Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Con: succinylcholine should not be replaced by rocuronium for rapid sequence induction Erratum

European Journal of Anaesthesiology: December 2013 - Volume 30 - Issue 12 - p 782
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000007
Erratum
Free
SDC

An error occurred in the recent article ‘Con: succinylcholine should not be replaced by rocuronium for rapid sequence induction’ by Schreiber.1 The final sentence of the second paragraph on page 590 should have read: “However, there are some good reasons why we should not completely switch to ‘ROC”’. The publisher apologises for the omission of the word ‘not’ from the published version. The online version of the article has been corrected.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Reference

1. Schreiber J-U. Con: succinylcholine should not be replaced by rocuronium for rapid sequence induction. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30:590–593.
© 2013 European Society of Anaesthesiology