Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Achieving Electric-Acoustic Benefit with a Modulated Tone

Brown, Christopher A.; Bacon, Sid P.

doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b87
Research Articles

Objective: When either real or simulated electric stimulation from a cochlear implant (CI) is combined with low-frequency acoustic stimulation (electric-acoustic stimulation [EAS]), speech intelligibility in noise can improve dramatically. We recently showed that a similar benefit to intelligibility can be observed in simulation when the low-frequency acoustic stimulation (low-pass target speech) is replaced with a tone that is modulated both in frequency with the fundamental frequency (F0) of the target talker and in amplitude with the amplitude envelope of the low-pass target speech (Brown & Bacon 2009). The goal of the current experiment was to examine the benefit of the modulated tone to intelligibility in CI patients.

Design: Eight CI users who had some residual acoustic hearing either in the implanted ear, the unimplanted ear, or both ears participated in this study. Target speech was combined with either multitalker babble or a single competing talker and presented to the implant. Stimulation to the acoustic region consisted of no signal, target speech, or a tone that was modulated in frequency to track the changes in the target talker's F0 and in amplitude to track the amplitude envelope of target speech low-pass filtered at 500 Hz.

Results: All patients showed improvements in intelligibility over electric-only stimulation when either the tone or target speech was presented acoustically. The average improvement in intelligibility was 46 percentage points due to the tone and 55 percentage points due to target speech.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that a tone carrying F0 and amplitude envelope cues of target speech can provide significant benefit to CI users and may lead to new technologies that could offer EAS benefit to many patients who would not benefit from current EAS approaches.

Although cochlear implants are generally successful, users often experience difficulty understanding speech when competing backgrounds are present. When an implant patient retains some residual low-frequency acoustic hearing, the combined electric-acoustic stimulation often results in dramatic improvements in speech recognition in competing backgrounds. In this study, we replaced the target speech in the acoustic region with a tone carrying low-frequency speech cues. On average, the tone provided 46 percentage points of improvement over electric stimulation alone, whereas target speech provided 55 percentage points. This novel processing scheme may have important implications for many current and potential cochlear implant patients.

Psychoacoustics Laboratory, Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC01376 and DC008329) (to S.P.B.).

Received October 1, 2008; accepted April 16, 2009.

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.