Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

[3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding to P2X purinoceptor is unaffected by volatile anaesthetics

Masaki, E.*†; Yamazaki, K.; Hori, S.*; Kawamura, M.*

Author Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology: March 2004 - Volume 21 - Issue 3 - p 221-225
  • Free


The modulation of neuron-to-neuron signalling, especially synaptic transmission via the ligand-gated ion channel, plays an important role in general anaesthesia. Volatile anaesthetics at clinically relevant concentrations affect the signal transmission through ligand-gated ion channels [1,2] and the modulators of these channels change the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of these anaesthetics [3]. The P2X purinoceptor, i.e. the extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-gated cation channel, is a member of these ligand-gated ion channels. This receptor is responsible for a fast excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system (CNS) [4]. Several recent studies on the purinoceptor indicate various functional roles including the conduction of nociceptive stimulus [5,6]. The intracerebroventricular administration of P2 antagonists reduces the MAC of volatile anaesthetics [7], which suppress the ATP-induced inward current in neurons of the locus coeruleus [8], thus suggesting that the purinergic receptor is one of the targets of the volatile anaesthetics. In general, the spinal cord is the principal sites of action for volatile anaesthetics with respect to MAC measurements [9]. However, the descending modulatory system influences the action of anaesthetics on the cord [10]. The neurons of the locus coeruleus also project norepinephric axons widely to many regions of the brain including the cortex, hippocampus and thalamus - all of which are important targets for general anaesthesia [11]. Indeed, the destruction of the locus coeruleus results in reduction of MAC [12]. It is therefore possible that the suppression of P2X receptor activity by P2 antagonists or volatile anaesthetics in the brain could be involved in anaesthetic effects.

The study was undertaken to investigate the mechanism of the suppressive actions of volatile anaesthetics on P2X receptors. The hypothesis was that inhibition of neurotransmission may occur if volatile anaesthetics block the binding of ATP to the P2X receptor. ATP not bound to its receptor is readily hydrolysed to adenosine without activation of the P2X receptor. Adenosine is known to be an inhibitory neurotransmitter [13]. Therefore, the effects of volatile anaesthetics on [3H] α,β-methylene ATP, a selective P2X agonist, binding in rat crude synaptic membranes were investigated.


This study was approved by the Animal Research Committee at Jikei University School of Medicine.

Preparation of rat crude synaptic membranes

The crude synaptic membranes were essentially prepared according to the method of Zukin and colleagues [14]. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (7 weeks old, 150-200 g) were anaesthetized with thiopental 50 mg kg−1 intraperitoneally and the brain rapidly excised. Thiopental does not to change the P2X receptor activity in PC12 cells [15]. The brain was homogenized with sucrose solution (0.32 molar, 9 vols) and centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min. The pellet was dispersed and disrupted in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mmol, 20 vols, pH 7.4), and centrifuged at 8000g for 15 min. The supernatant and soft layer were resuspended with the buffer and stored overnight at −20°C. The suspension was thawed and centrifuged at 25 000g for 15 min. The resultant pellet was washed five times with 20 times the volume of the buffer and stored at −20°C until use.

Assay of [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding

The incubation was initiated by addition of [3H] α,β-methylene ATP (10 nmol) for 15 min at 4°C with Tris 10 mmol, 100 μg crude synaptic membranes protein, and the volatile anaesthetics (sevoflurane or isoflurane), or the P2 antagonists (suramin and pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulphonic acid (PPADS)), to a total volume 200 μL. The binding assay was performed at 4°C because the specific [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding in mouse crude synaptic membranes is higher at 4°C than at 25°C [16]. The MACs of sevoflurane and isoflurane in the Sprague-Dawley rat were 2.40 and 1.46%, respectively [17,18]. The corresponding aqueous concentrations (EC50) were 0.40 and 0.35 mmol at 37°C for sevoflurane and isoflurane, respectively [19]. EC50 concentrations for general anaesthesia decreased with temperature in aqueous concentrations. Applying the equation calculated by Franks and Lieb [20], the estimated EC50 for sevoflurane and isoflurane were 0.24 and 0.22 mmol at 4°C, respectively. Therefore, the concentrations up to 1.5 mmol were selected to examine the effect of volatile anaesthetics at clinically relevant concentrations. The reaction was terminated by centrifugation (18 000g for 10 min), and the pellet was rinsed rapidly and superficially with ice-cold deionized water. The radioactivity in the pellet was measured with a liquid scintillation counter. Specific [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding was determined by subtracting non-specific binding (the amount of radioactivity in the pellet in the presence of unlabeled ATP 1 mmol) from total binding (the amount of the radioactivity in the absence of unlabeled ATP). At each concentration of volatile anaesthetics and P2 antagonists, the data were obtained from four separate experiments in which the determinations were carried out in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

A parametric test was used. Data were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with subsequent intragroup comparisons using Scheffé's F-test. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.


Figure 1 shows that sevoflurane and isoflurane did not affect [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding at clinically relevant concentrations up to 1.4 and 1.5 mmol, respectively. Suramin, one of the P2 antagonists, decreased [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding (68.7 ± 14.7% at 10 μmol, 49.5 ± 6.4% at 50 μmol, 24.3 ± 5.7% at 100 μmol, n = 12, means ± SD) in a dose-dependent manner. The decrease of the binding by suramin was significant at 10, 50 and 100 μmol. However, PPADS, another P2 antagonist, did not affect the binding up to 100 μmol; this is similar to the effect of the volatile anaesthetics (Fig. 2). Scatchard analyses were performed with [3H] α,β-methylene ATP (0.5-50 nmol) and suramin (50 μmol), and revealed that suramin blocked [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding non-competitively. Bmax and Kd were as follows: Bmax, control: 3.43 ± 0.45, suramin; 1.62 ± 0.35 pmol mg−1 protein; Kd, control: 21.2 ± 3.4, suramin; 20.7 ± 2.7 nmol (n = 12, mean ± SD). There were no significant differences in Scatchard analysis between control, volatile anaesthetics and PPADS.

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Effect of volatile anaesthetics on [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding in rat crude synaptic membrane. The crude synaptic membrane was incubated with volatile anaesthetics for 15 min at 4°C. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 12). ―●―: Isoflurane; ――△――: sevoflurane.
Figure 2
Figure 2:
Effect of P2 antagonists on [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding in rat crude synaptic membrane. The crude synaptic membrane was incubated with P2 antagonists for 15 min at 4°C. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 12). **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05 versus 0 μmol. ―●―: Suramin; ――▲――: PPADS.


The major findings were that sevoflurane and isoflurane did not affect the binding of the ATP analogue, [3H] α,β-methylene ATP, to the P2X receptor. It has been demonstrated that intracerebroventricular administration of suramin and PPADS reduced the MAC of volatile anaesthetics, suggesting that the inhibition of the ATP signalling system in the CNS leads to anaesthetic and analgesic effects [7]. Therefore, it is possible that this system could be a target for the action of the volatile anaesthetics. However, in contrast to our hypothesis, the blockade of ATP binding to the P2X receptor cannot be the site or mechanism of action of the volatile anaesthetics. It was also reported that ATP evoked a rapidly rising and moderately desensitizing inward current in neurons of the locus coeruleus; also, that sevoflurane at clinically relevant concentrations significantly suppressed this current in a dose-dependent manner [8]. The ATP-induced current was likely to be mediated by P2X receptors, and the current sensitive to sevoflurane was blocked by PPADS, indicating that the attenuation of extracellular ATP-mediated signalling in the CNS is one of the multiple actions of volatile anaesthetics. Taking the results of the present study into account, it can now be suggested that volatile anaesthetics could attenuate the signalling, via P2X receptors, by modulation of receptor function after the binding of ATP to the P2X receptor because (a) intracerebroventricular administration of P2 antagonists reduced the MAC of volatile anaesthetics, (b) ATP-induced currents were inhibited by volatile anaesthetics and (c) volatile anaesthetics did not affect [3H] α,β-methylene ATP binding.

The binding of [3H] α,β-methylene ATP was significantly inhibited by suramin, but not by PPADS. The two P2 antagonists showed differential effects on the binding activity of [3H] α,β-methylene ATP in the current study. These differential effects of P2 antagonists on the binding in P2X receptors suggest that the antinociceptive effect of suramin stems, at least in part, from the inhibitory effect on the binding. On the other hand, PPADS might reduce the MAC of volatile anaesthetics in a similar way to volatile anaesthetics, interfering with the receptor function itself. The exact mechanism for the differential effect between suramin and PPADS is not apparent; however, these structurally different compounds have several different properties. The sensitivity of both antagonists for cloned P2X receptor sub-types is not same [21]. It has been demonstrated that suramin [22] and the suramin analogue [23] are very sensitive to the heteromeric P2X receptors. The differential sensitivity of both antagonists for P2X receptor sub-types might be due to the differential binding activity for P2X receptor. Suramin may bind more preferably the P2X receptors - which are rich in the crude synaptic membranes used in this study - than PPADS. Beside P2X receptors, suramin might slow the onset of glutamate-evoked AMPA current, while PPADS did not show any effect on this current [24]. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and glycine-induced inward currents were also significantly blocked by suramin, but not by PPADS [25]. The present study reports another differential effect between suramin and PPADS: that suramin but not PPADS decreased the binding of [3H] α,β-methylene ATP in rat crude synaptic membranes.

Like the P2X receptor, volatile anaesthetics did not affect the agonist binding at the NMDA [26] and nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors [27]. Martin and colleagues demonstrated that enflurane inhibited glutamate-stimulated [3H] MK-801, but not [3H] CGS-19775, binding to the NMDA receptor channel [26]. MK-801 and CGS-19775 are the NMDA receptor ligands that bind to the sites within the channel and glutamate binding sites, respectively. These data suggest that enflurane does not affect glutamate binding sites in the NMDA receptor but rather interferes with conformational changes of the receptor necessary for channel activation. These finding are consistent with our results in terms of the anaesthetic interaction with receptor functions but not the agonist binding. In the nACh receptor, the binding domain of volatile anaesthetics on the ligand-gated ion channel receptor was determined. [14C] halothane photoaffinity labelling of both the native Torpedo membrane and the isolated nACh receptor was reduced by unlabelled halothane but not by the agonist and antagonist of nACh receptors, suggesting that the agonist site is not a likely candidate for halothane binding. The fact that volatile anaesthetics did not bind to the agonist binding sites is in agreement with our findings whereby volatile anaesthetics did not influence the binding of agonist to a P2X receptor.

In conclusion, the suppressive effect of volatile anaesthetics on the ATP signalling system might be one of the multiple actions of these anaesthetics. However, the blockade of ATP binding to the P2X receptor is not the mechanism of action of volatile anaesthetics.


Work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, and the Japan Health Science Foundation. The authors thank Dr Salim Hayek (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA) for help with manuscript preparation.


1. Yang J, Zorumski CF. Effect of isoflurane on N-methyl-D-aspartate gated ion channels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991; 625: 287-289.
2. Mihic SJ, Ye Q, Wick MJ, Koltchine VV, et al. Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABAA and glycine receptors. Nature 1997; 389: 385-389.
3. France CP, Winger GD, Woods JH. Analgesic, anesthetic and respiratory effects of competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist CGS 19755 in rhesus monkeys. Brain Res 1990; 526: 355-358.
4. Edwards FS, Gibb AJ. ATP - a fast neurotransmitter. FEBS Lett 1993; 325: 86-89.
5. Inoue K, Koizumi S, Ueno S. Implication of ATP receptors in brain functions. Prog Neurobiol 1996; 50: 483-492.
6. Burnstock G, Wood JN. Purinergic receptors: their role in nociception and primary afferent neurotransmission. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1996; 6: 526-532.
7. Masaki E, Ebisawa T, Kondo I, Hayashida K, Matsumoto Y, Kawamura M. P2-purinergic antagonists reduce the minimum alveolar concentration of inhaled volatile anesthetics. Brain Res 2000; 864: 130-133.
8. Masaki E, Kawamura M, Kato F. Reduction by sevoflurane of adenosine 5′-triphosphate-activated inward current of locus coeruleus neurons in pontine slices of rats. Brain Res 2001; 921: 226-232.
9. Rampil IJ. Anesthetic potency is not altered after hypothermic spinal cord transection in rats. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 606-610.
10. Borges M, Antognini JF. Does the brain influence somatic responses to noxious stimuli during isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1511-1515.
11. Aston-Jones G, Shipley MT, Chouvet G, et al. Afferent regulation of locus coeruleus neurons: anatomy, physiology and pharmacology. Prog Brain Res 1991; 88: 47-75.
12. Roizen MF, White PF, Eger II EI, Brownstein M. Effects of ablation of serotonin or norepinephrine brain-stem area on halothane and cyclopropane MACs in rats. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 252-255.
13. Salter MW, Koninck YD, Henry JL. Physiological roles for adenosine and ATP in synaptic transmission in the spinal dorsal horn. Prog Neurobiol 1993; 42: 125-156.
14. Zukin SR, Young AB, Snyder SH. Gamma-aminobutyric acid binding to receptor sites in the rat central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974; 71: 4802-4807.
15. Andoh T, Furuya R, Oka K, et al. Differential effects of thiopental on neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and P2X purinergic receptors in PC 12 cells. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1199-1209.
16. Hori S, Kawamura M. Characterization of α,β-methylene ATP binding sites in mouse crude synaptic membranes. Brain Res Bull 1997; 43: 59-63.
17. Rampil IJ, King BS. Volatile anesthetics depress spinal motor neurons. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 129-134.
18. Mazze RI, Rice SA, Baden JM. Halothane, isoflurane, and enflurane MAC in pregnant and nonpregnant female and male rats. Anesthesiology 1985; 62: 339-341.
19. Park WK, Pancrazio JJ, Suh CK, Lynch III C. Myocardial depressant effects of sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 1166-1176.
20. Franks NP, Lieb WR. Selective actions of volatile general anaesthetics at molecular and cellular levels. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71: 65-76.
21. North RA, Surprenant A. Pharmacology of cloned P2X receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2000: 40; 563-580.
22. Le KT, Babinski K, Séguéla P. Central P2X4 and P2X6 channel subunits coassemble into a novel heteromeric ATP receptor. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 7152-7159.
23. Soto F, Lambrecht G, Nickel P, Stuhmer W, Busch AE. Antagonistic properties of the suramin analogue NF023 at heterologously expressed P2X receptors. Neuropharmacology 1999; 38: 141-149.
24. Gu JG, Bardoni R, Magherini PC, MacDermott AB. Effects of P2 purinoceptor antagonists suramin and pyridoxal-phosphate-6 azophenyl-2′,4′-disulfonic acid on glutamatergic synaptic transmission in rat dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord. Neurosci Lett 1998; 253: 167-170.
25. Dale N, Gilday D. Regulation of rhythmic movements by purinergic neurotransmitters in frog embryos. Nature 1996; 383: 259-263.
26. Martin DC, Abraham JE, Plagenhoef M, Aronstam RS. Volatile anesthetics and NMDA receptors. Enflurane inhibition of glutamate stimulated [3H] MK-801 binding and reversal by glycine. Neurosci Lett 1991; 132; 73-76.
27. Eckenhoff RG. An inhalational anesthetic binding domain in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 2807-2810.

ADENINE NUCLEOTIDES, adenosine triphosphate; ANAESTHETICS GENERAL, anaesthetics inhalation, isoflurane, sevoflurane; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS, ion channels; NEUROTRANSMITTERS

© 2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology