Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Regional or general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

Stoneham, Mark D.

Author Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology: January 2017 - Volume 34 - Issue 1 - p 45-46
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000504
  • Free


Your recently published ‘Regional or general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy’ debate1–3 was interesting, but there may be more to the story when comparing regional and general anaesthetic techniques.

First, patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy have significant comorbidity and may experience significant cardiovascular and neurological complications during surgery, which obviously contribute to operative morbidity and mortality. One's ability as an anaesthetist to ‘intervene’ when looking after such patients is governed in part by how early one receives information about such complications – the earlier information is received, the sooner meaningful interventions can be made which can terminate or treat the complication. Thus, the neurological status of patients with a cross-clamped common carotid artery can be determined earlier when they are awake compared with any of the neurological monitoring modalities utilised under general anaesthesia.4 Titration of blood pressure and additional oxygenation against the patient's neurological status may then be used to help reverse that complication.5,6

Second, in their discussion of the general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA) trial, Unic-Stojanovic and Jovic3 pointed out the divergence of the survival curves of patients in the GALA trial with a smaller percentage of patients in the general anaesthesia group surviving for 1 year. Although this difference did not achieve statistical significance, the curves were still diverging at 12 months without explanation, yet, because of a lack of funding, there was no follow-up after 12 months.

In the GALA trial,7 underpowered as it was to detect a difference in mortality, the only significant difference between the two groups was the percentage of patients who received internal carotid artery shunting during the procedure. It is intriguing whether this in itself might in some way contribute to outcome. There is other evidence available that shunting may itself be deleterious to patient outcome, including increased risk of carotid re-stenosis8 and alterations in early postoperative cognitive function.9

Acknowledgements relating to this article

Assistance with the letter: none

Financial support and sponsorship: none.

Conflicts of interest: none.


1. Licker M. Regional or general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: does it matter? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33:241–243.
2. Cedergreen P, Swiatek F, Nielsen HB. Local anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Pro: protect the brain. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33:236–237.
3. Unic-Stojanovic D, Jovic M. Local anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy. Con: decrease the stress for all. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016; 33:238–240.
4. Guay J, Kopp S. Cerebral monitors versus regional anesthesia to detect cerebral ischemia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60:266–279.
5. Stoneham MD, Warner O. Blood pressure manipulation during awake carotid surgery to reverse neurological deficit after carotid cross-clamping. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87:641–644.
6. Stoneham MD, Martin T. Increased oxygen administration during awake carotid surgery can reverse neurological deficit following carotid cross-clamping. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94:582–585.
7. Lewis SC, Warlow CP, Bodenham AR, et al. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372:2132–2142.
8. Mazul-Sunko B, Hromatko I, Tadinac M, et al. Subclinical neurocognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy: the impact of shunting. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2010; 22:195–201.
9. Hudorovic N, Lovricevic I, Hajnic H, et al. Postoperative internal carotid artery restenosis after local anesthesia: presence of risk factors versus intraoperative shunt. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11:182–184.
© 2017 European Society of Anaesthesiology