Need for Standardization of Measurement of Time to Reorientation as a Predictor of Cognitive Adverse Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy

Abstract

Testing for time to reorientation (TRO) after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been one of the most predictive measures for cognitive adverse effects of ECT. However, measuring TRO varies between clinical trials, and there is no standardized approach on its measurement between studies. The objective of this report is to systematically review the literature on the different ways of measuring TRO. This would be a first step to establish a consensus on a standard method for TRO. We performed a systematic literature review from 1968 to October 2019 for clinical trials with a sample size of more than 50 and published in English that describe measures of TRO. We searched both PubMed and Web of Science databases. The literature search generated 12 clinical trials, which met the inclusion criteria. Studies measured TRO using 3-, 5-, or 10-item questionnaires. Most studies measured full orientation as answering 4/5 questions. Other studies smaller than 50 required 14/14 items to be answered correctly. There was wide variation between studies on how often and when orientation questions were initiated. These factors have obvious implications to the results and interpretation of the ECT literature.There was no clear consensus on measuring TRO in a uniform fashion. Research and clinical care would benefit from a standardized approach to measuring TRO. Measuring TRO using a 4/5 method seems the most common and quickest way, whereas using a 14/14 method seems to be the most rigorous and sensitive to change in trials.