Sudden cardiac death is the third leading cause of death in industrialised nations. It is estimated that in Europe and in the United States, more than 700 000 patients die annually following sudden cardiac death, even when the emergency medical service has been activated and started cardiopulmonary resuscitation.1,2 The same applies to all other developed regions of the world. Despite many improvements in emergency medical services and hospital treatment of sudden cardiac death patients, the survival rates remain low. The key problem is that it can take a long time for an emergency medical service to arrive after the victim's collapse. The brain, however, starts to die some 3 to 5 min after circulatory arrest. Thus, the treatments that emergency medical services deliver arrive too late for most sudden cardiac arrest patients.
One of the most effective ways to increase survival in sudden cardiac arrest is swift onset of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders (who we know observe the victim collapse in at least 60% of cases3) and by educated and trained ‘first responders’ who are dispatched in parallel with the emergency medical services. Lay bystander resuscitation rates differ significantly across Europe, ranging from 10 to 20% in many countries, and higher than 60 to 80% in a few other countries.4 Some countries have made remarkable progress with increasing bystander resuscitation rates over the last decade. Denmark in particular can serve as a blue print for national initiatives to successfully and markedly increase bystander resuscitation rates. In Denmark, over a period of more than 10 years, bystander resuscitation rates following sudden cardiac arrest increased from less than 20% in 2001 to more than 50% in 2012. This was not only associated with a tripling in survival of patients following sudden cardiac arrest, but also – and most interestingly – with lower rates of brain damage, nursing home admission and death from any cause within the first year after sudden cardiac arrest as compared with no bystander resuscitation.5 Furthermore, the majority of survivors went back to work.6 This success is because of nationwide initiatives including mandatory education in resuscitation in elementary schools since 2005 in Denmark.7 In the years before, Norway and some states in the United States and Germany successfully established similar programs. To save the lives of hundreds of thousands of sudden cardiac arrest patients, it is, therefore, important to focus efforts on increasing bystander resuscitation. This is also one of the 10 recommendations emphasised by the Global Resuscitation Alliance as the most important to improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.8
Educating school children in cardiopulmonary resuscitation is an effective and long-lasting way to increase bystander efforts.9 This was recognised in 2015 by the WHO when they endorsed the KIDS SAVE LIVES statement.10,11 Following such training, school children can also serve as multipliers,11 and all this will have a significant positive influence on survival after sudden cardiac arrest.
We recommend that resuscitation training for school children should start at the age of 12 years or earlier, with 2 h of theoretical and practical training per year, and as long as the children go to school. Educated teachers and medical personnel are both equally effective in training school children in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Following several initiatives, school children education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation is already mandatory in five countries in Europe, and it is a recommendation in 16 additional countries (Fig. 1).12 Our aim is to have school children educated in resuscitation all over Europe and the rest of the world. To support this goal, we have summarised what we have experienced and, in part, actively initiated with regard to historical facts and milestones (Table 1).13 Many of those have been initiated by anaesthesiologists,13 and this editorial wants to motivate and activate as many colleagues as possible from all kinds of emergency medical disciplines.
Fig. 1: This is the ‘KIDS SAVE LIVES’ – European map of CPR education in school children. In the countries with yellow-haired kids, CPR education is a suggestion, and in the countries with green-haired kids, there is legislation about CPR education. Adapted with permission
12. CPR, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Table 1: Historical milestones in school children education in resuscitation
Table 1: (Continued) Historical milestones in school children education in resuscitation
What can be done to support the movement KIDS SAVE LIVES? There are different concepts, curricula and methods available to educate school children in resuscitation14–25:
- Small and relatively cheap manikins that can also be taken home by the school children (school children as multipliers);
- ‘High-fidelity’ manikins with feedback systems for group education;
- Serious games and apps dedicated to school children;
- School children education by medical personnel (doctors, nurses and paramedics);
- School children education by educated school teachers;
- School children education by other school children (peers)
The focus of the first steps of school children education in resuscitation is on chest compression resuscitation only (hands only).19 In case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, ‘hands only’ resuscitation is sufficient in most adult patients until arrival of the emergency medical service. This is because following sudden cardiac arrest there is still remaining oxygen in the blood and in the whole body outside the brain. Usually, we do not train ventilation or the use of automated external defibrillators before the age of 16 to 18 years.18
What is most important?
It is well known that early commencement of resuscitation by laypersons is the most effective way to increase survival and improve neurological outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.24–28 Education of school children and using them as multipliers plays a central role in increasing lay resuscitation rates and, thus, survival.18 Therefore, we suggest implementation of mandatory education of school children in resuscitation nationwide and to support and secure this by national law.
Until this important goal is reached – which will save hundreds of thousands of lives annually – we all have to do our part. Society conferences are an excellent forum to spread the message and also to organise mass training events. Please, just start, help others and you will see it is effective – and it is also a lot of fun.
Further information, videos, presentations, curricula and concepts on school children education in resuscitation can be found here:
www.erc.edu
https://kids-save-lives.net/
www.grc-org.de
https://www.ircouncil.it/
www.einlebenretten.de
www.wiederbelebung.de
www.lifesaver.org.uk
http://www.wosp.org.pl/uczymy-ratowac/rekord
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Yf4umHnD3c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYlvdUcGjz0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDp4krk2--M
Acknowledgements related to this article
Assistance with the Editorial: none.
Financial support and sponsorship: we cordially thank all colleagues, ministers, politicians, teachers, women and men, children, organizations, medical societies and business entities who have supported and will support the very important and positive impact of our ‘KIDS SAVE LIVES’ initiative in Europe and in other parts of the world. BWB is supported by the ERC Research NET.
Conflicts of interest: BWB is European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Board Director Science and Research; has received Speakers honorarium from Medupdate, FoMF, Baxalta, Bayer Vital, Bard; is Chairman of the German Resuscitation Council (GRC); is a Board Member of the German Society of Interdisciplinary Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI); and is an Associated Editor of Resuscitation. FS is Chairman of the Italian Resuscitation Council (IRC). AL is Honorary Secretary of the Resuscitation Council (UK). FL is Board Member of Global Resuscitation Alliance, and Board member of Danish Resuscitation Council, and has received unrestricted research grants from the Danish TrygFonden and The Laerdal Foundation. MG is ERC Board Director of External Affairs and a board member of the Cyprus Resuscitation Council (CyRC).
Comment from the Editor: this Editorial was checked by the editors but was not sent for external peer review. BWB is an Associate Editor of the European Journal of Anaesthesiology.
References
1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Writing Group Members, American Heart Association Statistics Committee; Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics – 2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation 2016; 133:447–454.
3. Weisfeldt ML, Everson-Stewart S, Sitlani C, et al. Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Investigators. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac arrest in public versus at home.
N Engl J Med 2011; 364:313–321.
4. Gräsner JT, Lefering R, Koster RW, et al. EuReCa ONE Collaborators. EuReCa ONE-27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE registry: a prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe.
Resuscitation 2016; 105:188–195.
5. Kragholm K, Wissenberg M, Mortensen RN, et al. Bystander efforts and 1-year outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1737–1747.
6. Kragholm K, Wissenberg M, Mortensen RN, et al. Return to work in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors: a nationwide register-based follow-up study.
Circulation 2015; 131:1682–1690.
7. Malta Hansen C, Zinckernagel L, Kjær Ersbøll A, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in schools following eight years of mandating legislation in Denmark: a nationwide survey.
J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 14:6.
9. Böttiger BW. The new European Resuscitation Council guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and post-resuscitation care: great opportunities for anaesthesiologists: focus on lay people, hospitals and prognostication.
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33:701–704.
10. Böttiger BW, Semeraro F, Wingen S. ‘Kids save lives’: educating schoolchildren in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a civic duty that needs further support for implementation!.
J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:
11. Böttiger BW. ‘A time to act’: anaesthesiologists in resuscitation help save 200,000 lives per year worldwide: school children, lay resuscitation, telephone-CPR, IOM and more.
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32:825–827.
12. Semeraro F, Wingen S, Schroeder DC, et al. Kids save lives implementation in Europe: a survey through the ERC research NET.
Resuscitation 2016; 107:e7–e9.
13. Böttiger BW, Semeraro F, Altemeyer KH, et al. Kids save lives: Schülerausbildung in Wiederbelebung. Eine Erfolgsgeschichte für Deutschland und die Welt.
Notfall Rettungsmed 2017; 20:91–96.
14. Bohn A, Lukas RP, Breckwoldt J, et al. ‘Kids save lives’: why schoolchildren should train in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21:220–225.
15. Cave DM, Aufderheide TP, Beeson J, et al. American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular Diseases in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Advocacy Coordinating Committee. Importance and implementation of training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillation in schools: a science advisory from the American Heart Association.
Circulation 2011; 123:691–706.
16. Böttiger BW, Van Aken H. Training children in cardiopulmonary resuscitation worldwide.
Lancet 2015; 385:2353.
17. Böttiger BW, Van Aken H. Kids save lives: training school children in cardiopulmonary resuscitation worldwide is now endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO).
Resuscitation 2015; 94:A5–A7.
18. Böttiger BW, Bossaert LL, Castrén M, et al. Board of European Resuscitation Council (ERC). Kids save lives: ERC position statement on school children education in CPR: ‘hands that help: training children is training for life’.
Resuscitation 2016; 105:A1–A3.
19. German Resuscitation Council. Recommended curriculum to teach and train resuscitation to school children in Germany. German Resuscitation Council; 2012.
http://www.grc-org.de/reanimationsunterricht [Accessed 23 June 2017]
20. De Buck E, Van Remoortel H, Dieltjens T, et al. Evidence-based educational pathway for the integration of first aid training in school curricula.
Resuscitation 2015; 94:8–22.
21. Lukas RP, Van Aken H, Mölhoff T, et al. Kids save lives: a six-year longitudinal study of schoolchildren learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should do the teaching and will the effects last?
Resuscitation 2016; 101:35–40.
22. Plant N, Taylor K. How best to teach CPR to schoolchildren: a systematic review.
Resuscitation 2013; 84:415–421.
23. Breckwoldt J, Beetz D, Schnitzer L, et al. Medical students teaching basic life support to school children as a required element of medical education: a randomised controlled study comparing three different approaches to fifth year medical training in emergency medicine.
Resuscitation 2007; 74:158–165.
24. Böttiger BW, Grabner C, Bauer H, et al. Long term outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with physician staffed emergency medical services: the Utstein style applied to a midsized urban/suburban area.
Heart 1999; 82:674–679.
25. Lockey AS, Barton K, Yoxall H. Opportunities and barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in English secondary schools.
Eur J Emerg Med 2016; 23:381–385.
26. Breckwoldt J, Schloesser S, Arntz HR. Perceptions of collapse and assessment of cardiac arrest by bystanders of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA).
Resuscitation 2009; 80:1108–1113.
27. Holmberg M, Holmberg S, Herlitz J. Effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Sweden.
Resuscitation 2000; 47:59–70.
28. Wissenberg M, Lippert FK, Folke F, et al. Association of national initiatives to improve cardiac arrest management with rates of bystander intervention and patient survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
JAMA 2013; 310:1377–1384.