Correct word recognition is generally determined by audibility, but lexical parameters also play a role. The focus of this study was to examine both the impact of audibility and lexical parameters on speech recognition of test words of the clinical German Freiburg monosyllabic speech test, and subsequently on the perceptual imbalance of test lists observed in the literature.
For 160 participants with normal hearing that were divided into three groups with different simulated hearing thresholds, monaural speech recognition for the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test was obtained via headphones in quiet at different presentation levels. A software manipulated the original speech material to simulate two different hearing thresholds. All monosyllables were classified according to their frequency of occurrence in contemporary language and the number of lexical neighbors using the Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource for Phonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Density database. Generalized linear mixed-effects regression models were used to evaluate the influences of audibility in terms of the Speech Intelligibility Index and lexical properties of the monosyllables in terms of word frequency (WF) and neighborhood density (ND) on the observed speech recognition per word and per test list, respectively.
Audibility and interactions of audibility with WF and ND correctly predicted identification of the individual monosyllables. Test list recognition was predicted by test list choice, audibility, and ND, as well as by interactions of WF and test list, audibility and ND, ND and test list, and audibility per test list.
Observed differences in speech recognition of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test, which are well reported in the literature, depend not only on audibility but also on WF, neighborhood density, and test list choice and their interactions. The authors conclude that future creations of speech test material should take these lexical parameters into account.
1Institute of Hearing Technology and Audiology, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany;
2Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4All,” Oldenburg, Germany; and
3Institute of Dutch Studies, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Germany.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and text of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.ear-hearing.com).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The authors thank Sascha Bilert, Tina Gebauer, Lena Haverkamp, Britta Jensen, and Kristin Sprenger for their support performing the measurements and categorizing the monosyllables per database. The authors also thank Daniel Berg for technical support and Thomas Brand for support on the SII predictions. English language support was provided by www.stels-ol.de.
This work was supported by the Ph.D. program Jade2Pro of Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Received October 14, 2017; accepted March 8, 2019.
Address for correspondence: Alexandra Winkler, Institute of Hearing Technology and Audiology, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Ofener Straße 16/19, D-26121 Oldenburg, Germany. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org