Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

The role of hypertonic saline in neurotrauma

White, H.*; Cook, D.; Venkatesh, B.

Author Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology: February 2008 - Volume 25 - Issue - p 104-109
doi: 10.1017/S0265021507003420
  • Free

Abstract

Introduction - the role of osmotherapy in TBI

Cerebral oedema and subsequent intracranial hypertension are important causes of morbidity and mortality after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Intracranial hypertension following TBI results from cerebral oedema, disruption of the blood/brain barrier (BBB) and disordered autoregulation. Over the past 30 yr, osmotherapy has emerged as the cornerstone of management of intracranial hypertension following TBI.

Traditionally, the salutary effects of osmotherapy on intracranial pressure (ICP) were thought to result from brain shrinkage following the shift of water out of the brain substance. This has been confirmed in animal studies where osmotherapy following brain injury has led to shrinkage of normal but not injured brain tissue [1,2]. Interestingly, low ICP persists for some time after the serum concentration of the osmotic agent has fallen below the level considered as osmotically active.

A number of osmotic agents have been investigated in TBI for the management of raised ICP following TBI. These include urea, glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol and, more recently, hypertonic saline (HTS). Urea, glycerol and sorbitol are associated with significant side-effects. Mannitol has been proven to be efficacious and safe and is recommended by both the Brain Trauma Foundation and the European Brain Injury Consortium as the osmotic agent of choice [3,4]. Side-effects with mannitol include renal dysfunction, hypotension in the volume-depleted patients and rebound intracranial hypertension on cessation. HTS has emerged as a suitable alternative to mannitol.

Pharmacology of HTS

HTS solutions are available in a range of formulations; examples are listed in the table below (Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1:
. Sodium content and osmolality of solutions administered to patients following neurotrauma.

Pharmacology and mechanisms of action

The proposed beneficial effects of HTS in TBI are thought to arise from several mechanisms - the creation of an osmotic gradient between the intravascular and intracellular/interstitial compartments, leading to the shrinkage of brain tissue (where BBB is intact) and therefore to a reduction in ICP [5,6], increased circulating blood volume, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) [7], restoration of the neuronal membrane potential, and modulation of the inflammatory response [8-10]. HTS increases the volume of concussed tissue while dehydrating the normal brain tissue.

HTS - a critical review of the evidence

Weed and McKibben [11] reported the first use of HTS therapy following TBI in 1919. Worthley and colleagues [12] reported prolonged reduction in ICP following its use in two patients with refractory intracranial hypertension. While there is widespread acceptance that HTS therapy improves ICP control, there is general recognition of the need for more human studies before definitive recommendations can be made. Published data on HTS are limited by small sample sizes, lack of a control population in some and many of them are case reports or small prospective studies. A recent study by Cooper and colleagues [13], where HTS was administered pre-hospital to patients with TBI, failed to demonstrate an improved outcome compared to placebo. It is important therefore that clinicians should use HTS with a certain amount of circumspection.

Animal studies

TBI has been extensively studied in animals. Several different models are used to replicate the complex pathophysiology of the injured brain including the mechanical percussion (produces contusions and subdural haemorrhages), cryogenic injury (focal injury with disruption of BBB) and balloon insufflation models (ischaemic injury) [14]. Areas of research include the influence of HTS on cerebral water content, ICP, CPP, MAP, cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral oxygenation, studies on haemorrhage and resuscitation, effects on microcirculation and metabolism, and comparisons with a variety of resuscitation solutions [1,2,15-20]. Animal experiments suggest that small-volume resuscitation with HTS solution may be beneficial in elevating CPP and CBF and decreasing ICP while maintaining haemodynamic stability following haemorrhagic shock associated with TBI. Studies by Shackford [15] also suggest that the use of HTS is associated with a reduction in the cerebral water content in the uninjured brain and an improvement in intracranial compliance. In rodent models of head injury, the use of HTS was associated with improved microcirculation and a reduction in endothelial cell adhesion, suggestive of an attenuation of the inflammatory cell response. As noted, HTS appeared to be better with respect to these parameters when compared with other solutions such as Hetastarch, Ringer's lactate and Normal saline.

The efficacy of HTS with respect to ICP reduction has been compared with that of mannitol. At equiosmolar doses, HTS achieved a greater degree of reduction in ICP for a longer duration when compared to mannitol.

Human studies

There are published data supporting the use of HTS for resuscitation and ICP management (Table 2; [34-44]). There are also data to suggest that HTS may be useful in the management of refractory intracranial hypertension. There are also preliminary data in children that suggest that outcomes may improve when HTS is used for osmotherapy. HTS has also demonstrated efficacy at reducing intracranial pressure in non-traumatic causes of cerebral oedema including subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), acute liver failure and stroke [21-23].

Table 2
Table 2:
. Human trials using HTS in the treatment of neurotrauma.

Results between studies are difficult to compare owing to differences in study design, differences in the concentration of HTS used and differing modes of administration of HTS (single dose vs. multiple doses vs. continuous infusions).

HTS for refractory ICP in adult patients

One of the fundamental challenges with comparing studies on refractory ICP is the definition of refractory intracranial hypertension. Nevertheless, both anecdotal reports and small clinical trials have demonstrated a benefit in ICP reduction with the use of HTS for refractory intracranial hypertension. There was a correlation between reductions in ICP and elevations in serum osmolality but not with serum sodium (Na) concentration.

Does HTS improve survival in the ICU adult population with TBI?

It is important to note that convincing data of improved survival in both adults and children when HTS is used for the management of elevated ICP in isolated TBI are absent [24-27]. Support for the early administration of HTS solutions in brain injury came from post hoc analysis of patients with multi-trauma. Some of the original data came from Vasser and colleagues [28]. In a cohort of patients with multi-trauma undergoing helicopter transport, it was a prospective, double blind, randomized comparison of 250 mL of 7.5% HTS/dextran, compared to Ringer's lactate solution. While significant differences in survival between the groups were not demonstrable, in a subsequent study the same group [29] compared different hypertonic solutions. Overall survival in the four treatment groups was not statistically different. Survival to hospital discharge in patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 8 or less was associated with HTS treatment (34% survival in the HTS group vs. 12% lactated Ringer's group).

Wade and colleagues [30] undertook a cohort analysis of individual patient data from previous prospective randomized double-blind trials. Study patients came from a variety of sources including emergency department, ambulance and helicopter and included both blunt and penetrating trauma. Treatment with HTS solutions led to an improved survival to discharge (odds ratios of 2.12 (P = 0.048)). Despite the apparent benefit of HTS, confounding cannot be excluded as the data come from a diverse group of patients and centres and the studies were not primarily designed to examine head-injury patients.

The most recent large-scale study investigating the use of HTS for the pre-hospital management of TBI comes from Cooper and colleagues [13]. They compared a 250 mL bolus of 7.5% HTS with lactated Ringers in 229 head-injured and hypotensive patients. Despite a small but statistically significant difference in Na concentration on admission (148 vs. 143 mmol L−1, P < 0.001), outcome measures were similar between the two groups (ICP-10 vs. 15 mm Hg, P = 0.08, CPP 73 vs. 69 mmHg, respectively). All survival data, including during admission, at 6 months and on discharge from hospital, were equal in both groups. They concluded that the routine use of HTS in pre-hospital treatment of TBI has no advantage over resuscitation with Ringer's lactate.

One of the difficulties with studies on HTS in TBI is that most resuscitation studies are based on the assumption that a single dose of HTS will reduce mortality. Furthermore, the influence of associated injuries on mortality needs to be accounted for. Many patients die before admission to ICU. It is often not clear whether they die from injuries related to multi-trauma or TBI. Some investigators use albumin solutions as part of their resuscitation regimen. Subgroup analysis from the SAFE study demonstrated a possible link between the use of albumin and poor outcome following TBI [31]. Therefore, despite the negative findings of the Cooper study, it remains unclear as to whether HTS should be initiated in the resuscitation phase of multi-trauma, TBI patients.

Complications

The potential adverse effects of HTS include renal failure, osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS), a rebound rise in ICP and various systemic complications including coagulopathies, volume overload and electrolyte abnormalities.

Renal failure

The use of mannitol has been traditionally associated with renal dysfunction when serum osmolality exceeded 30 mOsm kg−1. The link between the use of HTS and the development of renal failure remains tenuous. A single study has shown an association between HTS use and renal failure in burns patients associated with an increased mortality in the HTS cohort [32]. Data in TBI are scant. In a study of head-injured children (who received HTS), Khanna and colleagues [27] reported the development of ARF following HTS, although a large number of those patients had multi-organ failure. Thus the relative contribution of hypernatremia to renal failure is unclear.

Osmotic demyelination syndrome

This syndrome originally described in 1959 as a disease affecting alcoholics and the malnourished [33] was subsequently shown to be associated with rapid changes in serum Na in patients with chronic hyponatremia. No human studies of TBI have specifically examined the incidence of ODS following HTS administration.

Rebound increases in ICP

Rebound increases in ICP following mannitol use have been reported. While theoretical concerns exist about a similar process with the use of HTS, convincing data do not exist.

Systemic side-effects

Other systemic side-effects include the development of hypernatraemia, hyperchloraemia and non-anion gap acidosis. Fluid overload, hypokalaemia secondary to exaggerated diuresis and the need for a central venous cannula to administer HTS are other concerns.

References

1. Shackford SR, Zhuang J, Schmoker J. Intravenous fluid tonicity: effect on intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow, and cerebral oxygen delivery in focal brain injury. J Neurosurg 1992; 76: 91-98.
2. Wisner DH, Schuster L, Quinn C. Hypertonic saline resuscitation of head injury: effects on cerebral water content. J Trauma 1990; 30: 75-78.
3. The Brain Trauma Foundation. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Initial management. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17: 463-469.
4. Maas AI, Dearden M, Teasdale GM et al.. EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997; 139: 286-294.
5. Fenstermacher JD, Johnson JA. Filtration and reflection coefficients of the rabbit blood-brain barrier. Am J Physiol 1966; 211: 341-346.
6. Zornow MH. Hypertonic saline as a safe and efficacious treatment of intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1996; 8: 175-177.
7. Schmoker JD, Shackford SR, Wald SL, Pietropaoli JA. An analysis of the relationship between fluid and sodium administration and intracranial pressure after head injury. J Trauma 1992; 33: 476-481.
8. Cross JS, Gruber DP, Gann DS et al.. Hypertonic saline attenuates the hormonal response to injury. Ann Surg 1989; 209: 684-691.
9. Hartl R, Medary MB, Ruge M et al.. Hypertonic/hyperoncotic saline attenuates microcirculatory disturbances after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 1997; 42: S41-S47.
10. Hartl R, Schurer L, Schmid-Schonbein EA. Antileukocyte interventions in experimental cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1997; 16: 1108-1119.
11. Weed LH, McKibben PS. Experimental alteration of brain bulk. Am J Physiol 1919; 48: 531-558.
12. Worthley LI, Cooper DJ, Jones N. Treatment of resistant intracranial hypertension with hypertonic saline. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 478-481.
13. Cooper DJ, Myles PS, McDermott FT et al.. Prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1350-1357.
14. Lighthall JW, Dixon CE, Anderson TE. Experimental models of brain injury. J Neurotrauma 1989; 6: 83-97.
15. Shackford S. Effect of small-volume resuscitation on intracranial pressure and related cerebral variables. J Trauma 1997; 42: 48S-53S.
16. Eilig I, Rachinsky M, Artru AA et al.. The effect of treatment with albumin, hetastarch, or hypertonic saline on neurological status and brain edema in a rat model of closed head trauma combined with uncontrolled hemorrhage and concurrent resuscitation in rats. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 669-675.
17. Dubick MA, Wade CE. A review of the efficacy and safety of 7.5% NaCl/6% dextran 70 in experimental animals and in humans. J Trauma 1994; 36: 323-330.
18. Gunnar W, Jonasson O, Merlotti G et al.. Head injury and hemorrhagic shock: studies of the blood brain barrier and intracranial pressure after resuscitation with normal saline solution, 3% saline solution, and dextran-40. Surgery 1988; 103: 398-407.
19. Kramer GC. Hypertonic resuscitation: physiologic mechanisms and recommendations for trauma care. J Trauma 2003; 54: S89-S99.
20. Ramming S, Shackford SR, Zhuang J, Schmoker JD. The relationship of fluid balance and sodium administration to cerebral edema formation and intracranial pressure in a porcine model of brain injury. J Trauma 1994; 37: 705-713.
21. Bentsen G, Breivik H, Lundar T, Stubhaug A. Predictable reduction of intracranial hypertension with hypertonic saline hydroxyethyl starch: a prospective clinical trial in critically ill patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 1089-1095.
22. Murphy N, Auzinger G, Bernel W, Wendon J. The effect of hypertonic sodium chloride on intracranial pressure in patients with acute liver failure. Hepatology 2004; 39: 464-470.
23. Schwarz S, Georgiadis D, Aschoff A, Schwab S. Effects of hypertonic (10%) saline in patients with raised intracranial pressure after stroke. Stroke 2002; 33: 136-140.
24. Qureshi AI, Suarez JI, Castro A, Bhardwaj A. Use of hypertonic saline/acetate infusion in treatment of cerebral edema in patients with head trauma: experience at a single center. J Trauma 1999; 47: 659-665.
25. Qureshi AI, Suarez JI, Bhardwaj A. Malignant cerebral edema in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage associated with hypertonic saline infusion: a rebound phenomenon? J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1998; 10: 188-192.
26. Simma B, Burger R, Falk M et al.. A prospective, randomized, and controlled study of fluid management in children with severe head injury: lactated Ringer's solution versus hypertonic saline. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1265-1270.
27. Khanna S, Davis D, Peterson B et al.. Use of hypertonic saline in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1144-1151.
28. Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Gannaway WL, Holcroft JW. 7.5% sodium chloride/dextran for resuscitation of trauma patients undergoing helicopter transport. Arch Surg 1991; 126: 1065-1072.
29. Vassar MJ, Fischer RP, O'Brien PE et al.. A multicenter trial for resuscitation of injured patients with 7.5% sodium chloride. The effect of added dextran 70. The Multicenter Group for the Study of Hypertonic Saline in Trauma Patients. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 1003-1011, discussion 11-3.
30. Wade CE, Grady JJ, Kramer GC et al.. Individual patient cohort analysis of the efficacy of hypertonic saline/dextran in patients with traumatic brain injury and hypotension. J Trauma 1997; 42: S61-S65.
31. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N et al.. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2247-2256.
32. Huang PP, Stucky FS, Dimick AR et al.. Hypertonic sodium resuscitation is associated with renal failure and death. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 543-554.
33. Adams RD, Victor M, Mancall EL. Central pontine myelinolysis: a hitherto undescribed disease occurring in alcoholic and malnourished patients. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1959; 81: 154-172.
34. Einhaus SL, Croce MA, Watridge CB et al.. The use of hypertonic saline for the treatment of increased intracranial pressure. J Tenn Med Assoc 1996; 89: 81-82.
35. Hartl R, Ghajar J, Hochleuthner H, Mauritz W. Treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension in severe traumatic brain injury with repetitive hypertonic/hyperoncotic infusions. Zentralbl Chir 1997; 122: 181-185.
36. Schatzmann C, Heissler HE, Konig K et al.. Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure by infusions of 10% saline in severely head injured patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1998; 71: 31-33.
37. Horn P, Munch E, Vajkoczy P et al.. Hypertonic saline solution for control of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with exhausted response to mannitol and barbiturates. Neurol Res 1999; 21: 758-764.
38. Qureshi AI, Suarez JI, Bhardwaj A et al.. Use of hypertonic (3%) saline/acetate infusion in the treatment of cerebral edema: Effect on intracranial pressure and lateral displacement of the brain. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 440-446.
39. Shackford SR, Bourguignon PR, Wald SL et al.. Hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients with head injury: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Trauma 1998; 44: 50-58.
40. Suarez JI, Qureshi AI, Bhardwaj A et al.. Treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension with 23.4% saline. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1118-1122.
41. Peterson B, Khanna S, Fisher B, Marshall L. Prolonged hypernatremia controls elevated intracranial pressure in head-injured pediatric patients. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1136-1143.
42. Munar F, Ferrer AM, de Nadal M et al.. Cerebral hemodynamic effects of 7.2% hypertonic saline in patients with head injury and raised intracranial pressure. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17: 41-51.
43. Vialet R, Albanese J, Thomachot L et al.. Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 mL/kg 7.5% saline is more effective than 2 mL/kg 20% mannitol. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1683-1687.
44. White H, Cook D, Venkatesh B. The use of hypertonic saline for treating intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1836-1846.
Keywords:

SALINE SOLUTION HYPERTONIC; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION; MANNITOL

© 2008 European Society of Anaesthesiology