Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Neuromuscular effects of rapacuronium on the diaphragm and skeletal muscles in anaesthetized patients using cervical magnetic stimulation for stimulating the phrenic nerves

Moerer, O.; Baller, C.; Hinz, J.; Buscher, H.; Crozier, T. A.

Author Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology: December 2002 - Volume 19 - Issue 12 - p 883-887

Abstract

Introduction

Neuromuscular blocking agents have differential effects on various groups of striated muscles such as the diaphragm, skeletal or laryngeal muscles. The onset and offset of their action are usually more rapid for the diaphragm and the muscles of the larynx compared with skeletal muscles [1,2]. The onset and duration of the effects of rapacuronium, a rapid-onset rapid-offset, amidosteroid, non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, have been described for the adductor pollicis and laryngeal muscles, but not for the diaphragm [3]. While the response of the laryngeal muscles can be important for induction of anaesthesia and intubation, differences in the duration of action at the diaphragm and skeletal muscles are more important for surgery and the safety of recovery. In the present study, we simultaneously studied the duration of action of a 1.5 mg kg−1 dose of rapacuronium (1.5 × ED90) on the diaphragm, adductor pollicis and orbicularis oculi muscle. Most investigations of diaphragm function require the use of needle electrodes to stimulate the phrenic nerve and measure the diaphragmatic response as changes in gastric and oesophageal pressures or as an electromyographical response of the diaphragm. The present study used a new method, previously employed in postoperative patients, in which the phrenic nerve is stimulated by cervical magnetic stimulation and the diaphragmatic response is measured as changes in the occluded airway pressure [4]. The differences between these methods are also addressed.

Methods

This study was conducted with the approval of our institutional Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. We recruited 20 patients, ASA I and II, undergoing elective maxillofacial surgery with general anaesthesia. All patients were free of neuromuscular, renal or hepatic disorders, and none were taking drugs that interfere with neuromuscular function. Patients with pacemakers or similar devices were excluded from the study. Patients were premedicated with midazolam 7.5 mg orally 30 min before induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg kg−1 and remifentanil 1 μg kg−1. The trachea was intubated after topical anaesthesia of the hypopharynx, larynx and trachea with lidocaine 2%, and the lungs were ventilated with 40% oxygen in air. The cuff of the endotracheal tube was inflated with enough air to assure a complete seal. Mechanical ventilation of the lungs was adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Since changes in bronchomotor tone would distort the results of the airway pressure twitch responses, the patients were observed carefully for signs of bronchoconstriction (capnometry curve, expiratory flow curve, compliance, auscultation).

Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol 6 mg kg−1h−1 and remifentanil 0.2 μg kg−1 min−1. Additional doses of propofol (50 mg) or remifentanil (1 μg kg−1) were given if necessary. The patients were carefully covered to maintain a core temperature >36°C and skin temperature of the study hand >32.5°C.

A pneumatic occlusion valve was inserted between the endotracheal tube and the Y-piece of the ventilator breathing hoses. Non-compliant tubing connected a side-port of the endotracheal tube connector with the pressure transducers. Occluded airway pressure (Pao) was measured with differential pressure transducers (Huba Control, Würenlos, Switzerland). The pressure signals were monitored and collected with a sampling frequency of 200 Hz using a PC and commercial software (TurboLab®; Bressner Technology, Gröbenzell, Germany).

Neuromuscular blockade of the diaphragm was quantified by measuring the twitch airway pressure responses (TwPao) after stimulation of the phrenic nerves [5] using a method developed for intubated patients [4]. Bilateral phrenic stimulation was performed with a magnetic stimulator (Magstim200®; Magstim Co, Whitland, UK) using a 90 mm single coil placed over the posterior cervical spine. The neck was bent forwards and supported with cushions to achieve stimulation of the phrenic nerve roots [6,7]. The site of optimal stimulation was determined by moving the coil between C5 and C7 and comparing the responses in the Pao signal. The coil was affixed in the position that gave the maximum Pao response and was left there for the duration of the measurement. We did not test for supramaximal stimulation but set the magnet stimulator at the maximum output of 2 Tesla. Since a magnetic field of 1.5 Tesla gives supramaximal stimulation in five of six subjects if the coil position is optimized as done in this study [7], we expected a magnetic field of 2 Tesla to be supramaximal in at least the same percentage of subjects. The coefficient of variation for repeated measures in an individual subject during one experimental session is approximately 6% [8].

The ventilatory mode was switched to spontaneous at the end of expiration, the airway automatically closed by the occlusion valve and four magnetic stimuli (2 Tesla, 0.1 ms) were applied at a frequency of 2 Hz. The measurements were repeated at 15 s intervals until maximum relaxation was obtained and thereafter at 30 s intervals.

The effect of rapacuronium on the adductor pollicis and orbicularis oculi muscles was quantified by acceleromyography (TOF-Guard®; Organon Teknika, Oss, The Netherlands). Stimulation electrodes were positioned over the ulnar nerve at the wrist and over the facial nerve in front of the tragus. The acceleromyometer probes were attached at the tip of the thumb and on the mediolateral portion of the upper eyelid just proximal to the eyelashes. The supramaximal stimulation current was determined and the muscles were then preconditioned with single-twitch stimulation at a frequency of 0.1 Hz for at least 10 min until a stable response was obtained. The stimulation mode was then set to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation at 15 s intervals throughout the study. Recovery of neuromuscular function was assessed by the guidelines described by Viby-Mogensen and colleagues [9].

Rapacuronium bromide was purchased by our hospital pharmacy in the commercially available formulation Raplon® (Organon, Inc, West Orange, NJ, USA). The content of each 100 mg vial was dissolved in 5 mL sterile water giving a concentration of 20 mg mL−1. Rapacuronium was given in a dose of 1.5 mg kg−1 body weight (approximately 1.5 × ED90[10]) injected into a rapidly flowing infusion. Surgery did not begin until neuromuscular function had returned to a TOF quotient of 0.8 in the adductor pollicis muscle.

All data were tested for normality and then analyzed further with parametric or non-parametric methods as indicated using commercial statistics software (GraphPad InStat®, v.3.01 for Windows 95®; GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). The clinical duration, recovery and demographic data were evaluated by analysis of variance and tested post hoc with the Bonferroni multiple comparison test. The descriptive data are given as mean and SD. The depth of relaxation and TOF0.8 data did not follow a Gaussian distribution and were analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

A power analysis of existing data showed that 11 patients would probably be sufficient to detect a reduction of clinical duration of action on the diaphragm by 40% compared with the adductor pollicis muscle. Twenty patients were studied to detect a smaller effect.

Results

Fifteen male and five female patients (27 ± 8 yr, 73 ± 13 kg; mean ± SD) were recruited for the study. Laboratory data showed no impairment of renal or hepatic function.

The median maximum degree of relaxation using the selected dose of 1.5 mg kg−1 rapacuronium was 89% (range 63-98%) for the diaphragm, which was significantly (P < 0.001) less than for the adductor pollicis (median 100%, range 94-100%) or orbicularis oculi muscles (median 100%, range 79-100%). The twitch response of the diaphragm was suppressed to < 10% of baseline in only 11 of 20 patients (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Mean time-courses of onset and offset of the effect of rapacuronium (1.5 mg kg−1) on the diaphragm, as well as on the adductor pollicis and orbicularis oculi muscles. The dots indicate 50% recovery, the bars SD. Note that mean maximum relaxation of the diaphragm is < 90%.

The onset time for maximum relaxation was identical for the diaphragm, adductor pollicis and orbicularis oculi (Table 1). The clinical duration of action (T1 25%) was significantly shorter for the diaphragm than for the adductor pollicis or the orbicularis oculi (P < 0.001). The recovery index (T1 25-75%) was virtually identical for the diaphragm and adductor pollicis but was significantly longer (P < 0.01) for the orbicularis oculi. The time for recovery to TOF0.8 was significantly shorter for the diaphragm than for the adductor pollicis or the orbicularis oculi (P < 0.05).

Table 1
Table 1:
Onset and offset times of rapacuronium in minutes (mean ± SD or median and range). SinceT1 in the diaphragm was suppressed to < 10% in only 11 of 20 patients, the classical onset time was not calculated and T1 max relax was used in its place.

Discussion

The results show that the diaphragm is less sensitive to the effects of rapacuronium than the adductor pollicis and orbicularis oculi muscles, both with regard to maximum effect as well as to the duration of action as measured with our method. This finding resembles the results of studies with other non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs, such as vecuronium or rocuronium, using needle electrode stimulation in which both a higher ED95 as well as a more rapid recovery was determined for the diaphragm [11-14].

The method used to assess the effects of the neuromuscular blocker on the diaphragm is relatively new with regard both to the method of stimulation and to that used to quantify diaphragmatic contractility. One confounding factor when using cervical magnet stimulation of the phrenic nerves to assess diaphragm function as was done in this study is that the diaphragm is not selectively stimulated. Cervical motor nerve roots are simultaneously stimulated and can enhance the TwPao response by stabilizing the chest wall [6,15]. This is not a problem when using the method to assess the maximum inspiratory force in patients with muscular impairment of ventilatory function [16]. However, in studies such as the present one in which the diaphragm and skeletal muscles are expected to be affected differently by the neuromuscular blocking agent, it could prove difficult to determine accurately the effect that this factor will have on recovery data. The baseline airway pressure twitch response includes the contribution of the extrathoracic muscles and is higher than the response of the diaphragm alone [6]. This would lead one to overestimate the clinical duration of action of muscle relaxants on the diaphragm since the response of skeletal muscles was still suppressed to <10% of baseline when the TwPao had already recovered to 25%. The same reasoning holds true for the recovery index and the recovery to a TOF quotient of 0.8 for the diaphragm. The duration of action measured by bilateral electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves would therefore tend to be shorter and not longer than those measured in this study, amplifying the difference between the effects of rapacuronium on the diaphragm and skeletal muscles.

While it is now agreed that cervical magnet stimulation of the phrenic nerves can be used instead of direct needle electrode stimulation, there is no such agreement on the method used to quantify the diaphragm contractility. The standard method used to quantify the response to diaphragmatic stimulation, aside from electromyography of the diaphragm, is to determine the transdiaphragmatic pressures from gastric and oesophageal pressure recordings. However, it has been shown that the mouth twitch pressure as a measure of diaphragm contractility can correlate very well with these transdiaphragmatic pressures [5,17]. Nevertheless, the measurement can be easily disturbed by volitional activity of the diaphragm or by glottic closure [17], but this is not a problem in intubated and sedated subjects. A study conducted in our institution demonstrated that airway pressure responses to phrenic nerve stimulation were a suitable substitute for oesophageal and gastric pressures in intubated patients and were technically much easier to obtain [4]. This method, adapted and employed in a slightly altered form, also gave acceptable results in intensive care patients with considerable lung pathology [18]. The reservations put forth by Watson and colleagues pertaining to the variable interindividual differences between Pao and transdiaphragmatic pressures are of no import for the aims of the present study, since not absolute values but only the changes of the Pao response over time were compared with baseline values in individual patients. The intraindividual variation using cervical magnet stimulation and transdiaphragmatic pressures has been determined by Mills and colleagues [8] and by Wragg and colleagues [15] to be approximately 6-8% and would be similar for the airway occlusion pressure method.

We have no explanation for the observation that the recovery index was longer for the orbicularis oculi muscle than for the other two muscles tested, but this is essentially the same behaviour as observed by Plaud and colleagues [19] for rocuronium. Conflicting results such as those of Lagneau and colleagues [20] or Rimaniol and colleagues [21], who found that the orbicularis oculi muscle recovered more rapidly than did the adductor pollicis, might be due to differences in the placement of the acceleromyometry probe [19]. On the other hand, the difference might depend on the type of neuromuscular blocking drug studied: only studies using neuromuscular blocking drugs with a benzylisoquinoline structure demonstrated a shorter duration of action on the orbicularis oculi [20,21], whereas studies investigating drugs with a steroid structure found either no difference or - as in the present study - a longer duration of action on the orbicularis oculi [19,21]. A consistent observation in other studies was that the orbicularis oculi muscle responded more rapidly to neuromuscular blocking drugs than the adductor pollicis muscle [19,21-24]. We could not confirm this observation in our study, but this may be due to the measurement error inherent in the chosen stimulation frequency of four per minute.

Rapacuronium was recently voluntarily with drawn from the market by the manufacturer for an undetermined period. This step was taken after several cases of severe bronchospasm with fatal outcome occurred in patients who had been given it as one of the anaesthesia induction drugs. This is an unfortunate fate for an interesting drug, but it does not detract from the validity of this study, where a novel method was used to stimulate the diaphragm and diaphragm contractility was assessed.

References

1. Kim KS, Chung CW, Shin WJ. Cisatracurium neuromuscular block at the adductor pollicis and the laryngeal adductor muscles in humans. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 483-484.
2. Wright PM, Caldwell JE, Miller RD. Onset and duration of rocuronium and succinylcholine at the adductor pollicis and laryngeal adductor muscles in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 1110-1115.
3. Wright PM, Brown R, Lau M, Fisher DM. A pharmacodynamic explanation for the rapid onset/offset of rapacuronium bromide. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 16-23.
4. Valta P, Buscher H, Sydow M, Burchardi H. Twitch airway and transdiaphragmal pressure in intubated patients. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23 (Suppl): 24.
5. Hamnegaard CH, Wragg S, Kyroussis D, et al. Mouth pressure in response to magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves. Thorax 1995; 50: 620-624.
6. Laghi F, Harrison MJ, Tobin MJ. Comparison of magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation in assessment of diaphragmatic contractility. J Appl Physiol 1996; 80: 1731-1742.
7. Similowski T, Fleury B, Launois HP, et al. Cervical magnetic stimulation: a new painless method for bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation in conscious humans. J Appl Physiol 1989; 67: 1311-1318.
8. Mills GH, Kyroussis D, Hamnegard CH, et al. Bilateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves from an anterolateral approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 1099-1105.
9. Viby-Mogensen J, Ostergaard D, Donati F, et al. Pharmacokinetic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents: good clinical research practice (GCRP). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 1169-1190.
10. Wierda JMKH, Beaufort AM, Kleef UW, Smeulers NJ, Agoston S. Preliminary investigations of the clinical pharmacology of three short-acting agents, Org 9453, Org 9489, Org 9487. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 213-220.
11. Chauvin M, Lebrault C, Duvaldestin P. The neuromuscular blocking effect of vecuronium on the human diaphragm. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 117-122.
12. Lebrault C, Chauvin M, Guirimand F, Duvaldestin P. Relative potency of vecuronium on the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 389-392.
13. Cantineau JP, Porte F, d'Honneur G, Duvaldestin P. Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium on the diaphragm and adductor pollicis muscles in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 585-590.
14. D'Honneur G, Kirov K, Slavov V, Duvaldestin P. Effects of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx and diaphragm: an electromyographic study in humans. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 951-955.
15. Wragg S, Aquilina R, Moran J, et al. Comparison of cervical magnetic stimulation and bilateral percutaneous electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves in normal subjects. Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1788-1792.
16. Hamnegard CH, Wragg SD, Mills GH, et al. Clinical assessment of diaphragm strength by cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves. Thorax 1996; 51: 1239-1242.
17. Laghi F, Tobin MJ. Relationship between transdiaphragmatic and mouth twitch pressures at functional residual capacity. Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 530-536.
18. Watson AC, Hughes PD, Harris ML, et al. Measurement of twitch transdiaphragmatic, esophageal, and endotracheal tube pressure with bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1325-1331.
19. Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F. The corrugator supercilii, not the orbicularis oculi, reflects the rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 96-101.
20. Lagneau F, Benayoun L, Plaud B, et al. The interpretation of train-of-four monitoring in intensive care: what about muscle site and the current intensity? Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 1058-1063.
21. Rimaniol JM, Dhonneur G, Sperry L, Duvaldestin P. A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects of atracurium, mivacurium, and vecuronium on the adductor pollicis and the orbicularis oculi muscle in humans. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 808-813.
22. Haller G, Gardaz JP, Bissonnette B. Assessment of intubation time and conditions under the influence of rocuronium. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 312-316.
23. Ungureanu D, Meistelman C, Frossard J, Donati F. The orbicularis oculi and the adductor pollicis muscles as monitors of atracurium block of laryngeal muscles. Anesth Analg 1993; 77: 775-779.
24. Debaene B, Beaussier M, Meistelman C, Donati F, Lienhart A. Monitoring the onset of neuromuscular block at the orbicularis oculi can predict good intubating conditions during atracurium-induced neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 360-363.
Keywords:

NEUROMUSCULAR NON-DEPOLARIZING AGENTS, rapacuronium; RESPIRATORY MUSCLES, diaphragm

© 2002 European Academy of Anaesthesiology