Share this article on:

The Authors Respond

Tsuda, Toshihide; Tokinobu, Akiko; Yamamoto, Eiji; Suzuki, Etsuji

Erratum

In the Letter that appeared on page e21 of the May 2016 issue, there was an error in the following sentence. The correction appears in bold italics.

Given the substantially larger sample size, however, direct estimation from ultrasound screening data among 47,203 examinees in the unexposed or relatively low contaminated areas in Belarus would be more appropriate, where no cancer cases were detected (95% confidence interval: 0–78 per million examinees),16–19 as shown in eTable 1 of our article.9

Epidemiology. 27(5):e36, September 2016.

doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000468
Letters

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Department of Human Ecology, Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan, tsudatos@md.okayama-u.ac.jp

Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan

Department of Information Science, Faculty of Informatics, Okayama University of Science, Okayama, Japan

Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental digital content is available through direct URL citations in the HTML and PDF versions of this article (www.epidem.com).

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.