Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Tranexamic acid partially improves platelet function in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy

Weber, Christian F; Görlinger, Klaus; Byhahn, Christian; Moritz, Anton; Hanke, Alexander A; Zacharowski, Kai; Meininger, Dirk

European Journal of Anaesthesiology: January 2011 - Volume 28 - Issue 1 - p 57–62
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834050ab
Coagulation
Free

Background Although the impact of tranexamic acid on platelet function remains controversial, tranexamic acid is part of clinical algorithms for the management of platelet dysfunction. The goal of our prospective, observational study was to examine the effects of tranexamic acid on platelet function in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy compared to those who ceased antiplatelet therapy for at least 7 days.

Methods Forty patients scheduled for cardiac surgery were enrolled in this study. Group 1 consisted of 20 patients who ceased antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel at least 7 days before surgery. Group 2 consisted of 20 patients who were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel until the day before surgery. Using the Multiplate device (Dynabyte, Munich, Germany), multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) was performed following platelet stimulation with thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 (TRAP-6), arachidonic acid or ADP on blood collected 20 min before and after application of 2 g tranexamic acid.

Results Compared with group 1, platelet aggregation was statistically significantly reduced in ASPItest and ADPtest in group 2, whereas there were no significant differences in the TRAPtest. In group 1, platelet aggregation did not differ significantly before and after tranexamic acid treatment. In contrast, in group 2, we observed a significant increase in arachidonic acid-induced [295 (280/470) arbitrary aggregation units × min [AU*min; median (25th/75th percentile) vs. 214 (83/409) AU*min, P = 0.01] and ADP-induced platelet aggregation [560 AU*min (400/760 AU*min) vs. 470 AU*min (282/550 AU*min), P = 0.013], whereas platelet aggregation following stimulation with TRAP-6 did not change significantly [980 (877/1009) AU*min, median (25th/75th percentile) after tranexamic acid vs. 867 (835/961) AU*min before tranexamic acid, P = 0.464].

Conclusion The results of this study indicate that tranexamic acid potentially corrects defects in arachidonic acid-induced and ADP-induced platelet aggregation imposed by dual antiplatelet therapy. However, platelet aggregation in response to arachidonic acid or ADP in the blood of patients who have not received aspirin and clopidogrel is unaffected by tranexamic acid. These results support the use of tranexamic acid to partially reverse platelet aggregation dysfunction due to antiplatelet therapy.

From the Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, J.-W. Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main (CFW, CB, KZ, DM), Clinic for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen (KG), Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, J.-W. Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main (AM) and Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover (AH), Germany

Published online 19 October 2010

Correspondence to Dr Klaus Görlinger, Clinic for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany Tel: +49 177 7231407; fax: +49 201 7235949; e-mail: klaus@goerlinger.net

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Platelet dysfunction contributes to intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications and might consequently increase perioperative mortality. With a prevalence of 3–5% in surgical patients collectively,1 perioperative impaired platelet function is a topic of high clinical relevance. Such platelet dysfunction is of multifactorial origin. Factors such as hypothermia,2 anaemia,3 interaction with colloids4 and exposure to foreign surfaces5 may lead to acquired platelet dysfunction. However, patients treated preoperatively with antiplatelet drugs for prophylaxis against ischaemic events are the predominant group of surgical patients suffering from platelet dysfunction.1 In this context, aspirin and clopidogrel are the most commonly used drugs.6

In cases of perioperative bleeding complications in patients with platelet dysfunction, transfusion of platelet concentrates represents a causal therapeutic approach. As controversial findings have been reported regarding whether platelet transfusions were associated with adverse outcome particularly in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or liver transplantation,7–9 pharmacological approaches to reverse the effects of antiplatelet therapy on platelet function are of high clinical relevance.

The lysine analogue tranexamic acid (Cyklokapron, MEDA Pharma GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) represents a facultative element of clinical therapy algorithms for the management of platelet dysfunction.10–12 Although the use of tranexamic acid as an antifibrinolytic drug was supported by a variety of clinical studies,13 up to now there is only a small number of publications with controversial findings which studied the effects of tranexamic acid on platelet function.14–16

Therefore, the aim of our prospective, observational study was to quantify effects of tranexamic acid on platelet aggregation in the blood of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and being treated with or without dual antiplatelet therapy. We assessed platelet aggregation in whole blood drawn before and after patients were given tranexamic acid using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) with the Multiplate point-of-care platelet function analyser (Dynabyte, Munich, Germany). MEA is a recently developed technique for platelet function testing in whole blood17 based on classical whole-blood impedance aggregometry.18

Evidence is presented that the application of 2 g tranexamic acid corrects defects in arachidonic acid-induced and ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Patients and methods

Study population and intervention

This prospective, observational study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Ethics Committee which waived the necessity of patients to give written informed consent. A total of 40 adult patients scheduled for elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) undergoing extracorporeal circulation were enrolled into this study. The study population consisted of two groups. Group 1 consisted of 20 consecutive patients who ceased antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel at least 7 days prior to surgery following local institutional standards for long-term scheduled elective cardiac surgery patients. Group 2 consisted of 20 consecutive patients who were urgently scheduled for cardiac surgery and who continued antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel until the day before surgery. According to our institutional standards, all patients received a cumulative dosage of 6 g tranexamic acid to prevent hyperfibrinolysis: a bolus of 2 g before skin incision, a bolus of 2 g into the priming volume of the extracorporeal circulation and a bolus of 2 g after aortic declamping. In order to assess the effect of tranexamic acid on platelet function specially, independent of factors such as hypothermia or any surgical stressors, the tests were done on blood collected before and after the first tranexamic acid dose, before incision.

Blood was drawn from a central venous line. The first 10 ml blood was discarded; then blood was collected into a 2 ml heparin-anticoagulated and calcium-balanced tube (Bloodgas-Monovette, Sarstedt AG).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Platelet function analysis

Platelet function analysis was performed using MEA, a whole-blood impedance aggregometer (Multiplate; Dynabyte). Analysis is based on aggregation of activated platelets onto metal sensor wires which increases the electrical impedance between the wires.17 For each measurement, 300 μl of preheated saline (37°C) and 300 μl of heparin-anticoagulated whole blood were placed into the test cell and the sample was stirred using a teflon-coated electromagnetic stirrer (800 revolutions min−1) over a 3-min incubation period. Platelet aggregation was initiated with thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 (TRAPtest, TRAP-6, 32 μmol l−1), arachidonic acid (ASPItest, AA, 0.5 mmol l−1) or adenosine diphosphate (ADPtest, ADP, 6.4 μmol l−1), using commercially available reagents (Dynabyte). Increased impedance due to attachment of platelets to the electrodes was continuously and separately measured for each sensor unit over 6 min. Data were transformed into arbitrary aggregation units and plotted against time. For internal quality control, two curves are plotted in each test. In the absence of any methodical errors, the two curves run parallel. Aggregation measured by MEA was quantified as the area under the aggregation curve [AUC, arbitrary aggregation units × min (AU*min)]. Reference ranges for healthy individuals obtained from the manufacturer were 868–1473 AU*min for the TRAPtest, 505–1086 AU*min for the ASPItest and 607–963 AU*min for the ADPtest. Values measured lower than normal indicate inhibition of platelet function in response to the specific agonist.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistics

Sample size analysis (expected difference of means for ASPItest 100 AU*min, expected SD 150 AU*min, desired power 0.8, and P < 0.05) was based on previous experience of our study group with DDAVP19 and revealed a required sample size of at least n = 20 in group 2 in order to detect statistically significant differences in platelet aggregation before and after treatment.

The t-tests were used to detect differences in the two groups' demographic data. A Mann–Whitney rank–sum test was used to analyse differences in conventional coagulation tests and baseline measurements in MEA between groups 1 and 2. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used to detect differences in MEA analyses before and after administration of tranexamic acid. Depending on the distribution on the data (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test), values were expressed as mean ± SD or median (with 25th/75th percentiles). The level of statistical significance was set at P less than 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SigmaStat (version 3.5, Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany) and SigmaPlot (version 11, Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany) software.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

There were no differences in basic demographic data between the two groups (Table 1). Preoperatively performed standard laboratory coagulation analyses did not differ between the two groups (Table 2). There were no group differences in preoperative serum creatinine [1 (0.8/1.2) mg dl−1 in group 1 vs. 1 (0.8/1.2) mg dl−1 in group 2 (P = 0.942)]. Overall, 29 patients (n = 13 in group 1, n = 16 in group 2) underwent CABG and 11 patients (n = 7 in group 1, n = 4 in group 2) underwent combined procedures (valve surgery and CABG). The duration of extracorporeal circulation was 112 ± 49 min in group 1 and 99 ± 51 min in group 2 (P = 0.412). None of the patients underwent re-do procedures and none of the patients required postoperative surgical re-exploration.

Table 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 2

Comparing the baseline parameters (before tranexamic acid) of each group, platelet aggregation in the TRAPtest revealed no significant group differences (P = 0.207), whereas there were significant group differences in platelet aggregation following stimulation with arachidonic acid (ASPItest, P < 0.001) and ADP (ASPItest, P < 0.001).

In those patients who ceased dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 7 days, we did not observe any significant change in platelet aggregation in neither the TRAPtest (P = 0.261), or in the ASPItest (P = 0.294), or in the ADPtest (P = 0.167) after the application of tranexamic acid (group 1, Fig. 1). In contrast, in those patients who did not cease dual antiplatelet therapy, we observed a significant increase in arachidonic acid-induced [295 (280/470) AU*min vs. 214 (83/409) AU*min, P = 0.01] and ADP-induced platelet aggregation [560 AU*min (400/760 AU*min) vs. 470 AU*min (282/550 AU*min), P = 0.013], whereas platelet aggregation following stimulation with thrombin receptor activating peptide-6 did not change significantly [980 (877/1009) AU*min, median (25th/75th percentile) after tranexamic acid vs. 867 (835/961) AU*min before tranexamic acid, P = 0.464].

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

The main result of the present study was that application of the lysine analogue tranexamic acid resulted in a statistically significant increase in both arachidonic acid-induced and ADP-induced platelet aggregation selectively in those patients who did not cease preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel.

In the present study, platelet function was analysed using the MEA device performing whole-blood analyses. In fact, light transmission aggregometry (LTA) using platelet-rich plasma is considered to be the gold standard for assessing the platelet response to agonists such as arachidonic acid or ADP.20 However, LTA measurements require a specialised laboratory, are time consuming and weakly standardised. Furthermore, the logistical demands of LTA make it difficult to use in daily clinical practice.21 In contrast, the MEA is based on impedance aggregometry which was first described by Cardinal and Flower.18 MEA does not require a specialised laboratory and is useful for point-of-care analysis due to its use of a single-use test cell, integrated computer analysis and documentation and electronic pipetting. Its high specificity and sensitivity in platelet function analyses have already been demonstrated in several studies, also in comparison to LTA.22

Corresponding to the aspirin-induced inhibition of the cyclooxygenase pathway and the clopidogrel-induced blockade of the ADP receptor pathway, arachidonic acid-induced and ADP-induced platelet aggregation in group 2 were below the lower reference ranges for normal aggregation before the application of tranexamic acid (Fig. 2). The relatively large 25th/75th interval in the ASPItest and ADPtest potentially indicates an interindividual variability in drug response to aspirin and clopidogrel. However, in none of the patients, ex-vivo aggregation was within normal reference ranges, indicating that none of the patients was ‘resistant’ to aspirin and/or clopidogrel. In contrast, as neither the arachidonic acid-induced pathway of platelet aggregation via cyclooxygenase 1 nor the ADP receptor were affected by any pharmacologic therapy in group 1, platelet aggregation in the corresponding tests (ASPItest, ADPtest; Fig. 1) was within normal ranges and was significantly higher as compared with group 2. Ex-vivo platelet aggregation following the TRAPtest was within normal range in both groups because neither the platelets thrombin receptor nor the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor was affected by either medication.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Arachidonic acid-induced and ADP-induced platelet aggregation in MEA were thought to be dependent on the platelet count, haematocrit and general functional integrity of platelets.23,24 As we did not detect any differences in either conventional coagulation parameters, haematocrit or platelet count (Table 2) or in thrombin receptor-induced platelet aggregation in the TRAPtest at baseline in the two groups, our results indicate tranexamic acid treatment effects. As platelet aggregation in the ASPItest and the ADPtest increased equally, we suspected that there was a ‘direct’ effect of tranexamic acid on receptor-mediated platelet aggregation. Two other studies including patients suffering from chronic renal failure have investigated the influence of tranexamic acid on platelet function. Performing in-vitro closure time measurements with the Platelet Function Analyzer PFA-100 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Eschborn, Germany) and investigating the skin bleeding time, they assumed that tranexamic acid treatment resulted in a significant improvement in platelet function.25,26 In that case, how can the observed improvement in platelet function be explained? Both platelet adhesion to the subendothelial matrix and platelet aggregation are mediated mainly via glycoprotein Ib and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors.

The plasma proteinase plasmin is known to multifactorially affect platelet function. It was shown to induce platelet activation by stimulating the protease-activating receptor 4 (PAR4).27 Plasmin-induced platelet activation was described to be similar to platelet activation due to thrombin.10 Furthermore, plasmin was shown to activate the complement cascade by generating activated complement factors C3a and C5a,28 which are known to induce platelet dysfunction and contribute to perioperative haemorrhage.29–31 Finally, plasmin was shown to induce a proteolytic degradation and redistribution of platelet glycoprotein Ib and IIb/IIIa receptors and thereby reduce platelet adhesion and aggregation.32,33 In this context, Lindvall et al.34 described an improvement in platelet function following the substitution of aprotinin. This corroborates the hypothesis that the main effect of influencing platelets function by the use of antifibrinolytics may be due to a reduction of plasmin-induced platelet inhibition.

Hence, tranexamic acid reduces the plasma concentration of plasmin by blocking the lysine-binding sites of plasminogen, thereby preventing the binding of plasminogen to fibrin and the consecutive conversion of plasminogen to plasmin.35 Thus, tranexamic acid may preserve platelet function by mitigating the above-mentioned multifactorial plasmin-induced platelet dysfunction.

The present study did not assess either the concentration of platelet glycoprotein Ib or IIb/IIIa receptors nor the plasma level of fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, plasmin or plasminogen. Therefore, final conclusions concerning the mechanism of action of tranexamic acid in increasing arachidonic acid-induced and ADP-induced platelet aggregation partially in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy could not be drawn.

There were some limitations to this study. First, the study population was small and observational. Study results may be prone to alpha and beta errors, especially as the power analysis was based on hypothetical variables. Second, we analysed only one time point after tranexamic acid administration, so no information about duration of the effect of tranexamic acid on platelet function could possibly be derived from the data. Third, platelet function in response to tranexamic acid was assessed only by MEA and not using the gold standard for platelet function testing, the LTA. This method might have provided different results.

Despite these limitations, this study may be of clinical relevance. Although ex-vivo platelet function did not return to normal values after the substitution of tranexamic acid, this study leads to the assumption, that tranexamic acid may represent a pharmacological option to partially increase platelet aggregation in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy who come for cardiac or noncardiac surgery. As the design of the present study did not allows us to draw any conclusions concerning causal relationships between tranexamic acid and platelet function due to methodical limitations, randomised and placebo-controlled studies on larger study populations that also include healthy volunteers without any pharmacological therapy are needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the potentially dose-dependent applicability of tranexamic acid to partially reverse the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

The study was performed with departmental founding from the Clinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, J.-W. Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. K.G. received speaking honoraria from Dynabyte, Munich, Germany.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1 Flordal PA. Use of desmopressin to prevent bleeding in surgery. Eur J Surg 1998; 164:5–11.
2 Valeri CR, Feingold H, Cassidy G, et al. Hypothermia-induced reversible platelet dysfunction. Ann Surg 1987; 205:175–181.
3 Valeri CR, Cassidy G, Pivacek LE, et al. Anemia-induced increase in the bleeding time: implications for treatment of nonsurgical blood loss. Transfusion 2001; 41:977–983.
4 Franz A, Braunlich P, Gamsjager T, et al. The effects of hydroxyethyl starches of varying molecular weights on platelet function. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:1402–1407.
5 Paparella D, Brister SJ, Buchanan MR. Coagulation disorders of cardiopulmonary bypass: a review. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1873–1881.
6 Holmes DR Jr, Kereiakes DJ, Kleiman NS, et al. Combining antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:95–109.
7 Spiess BD, Royston D, Levy JH, et al. Platelet transfusions during coronary artery bypass graft surgery are associated with serious adverse outcomes. Transfusion 2004; 44:1143–1148.
8 Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Yau TM, et al. Platelet transfusions are not associated with increased morbidity or mortality in cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53:279–287.
9 Pereboom IT, de Boer MT, Haagsma EB, et al. Platelet transfusion during liver transplantation is associated with increased postoperative mortality due to acute lung injury. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:1083–1091.
10 Soslau G, Horrow J, Brodsky I. Effect of tranexamic acid on platelet ADP during extracorporeal circulation. Am J Hematol 1991; 38:113–119.
11 Koscielny J, Pruss A, Kiesewetter H, Klinischer Einsatz von Desmopressin und Antifibrinolytika in der perioperativen Intensivmedizin. In: Intensivmedizin. 15. Ergänzungslieferung Oktober 2005. Landsberg, Germany: ecomed Medizin Verlagsgruppe, 2005.
12 Weber CF, Schneider AC, Kirschning T, et al. Therapeutic options for perioperatively acquired platelet dysfunctions. Anaesthesist 2009; 58:931–932, 934–936, 938–940.
13 Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, et al. Antifibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD001886.
14 Mengistu AM, Rohm KD, Boldt J, et al. The influence of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on platelet function and postoperative blood loss in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008; 107:391–397.
15 Kickler T. Alternatives to platelet transfusion in the management of platelet dysfunction or thrombocytopenia. Transfus Altern Transfus Med 2006; 8:127–134.
16 Pleym H, Stenseth R, Wahba A, et al. Single-dose tranexamic acid reduces postoperative bleeding after coronary surgery in patients treated with aspirin until surgery. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:923–928.
17 Toth O, Calatzis A, Penz S, et al. Multiple electrode aggregometry: a new device to measure platelet aggregation in whole blood. Thromb Haemost 2006; 96:781–788.
18 Cardinal DC, Flower RJ. The electronic aggregometer: a novel device for assessing platelet behavior in blood. J Pharmacol Methods 1980; 3:135–158.
19 Weber CF, Dietrich W, Spannagl M, et al. A point-of-care assessment of the effects of desmopressin on impaired platelet function using multiple electrode whole-blood aggregometry in patients after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:702–707.
20 Key NS, Negrier C. Coagulation factor concentrates: past, present, and future. Lancet 2007; 370:439–448.
21 Eikelboom JW, Hankey GJ. Aspirin resistance: a new independent predictor of vascular events? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:966–968.
22 Paniccia R, Antonucci E, Maggini N, et al. Comparison of methods for monitoring residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel by point-of-care tests on whole blood in high-risk patients. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104:287–292.
23 Seyfert UT, Haubelt H, Vogt A, Hellstern P. Variables influencing Multiplate(TM) whole blood impedance platelet aggregometry and turbidimetric platelet aggregation in healthy individuals. Platelets 2007; 18:199–206.
24 Mengistu AM, Mayer J, Boldt J, Rohm KD. Whole-blood aggregometry: are there any limits with regard to platelet counts? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:72–76.
25 Sabovic M, Zupan IP, Salobir B, et al. The effect of long-term, low-dose tranexamic acid treatment on platelet dysfunction and haemoglobin levels in haemodialysis patients. Thromb Haemost 2005; 94:1245–1250.
26 Mezzano D, Panes O, Munoz B, et al. Tranexamic acid inhibits fibrinolysis, shortens the bleeding time and improves platelet function in patients with chronic renal failure. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82:1250–1254.
27 Mao Y, Jin J, Daniel JL, Kunapuli SP. Regulation of plasmin-induced protease-activated receptor 4 activation in platelets. Platelets 2009; 20:191–198.
28 Amara U, Rittirsch D, Flierl M, et al. Interaction between the coagulation and complement system. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008; 632:71–79.
29 Fitch JC, Rollins S, Matis L, et al. Pharmacology and biological efficacy of a recombinant, humanized, single-chain antibody C5 complement inhibitor in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 1999; 100:2499–2506.
30 Warren OJ, Smith AJ, Alexiou C, et al. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Part 1: Mechanisms of pathogenesis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23:223–231.
31 Videm V, Svennevig JL, Fosse E, et al. Reduced complement activation with heparin-coated oxygenator and tubings in coronary bypass operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103:806–813.
32 van Oeveren W, Harder MP, Roozendaal KJ, et al. Aprotinin protects platelets against the initial effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 99:788–796, discussion 796–787.
33 de Haan J, van Oeveren W. Platelets and soluble fibrin promote plasminogen activation causing downregulation of platelet glycoprotein Ib/IX complexes: protection by aprotinin. Thromb Res 1998; 92:171–179.
34 Lindvall G, Sartipy U, Bjessmo S, et al. Aprotinin reduces the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9:178–181.
35 Cardone D, Klein AA. Perioperative blood conservation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26:722–729.
Keywords:

aspirin; clopidogrel; platelet aggregation inhibitors; platelet function test; tranexamic acid

© 2011 European Society of Anaesthesiology