An error occurred in the recent article ‘Con: succinylcholine should not be replaced by rocuronium for rapid sequence induction’ by Schreiber.1 The final sentence of the second paragraph on page 590 should have read: “However, there are some good reasons why we should not completely switch to ‘ROC”’. The publisher apologises for the omission of the word ‘not’ from the published version. The online version of the article has been corrected.
Reference
1. Schreiber J-U. Con: succinylcholine should not be replaced by rocuronium for rapid sequence induction.
Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30:590–593.
