Thickness of rectus abdominis measured by ultrasound in critically ill patients after abdominal surgery: A retrospective cohort study : European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Intensive care medicine

Thickness of rectus abdominis measured by ultrasound in critically ill patients after abdominal surgery

A retrospective cohort study

Yang, Ming-Chieh; Wang, Yung-Chang; Chen, I-Shu; Huang, Wei-Chun

Author Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology 38(7):p 684-691, July 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001407

Abstract

Introduction

The critically ill may have significant functional impairment, with slow recovery and high mortality rates.1,2 Following prolonged mechanical ventilation, fewer than half survived beyond 1 year.3 Therefore, the early identification of patients at high risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation may significantly influence the manner of their care.

Sarcopenia is associated with extended mechanical ventilation, longer stays in hospital and the ICU, complications after emergency surgery, problems with disposal and mortality.4–6 It is also reported that sarcopenia, defined by skeletal muscle mass adjusted for BMI, is related to cardiometabolic risk factors.7 Various methods, including computed tomography (CT), MRI, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioimpedance analysis (BIA), muscle strength evaluation and ultrasound, have been used in determining the degree of sarcopenia.8 MRI and CT are considered to be best for assessing muscle quantity,9,10 but use of these methods may be hampered by clinical conditions, facility and personnel, lack of portability or their high costs.11 Ultrasound examination is noninvasive and can be performed at the bedside, and studies have shown that ultrasound measurement of muscle thickness correlates well with other methods.12–14 However, as yet, there is no standardised method of performing muscle ultrasound in clinical practice.14,15

This study aimed to investigate the association between BMI-rectus abdominis (BMI-RA) thickness ratio, defined as BMI divided by the thickness of the rectus abdominis measured by ultrasound, and the outcomes of the critically ill, to describe a standardised and reproducible method for measuring trunk muscle that is easy to use at the bedside, and to investigate the relationship between results from ultrasound examination and those from CT scan.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This retrospective study was carried out in two ICUs with 24 beds in total at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (a tertiary referral teaching hospital) from October 2017 to June 2018. Ethical approval for this study (Ethical Committee Number VHGKS19-EM4-01) was provided by the institutional review board of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan on 26 March 2019. Because all data including ultrasound measurements were already recorded in the medical records, a waiver was granted for individual written consent.

Participants

During the period of study, patients being transferred to ICU immediately after major abdominal procedures received a bedside ultrasound examination during the first week of ICU stay, or when clinically indicated (Fig. 1). Extended focused assessment sonography for trauma (eFAST) had been performed to evaluate patients by one of the investigators (Yang) since June 2015. The eFAST ultrasound examination assessed the abdomen, pelvis, pericardium and pleura.16 Since August 2017, the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle over the upper abdomen had also been measured while performing eFAST. If the ICU stay was more than 1 week, the ultrasound examination was performed weekly.

F1
Fig. 1:
Flow chart of the study

Measurement of rectus abdominis

The thickness of rectus abdominis muscle over upper abdomen was measured by B mode ultrasonography while the patient was breathing quietly in the supine position (Fig. 2a). The measurement was performed using a Siemens ACUSON P300TM portable ultrasound system with LA523 linear transducer array (frequency bandwidth: 5.0 to 12.0 MHz) (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Mountain View, California, USA). The distance between sheaths of rectus abdominis muscle was calculated on the screen by planimetric technique provided by the vendor of the ultrasound unit (Fig. 2b). Both sides of the upper abdomen were examined by ultrasound and the thickness of rectus abdominis was recorded in cm. Images were stored in the medical information system of the hospital and were retrospectively retrieved for analysis.

F2
Fig. 2:
(a) Measurement of rectus abdominis by ultrasound. Although the patient was in supine position and breathing quietly without muscle contraction, the probe was placed perpendicularly on the upper abdominal wall with a copious amount of gel. The upper abdomen was scanned from the level of the umbilicus to 5 cm cephalad in order to find the thickest part of the muscle. Then, the probe was tilted until both sheaths of the muscle were seen clearly on the monitor. (b) When both sheaths of the muscle were clearly seen, the image was frozen and the distance between sheaths was measured on the monitor of the ultrasound machine.

If an abdominal CT scan was performed within 3 days before or after the ultrasound examination, images of the CT scan were retrieved from the medical information system and viewed on the computer monitor. The thickness of rectus abdominis was measured by picture archiving and communications system viewer program (smartPACSTM, Taiwan Electronic Data Processing Co., Taipei, Taiwan). The boundaries of skeletal muscle of the cross-section at the level of the third lumbar vertebra were outlined on the monitor manually, and the enclosed area was calculated by the computer program to derive skeletal muscle area (SMA) (Supplement Fig. 1, https://links.lww.com/EJA/A445). Intra-observer and interobserver variations of ultrasound measurements were assessed 18 months after the end of the study period. The same analyst (Yang) read images of the first ultrasound examination of each patient without any markers on them, and a second analyst (Wang) blindly and independently analysed the same images. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to test intra-observer and interobserver reliability.

Data collection and outcomes

Characteristics of patients, including age, sex, height, weight, diagnosis at admission, reason for transfer to ICU, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, hospital stay, follow-up period and final condition, were retrospectively retrieved from medical records. The Charlson comorbidity index17,18 and Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score19 were calculated based on the information and data collected on the day of transfer to ICU. Serum albumin levels and vital signs on the days of ICU admission and ultrasound examination were also collected retrospectively from medical records. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score20 and BMI were calculated based on the data on the day of each ultrasound measurement of the rectus abdominis. Images were retrieved from the medical information system and skeletal muscle index (SMI) was derived from SMA adjusted by the square of body height.10,21 Sarcopenia was defined by the cut-off value reported by the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.22 BMI-RA thickness ratio was defined as BMI divided by the averaged thickness of rectus abdominis on both sides of the upper abdomen.

The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay. Prolonged mechanical ventilation was defined as failed weaning from mechanical ventilation within 14 days after the first ultrasound examination. Only the first BMI-RA thickness ratio measured after admission to ICU was used in the analyses of primary and secondary outcomes. Results of ultrasound measurements after the first week were analysed for correlation with CT scan results if available. The follow-up period was defined as days between the first ultrasound examination and discharge from the hospital or the last follow-up at the outpatient department of the hospital.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables in normal distribution were compared using Student's t-test and expressed as mean ± SD. For continuous variables not normally distributed, the data were compared using Mann--Whitney U test and expressed as median [IQR]. For multiple comparisons, P values were corrected for false discovery rate by the Benjamini--Hochberg method. Categorical variables were presented as a number or as a percentage and compared using χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Correlation analysis was performed to assess the correlation between ultrasound measurement and CT scan findings, and the correlation between BMI-RA thickness ratio and other variables. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess in-hospital mortality predictions. The cut-off value on the ROC curve was calculated by obtaining the best Youden index ((sensitivity + specificity) -1). Survival curves as a function of days were generated using Kaplan--Meier analysis and compared using Mantel--Cox test. Linear regression was used to analyse the association between continuous variables and lengths of stay in ICU, in hospital and duration of mechanical ventilation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The results were reported as Wald χ2P value and adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.07 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA), PASW Statistics version 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA), R version 3.4.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and G∗Power version 3.1.9.7.23 All statistical tests were two-tailed, with the level of significance set to P value less than 0.05.

Result

There were 27 patients transferred to the ICU after major abdominal surgery and all received eFAST ultrasound examination within the first week of admission (Fig. 1). The median duration between the day of admission to ICU and the day of the first ultrasound examination was 2.2 ± 2.2 days (range: 0 to 6 days). The mean age of the patients was 67.9 ± 11.3 years, and 18 (66.7%) underwent emergency surgery. Patient characteristics and diagnoses are summarised in Table 1. The median follow-up time was 63 days (range: 13 to 312 days). Thirteen patients required mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days after the first ultrasound examination. The in-hospital mortality was 25.9% (7 of 27). No local infection or poor healing of abdominal wounds was observed. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the same observer and different observers were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.97) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.94), respectively.

Table 1 - Patient characteristics
Characteristics n = 27
Sex (male/female) 16 (59%)/11 (41%)
Age (years) 67.9 ± 11.3 (63.5 to 72.4)
ICU stay (days) 16 [2 to 58]
APACHE II score 26.1 ± 7.3 (23.2 to 29.0)
SOFA score 6.3 ± 3.1 (5.0 to 7.5)
RA thickness (cm) 0.74 ± 0.17 (0.68 to 0.81)
BMI (kg m−2) 25.9 [17.5 to 51.1]
Charlson comorbidity index 4.2 ± 1.9 (3.5 to 5.0)
Hospital stay (days) 31.6 ± 19.3 (23.9 to 39.2)
MV duration (days) 12 (1 to 81)
Successful weaning in 14 days/prolonged MV 14 (52%) / 13 (48%)
Successful weaning/failure at discharge 20 (74%) / 7 (26%)
Alive/death at discharge 20 (74%) / 7 (26%)
Admission after elective surgery 9 (33.3%)
 Upper gastrointestinal tract cancer 2
 Colorectal cancer 3
 Other tumours or disease 4
Admission after emergency surgery 18 (66.7%)
 Upper gastrointestinal tract perforation 5
 Small bowel obstruction, ischaemia, or perforation 5
 Colon perforation, diverticulitis, or cancer 6
 Other peritonitis 2
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (95% CI), median [range] or n (%).APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; MV, mechanical ventilation; RA, rectus abdominis; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

In total, 51 ultrasound measurements of the rectus abdominis were made for the 27 patients. There were 20 CT scans performed within 3 days before or after the 51 ultrasound examinations, including 16 performed close to the first ultrasound examination of each patient (Fig. 1). No association was found between sarcopenia defined by SMI and outcomes of the 16 patients (Supplement Table 1, https://links.lww.com/EJA/A445). Among all 20 CT scans, the thickness of rectus abdominis measured by ultrasound correlated significantly with the thickness measured by CT scan (P = 0.0211) and SMA at the third lumbar spine level (P = 0.0027). No significant association was found between the BMI-RA thickness ratio and results from the 20 CT scans (Supplement Table 2, https://links.lww.com/EJA/A445).

BMI-RA thickness ratio is associated with in-hospital mortality

In nonsurvivors, the disease severity and the first BMI-RA thickness ratio measured after admission to ICU were significantly higher than survivors (BMI-RA thickness ratio: 47.9 [34.9 to 58.6] and 37.5 [25.1 to 42.5], respectively, P = 0.013; APACHE II score: 34 [29 to 39] and 25 [19 to 28.7], respectively, P = 0.013; SOFA score: 8 [6 to 10] and 5 [4 to 7], respectively, P = 0.018) (Table 2). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the BMI-RA thickness ratio was found to be associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.48, P = 0.041; Table 3).

Table 2 - Characteristics of patients according to clinical outcomes
Condition at discharge Prolonged mechanical ventilation
Dead Alive P 95% CI >14 days ≤ 14 days P 95% CI
Age (years) 64 [63 to 77] 69.5 [56.0 to 79.5] 0.82 −11 to 12 70.7 ± 10.1 65.4 ± 12.1 0.23 −3.5 to 14.2
APACHE II 34 [29 to 39] 25.0 [19.0 to 28.7] 0.013a −15 to −2 28.9 ± 7.4 23.5 ± 6.3 0.05 −0.03 to 10.9
SOFA 8 [6 to 10] 5 [4 to 7] 0.018a −6 to −1 7.9 ± 3.4 4.7 ± 1.8 0.005a 1.1 to 5.4
CCI 5 [4 to 6] 4 [2 to 6] 0.30 −3 to 1 4.6 ± 1.7 3.9 ± 2.0 0.30 −0.7 to 2.2
Albumin (g dl−1) 2.3 [1.6 to 2.7] 2.5 [2.3 to 2.9] 0.08 −0.1 to 1 2.4 ± 0.5 2.7 ± 0.5 0.09 −0.7 to 0.06
BMI 27.5 [24.0 to 34.7] 25.8 [22.9 to 29.4] 0.31 −9.2 to 2.0 27.4 [24.2 to 33.6] 25.6 [22.2 to 28.8] 0.18 −1.2 to 7.7
RA thickness 0.67 [0.53 to 0.77] 0.76 [0.65 to 0.84] 0.13 −0.03 to 0.26 0.69 ± 0.11 0.79 ± 0.2 0.11 −0.24 to 0.026
Ratio 47.9 [34.9 to 58.6] 37.5 [25.1 to 42.5] 0.013a −23.6 to −2.0 43.4 [35.0 to 52.5] 36.2 [23.7 to 41.8] 0.03 1.2 to 18.6
Data are presented as median [IQR] or mean ± SD.APACHE II, Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation II score; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; CI, confidence interval; RA, rectus abdominis; Ratio, BMI-RA thickness ratio; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
aStatistically significant with Benjamini–Hochberg correction.

Table 3 - Multivariable logistic regression model predicting in-hospital mortality and prolonged mechanical ventilation
Outcome Variable Odds ratio 95% CI P
In-hospital Mortality APACHE II score 1.12 0.88 to 1.43 0.35
SOFA score 1.43 0.82 to 2.47 0.20
BMI-RA thickness ratio 1.22 1.01 to 1.48 0.04
Prolonged mechanical ventilation APACHE II score 0.98 0.81 to 1.18 0.82
SOFA score 1.99 1.06 to 3.75 0.03
BMI-RA thickness ratio 1.16 0.99 to 1.36 0.07
APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; CI, confidence interval; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Using the ROC curve to assess BMI-RA thickness ratio in predicting in-hospital mortality, the cut-off value was selected as 44.2 (area under curve: 0.81) (Supplement Fig. 2, https://links.lww.com/EJA/A445). In patients with a BMI-RA thickness ratio greater than 44.2, survival was worse, and the probability of remaining on mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days was higher (Supplement Table 3, https://links.lww.com/EJA/A445).

Factors associated with mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay

The BMI-RA thickness ratio calculated from the first ultrasound examination following transfer to ICU significantly correlated with ICU stay, hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation (Table 4). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between the BMI-RA thickness ratio and hospital stay, but not ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation (Supplement Fig. 3, https://links.lww.com/EJA/A445). In multivariable logistic regression analysis including APACHE II score, SOFA score and the BMI-RA thickness ratio, the SOFA score was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.06 to 3.75, P = 0.033; Table 3).

Table 4 - Correlation between BMI-RA thickness ratio and other variables
Variable r R 2 95% CI P
APACHE II 0.39 0.15 0.01 to 0.67 0.04
SOFA 0.16 0.03 −0.23 to 0.51 0.41
CCI 0.33 0.11 −0.05 to 0.63 0.09
Albumin −0.12 0.01 −0.48 to 0.27 0.56
BMI 0.69 0.48 0.42 to 0.85 <0.0001
RA −0.63 0.40 −0.81 to −0.33 0.0004
Hospital stay 0.50 0.25 0.15 to 0.74 0.007
aICU stay 0.48 0.11 to 0.73 0.01
aMV duration 0.56 0.22 to 0.78 0.002
APACHE II, Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation II score; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit; MV, mechanical ventilation; RA, rectus abdominis; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
aSpearman r.

Discussion

We have shown that the BMI-RA thickness ratio was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality, a relationship that persisted even after adjustment for APACHE II and SOFA scores. We also found that the thickness of rectus abdominis measured by ultrasound correlated well with CT measurements. However, there was no relationship between CT measurements and the BMI-RA thickness ratio, suggesting that the BMI-RA thickness ratio contributed more information than a simple linear measurement alone. Also, ultrasound measurements demonstrated good intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility, leading us to believe that our method may be used as a standardised method of measuring the thickness of the rectus abdominis.

Skeletal muscle mass is highly important in immune function, glucose disposal, protein synthesis and mobility,24–26 but quantity and quality of muscle may be affected by disease and activity,9,27 and muscle wasting occurs rapidly in ICU.28 Sarcopenia is associated with mechanical ventilation, postoperative status, surgical complications, hospital and ICU stay, problems with disposal and mortality.4–6,29–31 A previous study reported that sarcopenia was present in 43.1% of surgical ICU patients,32 and in our study, sarcopenia was present in 56.25% of the 16 patients having CT scans within the first week of admission to ICU. However, no association was found between sarcopenia and outcomes, possibly due to the low number of patients in our study.

Site-specific sarcopenia may be present before whole-body sarcopenia.15,33 Ishida et al.34 reported that the thickness of the rectus abdominis correlated better with expiratory pressure production than with thickness of other abdominal muscles.33 The thickness of the rectus abdominis among different groups has been evaluated with various methods (Supplement Table 4, https://links.lww.com/EJA/A445).8,12,33–36 In our study, neither the thickness of the rectus abdominis nor the BMI alone was associated with outcomes. Tandon et al.37 reported that combining BMI and thigh muscle thickness measured by ultrasound can identify patients with sarcopenia. Similarly, in this study, we have found that the BMI-RA thickness ratio, derived from dividing BMI by the average thickness of the rectus abdominis on both sides of the upper abdomen, is associated with in-hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay. However, in a multivariable analysis adjusting for APACHE and SOFA scores, the BMI-RA thickness ratio is only significantly associated with in-hospital mortality but not prolonged mechanical ventilation.

An ideal method for assessing muscle composition of patients in ICU should be easy to perform at bedside with reasonable reproducibility and minimal impact on organ function. CT is one of the gold standards for assessing muscle quantity.9,10 However, critically ill patients are often too unstable to be transferred to another facility, hence the use of CT, MRI and DXA to detect sarcopenia is not easy.38,39 Traditional markers, such as serum albumin and BMI, are neither good markers for malnutrition and lean body mass nor good predictors of mortality.30,40–44 In critically ill patients, testing muscle strength may be difficult to perform in patients under sedation, and BIA often may be affected by hydration status and presence of oedema.38 Ultrasound is noninvasive and can evaluate muscle strength and quality. It is reported that muscle thickness measured by ultrasound correlated with measurements from MRI and CT.12–14,45–49 We also found that the thickness of the rectus abdominis measured by ultrasound correlated with the thickness measured by CT and SMA at the third lumbar spine level. This implies that ultrasound may be an ideal alternative for evaluating trunk muscle, such as the rectus abdominis in critically ill patients.

There is no standardised method of performing muscle ultrasound in clinical practice.15 Ultrasound examination may be affected by image acquisition, image processing and analysis, skills of examiners and differing technological capabilities of machines.50 Nevertheless, studies have reported that great interobserver reliability of ultrasound examination can be achieved.32,51 In our retrospective study, all ultrasound measurements were performed by a single investigator using only one ultrasound machine before the outcomes of patients were known. Intra-observer and interobserver variations were independently assessed, and with a substantial temporal separation between analyses to mitigate recall bias. The high intraclass correlation coefficients indicate good reliability of the current method. However, a prospective study involving different examiners independently examining the same patient on the same day and reviewing images blindly sometime later, should be carried out to consolidate the reproducibility and interobserver reliability of current method. We did not observe any adverse events such as wound contamination, wound infections and delayed healing in this series.

There are several limitations of our study. The high disease severity and recent surgical condition of patients enrolled in our retrospective study mean that a larger prospective study enrolling more patients with different conditions is warranted to further study the role of BMI-RA thickness ratio in the care of critically ill patients. We did not assess the quality, function and serial changes of rectus abdominis measurements. The relationship between the BMI-RA thickness ratio and sex, age and sarcopenia defined by other methods, and serial change in the BMI-RA thickness ratio during the course of illness, remain to be investigated. Hence, larger prospective studies comparing ultrasound examination with other methods of sarcopenia evaluation, and taking muscle quality, strength evaluation and frailty assessment into consideration, are needed to elucidate the role of ultrasound examination of the rectus abdominis and BMI-RA thickness ratio in the care of critically ill patients.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that using ultrasound to measure the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle is safe and easy to perform in the surgical ICU. The BMI-RA thickness ratio is related to ICU stay, hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality of patients transferred to ICU after major abdominal surgery. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm the reliability of measuring thickness of the rectus abdominis by ultrasound and the relationship between the BMI-RA thickness ratio and outcomes in critically ill patients.

Acknowledgements relating to this article

Assistance with the study: we would like to thank Ms. Ho-shan Hsiao for her assistance in patient registry of the study.

Financial support and sponsorship: none.

Conflicts of interest: none.

Presentation: part of patients was enrolled in a poster presented at SG-ANZICS 2018, 17–21 May, Singapore.

References

1. Chin-Yee N, D’Egidio G, Thavorn K, et al. Cost analysis of the very elderly admitted to intensive care units. Crit Care 2017; 21:109.
2. Bugedo G, Egal M, Bakker J. Prolonged mechanical ventilation and chronic critical illness. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8:751–753.
3. Damuth E, Mitchell JA, Bartock JL, et al. Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3:544–553.
4. Toptas M, Yalcin M, Akkoc, et al. The relation between sarcopenia and mortality in patients at intensive care unit. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018:9.
5. Du Y, Karvellas CJ, Baracos V, et al. Sarcopenia is a predictor of outcomes in very elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. Surgery 2014; 156:521–527.
6. Dirks RC, Edwards BL, Tong E, et al. Sarcopenia in emergency abdominal surgery. J Surg Res 2017; 207:13–21.
7. Kim TN, Park MS, Lee EJ, et al. Comparisons of three different methods for defining sarcopenia: an aspect of cardiometabolic risk. Sci Rep 2017; 7:6491.
8. Choi ES, Cho SH, Kim JH. Relationship between rectus abdominis muscle thickness and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged men. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0185040.
9. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2018; 48:16–31.
10. Derstine BA, Holcombe SA, Ross BE, et al. Skeletal muscle cutoff values for sarcopenia diagnosis using T10 to L5 measurements in a healthy US population. Sci Rep 2018; 8:11369.
11. Beaudart C, McCloskey E, Bruyere O, et al. Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management. BMC Geriatr 2016; 16:170.
12. Wachi M, Suga T, Higuchi T, et al. Applicability of ultrasonography for evaluating trunk muscle size: a pilot study. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29:245–249.
13. Takai Y, Ohta M, Akagi R, et al. Validity of ultrasound muscle thickness measurements for predicting leg skeletal muscle mass in healthy Japanese middle-aged and older individuals. J Physiol Anthropol 2013; 32:12.
14. Stringer HJ, Wilson D. The role of ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for sarcopenia. J Frailty Aging 2018; 7:258–261.
15. Ticinesi A, Meschi T, Narici MV, et al. Muscle ultrasound and sarcopenia in older individuals: a clinical perspective. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18:290–300.
16. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB, et al. Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting posttraumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma 2004; 57:288–295.
17. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:373–383.
18. Charlson ME, Charlson RE, Peterson JC, et al. The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61:1234–1240.
19. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:818–829.
20. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:707–710.
21. van der Werf A, Langius JAE, de van der Schueren MAE, et al. Percentiles for skeletal muscle index, area and radiation attenuation based on computed tomography imaging in a healthy Caucasian population. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018; 72:288–296.
22. Lee JS, Kim YS, Kim EY, et al. Prognostic significance of CT-determined sarcopenia in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202700.
23. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. GPower 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39:175–191.
24. Brandt C, Pedersen BK. The role of exercise-induced myokines in muscle homeostasis and the defense against chronic diseases. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010; 2010:520258.
25. Price SRMW. Mechanisms stimulating protein degradation to cause muscle atrophy. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 1998; 1:79–83.
26. Lightfoot A, McArdle A, Griffiths RD. Muscle in defense. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:S384–S390.
27. Sanchis-Moysi J, Idoate F, Dorado C, et al. Large asymmetric hypertrophy of rectus abdominis muscle in professional tennis players. PLoS One 2010; 5:e15858.
28. Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA 2013; 310:1591–1600.
29. Parry SM, El-Ansary D, Cartwright MS, et al. Ultrasonography in the intensive care setting can be used to detect changes in the quality and quantity of muscle and is related to muscle strength and function. J Crit Care 2015; 30:1151e1159-1114.
30. Moisey LL, Cotton MM, Premji BA, et al. Nutrition and Rehabilitation Investigators Consortium (NUTRIC). Skeletal muscle predicts ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and mortality in elderly ICU patients. Crit Care 2013; 17:R206.
31. Hamidi M, Ho C, Zeeshan M, et al. Can sarcopenia quantified by computed tomography scan predict adverse outcomes in emergency general surgery? J Surg Res 2019; 235:141–147.
32. Mueller N, Murthy S, Tainter CR, et al. Can sarcopenia quantified by ultrasound of the rectus femoris muscle predict adverse outcome of surgical intensive care unit patients as well as frailty? A prospective, observational cohort study. Ann Surg 2016; 264:1116–1124.
33. Kim J, Lim H, Lee SI, et al. Thickness of rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue in adult women: correlation with age, pregnancy, laparotomy, and body mass index. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39:528–533.
34. Ishida H, Suehiro T, Kurozumi C, et al. Correlation between abdominal muscle thickness and maximal expiratory pressure. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34:2001–2005.
35. Bueno AF, Lemos FA, Ferrareze ME, et al. Muscle thickness of the pectoralis major and rectus abdominis and level of physical activity in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Bras Nefrol 2017; 39:391–397.
36. Tahan N, Khademi-Kalantari K, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, et al. Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study. J Physiol Anthropol 2016; 35:17.
37. Tandon P, Low G, Mourtzakis M, et al. A model to identify sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:1473–1480. e1473.
38. Rubbieri G, Di Bari ME, M. Techniques for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2014; 11:181–184.
39. Paris MT, Mourtzakis M. Development of a bedside-applicable ultrasound protocol to estimate fat mass index derived from whole body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans. Nutrition 2019; 57:225–230.
40. Kuzuya M, Izawa S, Enoki H, et al. Is serum albumin a good marker for malnutrition in the physically impaired elderly? Clin Nutr 2007; 26:84–90.
41. Liu L, Roberson BM, Sullivan PK, DH. Undernutrition and risk of mortality in elderly patients within 1 year of hospital discharge. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57:M741–746.
42. Moisey LL, Mourtzakis M, Cotton BA, et al. Skeletal muscle predicts ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and mortality in elderly ICU patients. Critical Care 2013; 17:R206.
43. Batsis JA, Villareal DT. Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14:513–537.
44. Schetz M, De Jong A, Deane AM, et al. Obesity in the critically ill: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:757–769.
45. Watanabe Y, Yamada Y, Fukumoto Y, et al. Echo intensity obtained from ultrasonography images reflecting muscle strength in elderly men. Clin Interv Aging 2013; 8:993–998.
46. Nieman DC, Shanely RA, Zwetsloot KA, et al. Ultrasonic assessment of exercise-induced change in skeletal muscle glycogen content. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2015; 7:9.
47. Yoshiko A, Kaji T, Sugiyama H, et al. Muscle quality characteristics of muscles in the thigh, upper arm and lower back in elderly men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118:1385–1395.
48. Miyatani M, Kanehisa H, Ito M, et al. The accuracy of volume estimates using ultrasound muscle thickness measurements in different muscle groups. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91:264–272.
49. Thiebaud RS, Abe T, Loenneke JP, et al. Body fat percentage assessment by ultrasound subcutaneous fat thickness measurements in middle-aged and older adults. Clin Nutr 2018; 38:2659–2667.
50. Correa-de-Araujo R, Harris-Love MO, Miljkovic I, et al. The need for standardized assessment of muscle quality in skeletal muscle function deficit and other aging-related muscle dysfunctions: a symposium report. Front Physiol 2017; 8:87.
51. Sarwal A, Parry SM, Berry MJ, et al. Interobserver reliability of quantitative muscle sonographic analysis in the critically ill population. J Ultrasound Med 2015; 34:1191–1200.

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2021 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.