Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Comparisons of analgesic effects of different doses of morphine and morphine plus methylprednisolone after knee surgery

Kizilkaya, M.*; Yildirim, O. S.; Ezirmik, N.; Kursad, H.*; Karsan, O.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology: August 2005 - Volume 22 - Issue 8 - p 603–608
doi: 10.1017/S0265021505001018
Original Article
Free
SDC

Background: In this double-blind randomized study, the analgesic effects of morphine alone and with methylprednisolone were examined in 72 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.

Methods: At the end of arthroscopy, patients were allocated randomly to one of four groups to receive intra-articular administrations of saline, morphine 1 mg, morphine 5 mg or morphine 1 mg with methylprednisolone 40 mg. Preoperative and postoperative pain levels at rest and during movement (active flexion of the knee) were measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Postoperative analgesic requirements to alleviate pain were evaluated.

Results: Pain scores were significantly lower for the patients who received 5 mg morphine and 1 mg morphine with 40 mg methylprednisolone than for those who received saline or 1 mg morphine. This was accompanied by a decrease in the postoperative consumption of analgesics and prolongation of the duration of pain relief.

Conclusions: This study confirms that the analgesic effect of morphine given intra-articularly is dose dependent and that combination of methylprednisolone with morphine has an additive effect on analgesia.

*Atatürk University, The School of Medicine, Departments of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Erzurum, Turkey

Atatürk University, The School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erzurum, Turkey

Correspondence to: Mehmet Kizilkaya, Universite Lojmanlari, No. 46/4, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey. E-mail: mkizilkaya65@hotmail.com; Tel: +90 442 3166333/1266; Fax: +90 442 3166340

Accepted for publication June 2005

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Arthroscopic surgery is more and more commonly used for the diagnosis and treatment of knee disorders. One of the main complications resulting from knee arthroscopy is intense pain in the postoperative period [1]. Several intra-articular drugs including local anaesthetics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics and opioids have been used to decrease postoperative pain, particularly after arthroscopic knee surgery [1].

Opioid receptors are located at peripheral nerve endings in animals [2] and human beings [3]. Results of studies concerning postoperative analgesic effects of intra-articular administration of opioids are confusing [4-6]. Combination therapy by using an opioid plus a non-opioid drug has been proposed for alleviating postoperative pain [7,8]. Intra-articular glucocorticoid may also improve pain relief after arthroscopy possibly due to its effect on reducing inflammation [6,9].

The aims of this study were to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of intra-articular administration of different doses of morphine and morphine with methylprednisolone.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

With approval by the Atatürk University, Medical Faculty Ethical Committee, informed patient consent was obtained from all patients. Seventy-two patients, ASA I-II, scheduled for arthroscopic knee surgery either for diagnostic purposes or for partial meniscectomy were recruited to this study. Patients taking steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioids, having relevant drug allergy or needing postoperative articular drainage were excluded.

All operations were performed under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Monitoring included continuous electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure every 5 min. General anaesthesia was induced by intravenous (i.v.) administration of fentanyl (1-1.5 μg kg−1) and propofol (2.0 mg kg−1). Tracheal intubation was facilitated with vecuronium (0.1 mg kg−1) and anaesthesia was maintained with propofol 10 mg kg−1 h−1 for 10 min, 8 mg kg−1 h−1 for 10 min and then 6 mg kg−1 h−1 for the remainder of the procedure. Patients breathed N2O (70%) and O2 (30%) through an endotracheal tube. No other opioids were given during the operation. A thigh pneumatic tourniquet was applied during surgery and kept inflated until 10 min after the intra-articular injection of the trial drug into the knee joint at the end of the procedure.

Before the arthroscope was removed, patients were randomly assigned (by a computer-generated randomization sequence) to four groups for double-blind administration of drugs: Group C (n = 18), the control group, received 20 mL of intra-articular isotonic saline and 5 mg morphine in 5 mL of isotonic saline i.v.; Group M5 (n = 17) received 5 mg morphine in 20 mL of isotonic saline intra-articularly and 5 mL isotonic saline i.v.; Group M1 (n = 18) received 1 mg morphine in 20 mL of isotonic saline intra-articularly and 5 mL of isotonic saline i.v.; and Group M1M (n = 19) received 1 mg morphine plus 40 mg methylprednisolone in 20 mL of isotonic saline intra-articularly and 5 mL of isotonic saline i.v. The doses of drugs were chosen on the basis of previous clinical studies [6,8,10]. The test drugs were given to the surgeon who injected the solution through the arthroscope at the end of the procedure without knowing the contents so as to ensure that the drug was delivered into the joint. Postoperative analgesic consumption and pre- and postoperative pain scores (visual analogue scale, VAS, 0-100 mm) at rest and during movement (active flexion of the knee) were measured and recorded by another anaesthetist who was blinded to the group allocation. Eleven patients were instructed preoperatively in the use of the 100-mm VAS. Pain scores were recorded preoperatively (T0), and at 60 min (T1), 120 min (T2), 180 min (T3) and 24 h (T4) relative to the intra-articular injection.

Postoperative analgesia was provided by bolus doses of 50 mg tramadol i.v. if pain score exceeded 5 in the recovery room or 500 mg paracetamol orally at patients request on the ward. The occurrence of side-effects (nausea, vomiting, sedation and pruritus) was noted for each patient.

Sample size was calculated using VAS as the primary variable. Sample size calculation resulted in a requirement for 16 patients per group (SD 20%, 80% power, P < 0.05). Patient characteristics, arthroscopy type, anaesthesia duration and tourniquet time were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the χ2-test when appropriate. Pain scores were analysed by ANOVA and group means were compared by linear standard deviation (LSD) post hoc test. Analgesic consumption was analysed by the U-test. Results were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05. All data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

As shown in Table 1, experimental groups were homogenous, with respect to patient characteristics data (sex, age, knee operated and weight), anaesthesia duration, tourniquet time and surgery type. Neither complications in relation to drugs administered and their side-effects (nausea, vomiting and pruritus) nor postoperative infection were observed in any group.

Table 1

Table 1

Difference of pain scores at rest and during movement among groups by time are shown in Figures 1 (at rest) and 2 (during movement). There were no differences in preoperative pain scores across the groups. Pain scores for all groups were highest 1 h after operation and gradually decreased until 24 h. Postoperative pain scores during rest and movement were significantly lower in the M1, M5 and M1M groups than in the control group at 60, 120 and 180 min (P < 0.05). Pain scores in the M5 and M1M groups were also significantly lower than in the M1 group at these (P < 0.05) times. At 24 h, pain scores for the M5 and M1M groups were significantly lower than for the control and M1 groups although pain scores for the control and M1 groups were similar.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Postoperative supplementary analgesic consumption was significantly less in the M5 and M1M groups as compared with the control and M1 groups at all times (P < 0.05). Analgesic consumption for the control group was the highest. The differences in analgesic consumption between the control and M1 groups were not significant in the recovery room (P < 0.05), but were in the ward (P < 0.05), although postoperative analgesic requirements was lower for the M1 group than that for the control group (Table 2).

Table 2

Table 2

Pain scores for patients in the M1M group were slightly higher than for those in the M5 group at 180 min and 24 h. Although consumption of tramadol in both groups in the recovery room was almost the same, consumption of paracetamol in patients in the M1M group was less than in patients in the M5 group during the first 24 h. Consumption of paracetamol between the two groups did not differ.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

After knee arthroscopy, patients regularly suffer from pain and are commonly given non-steroidal agents [11], neostigmine [12], opioids and/or bupivacaine [7]. Reduction of postoperative pain by injecting opioid into the knee joint is believed to support the hypothesis that peripheral opioid receptors are activated in response to inflammation [13]. The use of opioid drugs such as fentanyl, morphine [14] and meperidine [15], or even combination therapy by using an opioid plus a non-opioid drug have also been reported to reduce postoperative pain [7,8].

Despite a number of studies, it has been difficult to determine whether intra-articular injections of opioids provide significant postoperative pain relief. Gupta and colleagues reported that 13 studies showed a beneficial effect of morphine among 27 studies involving 1748 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery [16]. Rosseland and colleagues reported that only 70% of 57 patients had pain at varying degrees of severity (moderate-to-severe) within 1 h after an arthroscopic surgery and that there was a lack of pain relief from 2 mg morphine in 10 mL of saline intra-articularly compared with placebo [17]. Lin Cheng Yang and colleagues also reported no difference in pain score of patients receiving 2 mg morphine and placebo after arthroscopy, but morphine administration decreased analgesic need for 48 h [12]. However, Haynes and colleagues used 1 mg intra-articular morphine vs. saline placebo and observed that the morphine injected group had lower pain scores than the control group at 2 and 4 h postoperatively despite a lack of difference in pain scores at 1 h or at 24 h after recovery [18]. In contrast, studies by Jesus and colleagues [19], Joshi and colleagues [18] and Allen and colleagues [7] consistently demonstrated greater responses to the administration of 5 mg morphine in patients undergoing arthroscopy and anterior cruciate ligament repair. In our study, intra-articular morphine provided a considerable clinical analgesic effect into the postoperative period.

Another issue regarding provision of postoperative analgesia is whether the potential effect of intra-articular morphine is dose dependent or not [16]. The analgesic effects of intra-articular morphine may be related to the dose [20], which was confirmed by the present study. In a recent meta-analysis investigating efficacy of morphine, Kalso and colleagues [21] reported that seven studies (one testing 1 mg, one testing 3 mg and five testing 5 mg) showed positive effects and eight studies (seven testing 1 mg and one testing 4 mg) showed negative effects on pain relief during the initial period (0-2 h); eight studies (two testing 1 mg, one testing 3 mg and five testing 5 mg) showed positive effects and four studies (three testing 1 mg and one testing 4 mg) showed negative effects on pain relief during the early period (2-6 h); and ten studies (four testing 1 mg, one testing 4 mg, five testing 5 mg) showed positive effects and three studies (all testing 1 mg) showed negative effects on pain relief during the late period (6-30 h), respectively. Regardless of the period, the authors [21] concluded that as compared with 1 mg of intra-articular morphine, 5 mg of intra-articular morphine provided better analgesia.

Stein and colleagues showed a reduction in pain and supplementary analgesic need in subjects receiving 1 and 0.5 mg of morphine intra-articularly following arthroscopic knee surgery. Although these parameters did not differ with morphine doses, the pain scores decreased slightly with increasing morphine dose [22]. In another study, although the pain score for 1-6 h postoperation was reported to be inversely related to morphine dose, pain scores at 24 h were similar for patients who received 1 and 2 mg morphine [7]. Moreover, patients who received 1 mg morphine required less analgesic than those who received 2 mg morphine [7]. Brandsson and colleagues observed that the pain scores were lower for intra-articular morphine treatment groups (both 1 and 5 mg) as compared with placebo after 24 h. The pain score during the whole postoperative period (from 24 h to 1 week after surgery) was also significantly lower for the morphine 5 mg group than for placebo [10]. Alvarez-Cabo and colleagues reported that patients treated with a morphine dose of 5 mg had less intense pain than those patients treated with a morphine dose of 1 mg. In addition, supplementary analgesic requirement after arthroscopy with spinal anaesthesia was lower in the 5 mg morphine groups than the 1 mg morphine groups [1]. Drosos and colleagues found that neither the low (5 mg) nor the high dose (15 mg) of morphine solution administered intra-articularly, provided significantly better analgesia and achieved lower pain scores compared to the control group [23]. Meta-analysis performed by Gupta and colleagues [16] showed that 1 mg morphine had no benefit in two studies and less pain in four studies as compared to placebo. When the dose-response relationship of intra-articular morphine was evaluated, it was shown that 5 mg morphine provided better analgesia as compared to 1 mg morphine but there were no differences among other doses compared.

Synovial cellular inflammation is associated with oedema and inflammation which may lead to a greater postoperative pain score and greater demand for analgesic depending upon the kind of arthroscopic surgery [3]. In this study, to decrease pain scores and analgesic requirements during the postoperative period, we administered methylprednisolone plus a low-dose opioid. Our results consistently showed that the combination of 40 mg methylprednisolone with 1 mg morphine was more effective at reducing postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement than 1 mg morphine alone.

There was no difference between pain scores (at rest and movement) of patients administered 1 mg morphine plus 40 mg methylprednisolone and patients administered 5 mg morphine at 60 and 120 min. However, pain scores in the M1M group were slightly higher than those of the M5 group at 180 min and 24 h. Although consumption of tramadol of patients in both groups in the recovery room was almost the same, consumption of paracetamol in the M1M group (78 mg) was less than that in the M5 group (117 mg) during the first 24 h (not statistically significant). Moreover it was observed that the ability of the former group to walk and manage stairs was better than that of the latter group, indicating better postoperative comfort.

In our study, intra-articular 5 mg morphine administration provided better analgesia and necessitated less postoperative analgesia than 1 mg morphine. Moreover, the analgesic effect of 1 mg morphine was similar to that of 5 mg morphine when 40 mg methylprednisolone was added. As an indirect indicator of the intensity of pain, the need for supplemental analgesic medication was significantly lower in the 5 mg morphine and 1 mg morphine plus methylprednisolone groups than in the control and 1 mg morphine groups, suggesting that this combination was effective in reducing pain and supplementary analgesic use. Due to greater postoperative analgesic intake for the control group than for the M1 group, the pain scores at 24 h did not differ.

The volume of the intra-articular injection may be important to intra-articular opioid action with respect to intra-articular pressure which may facilitate systemic absorption of drugs [7]. Khoury and colleagues reported that a 20 mL volume produced satisfactory analgesia [24]. The application of a tourniquet and an interval between intra-articular injection and tourniquet release may have an effect of the duration of the local action of the drugs and the rate of opioid absorption from the joint [25]. Due to these points, drugs were prepared at a similar volume and a tourniquet was applied in the present study. In our study, 5 mg morphine was administered i.v. to the control group. A systemic analgesic effect of intra-articular morphine could be excluded because the control group had less pain relief postoperatively. To obtain accurate recording of pain scores and the required supplementary analgesia, our patients stayed in hospital during the entire study period. Infection is a potential complication in the use of intra-articular glucocorticoid administration. Montgomery and Campbell reported that incidence of septic arthritis to be 0.2% among patients treated with glucocorticoids [26]. In our study, postoperative infection was not seen in any patient.

In conclusion, the combination of intra-articular low dose morphine (1 mg) plus methylprednisolone (40 mg) provides good analgesia after knee arthroscopy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Alvarez-Cabo JM, López-Rouco M, González-Paleo JR. Analgesic effect of intra-articular morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery. Ambul Surg 1998; 6: 179-182.
2. Hassan AHS, Ableitner A, Stein C, Herz A. Inflammation of the rat paw enhances axonal transport of opioid receptors in the sciatic nerve and increases their density in the inflamed tissue. Neuroscience 1993; 55: 185-195.
3. Stein C, Pflüger M, Yassouridis A et al. No tolerance to peripheral morphine analgesia in presence of opioid expression in inflamed synovia. J Clin Invest 1996; 98: 793-799.
4. Heard SO, Edwards WT, Ferrari D et al. Analgesic effect of intraarticular bupivacaine or morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 822-826.
5. Hege-Scheuing G, Michealsen K, Buhler A et al. Analgesie durch intraartikulares morphin nach kneigelenksar throscopien? Anaesthesist 1995; 44: 351-358.
6. Kizilkaya M, Yildirim OS, Dogan N, Kursad H, Okur A. Analgesic effects of intraarticular sufentanil and sufentanil plus methylprednisolone after arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1062-1065.
7. Allen GC, St Amand MA, Lui AC, Johnson DH, Lindsay MP. Postarthroscopy analgesia with intraarticular bupivacaine/morphine. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 475-480.
8. Rasmussen S, Lorentzen JS, Larsen AS, Thomsen ST, Kehlet H. Combined intra-articular glucocorticoid, bupivacaine and morphine reduces pain and convalescence after diagnostic knee arthroscopy. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 175-178.
9. Kelly PJ, Carboni M, Sforsini CM, Donaldson M. Quality of postoperative analgesia in day-case operative knee arthroscopy: role of fentanyl added to intra-articular bupivacaine and antiinflammatory therapy. Ambul Surg 1999; 7: 123-126.
10. Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Morberg P, Rydgren B, Eriksson BI, Hedner T. Intraarticular morphine after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 280-285.
11. Dennis AR, Leeson-Payne CG, Hobbs GJ. A comparison of diclofenac with ketorolac for pain relief after knee arthroscopy. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 904-906.
12. Yang LC, Chen LM, Wang CJ, Buerkle H. Postoperative analgesia by intra-articular neostigmine in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 334-339.
13. Kalso E, Tramer MR, Carroll D, Mcquay HJ, Moore RA. Pain relief from intra-articular morphine after knee surgery. Pain 1997; 71: 127-134.
14. Varkel V, Volpin G, Ben-David B et al. Intraarticular fentanyl compared with morphine for pain relief following arthroscopic knee surgery. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 867-871.
15. Lyons B, Lohan D, Flynn CG et al. Intra-articular analgesia for arthroscopic meniscectomy. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 552-555.
16. Gupta A, Bodin L, Holmstrom B, Berggren L. A systematic review of the peripheral analgesic effects of intraarticular morphine. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 761-770.
17. Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A, Grevbo F, Reikeras O, Breivik H. Effective pain relief from intra-articular saline with or without morphine 2 mg in patients with moderate-to-severe pain after knee arthroscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 732-738.
18. Haynes TK, Appadurai IR, Power I, Rosen M, Grant A. Intra-articular morphine and bupivacaine analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 54-56.
19. Marchal JM, Delgado-Martinez AD, Poncela M, Valenzuela J, de Dios Luna J. Does the type of arthroscopic surgery modify the analgesic effect of intraarticular morphine and bupivacaine? A preliminary study. Clin J Pain 2003; 19: 240-246.
20. Likar R, Kapral S, Steinkellner H, Stein C, Schafer M. Dose-dependency of intra-articular morphine analgesia. Br J Anaesthesia 1999; 83: 241-244.
21. Kalso E, Smith L, McQuay HJ, Andrew Moore R. No pain, no gain: clinical excellence and scientific rigour - lessons learned from IA morphine. Pain 2002; 98: 269-275.
22. Stein C, Comisel K, Haimerl E et al. Analgesic effect of intraarticular morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1123-1126.
23. Drosos GI, Vlachonikolis IG, Papoutsidakis AN, Gavalas NS, Anthopoulos G. Intra-articular morphine and postoperative analgesia after knee arthroscopy. Knee 2002; 9: 335-340.
24. Khoury GF, Chen ACN, Garland DE, Stein C. Intraarticular morphine, bupivacaine, and morphine/bupivacaine for pain control after knee videoarthroscopy. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 263-266.
25. Whitford A, Healy M, Joshi GP et al. The effect of tourniquet release time on the analgesic efficacy of intraarticular morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 791-793.
26. Montgomery SC, Campbell J. Septic arthritis following arthroscopy and intra-articular steroids. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71: 540.
Keywords:

MORPHINE; METHYLPREDNISOLONE; ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY; knee; INJECTIONS; INTRA-ARTICULAR; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE

© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology