Letter to the Editor
Letters to the Editor
Emergency Medicine News welcomes letters to the editor about any subject related to emergency medicine. Please limit your letter to 250 words, and include your full name, credentials, and city and state of residence or practice.
Letters may be edited for content, length, and grammar. Submission of a letter constitutes the author's permission to publish on all media, including print, online, and social media, but does not guarantee publication. Letters express the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Emergency Medicine News and Wolters Kluwer.
Letters to the editor may be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
I wondered, as I read the article “Six Tries to Get the Diagnosis Right” by Daniel G. Miller, MD, and Matt Negaard, MD, (EMN 2019;41:33; http://bit.ly/2CUQ4m4) how the billing codes for each visit would reconcile with the truncated exams that this patient endured.
Timothy Donnelly, MD
Drs. Miller and Negaard respond: Dr. Donnelly's question raises an interesting point. While a level IV chart requires a detailed exam, it does not require the exam to be accurate or diagnostic. This suggests that our current system often bills for how much we do to patients, rather than how well we care for them.