Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Comparison of pre-oxygenation using spontaneous breathing through face mask and high-flow nasal oxygen

A prospective randomised crossover controlled study in healthy volunteers

Hanouz, Jean-Luc; Lhermitte, David; Gérard, Jean-Louis; Fischer, Marc Olivier

European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA): January 18, 2019 - Volume Publish Ahead of Print - Issue - p
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000954
ORIGINAL ARTICLE: PDF Only

BACKGROUND High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy has been proposed for pre-oxygenation before intubation, but the end-tidal fraction of oxygen (ETO2) obtained remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE(S) To compare the ETO2 following a 3 min pre-oxygenation with HFNO and face mask.

SETTING Operating room in a primary university hospital.

DESIGN A prospective, randomised crossover study.

PARTICIPANTS Fifty healthy volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly pre-oxygenated through spontaneous breathing 100% oxygen in a face mask and with HFNO (mouth closed, heated and humidified gas flow at 60 l min–1). In the face mask group, the ETO2 was measured continuously. In the HFNO group, the nasal cannula was quickly exchanged with a face mask while the subject held their breath at end inspiration and the ETO2 was measured after a deep expiration. The protocol ended when ETO2 reached 90% or otherwise at 6 min.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint was the ETO2 after 3 min of pre-oxygenation. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of participants with an ETO2 at least 90% and the time until the ETO2 at least 90%.

RESULTS The ETO2 after 3 min of pre-oxygenation was 89 (2) % and 77 (12) % in the face mask and HFNO groups [difference 12% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 8 to 15]; P < 0.001), respectively. After 3 min of pre-oxygenation, 54 and 4% (P < 0.001) of volunteers had an ETO2 at least 90% in the face-mask and HFNO groups, respectively. After 6 min of pre-oxygenation, 96 and 46% (P < 0.001) of volunteers had an ETO2 at least 90% in the face-mask and HFNO groups, respectively. In the face mask group, the hazard ratio to achieve an ETO2 of 90% was 5.3 (95% CI: 3.2 to 8.9; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that pre-oxygenation with HFNO is not a reliable method of pre-oxygenation before the induction of anaesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trial NCT03399695.

From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France

Correspondence to Jean-Luc Hanouz, Service d’Anesthésie Réanimation (niveau 6), CHU de Caen, Av Côte de Nacre, 14033 CAEN Cedex, France E-mail: hanouz-jl@chu-caen.fr

© 2019 European Society of Anaesthesiology