Secondary Logo

Ameloblastic fibroma of the posterior maxilla. Presenting as a complication of bilateral maxillary impacted third molars: a case report

Lawal, Abdulwahab; El-Barkouky, Ahmed H.

Egyptian Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery: October 2014 - Volume 5 - Issue 3 - p 103–105
doi: 10.1097/01.OMX.0000452296.95546.e4
CASE REPORTS
Free

Ameloblastic fibroma is a rare odontogenic tumour, uncommon in the posterior maxilla. A case report is presented where swelling and excruciating pain in the buccal space distal to maxillary impacted third molars on both sides was the presenting features.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Umm Al Quwain Hospital, Ministry of Health, King Faisal Road, Umm Al Quwain, United Arabs Emirate

Correspondence to Abdulwahab Lawal, BSc, DDS (USA), MSc (LONDON), FFDRCSI, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Umm Al Quwain Hospital, Ministry of Health, King Faisal Road, Umm Al Quwain 24, United Arabs Emirate Tel: +971 6765 6888 x441; fax: +971 6765 6588; e-mail: lawal20052003@yahoo.co.uk

Received June 8, 2014

Accepted June 29, 2014

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Ameloblastic fibroma is a tumor of mixed connective and odontogenic tissue origin, most commonly found in the young age groups of 15–25 years; the male population is affected more than the female population. It presents frequently in the mandible than in the maxilla, usually in the canine to molar region. Clinically, the tumor grows slowly and painlessly, expanding the jaw.

Radiographic appearance is identical to that of unicystic ameloblastoma with area of radiolucency and smooth outline especially if unerupted teeth are involved. Both lesions affect similar age groups and have similar clinical appearances. Histologic examination differentiates the two 1–3.

Histologically, the tumor consists of strands of epithelial cells in a connective tissue background and does not invade the bone. These cells are arranged irregularly with branching strands that have some resemblance to the dental lamina.

The connective tissue resembles cellular fibroblastic tissue similar to dental pulp in the developing tooth, with occasional collagen bands and sometimes hyaline-like tissue seen adjacent to the epithelial strands. The epithelial and connective tissue components grow together inside a capsule.

The tumor is distinguished from ameloblastomas by the fact that both the epithelial and mesenchymal components are neoplastic, whereas in ameloblastomas only the epithelium is neoplastic 4.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Clinical management

Ameloblastic fibroma is a benign lesion and treatment is by block excision with a border of normal bone. With simple excision or enucleation, recurrence rates of 20–40% have been reported. Sarcomatous change (ameloblastic fibroma) has been reported with recurrence or inadequate excision 5. From 23 cases reported only two recurrences have been found 6.

A follow-up over a longer period found a recurrence rate of 43.5%, which suggested the tumor might be more difficult to excise than originally thought and wide resection is not usually required 7,8.

Other forms include the ameloblastic fibro-odontoma, which occurs more often in the upper jaw. Malignant variations are rare, and include ameloblastic fibrosarcoma and ameloblastic odontofibrosarcoma.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Case report

A 17-year-old girl was referred by the community dental service. The presenting problem was swelling and excruciating pain in the buccal space distal to the maxillary-impacted third molars on both sides. The pain had started about 5 months earlier, increasing gradually, and disturbed eating and sleeping functions.

Oral examination revealed limitation in mouth opening. All teeth were fully erupted, except the maxillary and mandibular third molars.

Panoramic radiograph of the patient confirmed bilateral maxillary-impacted third molars, showing diffuse areas of radiolucency, and the lesion appeared with fairly well-circumscribed borders (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

The differential diagnosis was dentigerous cyst.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Treatment

The buccal space distal to the maxillary third molars on both sides was investigated carefully under general anesthetic and found to consist of firm, grayish-white tissue.

Surgical extraction of the bilateral maxillary-impacted third molars together with excision of the tumor was performed. Panoramic radiograph of the patient was taken subsequent to this (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Samples sent for histopathologic examinations were reported as follows: sections revealed fibrous stromal tissue that showed areas of enclosed strips of epithelial cells. These strips were formed of two layers of small cells. Focal area showed calcification with more hypercellularity (Figs 3 and 4).

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

These findings were consistent with ameloblastic fibroma.

Three years after the initial surgery, the patient complained of mild pain on the right side of the posterior maxilla. The patient underwent further surgery, and block excision of the remaining tumor tissue was performed. Follow-up examination 12 months later revealed the patient to be free of symptoms.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

The majority of ameloblastic fibromas have been reported in the mandible 9–12.

Unusual presentations include an ameloblastoma in association with ameloblastic fibroma in a 5-year-old boy 13, a cystic ameloblastic fibroma in a 7-year-old boy 14, and ameloblastic fibroma in a 1-year-old girl 15.

The distinction must be made between ameloblastic fibroma and peripheral ameloblastic fibroma; the latter is a true mixed tumor, and in that case report it was found that the lesion had occurred within the gingival rather than bony tissue 16.

In the case reported here, the main presenting feature was persistent excruciating pain with enlargement of the buccal gingiva right and left posterior maxilla distal to the third molars.

Radiographic investigation showed radiolucency associated with crowns of unerupted third molars. Differential diagnosis was a dentigerous cyst.

Surgical investigation and histopathological examinations revealed the lesion to be benign tumor of odontogenic origin.

What is unique is that the lesion was symptomatic and occurred bilaterally in this patient. Recurrence might be due to incomplete removal and presence of satellite tumors at the edge of the lesion, which occurred on one side but not both sides. This type of episode has never been reported in any journal.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusion

Ameloblastic fibroma is an uncommon tumor that must be carefully and correctly diagnosed and treated. Follow-up should be for a long period of at least 3–5 years to enable detection of possible recurrence or development of ameloblastic fibrosarcoma, which is the malignant counterpart.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

Dr Ahmad Hany El-Barkouky, MD performed the histopathology examination of the lesion.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Lucas RB. Pathology of tumors of the oral tissues 1984:4th ed..Edinburgh:Churchill Livingstone.
2. Mc Guiness NJ, Faughan T, Bennani F, Connolly CE. Ameloblastic fibroma of anterior maxilla presenting as a complication of tooth eruption: a case report. J Orthod 2001; 28:115–117.
3. Mcintosh JJ, Campbell JH, Aguirre A, Reddy LV, Elhodi H. Expansile mass of the maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:1253–1258.
4. Soames JV, Southam JC. Oral pathology 1998:3rd ed..Oxford:Oxford University Press.
5. Goldman KE2008Mandibular cyst and odontogenic tumors.
6. Gorlin RJ, Chaudhry AP, Pindborg JJ. Odontogenic tumors classification, histopathology and clinical behavior in man and domestic animals. Cancer 1961; 14:73–101.
7. Trodal JN. Ameloblastic fibroma. A survey of cases from Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med 1972; 33:547–558.
8. Pitak-Arnnop P, Chaine A, Dhanuthai K, Bertrand JC, Bertolus C. Extensive ameloblastic fibroma in an adolescent patient: a case report with a follow-up of 4 years. Eur J Dent 2009; 3:224–228.
9. Akal UK, Gunhan O, Guler M. Ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma. Report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26:455–457.
10. Kusama K, Miyake M, Moro J. Peripheral ameloblastic fibroma of the mandible. Report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56:399–401.
11. Schmidt-Westhausen A, Philipsen HP, Reichart PA. The ameloblastic fibroma. An odontogenic tumor in the growth period [article in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991; 46:66–68.
12. Tawfik MA, Zyada MM. Odontogenic tumors in Dakahlia, Egypt: analysis of 82 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109:e67–e73.
13. Chen SH, Katayanagi T, Osada K, Hanamo H, Inue T, Shimona M, et al.. Ameloblastoma and its relationship to ameloblastic fibroma histogenesis based on an unusual case and review of the literature. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1991; 32:51–56.
14. Meyers AD, Pouldon T, Pettigrew J, Clark M. Cystic ameloblastic fibroma. Ear Nose Throat J 1991; 70:729–732.
15. Munde AD, Karle RR, Kale UB. Ameloblastic fibroma in one year old girl. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2013; 17:149.
16. Gupta S, Tandan A, Mehrota D, Gupta OP. Ameloblastic fibroma. 3 cases and literature review. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Pathol 2011; 2:59–63.
© 2014 Egyptian Associations of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery