside of meals only was 1.02 (0.57–1.83), and the multivariate adjusted OR when exdrinkers were excluded was 0.72 (0.32–1.64). Comparing the trends (excluding nondrinkers) for alcohol during meals only and alcohol outside and during meals or outside meals only, we found a χ12 for interaction of 6.2 (P value = 0.01). For wine drinkers only, the ORs were 0.51 for drinkers of 2 or more drinks per day during meals and 0.75 for those drinking also outside meals.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1

When subjects drinking outside meals were further split among those drinking both during and outside meals (76 cases and 68 controls) or those drinking only outside meals (17 cases and 13 controls), no heterogeneity could be demonstrated statistically, although the OR was above unity (OR = 2.88; 0.61–13.58) for heavy drinkers (2 or more drinks per day) drinking outside meals only.

Binge drinkers represented a small proportion of this population (10 cases and 7 controls), and the OR for binge drinkers, compared with nondrinkers, was 1.20 (0.36–3.97).

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

In our study, alcohol drinking during meals was inversely related to acute MI risk, whereas alcohol drinking during and outside meals or outside meals only was not related to risk. In Italy, wine is the most common alcoholic beverage consumed, but we saw no difference by type of alcoholic beverage on the risk of MI.2,5 The results for wine drinkers who consume wine only during meals were similar to those for total alcohol consumed only during meals. It is difficult to make any inference for subjects drinking wine outside of meals, because risk estimates are based on a small number of subjects. However, the OR for increasing 1 drink of wine daily outside of meals was close to 1.0. In the 12-year follow up of the male Health Professional Cohort study, the relative risks for drinkers of ≥30 g/day of total alcohol were 0.57 (0.32–1.03) when less than 25% of total alcohol intake was consumed with meals, 0.51 (0.15–1.77) when 25% to 74%, and 0.33 (0.09–1.27) when 75% or more of total alcohol intake was consumed with meals.3 Although the point estimates for high levels of alcohol drinking agree with our findings, there was no consistent pattern of risk according to the proportion of alcohol consumed with meals.

Alcohol consumed in moderation is thought to reduce the risk of heart disease1 by improving blood lipids, coagulation factors, and blood pressure.9 An additional mechanism could be the hypoglycemic and hypoinsulinemic effects of alcohol when consumed with food.10 Wine has been shown to reduce by approximately 35% the glycemic response of a high-glycemic index food such as white bread.10 High levels of glucose11 and insulin11,12 are known risk factors for heart disease, and alcohol consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of diabetes,13 lower fasting insulin,14 improved glucose,7 and insulin sensitivity,7,14,15 the latter being shown also in a randomized clinical trial.16 Alcohol dose may be important in determining glucose and insulin response, and the ethanol's effect on the blood glucose concentration depends both on the ethanol dose and total glucose flux.17 Moreover, alcohol may have antiinflammatory properties, because moderate alcohol consumption has been associated with lower C-reactive protein concentrations than no or occasional alcohol intake, independently of alcohol-related effects on lipids,18 although the role of pattern of drinking on antiinflammatory parameters remains unclear. Alcohol consumption outside meals results in a faster absorption of ethanol, which could have detrimental effects on blood pressure, mainly in binge drinkers19; in contrast, ingestion of 250 mL of red wine during the noon meal reduced blood pressure of centrally obese hypertensive subjects.20 These vasodilating properties may be important in explaining alcohol effects on insulin action.21

This study was not population-based, but cases and controls were interviewed in the same hospitals and came from the same geographic area. Participation was more than 95% complete. We excluded from the comparison group patients admitted for chronic conditions potentially associated with tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking, as well as diseases related to known or potential risk factors for MI. When traumatic conditions were excluded from controls, the OR for drinkers of 3 or more drinks per day only during meals was 0.53 (0.30–0.93). The potential relation of alcohol drinking and drinking pattern with the risk of MI was unknown to the interviewers and to patients. The similarity of interview setting provided further reassurance against potential information bias. Underreporting of drinking may have occurred, but these alcohol data had satisfactory validity and reproducibility,8,22 and alcohol drinking is socially accepted in Italy. Furthermore, the potential confounding effect of several covariates was taken into account in the analyses.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ivana Garimoldi for editorial assistance.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Corrao G, Rubbiati L, Bagnardi V, et al. Alcohol and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2000;95:1505–1523.
2. Bianchi C, Negri E, La Vecchia C, et al. Alcohol consumption and the risk of acute myocardial infarction in women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993;47:308–311.
3. Mukamal KJ, Conigrave KM, Mittleman MA, et al. Roles of drinking pattern and type of alcohol consumed in coronary heart disease in men. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:109–118.
4. Tavani A, La Vecchia C, Negri E, et al. Alcohol intake and risk of myocardial infarction in Italian men. J Epidemiol Biostat. 1996;1:31–39.
5. Tavani A, Bertuzzi M, Negri E, et al. Alcohol, smoking, coffee and risk of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction in Italy. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17:1131–1137.
6. Murray RP, Connett JE, Tyas SL, et al. Alcohol volume, drinking pattern, and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: is there a U-shaped function? Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:242–248.
7. Facchini F, Chen YD, Reaven GM. Light-to-moderate alcohol intake is associated with enhanced insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:115–119.
8. Ferraroni M, Decarli A, Franceschi S, et al. Validity and reproducibility of alcohol consumption in Italy. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:775–782.
9. Pearson TA. Alcohol and heart disease. Circulation. 1996;94:3023–3025.
10. Brand-Miller J, Liu V, Holt SHA, et al. Alcoholic beverages lower acute glucose and insulin responses in healthy subjects. Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr. 2002;11:S309.
11. Wei M, Gaskill SP, Haffner SM, et al. Effects of diabetes and level of glycemia on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1167–1172.
12. Pyorala K, Savolainen E, Kaukola S, et al. Plasma insulin as coronary heart disease risk factor: relationship to other risk factors and predictive value during 9 1/2-year follow-up of the Helsinki Policemen Study population. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1985;701:38–52.
13. Wei M, Gibbons LW, Mitchell TL, et al. Alcohol intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in men. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:18–22.
14. Kiechl S, Willeit J, Poewe W, et al. Insulin sensitivity and regular alcohol consumption: large, prospective, cross sectional population study (Bruneck study). BMJ. 1996;313:1040–1044.
15. Goude D, Fagerberg B, Hulthe J; AIR study group. Alcohol consumption, the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in 58-year-old clinically healthy men (AIR study). Clin Sci (Lond). 2002;102:345–352.
16. Davies MJ, Baer DJ, Judd JT, et al. Effects of moderate alcohol intake on fasting insulin and glucose concentrations and insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;287:2559–2562.
17. Yki-Jarvinen H, Koivisto VA, Ylikahri R, et al. Acute effects of ethanol and acetate on glucose kinetics in normal subjects. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:E175–E180.
18. Albert MA, Glynn RJ, Ridker PM. Alcohol consumption and plasma concentration of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2003;107:443–447.
19. Puddey IB, Rakic V, Dimmitt SB, et al. Influence of pattern of drinking on cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors-a review. Addiction. 1999;94:649–663.
20. Foppa MJ, Fuchs FD, Preissler L, et al. Red wine with the noon meal lowers post-meal blood pressure: a randomized trial in centrally obese, hypertensive patients. Stud Alcohol. 2002;63:247–251.
21. Baron AD, Clark MG. Role of blood flow in the regulation of muscle glucose uptake. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997;17:487–499.
22. D’Avanzo B, La Vecchia C, Katsouyanni K, et al. Reliability of information on cigarette smoking and beverage consumption provided by hospital controls. Epidemiology. 1996;7:312–315.
© 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.